Elsevier

Forest Ecology and Management

Volume 437, 1 April 2019, Pages 324-339
Forest Ecology and Management

Integrative management to sustain biodiversity and ecological continuity in Central European temperate oak (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) forests: An overview

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Oak forests are of great economic and conservation importance.

  • We identify integrative management options for forestry and nature conservation.

  • Light availability is a strong link between forestry and conservation demands.

  • There is an urgent need for integrative oak forest planning approaches.

  • Ecological continuity should be secured in structural “sustainability units”.

Abstract

Central European temperate oak woodlands are highly valued for their rich biodiversity. They are also of great economic importance and forest management aims to produce high quality timber, which demands high investments. The aim of this literature review is to identify management options for forestry and nature conservation that sustain both the ecological value of oak forests and the economic viability of oak silviculture.

We addressed three main questions: (a) Oaks and close-to-nature forestry – what are the key silvicultural challenges and options?, (b) What is the particular significance of ecological continuity and which structural features are of importance for biodiversity conservation in oak forests?, (c) What are the key elements and possible strategies of forest management that sustain the ecological values in oak forests in combination with viable forestry?

Light availability appeared to be a conspicuous link connecting the conservation and the silvicultural aspects of multifunctional oak forest management: Both young oak trees and multiple oak woodland specialist species are characterized by their need for increased sunlight exposure. This common denominator provides a sound basis for integrative management practices for forestry and nature conservation. The concept of retention forestry offers purposeful approaches. So the harvest of valuable timber oaks or the creation of canopy gaps for oak regeneration can be used to release the crowns and trunks of habitat oaks from shading and competition. When looking at the management of oak woodland biodiversity hotspots, the re-establishment of (modified) historical forest management techniques, which increase stand openness and create transitional habitats that provide suitable oak regeneration niches, seems to be necessary.

Not only the continuity of oak woodland cover and natural site conditions, but also the uninterrupted temporal continuity and availability of wood-related structural features turned out to be of particular importance for oak woodland specialist species. We identified an urgent need for systematic forest planning approaches that secure the long-term availability of these structural features within areas or “sustainability units” that are large enough to maintain viable populations of oak woodland specialist species. In particular, conservation-oriented forestry measures should mainly be implemented in those areas, where the greatest effectiveness is to be expected. In the sustainability units, oak regeneration measures ought to take place either in close vicinity to old oak stands or directly in these stands. The choice of one of these options should be based on a careful consideration of the needs and possibilities of both silvicultural and nature conservation management.

Introduction

Quercus is the most important tree genus in the Northern Hemisphere, and there are about 600 extant species of oak (Mabberley, 2008). While the greatest oak diversity is to be found in the New World and in China (Nixon, 2006, Huang et al., 2013), Central Europe harbors merely four native species: the thermophilous Q. pubescens and Q. cerris and the widespread Q. robur and Q. petraea (Sayer, 2000, Leuschner and Ellenberg, 2017). Q. robur (pedunculate oak) and Q. petraea (sessile oak) are highly valued, both in economical and nature conservation terms, and temperate deciduous forests dominated by these species are the focus of this review.

Central European temperate oak woodlands were profoundly influenced and maintained by century-long human management (Kirby and Watkins, 2015). Traditional management practices, particularly pannage, wood pasture, coppicing and coppicing with standards, promoted oaks and led, at most sites, to decreasing proportions of the otherwise very competitive European beech (Fagus sylvatica) (Ningre and Doussot, 1993, Strandberg et al., 2005, Szabó, 2013, Vandekerkhove et al., 2016a). Bobiec et al. (2018) highlighted that the intensification and specialization of modern post-18th century agriculture and forestry led to the loss of transitional habitats, which had provided very suitable oak regeneration niches for centuries. Scientific forestry, however, regionally undertook great efforts to develop oak high forests in the first half of the 19th century (Ningre and Doussot, 1993, Eliasson and Nilsson, 2002, Mölder et al., 2017a). Hence, the role of oaks in the potential natural vegetation is ambiguous in some areas and has been controversial for decades (Bobiec et al., 2011, Reif et al., 2016, Leuschner and Ellenberg, 2017).

