Anomalously high elastic modulus of a poly(ethylene oxide)-based composite electrolyte
Introduction
The sustainability of modern society rests on the development of renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and tidal power combined with cost effective energy storage, to store power during excess generation and supply during peak demand. [1,2] In this regard, the development of low-cost, scalable energy storage systems with adequate cycle-life and safety is critical. [3] Further, attaining high energy density without jeopardizing safety is also important for a number of applications such as electric vehicles and consumer electronics. Lithium and sodium based solid-state batteries promise higher energy density and provides inherently safe operation as they replace flammable liquid electrolytes with solid counterparts. [4], [5], [6] The lithium metal anode has almost 10 times higher theoretical capacity than its graphite counterpart, [7] and clearly can be one of the most promising disruptive technologies to advance electric-vehicles and large-scale grid storage. [8,9] However, there are several technical and scientific challenges that need to be addressed. Stable cycling of lithium metal requires a chemically and inherently stable solid-state separator with high ionic conductivity and mechanical strength. [10], [11], [12]
Poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) is the most extensively studied polymer electrolyte material and is relatively stable against Li and Na metal. [13], [14], [15] But membranes composed of high molecular weight, linear PEO exhibit critically low ambient temperature ionic conductivity (~10−7 S/cm). [15,16] Previous work, including our own, showed that conductivity can be improved by using plasticizers and/or large anion lithium salts. [15,[17], [18], [19] However, these approaches inevitably lead to decreased mechanical rigidity (storage moduli, E’ < 10 MPa), [20], [21], [22] resulting in plastic flow and lithium dendrite growth during galvanostatic cycling. Furthermore, the low melting temperature (Tm) of PEO (~65 °C) inherently limits the temperature window over which these membranes can be used. Several strategies have been developed to improve the mechanical properties of PEO-based membranes. These include: 1) covalently binding a mechanically rigid phase (e.g. polystyrene) to the ion-conducting phase, [23,24] 2) embedding inorganic fillers into a polymer matrix, [25], [26], [27] 3) covalently bonding surface-modified inorganic particles to the polymer membrane, [28,29] 4) incorporating the polymer into an inorganic matrix, [30] and 5) crosslinking the PEO to increase its dimensional stability. [18] Theoretically, lithium dendrite growth would be suppressed if a homogeneous solid electrolyte could be used. [31] Despite a great deal of effort, the demonstrated mechanical rigidity in terms of the elastic modulus of all PEO-based electrolytes is so far still several orders of magnitude lower than Li metal (1.9 to 7.9 GPa). [3,[32], [33], [34]
Herein, we report a single-step synthesis route to fabricate a PEO based polymer membrane of exceptionally high storage modulus (up to 2.5 GPa) over a very broad temperature range (20 °C to 245 °C). The synthesis is enabled by in-situ crosslinking of PEO in the presence of a woven glass fiber (GF). Historically, GF woven and other fiber materials have been intensively explored as reinforcement methods for composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs). [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41] However, as far as we are aware, few studies have reported a storage modulus of composite membranes at this anomalously high level. Although there seems to be a consensus in literature that the strengthened mechanical properties in the fiber reinforced composite membranes are ascribed to the stress transfer between fibers and polymer matrix, a proper understanding of its underlying science remains quite challenging to date. To address this challenge, we further implemented hyperspectral Raman mapping on the GF/polymer interfacial region. Unveiled by an unsupervised machine learning algorithm, K-mean clustering analysis of the Raman mapping, the exceptionally high mechanical strength is attributed to strong GF/polymer interactions, including hydrogen bonding and dynamic ionic bonding. Due to its superior mechanical strength, the CPE can tolerate high plasticizer loading, up to 33 wt%, with a resultant room temperature ionic conductivity up to 1.2 × 10−4 S/cm. The storage modulus of the plasticized CPE remains above 450 MPa, comparable to the performance of the state-of-the-art composite electrolytes of a sophisticated design. [42] Based on stringent stripe/plate cycling tests in a Li|membrane|Li symmetric cell, such GF reinforced polymer electrolytes allow for 1498 C/cm2 equivalent Li striping/plating over the course of >4 months at 70 °C, with no observable Li dendrite growth. A proof-of-concept full cell test using a Li|CPE|LiFePO4 (LFP) configuration shows that the cell can deliver >135 mAh/g capacity for 100 cycles at C/15, with the capacity loss <0.06% per cycle. The cell maintained a Columbic efficiency close to 1 over the course of >3 months at 75 °C, demonstrating its excellent thermal and electrochemical stability in harsh conditions. The combination of ultra-high mechanical strength, dimensional stability, high ionic conductivity, electrochemical stability, and supreme capability of Li dendrite resistance provides a new and scalable route of synthesizing composite membranes for a number of electrochemical energy storage systems where high energy density is essential.
