Elsevier

Fluid Phase Equilibria

Volume 344, 25 April 2013, Pages 59-64
Fluid Phase Equilibria

Vapour–liquid equilibria in binary and ternary systems composed of 2,3-dimethylbutane, diisopropyl ether, and 3-methyl-2-butanone at 313.15, 323.15 and 313.15 K

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2013.01.020Get rights and content

Abstract

This article reports vapour–liquid equilibrium data in three binary systems, namely 2,3-dimethylbutane + diisopropyl ether, 2,3-dimethylbutane + 3-methyl-2-butanone, and diisopropyl ether + 3-methyl-2-butanone and in one ternary system, 2,3-dimethylbutane + diisopropyl ether + 3-methyl-2-butanone. The data were measured isothermally at 313.15, 323.15, and 333.15 K covering the pressure range of 13–108 kPa. The binary vapour–liquid equilibrium data were correlated using the Wilson and NRTL equations by means of a robust algorithm for processing all isotherms together. The resulting parameters were then used to calculate phase behaviour in the ternary system and to comparison the calculated with experimental data.

Highlights

► We have measured new experimental data on vapour–liquid equilibria at isothermal conditions. ► Three binary and one ternary systems consisting of 2,3-dimethylbutane + diisopropyl ether + isopropyl methyl ketone were investigated. ► Correlation of data with use of the Wilson and NRTL equation. ► Prediction of phase equilibria in ternary system based on binary data.

Introduction

This paper reports new results of a continuing project dealing with phase equilibria in mixtures belonging to distinct families of organic compounds. Here we determined the vapour–liquid equilibria (VLE) for three binary and one ternary system containing hydrocarbon, ether, and ketone. In a series of our earlier papers, we have already investigated systems having a common alkyl group (isopropyl or tert-butyl), namely 2-propanol + diisopropyl ether + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane [1], tert-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane + 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol [2], tert-butyl methyl ether + tert-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane [3], 2-propanol + diisopropyl ether + 1-methoxy-tert-butyl methyl ether [4], 2-propanol + diisopropyl ether + 4-methyl-2-pentanone [5], 2-methylpentane + 3-methyl-2-butanone + 3-methyl-2-butanol [6], 2-propanol + 3-methyl-2-butanone + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane [7], tert-butyl methyl ether + 3,3-dimethyl-2-butanone + 2,2-dimethyl-1-propanol [8], and 2,2,4-trimethylpentane + 2-methyl-1-propanol + 4-methyl-2-pentanone [9]. The next in the series of experiments aimed at completing our database are systems containing compounds that share the alkyl group [isopropyl (CH3)2CHsingle bond], ether group single bondOsingle bond, and carbonyl group 2 bonds on the lefthand sideCdouble bondO with the already investigated systems. The compounds used in this experiment were 2,3-dimethylbutane, diisopropyl ether, and 3-methyl-2-butanone. The new data were measured at three isothermal levels: 313.15, 323.15, and 333.15 K.

Section snippets

Apparatus and procedure

Experimental VLE data were measured in an all-glass circulation still chargeable with 150 ml of liquid phase. Essentially, it was the generic Dvořák–Boublík type used in our previous research (e.g. [7]). Pressure was measured indirectly via the boiling point of water in an ebulliometer connected in parallel to the still; the uncertainty was ±0.1% of the measured value. The equilibrium temperature was determined with a digital thermometer F250 (ASL, United Kingdom) calibrated against a

Results

Table 3 shows direct experimental xyP values together with the activity coefficients, γ1, γ2, and ΔGE (evaluated from the NRTL correlation) for the binary systems. All three binary systems are zeotropic. The data were correlated using the Wilson and NRTL equations in the following forms (expressions for ln γ2 can be easily obtained after interchanging indices 1 and 2):

  • (1)

    The Wilson equationlnγ1=1ln(x1+x2A12)x1x1+x2A12x2A21x2+x1A21,where A12 = (V1/V2) exp[− (λ12  λ11)/RT], A21 = (V2/V1) exp[− (λ21  λ22)/

Discussion and conclusions

We have found no vapour–liquid equilibrium data for the studied systems in the bibliography covering the period 1888–2007 [17] and in the Web of Knowledge since 2008 to be able to compare them. However, we believe that the obtained standard deviations in our calculations, which are approximately proportional to the magnitudes of input uncertainties sufficiently verify the reliability of both the data and the correlation procedure. The distribution of deviations from the smoothed data confirms

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge technical assistance of Ms S. Bernatová and a partial support of the Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals (internal project).

References (18)

  • I. Wichterle

    ELDATA: Int. Electron. J. Phys.-Chem. Data

    (1999)
  • S. Bernatová et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2001)
  • S. Bernatová et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2001)
  • S. Psutka et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2004)
  • S. Psutka et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2005)
  • S. Psutka et al.

    J. Chem. Eng. Data

    (2005)
  • S. Psutka et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2008)
  • S. Bernatová et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2009)
  • S. Bernatová et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2011)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text