European temperate oak woodlands are highly valued for their rich, typical biodiversity, which can be mainly attributed to the life history traits and structural characteristics of Q. robur and Q. petraea. In particular, both oak species have a long natural life span of between 300 and 900 years and very durable wood, even in the decay stage (Ranius et al., 2009b, Leuschner and Ellenberg, 2017). Therefore, they offer suitable and particularly long-lasting habitats for a variety of saproxylic species with low dispersal abilities. However, even one clear-cut or deep ploughing event can destroy the temporal and spatial thread of ecological continuity in oak woodlands (Grove, 2002, Vandekerkhove et al., 2013, Fichtner et al., 2014, Nordén et al., 2014). According to Brändle and Brandl (2001), 252 phytophagous insect and mite species are oak specialists. For comparison, beech has merely 44 specialist species in these groups. In addition, the understory of oak-dominated woodlands is frequently characterized by a wide variety of woodland plant species and soil-dwelling fungi (Nitare, 2000, Leuschner and Ellenberg, 2017). However, Lindbladh and Foster (2010) critically suggested that the current populations of oak and its associated species appear to represent biological legacies in the midst of protracted decline, especially in view of the former abundance, longevity and persistence of oaks.

Current oak silviculture in the high forest system aims at producing high quality timber (e.g., sliced or peeled veneer) or construction timber. The investment in oak stands is high, due to long rotation periods, laborious regeneration techniques and frequent silvicultural interventions (Kenk, 1993, Schütz, 1993, Solymos, 1993, Lüpke, 1998). This is particularly true in the framework of close-to-nature forestry (Lüpke, 1998, Pommerening and Murphy, 2004).

In the management of mature oak stands, in particular, there are trade-offs between economic and conservation targets. Securing economic revenue and regeneration calls for harvesting of a large proportion of the mature stands, while the preservation of biodiversity requires a high level of old tree retention. Thus, the regeneration of mature oak stands results in sharp conflicts. Nature conservationists and advocates of strict continuous cover forestry have frequently criticized clearfelling and have called for complex small-scale regeneration techniques and the retention of more mature oaks (Stahl-Streit, 2004, Jedicke and Hakes, 2005, Meyer, 2013). In order to avoid these conflicts, forest planning frequently aims at establishing new oak stands on former agricultural land or at sites that previously were stocked with conifers (Saha et al., 2017). This approach, however, leads to a disruption of ecological continuity, due to the spatial decoupling of young and mature oak stands in fragmented modern forest landscapes (cf. Goßner et al., 2008, Vandekerkhove et al., 2013).

It is a great challenge to conserve or restore highly valued oak forest biocoenoses while, at the same time, maintaining the economic viability of oak forestry and, thus, the interest of forest managers in oak. Therefore, within the framework of close-to-nature forest management (Pommerening and Murphy, 2004), it seems worthwhile to bring current ecological and silvicultural knowledge together in an overview article with the aim of identifying suitable options for forest management planning. Very few publications have, up to now, dealt with this cross-section issue (Löf et al., 2015).

Our aim is to identify management options for forest and nature conservation management that sustain both the ecological value of oak forests and the economic viability of oak silviculture. In order to identify these management options, we conduct a literature review considering the following questions:

  • 1.

    Oaks and close-to-nature forestry – what are the key silvicultural challenges and options?

  • 2.

    What is the particular significance of ecological continuity and which structural features are of importance for biodiversity conservation in oak forests?

  • 3.

    What are the key elements and possible strategies of forest management that sustain the ecological values in oak forests in combination with viable forestry?

Section snippets

Area of interest

According to Leuschner and Ellenberg (2017), we define Central Europe as follows: It includes Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg, Switzerland, Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland, as well as parts of the neighbouring countries of Denmark, southern Sweden, Hungary, Romania, Slovenia, Croatia, eastern France and the Italian Alps. We are aware that Central European oak woodlands are not only characterized by large gradients of climatic and edaphic factors, but also by

Key targets of oak silviculture

Modern oak silviculture in the high forest system is aimed at producing high quality timber with a DBH of at least 70 cm within a timeframe of 160–200 years or, respectively, construction timber with a DBH of at least 60 cm within 140–180 years. To achieve these targets, the site nutrient supply should be mesotrophic or even better (Penistan, 1984, Schütz, 1993, Lüpke, 1998, Spellmann, 2001, Attocchi, 2015). While Q. robur can be found preferentially in sandy, loamy or alluvial sites in the

