Elsevier

Experimental Eye Research

Volume 141, December 2015, Pages 3-8
Experimental Eye Research

An acute intraocular pressure challenge to assess retinal ganglion cell injury and recovery in the mouse

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.03.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We describe a model of acute intraocular pressure elevation in the mouse eye.

  • Intraocular pressure is elevated by anterior chamber cannulation.

  • Injury induces inner retinal dysfunction, oxidative stress and glial cell activation.

  • Injury does not result in significant cell loss or retinal ischemia.

Abstract

We describe a model of acute intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in the mouse eye that induces reversible loss of inner retinal function associated with oxidative stress, glial cell activation and minimal loss of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) number. Young healthy mouse eyes recover inner retinal function within 7-days but more persistent functional loss is seen in older mice. Manipulation of diet and exercise further modify RGC recovery demonstrating the utility of this injury model for investigating lifestyle and therapeutic interventions. We believe that systematic investigation into the characteristics and determinants of RGC recovery following an IOP challenge will shed light on processes that govern RGC vulnerability in the early stages of glaucoma.

Introduction

We adapted an acute intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation injury model to investigate how retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) respond to a titratable and highly reproducible injury. Our goal in generating this “optic nerve stress test” was to identify levels of injury that, in a healthy young mouse retina, induce selective but reversible loss of RGC function while maintaining normal outer retinal function. Additionally, we sought an injury that does not lead to manifest ischemia of the inner retina with minimal RGC death. Our interest lies in determining the parameters that influence RGC recovery over time.

Glaucoma is a chronic, progressive optic neuropathy characterized by the selective death of RGCs and their axons. How then does our acute IOP injury model inform us of processes that are relevant to this disease? In the very early stages of glaucoma, the optic nerve head is repeatedly exposed to cycles of relatively minor injury (Downs et al., 2011). We propose that healthy RGCs are initially able to withstand and recover from such minor injuries. However, over time, repeated insults or an intrinsic impairment in the capacity of RGCs to recover, will overwhelm their ability to recover resulting in induction of a cell death program. Measuring the capacity for RGC recovery following an acute IOP injury, we believe, will shed light on the very early stages of glaucoma. Furthermore, this test will enable us to investigate factors such as aging, diet and exercise that can improve or impair RGC recovery. By incrementally increasing the IOP level or duration of injury we will also be able to investigate the critical switch point at which full functional recovery is not possible.

Section snippets

Overview

Our injury model involves acute elevation of IOP through insertion of a fine needle attached to either a column of fluid or a motorized syringe pump. RGC function is measured using the positive scotopic threshold response (pSTR) or the photopic negative response (PhNR) components of the full-field electroretinogram (ERG). A single animal can be monitored over a number of timepoints post-injury but to mitigate potential effects of repeat anesthesia, we leave 7 days between injury and functional

Pros and Cons of this injury model

An advantage of an IOP challenge is that it can be easily titrated by altering the magnitude or duration of IOP elevation (Table 1). It provides a precise and reproducible injury within and between experiments. This level of control contrasts with many of the more chronic IOP elevation models where the degree and duration of IOP elevation are much more unpredictable and often vary substantially between animals exposed within the same experiment. The discrete temporal nature of a single acute

Funding acknowledgment

The Centre for Eye Research Australia receives Operational Infrastructure Support from the Victorian Government.

References (18)

  • V. Chrysostomou et al.

    Forced exercise protects the aged optic nerve against intraocular pressure injury

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2014)
  • L.M. Ventura et al.

    Restoration of retinal ganglion cell function in early glaucoma after intraocular pressure reduction: a pilot study

    Ophthalmology

    (2005)
  • C.J. Abbott et al.

    Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and axonal transport 1 and 2 weeks after 8 hours of acute intraocular pressure elevation in rats

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2014)
  • V. Chrysostomou et al.

    The photopic negative response of the mouse electroretinogram: reduction by acute elevation of intraocular pressure

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2013)
  • V. Chrysostomou et al.

    The status of cones in the rhodopsin mutant P23H-3 retina: light-regulated damage and repair in parallel with rods

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2008)
  • J.C. Downs et al.

    24-Hour IOP telemetry in the non-human primate: implant system performance and initial characterization of IOP at multiple timescales

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2011)
  • S.A. Gandolfi

    Improvement of visual field indices after surgical reduction of intraocular pressure

    Ophthalmic Surg.

    (1995)
  • S.A. Gandolfi et al.

    Improvement of spatial contrast sensitivity threshold after surgical reduction of intraocular pressure in unilateral high-tension glaucoma

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2005)
  • J.M. Kezic et al.

    Effect of anterior chamber cannulation and acute IOP elevation on retinal macrophages in the adult mouse

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2013)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (55)

  • Inhibition of p66Shc attenuates retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury-induced damage by activating the akt pathway

    2022, Experimental Eye Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    This makes it a valuable and widely used model to study disease changes and evaluate neuroprotective methods (Osborne et al., 1999). In this model, the degree and time of IOP elevation can be precisely controlled, and surgical trauma to the anterior segment of the eye is small, which allows to better evaluate the changes in the structure and function of the eye (Crowston et al., 2015). However, this model also has its disadvantages and limitations.

  • Improvement in structure and visual function in patients with glaucoma: the possible key to better treatment?

    2021, Survey of Ophthalmology
    Citation Excerpt :

    During this period, if the insult is not severe enough that it will result in the death of the cell, the cell recovers function. This reversal of function after transient IOP insult has been demonstrated in mouse and rat models of glaucoma.14,15,33 Before axonal loss, elevated IOP induces a deficit in anterograde and retrograde transport in the RGC axon, thereby impairing transport of proteins, mitochondria, trophic signals; consequent decrease in retinal function as measured by pattern electroretinogram (PERG) amplitude has been confirmed to occur.12,19,77

  • Fluctuations in Macular Thickness in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents

    2020, Ophthalmology Retina
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another study used in vitro devices to model mechanical stress on retinal pigment epithelium cells as a model of AMD and similarly determined that stress induces VEGF expression and contributes to the progression of choroidal neovascularization.28 In addition, many studies of glaucoma have related intraocular pressure-induced mechanical strain of retinal neurons and glial cells to complex molecular cascades resulting in impaired function and cell death.29–32 In RVO eyes, another potential explanation is that there is a third, unknown factor that predisposes some eyes to the recurrence of edema after transient resolution with each injection because of suboptimal response or inconsistent therapeutic effects of anti-VEGF.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text