Section snippets
Materials
Two polymer precursors were needed for the crosslinked PEO (denoted as xPEO) membrane, namely (1) poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDGE, Sigma Aldrich, Mn = 500 g/mol) and (2) JeffamineⓇ ED 600, 900 and 2000 (95% purity, Huntsman, Mn = 600, 900 and 2000 g/mol, respectively). Lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate (lithium triflate, LiTf, 99.995% trace metals basis, Sigma Aldrich) was the salt in all membranes. 2-Propanol (IPA, anhydrous, 99.5%) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. The
Results and discussion
The GF reinforced composite polymer electrolyte membranes (CPE) were successfully fabricated by a facile single-step synthesis (Fig. 1(a)). Briefly, the woven GF is imbedded in the liquid precursor containing lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate (LiTf) salt, JeffamineⓇ, and poly (ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDGE). The primary amine moiety of the JeffamineⓇ reacts with the epoxide on PEGDGE to form a covalent linkage triggered by thermal activation. This one-step crosslinking reaction
Conclusion
We successfully demonstrated that a woven glass fiber reinforced crosslinked polymer electrolyte (CPE) can exhibit unprecedentedly high storage moduli (over 1 GPa). The high moduli of the PEO-based CPE have the following merits. (a) It shows an extraordinary capability of lithium dendrite growth resistance; (b) It allows for loading extended amount of plasticizer for high ionic conductivity without compromising the mechanical strength too much; (c) It is deformable and sufficiently robust to
Author credit statement
Guang Yang – Conceptualization, data curation, investigation, formal analysis, methodology, writing-original draft, review & editing
Michelle Lehman – Investigation, formal analysis, writing-original draft
Sheng Zhao – Investigation
Bingrui Li – Investigation
Sirui Ge – Investigation
Peng-Fei Cao – Investigation, formal analysis
Frank M. Delnick – supervision and writing – review and editing
Alexei P. Sokolov – supervision and writing – review and editing
Tomonori Saito – supervision and writing –
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no financial or competing interest.
Acknowledgement
This work performed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is supported by Energy Storage Program, Office of Electricity and Battery Materials Program (BMR), Vehicle Technology Office, EERE, Department of Energy USA. SZ, BL, SG, PC and APS acknowledge partial financial support on DMA and rheology measurements by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. We thank Huntsman Corporation for providing us JeffamineⓇ. We also
References (72)
- et al.
Energy Storage Mater.
(2018) - et al.
Energy Storage Mater.
(2017) - et al.
Energy Storage Mater.
(2019) - et al.
Chem
(2016) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2018) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2006) - et al.
Electrochim. Acta
(2007) - et al.
Electrochim. Acta
(2015) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2002) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2001)
Polymer (Guildf)
Electrochim. Acta
Chem. Sci.
Adv. Energy Mater.
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
Polymer (Guildf)
Adv. Funct. Mater.
Energy Storage Mater.
Adv. Funct. Mater.
Energy Storage Mater.
Nat. Rev. Mater.
Matter
Nat. Nanotechnol.
J. Electrochem. Soc.
Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.
J. Mater. Chem. A
ACS Energy Lett.
Macromolecules
Energy Storage Mater.
J. Electrochem. Soc.
Macromolecules
Energy Storage Mater.
ACS Appl. Energy Mater.
Macromolecules
J. Electrochem. Soc.
Nano Lett.
Cited by (0)
This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05–00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-publicaccess-plan).
- #
Equal contribution