The importance of ecological continuity

Many of the present distribution patterns of plant and animal species in Central European cultural landscapes are closely related to land-use history. Most notably, woodland specialist species with low dispersal abilities are dependent on a century- or even millennium-long interaction of land-use types and intensities that secured the long-term availability of suitable habitat conditions (Fichtner et al., 2014, Bradshaw et al., 2015, Buckley and Mills, 2015, Flensted et al., 2016, Cateau et

Habitat trees, habitat tree islands and retention forestry

Retention forestry has become an important topic in both forest science and practice in recent times (Bauhus et al., 2009, Gustafsson et al., 2012, Fedrowitz et al., 2014). This management approach means that “single trees and/or intact forest patches are retained at the time of harvest, with the overall aim of achieving a level of continuity in forest structure and complexity” (Fig. 3; Fedrowitz et al., 2014). Bauhus et al. (2009) have coined the term “silviculture for old-growth attributes”

Strategies for systematic oak forest conservation and management planning

With reference to the spatial distribution and arrangement of the management elements for ecological continuity and biodiversity conservation in oak forests presented here, it has to be decided where the different measures should be situated and implemented in the multifunctional forest landscape matrix (Krumm et al., 2013, Vandekerkhove et al., 2016b, Borrass et al., 2017). In the following we present possible strategies for management planning, each of which, however, should be implemented

Conclusions

Considering the initial research questions, we draw these main conclusions:

1 Oaks and close-to-nature forestry – what are the key silvicultural challenges and options?

With regard to integrative oak forest management, close-to-nature forestry must not be equated with strict continuous cover forestry. In view of the light-demanding oak regrowth, the creation and subsequent enlargement of canopy gaps is indispensable for oak forest regeneration and economically viable forestry. Therefore, the

Acknowledgments

The funding of the research projects “QuerCon – Long-term conservation of ecological continuity in oak forests” (grant number DBU 32694) and “Identification and protection of forest stands of special importance for biodiversity conservation” (grant number DBU 29677) by the German Federal Environmental Foundation (DBU) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Robert Larkin for language polishing and are indebted to the reviewers for suggestions that have greatly improved the paper.

References (258)

  • M. Dolek et al.

    Successful maintenance of Lepidoptera by government-funded management of coppiced forests

    J. Nat. Conserv.

    (2018)
  • A. Fichtner et al.

    Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on soil microbial communities in oak forests persist for more than 100 years

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2014)
  • K.K. Flensted et al.

    Red-listed species and forest continuity – a multi-taxon approach to conservation in temperate forests

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2016)
  • Ö. Fritz et al.

    Does forest continuity matter in conservation? – A study of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes in beech forests of southern Sweden

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2008)
  • I. Gjerde et al.

    Complementary Hotspot Inventory – a method for identification of important areas for biodiversity at the forest stand level

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2007)
  • F. Götmark

    Habitat management alternatives for conservation forests in the temperate zone: review, synthesis, and implications

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2013)
  • F. Götmark

    Careful partial harvesting in conservation stands and retention of large oaks favour oak regeneration

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2007)
  • F. Götmark et al.

    How we improved a landscape study of species richness of beetles in woodland key habitats, and how model output can be improved

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2011)
  • J. Horák et al.

    Biodiversity of most dead wood-dependent organisms in thermophilic temperate oak woodlands thrives on diversity of open landscape structures

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2014)
  • C. Hougner et al.

    Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park

    Sweden. Ecol. Econ.

    (2006)
  • A.B.I. Igboanugo

    Effects of shading on shoot morphology, wood production and structure of Quercus petraea seedlings

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (1990)
  • P. Janssen et al.

    Forest continuity acts congruently with stand maturity in structuring the functional composition of saproxylic beetles

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2017)
  • K. Albert et al.

    Biomasseproduktivität ausgewählter europäischer Mittel- und Niederwaldbestände – Ergebnisse einer vergleichenden Metaanalyse [Biomass productivity of selected coppice and coppice with standard forests in Europe – Comparative results of a meta analysis]

    Allg. Forst- Jagdztg.

    (2012)
  • J. Altman et al.

    Tree-tings mirror management legacy: dramatic response of standard oaks to past coppicing in Central Europe

    PLoS ONE

    (2013)
  • C. Ammer et al.

