Elsevier

Food Policy

Volume 49, Part 1, December 2014, Pages 250-258
Food Policy

Adapting to food safety crises: Interpreting success and failure in the Canadian response to BSE

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.09.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Analysis of institutional learning in Canada’s food safety system following an outbreak of BSE.

  • Implications for understanding recurrent risks within dominant production systems.

  • Non-problematicity and the bounding of safety within food policy.

Abstract

This paper explores processes of adaptation to food safety crises, and raises questions about what can be understood as success and failure in a crisis response. It presents the outcomes of a qualitative research study of Canada’s beleaguered beef industry, and investigates institutional learning and adaptation following an outbreak of BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) in particular. The analysis is guided by a concern with tensions between stability and change in adaptation. It draws on conceptual research on risk and the construction of non-problematicity as a means of symmetrically investigating how risk responses to BSE both opened up and closed down reflexive scrutiny of food and food safety systems. Specific attention is paid to constraints on adaptation imposed by preoccupations with market-led regulation, scientific risk analysis and the maintenance of institutional relations in the face of a potential public controversy. The paper concludes that in order to contend with recurrent crises in modern food-safety systems it is necessary to widen adaptive strategies, and to scrutinise agricultural priorities and food policy as essential aspects of adaptation.

Section snippets

Preface

This paper reports on research conducted into processes of institutional learning and adaptation in the face of long-term and endemic crises in the security of modern agri-food systems. More specifically, this paper provides a qualitative analysis of institutional adaptation following the emergence of BSE

The Canadian experience with BSE

The Canadian experience with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, or mad-cow disease) began in earnest in May 2003 with the identification of Canada’s first infected cow near Edmonton, Alberta.3 This was the same variant of the disease that had caused so much devastation to human, animal and rural life in Britain since

Towards reflexive adaptation in food safety policy

When food safety hazards emerge, institutions with responsibility for mitigating risks are inevitably drawn into the spotlight. Understanding the scope and focus of a risk and the boundaries within which institutions operate are necessary prerequisites for interpreting the ability to come to terms with complex social and dynamic risk scenarios, such as those posed by BSE. We thus turn our attention towards a consideration of dominant approaches to adaptation and their limits, before exploring

A case study in adaptation to BSE in Canada

In what follows we explore adaptation and the construction of the non-problem in reference to a qualitative research engagement involving a series of interviews with institutional actors involved in the management of food-safety in Canada, and of BSE in particular.9 Our research investigated the ways in which the disease created opportunities for learning and innovation in approaches to food safety.

Conclusion

Our intent has been to challenge how we measure, and even define, ‘success’ and ‘failure’ in adaptation to the risks associated with complex food systems by focusing on the outbreak of BSE in Canada. We have argued that evaluating how institutions have responded (or not) requires widening the boundaries around our interpretations of change. Importantly, this necessitates reviewing food safety systems in relation to a wider array of normative economic and political choices about the relationship

References (54)

  • Carl Folke

    Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses

    Global Environ. Change

    (2006)
  • David A. Hennessy et al.

    Systemic failure in the provision of safe food

    Food Policy

    (2003)
  • Mats Alvesson et al.

    Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis

    Human Relations

    (2000)
  • Ulrich Beck

    Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity

    (1992)
  • Beck et al.
  • Ulrich Beck

    Politics of risk society

  • Gwendolyn Blue

    If It Ain’t Alberta, It Ain’t Beef: local food, regional identity and (inter)national politics

    Food Cult. Soc.

    (2008)
  • Kathrin Braun et al.

    Beyond speaking truth? Institutional responses to uncertainty in scientific governance

    Sci. Technol. Human Values

    (2010)
  • Michael J. Broadway

    The social representation and reality of BSE’s impact in North Central Alberta

    Can. Geograph.

    (2008)
  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 2013. Enhanced Animal Health Protection from BSE – Specified Risk Material (SRM)....
  • Noam Chomsky et al.

    The Chomsky-Foucault Debate: On Human Nature

    (2006)
  • Louise Cummings

    Rethinking the BSE Crisis: A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty

    (2010)
  • Davidson, Debra, Kevin E., Jones, John, Parkins, (submitted for publication). The Role of Food Safety Risks in...
  • Paul J. DiMaggio et al.

    The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields

    Am. Sociol. Rev.

    (1983)
  • William Freudenberg
  • Alan Irwin et al.

    Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology

    (1996)
  • Alan Irwin et al.

    The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice

    Soc. Stud. Sci.

    (2013)
  • Sheila Jasanoff

    The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policy Makers

    (1990)
  • Kevin E. Jones

    BSE and the Phillips report: a cautionary tale about the uptake of ‘risk’

  • Jones, Kevin E., 2004b. The Politics of New Agricultural Technologies: Contesting Risk, Science and Governance. PhD...
  • Jones, Kevin E., Davidson, Debra (forth.) Food Safety and the Politics of Slaughter. In...
  • Kevin E. Jones et al.

    Un espace d’engagement citoyen? La participation profane et le changement institutionnel dans la gouvernance contemporaine des risques

    Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances

    (2013)
  • Bruno Latour

    Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society

    (1987)
  • Danny G. Le Roy et al.

    Mad cow chaos in Canada: was it just bad luck or did government policies play a role?

    Canadian Public Policy/Analyses de Politiques

    (2005)
  • William Leiss et al.

    Managing the risks of bovine spongiform encephalopathy: a Canadian perspective

    Int. J. Risk Assess. Manage.

    (2010)
  • Roxanne E. Lewis et al.

    The impact of social amplification and attenuation of risk and the public reaction to mad cow disease in Canada

    Risk Anal.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (12)

    • The impact of diseases on international beef trade: Market switching and persistent effects

      2018, Food Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, the full United States ban on Canadian beef imports after a 2003 BSE outbreak in Alberta lasted only four months, but the border opened only partially thereafter and it took four more years to end all restrictions on Canadian beef imports. Thus, as noted by Jones and Davidson (2014), the policy concern with animal disease outbreaks may quickly shift from issues of food safety to issues of market access. These market access issues may not be well understood in the literature.

    • Food safety recall effects across meat products and regions

      2017, Food Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      As an example, insights on E. coli O157: H7 contaminations on ground beef demand rather than aggregate beef demand are desired yet not obtainable using traditional disappearance data based analyses. FSIS recalls have been used in demand models as proxies for food safety information received by consumers which represents the perceived level of food safety hazards in analyzing impacts on meat demand, prices, and financial markets (Marsh et al., 2004; Lusk and Schroeder, 2000; Thomsen and McKenzie, 2001; Tonsor et al., 2010; Moghadam et al., 2013; Jones and Davidson, 2014; Pozo and Schroeder, 2016). Furthermore, the prior literature typically “linearly aggregates” the number and type of FSIS issued recall events quarterly for beef, pork, and poultry to build measures of meat products recalls (Burton and Young, 1996; Kinnucan et al., 1997; Marsh et al., 2004; Tonsor et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text