Liquid–liquid equilibria of water + 2,3-butanediol + 1-butanol at T = 298.15 K, T = 308.15 K and T = 318.15 K

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2007.12.003Get rights and content

Abstract

(Liquid–liquid) equilibrium (LLE) data of the solubility curves and tie-line compositions have been determined for mixtures of (water + 2,3-butanediol + 1-butanol) at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K and atmospheric pressure. Distribution coefficients and separation factors have been evaluated for the immiscibility region. The reliability of the experimental tie-lines has been confirmed by using Othmer–Tobias correlation. The LLE data of the ternary systems have been predicted by UNIFAC method.

Introduction

The production of 2,3-butanediol by fermentation has been considered as a potential source of fuels [1], [2] or chemical feedstock [3]. Its microbial preparation has been observed in several yeasts and bacteria from various genera such as Klebsiella, Bacillus, Serratia and Pseudomonas [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. The separation and purification of 2,3-butanediol from fermentation broth is essential to realize the industrial production for 2,3-butanediol.

Since the fermented liquors contain only a few percent of 2,3-butanediol along with various other materials which cause difficulty in separation, and since 2,3-butanediol has a much higher boiling point than that of water and cannot be distilled out directly, extraction from the fermentation liquors by a suitable solvent seems to be a feasible method. Various organic solvents have been investigated and reported for 2,3-butanediol extraction [11]. 1-Butanol used in this study may be a suitable solvent for extraction of 2,3-butanediol from water, being capable of forming azeotropic mixtures with water to take it from 2,3-butanediol.

The aim of this work is to present the phase behavior of LLE for the (water + 2,3-butanediol + 1-butanol) ternary system at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K and atmospheric pressure. The tie-lines have also been predicted using the UNIFAC method (a group contribution method) developed by Fredenslund et al. [12], and compared with the experimental data.

Section snippets

Chemicals

All the chemicals used in this study were purchased from commercial sources. 2,3-Butanediol was supplied by Sino-pharm. Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. with a minimum mass fraction purity of 99.2%. 1-Butanol was provided by Shanghai Feida Industrial and Trade Corp. Ltd. with a minimum mass fraction purity of 99.5%. They were used directly without further treatment in this study. Water was distilled twice before utilization. The purity of these materials was checked and assured by gas chromatography.

Results and discussion

The LLE measurements were made for the ternary system of (water + 2,3-butandiol + 1-butanol) at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K and atmospheric pressure. The experimental binodal curves for this ternary system at each temperature are listed in Table 2, for which Wi refers to the mass fraction of ith component. The experimental tie-line compositions of the equilibrium phases are shown in Table 3, for which Wi1 and Wi3 refer to the mass fractions of the ith component in the aqueous and solvent phases,

Conclusions

The LLE data of the ternary mixtures water + 2,3-butanediol + 1-butanol have been presented at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K. The UNIFAC model has been used to correlate the LLE data. It has been observed that the UNIFAC predictions do not fit the experimental results well. The temperature had practically no effect on the selectivity at the temperatures studied. Separation factor is found to be greater than 1 and it is not constant over the whole two-phase region. It is concluded that 1-butanol may

Acknowledgment

The financial support of Chinese National Program for High Technology and Development (863 Program, No. 2006AA02Z243), is gratefully acknowledged.

References (22)

  • R.J. Magee et al.

    Adv. Appl. Microbial.

    (1987)
  • S.K. Garg et al.

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (1995)
  • A. Senol

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2005)
  • A. Senol

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2004)
  • H. Ghanadzadeh et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2006)
  • N.B. Jansen et al.

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1984)
  • H.R. Bungay

    Energy the Biomass Option

    (1981)
  • M. Voloch et al.
  • M.J. Syu

    Appl. Microbial. Biotechnol.

    (2001)
  • A.V. Tran et al.

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1987)
  • E.K.C. Yu et al.

    Biotechnol. Lett.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Cleaner production and downstream processing of bio-based 2,3-butanediol: A review

      2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      It was found that lower chain alcohols and derivatives of phenol showed highest D(1-butanol, 1.6; 2-sec-butylphenol (SBP), 1.2 and cyclohexanol, 0.9). Thus more alcohols-based extractants, including tetraoctyl ammonium 2-methyl-1-naphthoate(D = 1.08, S = 11.47)(Garcia-Chavez et al., 2012), 2-methylbutan-1-ol(D = 0.43, S = 5.5)/2-ethylbutan-1-ol(D = 0.39, S = 5.6)/4-methylpentan-2-ol(D = 0.55 or 0.4, S = 6.0 or 6.84)(Park et al., 2017; Yim et al., 2019), 1-pentanol(D = 0.82, S = 5.09)(Jeong et al., 2018), 1-butanol(D = 0.91, S = 3.16)(Wu et al., 2008a), isobutanol(D = 0.83, S = 3.25)(Wu et al., 2012), butyl acetate(D = 0.12, S = 4.26)(Wu et al., 2008b), and ethyl acetate(D = 0.22, S = 2.85) (Wu et al., 2008c) were developed to improve the separation efficiency. According to the large differences between the density of isobutanol/1-butanol and that of water, the cost-effectiveness, high separation coefficients, and their expectedly inexpensive recoveries, isobutanol and 1-butanol were selected as the leading candidates for the separation of 2,3-BD from the fermentation broth(Haider et al., 2018a).

    • Measurement and correlation of ternary system {water + 2,3-butanediol + 2-methyl-1-pentanol} and {water + 2,3-butanediol + 3-methyl-1-butanol} liquid-liquid equilibrium data

      2020, Fluid Phase Equilibria
      Citation Excerpt :

      To increase the effectiveness and efficiency of solvent extraction, it is important to select a solvent suitable for the 2,3-butanediol aqueous solution. Although there have been many attempts to find a suitable solvent, the results showed low distribution coefficient (D) [1,12–15] and low selectivity (S) [1,15,16]. Although ionic liquids show high D and S, it has difficulties in separation between 2,3-butanediol and solvent after extraction [17].

    • Techno-economic analysis of various process schemes for the production of fuel grade 2,3-butanediol from fermentation broth

      2018, Biochemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Low distribution coefficient and selectivity are major issues in the solvent extraction process. Moreover, the available solvents often form azeotropes with water, requiring extra columns for the recovery of the solvent and 2,3-BD [11–13]. Addition of salt with the solvent can increase the separation factor, but recovery of the salt together with the solvent requires more capital costs due to the separation of the recovered solvent and salt, which then greatly affects the process economics.

    • Continuous countercurrent liquid-liquid extraction method for the separation of 2,3-butanediol from fermentation broth using n-butanol and phosphate salt

      2015, Process Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, from our own previous rapid solvent screening experiments, it was shown that C4–C6 alcohols (n-butanol, in particular) showed good promise for the extraction of BDO from the aqueous fermentation broth [24]. Although considerable amount of liquid–liquid equilibrium data are available in the literature for BDO [10–13,15–17], there are only few studies concerned with the continuous mode of operation for the extraction of BDO. In 1945, Othmer et al. [25] reported extraction feasibility of BDO from the fermented broth solution.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text