Elsevier

Fluid Phase Equilibria

Volume 477, 15 December 2018, Pages 1-11
Fluid Phase Equilibria

Extraction of benzothiazole and thiophene from their mixtures with n-heptane using tetrahexylammonium bromide-based deep eutectic solvents as extractive denitrogenation and desulfurization agents

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2018.07.023Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were used as extractive denitrogenation and desulfurization agents.

  • LLE data of {n-heptane + benzothiazole/thiophene + DES1/2} were experimentally determined.

  • Distribution ratios and selectivities were calculated and evaluated.

  • Experimental LLE data were successfully correlated using the NRTL model.

Abstract

The liquid-liquid extraction of a sulfur-nitrogen compound using deep eutectic solvents (DESs) was studied for the first time in this work. Benzothiazole (which contains both nitrogen and sulfur) and thiophene (which only contains sulfur) were separated from n-heptane using two tetrahexylammonium bromide-based DESs. Solubility data for benzothiazole and thiophene in the DESs and the DESs' constituents were determined at 298 K and atmospheric pressure. Subsequently, pseudo-ternary LLE data for the four systems {n-heptane + benzothiazole/thiophene + DES 1/DES 2} were determined at atmospheric pressure and a temperature of 298 K. The consideration of a pseudo-ternary system was validated showing that none of the DES′ constituents appears in the raffinate phase’ in the abstract. Both benzothiazole and thiophene were selectively extracted from their mixtures with n-heptane, but benzothiazole showed even higher affinity towards both DESs than thiophene due to the presence of nitrogen in benzothiazole. From the results derived from the experimental data, the selectivities and distribution ratios of benzothiazole and thiophene were calculated. These calculated values were able to show the potency of the DESs for both desulfurization and denitrogenation. In order to validate the experimental data, the equilibrium data were correlated with the NRTL model using ASPEN Plus. The modeled results showed a strong correlation with the experimental results.

Introduction

In order to prevent environmental pollution and due to stringent regulations, there is a burgeoning need to reduce NOx and SOx emissions [1,2]. This can be achieved by removing nitrogen- and sulfur-containing (aromatic) compounds from fuels. High aromatic content in fuels has been discovered to lower the fuel quality; hence, it is essential for the aromatic compounds to be separated from the aliphatic hydrocarbons [3]. The need for denitrogenation has also been spurred by the inhibition of the hydrodesulfurization process by the presence of nitrogen-containing compounds, which poison the catalysts [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. The limit on the nitrogen content in diesel fuel has been regulated from 70 ppm to <0.10 ppm in the year 2011 [10]. Likewise, the sulfur content in fuels in most countries has been set to as low as 10 ppm on an annual average basis beginning from January 2017 and 80 ppm on a per-gallon basis [11,12].

The most common method of desulfurization/denitrogenation is hydrotreatment, which comprises of hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN). For both processes, intense operating conditions and large amounts of hydrogen (300 atm H2 at 600 K, large reactor size, valving difficulty) are required in order to achieve higher efficiency [13,14]. Asides these demerits, hydrotreatment is not potent for the extraction of refractory aromatic nitrogen and sulfur-containing compounds. Considering HDN, basic nitrogen-containing compounds (like quinoline and pyridine) cannot be extracted alongside non-basic nitrogen-containing compounds (like pyrrole and indole). Basic nitrogen-containing compounds possess a lone pair of electrons, which is unassociated with the aromatic compound. Non-basic nitrogen-containing compounds, on the other hand, have the lone pair of electrons as a constituent of the п-bond [8,[15], [16], [17]]. Although HDS is effective in extracting sulfides, disulfides and thiols, it is less potent for the extraction of thiophene and its derivatives [18,19]. Due to these limitations associated with hydrotreatment, easier and cost-effective methods, which do not require hydrogen, are often investigated.

One of the techniques that does not require hydrogen is the acid adsorption method. Acidic adsorbents, which usually contain transition metal ions, have been found to effectively extract the basic nitrogen-containing compounds from fuel. However, their minimal affinity for the non-basic nitrogen-containing compounds have made them a poor option for denitrogenation. Contrary to acidic adsorbents, aprotic solvents (e.g. tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and hexamethyl phosphoric triamide (HMPT)) have high affinity for non-basic nitrogen-containing compounds, but are not powerful in the extraction of basic nitrogen-containing compounds [[20], [21], [22], [23]]. Also, during an extractive denitrogenation process using aprotic solvents, fuels are usually wasted by co-extraction. This is attributed to the low selectivity for the nitrogen-containing compounds in the fuels. In other to combat this, more selective Lewis acid-base reactions between the nitrogen-containing compounds and the extractive agents are carried out, but this technique is accompanied by a more difficult and expensive regeneration process of the solvent [8].

Other methods of denitrogenation and desulfurization include oxidative denitrogenation/desulfurization, biodenitrogenation/desulfurization, and extractive denitrogenation/desulfurization using novel solvents, which are still undergoing lots of research [[24], [25], [26]]. Due to easier operating conditions and un-altering of the fuel properties, extractive denitrogenation/desulfurization using novel solvents is the most preferable amongst other techniques. For example, ionic liquids (ILs) have been reported extensively in literature as extracting agents for the extraction of nitrogen- and sulfur-containing compounds from fuels [19,25,[27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]].

Although ILs can successfully extract nitrogen- and sulfur-containing compounds from fuels, the required large cost of purification, the complex synthesis and the toxicity of some ILs have generated concerns. These concerns have brought about an increase in attention for alternative solvents, including deep eutectic solvents (DESs).