    Untersuchungen über den Einfluß starker Weichlaubholzkonkurrenz auf das Wachstum und die Qualität junger Stieleichen [Investigating the effects of strong competition by inferior tree species on growth and quality of young European oaks]

    Forstw. Cbl.

    (1997)
  • M. Andersson et al.

    Low pre-death growth rates of oak (Quercus robur L.)—Is oak death a long-term process induced by dry years?

    Ann. For. Sci.

    (2011)
  • P. Annighöfer et al.

    Regeneration patterns of European oak species (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Quercus robur L.) in dependence of environment and neighborhood

    PLoS ONE

    (2015)
  • R. Aszalós et al.

    First signs of old-growth structure and composition of an oak forest after four decades of abandonment

    Biologia

    (2017)
  • G. Attocchi

    Silviculture of oak for high-quality wood production

    Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae

    (2015)
  • B

    Serpentara. Ein Grundbesitz der deutschen Nation in Italien [Serpentara. A land holding of the German nation in Italy]

    Gartenlaube

    (1876)
  • T. Becker et al.

    Forty years of vegetation change in former coppice-with-standards woodlands as a result of management change and N deposition

    Appl. Veg. Sci.

    (2017)
  • B. Beinhofer

    Comparing the financial performance of traditionally managed beech and oak stands with roomy established and pruned stands

    Eur. J. For. Res.

    (2010)
  • L. Bergès et al.

    Response of understorey plant communities and traits to past land use and coniferous plantation

    Appl. Veg. Sci.

    (2017)
  • M. Birkedal et al.

    Rodent impact on establishment of direct-seeded Fagus sylvatica, Quercus robur and Quercus petraea on forest land

    Scand. J. For. Res.

    (2009)
  • M. Blanc

    A propos d’Osmoderma eremita (Scopoli, 1763) en Suisse [About Osmoderma eremita (Scopoli, 1763) in Switzerland]

    Schweiz. Z. Forstwes.

    (2012)
  • A. Bobiec

    Białowieża Primeval Forest as a remnant of culturally modified ancient forest

    Eur. J. For. Res.

    (2012)
  • A. Bobiec et al.

    Oak (Quercus robur L.) regeneration as a response to natural dynamics of stands in European hemiboreal zone

    Eur. J. Forest Res.

    (2011)
  • A. Bobiec et al.

    Wpływ masowego zamierania świerka w drzewostanach Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego na odnowienie naturalne dębu [Influence of spruce decline in stands of the Białowieża National Park on natural oak regeneration]

    Sylwan

    (2012)
  • A. Bobiec et al.

    Seeing the oakscape beyond the forest: a landscape approach to the oak regeneration in Europe

    Landsc. Ecol.

    (2018)
  • S.M. Böhm et al.

    Patterns of resource use in an assemblage of birds in the canopy of a temperate alluvial forest

    J. Ornithol.

    (2009)
  • I. Bossema

    Jays and oaks: an eco-ethological study of a symbiosis

    Behaviour

    (1979)
  • C. Bouget et al.

    In search of the best local habitat drivers for saproxylic beetle diversity in temperate deciduous forests

    Biodivers. Conserv.

    (2013)
  • C. Bouget et al.

    Does a set-aside conservation strategy help the restoration of old-growth forest attributes and recolonization by saproxylic beetles?

    Anim. Conserv.

    (2014)
  • R.H. Bradshaw et al.

    Forest continuity and conservation value in Western Europe

    Holocene

    (2015)
  • M. Brändle et al.

    Species richness of insects and mites on trees: expanding Southwood

    J. Anim. Ecol.

    (2001)
  • I. Březina et al.

    Natural regeneration of sessile oak under different light conditions

    J. For. Sci.

    (2011)
  • J. Brunet et al.

    From wooded pasture to timber production – Changes in a European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest landscape between 1840 and 2010

    Scand. J. For. Res.

    (2012)
  • J. Brunet et al.

    Biodiversity in European beech forests – a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management

    Ecol. Bull.

    (2010)
  • P. Buckley et al.

    The flora and fauna of coppice woods: winners and losers of active management or neglect

  • H. Bußler

    Hotspot-Gebiete xylobionter Urwaldreliktarten aus dem Reich der Käfer

    LWF aktuell

    (2010)
  • Cited by (95)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text