The amount of research on denitrogenation and desulfurization using DESs is still limited. Ali et al. [8] were able to successfully use choline chloride and phenylacetic-based DESs for the simultaneous extraction of both basic and non-basic nitrogen-containing compounds from n-heptane, a challenge which other methods of denitrogenation have not been able to overcome so far. This was the first report in literature in which a DES was used for an extractive denitrogenation process. In another recent work, the removal of pyrrole, pyridine, indoline and quinoline from n-hexadecane using tetrabutylammonium bromide based DESs was successfully carried out [36].

With regards to extractive desulfurization using DESs, Warrag et al. [37] carried out the extraction of thiophene from n-hexane and n-octane using tetrahexylammonium-based DESs, which proved to be potent for the extraction of sulfur-containing compounds from fuels and could also be cost-effectively regenerated after extraction. Few other studies on the removal of thiophene and its derivatives from fuels using DESs have also been reported in literature [[37], [38], [39], [40]].

Still, the extraction of a sulfur- and nitrogen-containing compound from fuels using DESs has never been investigated. Therefore, this liquid-liquid extraction technique was studied for the first time in this work. Specifically, we will extract benzothiazole (which contains both nitrogen and sulfur) and thiophene (which only contains sulfur) from n-heptane using two tetrahexylammonium bromide-based DESs. These DESs were selected based on their previous successful performance in extraction of thiophene [37,38] and its derivatives [40] from different aliphatic hydrocarbons, and because they have been successfully regenerated before by using vacuum evaporation [37]. Because the DESs are actually mixtures themselves, we will measure pseudo-ternary liquid-liquid equilibrium (LLE) data. The assumption to treat both DESs as single species is only correct in case the ratio between the constituents is not changed, which means that the DESs stay intact in one phase only (no losses to the raffinate phase), which has to be experimentally verified. All obtained LLE data will be correlated using the non-random two-liquid (NRTL) model and used to evaluate the feasibility of both DESs as extractive denitrogenation/desulfurization agents.

Section snippets

Materials

The chemicals used for the determination of the LLE data were used without further purification. Their various sources, purity and CAS number are included in Table 1.

DES preparation

The 2 DESs were prepared at a temperature of 308 K. DES 1 and DES 2 consisted of tetrahexylammonium bromide (acting as hydrogen bond acceptor, HBA) and either ethylene glycol or glycerol (serving as hydrogen bond donor, HBD), respectively. The molar ratio between the HBD and the HBA was 2:1 in both cases, as this ratio for both

Solubility data

The solubility of benzothiazole in DES1, DES2, ethylene glycol, glycerol and n-heptane was determined using the cloud point method, while the solubility of n-heptane in both DESs was measured using the equilibrium cell method. The solubility data of thiophene in different solvents had been determined in previous work [37], but have been added for comparative reasons in Table 4 as well.

The solubility of benzothiazole can be observed to be greater than that of thiophene for all the different

Conclusions

This work was able to show the extractive denitrogenation and desulfurization using tetrahexylammonium based DESs. DES 1 consists of tetrahexylammonium bromide: ethylene glycol in molar ratio 1:2 with ethylene glycol being replaced with glycerol in DES 2. Initially, the binary solubilities of benzothiazole and thiophene in n-heptane, DES 1, DES 2, ethylene glycol and glycerol were determined. Afterwards, the LLE data for the four ternary systems {n-heptane + benzothiazole/thiophene + DES 1/DES

Funding sources

Financial support was gotten from the Petroleum Institute (startup fund M. C. Kroon) ESP 16002.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Inas AlNashef for his help in providing some of the chemicals.

References (47)

  • S.L. Borgne et al.

    Biotechnological processes for the refining of petroleum

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2003)
  • L. Alonso et al.

    Thiophene separation from aliphatic hydrocarbons using the 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethylsulfate ionic liquid

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (2008)
  • X. Jiang et al.

    Imidazolium-based alkylphosphate ionic liquids – a potential solvent for extractive desulfurization of fuel

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2008)
  • C.D. Wilfred et al.

    Extraction of dibenzothiophene from dodecane using ionic liquids

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2012)
  • L. Alonso et al.

    Solvent extraction of thiophene from n-alkanes (C7, C12, and C16) using the ionic liquid [C8mim][BF4]

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2008)
  • W. Jian-long et al.

    Desulfurization of gasoline by extraction with N-alkyl-pyridinium-based ionic liquids

    J. Fuel Chem. Technol.

    (2007)
  • H.F. Hizaddin et al.

    Extractive denitrogenation of diesel fuel using ammonium- and phosphonium-based deep eutectic solvents

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2016)
  • R.D. Alli et al.

    Removal of 2- and 3-methylthiophene from their mixtures with n-heptane using tetrahexylammonium bromide-based deep eutectic solvents as extractive desulfurization agents

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2018)
  • N.R. Rodriguez et al.

    Isopropanol dehydration via extractive distillation using low transition temperature mixtures as entrainers

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2015)
  • M. Królikowski et al.

    Solvent extraction of aromatic sulfur compounds from n-heptane using the 1-e thyl-3-methyl imidazolium tricyanomethanide ionic liquid

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2013)
  • U. Domańska et al.

    Separation of thiophene from heptane with ionic liquids

    J. Chem. Therm.

    (2013)
  • U.S Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook

    (2013)
  • U.S EPA Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Control of Harzadous Air Pollutants from mobile Sources; Final Rule

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text