Elsevier

Fuel Processing Technology

Volume 102, October 2012, Pages 140-145
Fuel Processing Technology

Ni catalyst on mixed support of CeO2–ZrO2 and Al2O3: Effect of composition of CeO2–ZrO2 solid solution on the methane steam reforming reaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.04.030Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study, catalysts containing 5 wt.% Ni deposited on a support composed of a CeO2–ZrO2 solid solution deposited on alumina were tested in the steam reforming of methane. The supports, with various ratios of Ce to Zr, were prepared by co-precipitation of the oxide precursors, followed by calcination in synthetic air. The catalysts were then prepared by Ni impregnation of the supports. The prepared solids were characterized by temperature-programmed reduction with H2 (TPR‐H2), in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy. The XRD analysis confirmed the formation of a solid solution between ZrO2 and CeO2. In the catalytic tests, it was found that catalysts with higher Ce content did not exhibit deactivation during 6 h of reaction. The catalyst with highest Ce content, Ni(0.8Ce0.2Zr)Al, provided the best result, with the highest rate of conversion of methane and the lowest carbon deposition, which may be partly due to the smaller Ni0 crystallites in this sample and also the segregated CeO2 particles may have favored H2O adsorption which could lead to higher C gasification.

Graphical abstract

XPD for samples supported on Al(CeZr).

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

►Ni catalysts supported on CeO2–ZrO2–Al2O3 were prepared and tested in the SRM. ►The formation of solid solution between ZrO2 and CeO2 was identified by XRD. ►Ni(0.8Ce0.2Zr)Al, provided higher rate of CH4 conversion and lower C deposition. ►This sample presented lower Ni0 crystallite size and the CeO2 segregated. ►These properties may have favored H2O adsorption and C gasification.

Introduction

Hydrogen is an important strategic material used in several industrial processes and also as a clean fuel, in fuel cells [1]. The industrial process generally used to generate H2 is the catalytic steam reforming (SR) of natural gas, whose main component is methane. The steam reforming of methane (SRM) reaction is represented by Eq. (1), but this process is usually accompanied by the water gas shift reaction (WGSR), Eq. (2).CH4+H2OCO+3H2ΔH°298K=206kJmol1ΔG°298K=142kJmol1CO+H2OCO2+H2ΔH°298K=41.2kJmol1DG°298K=28.5kJmol1

Supported nickel catalysts are used in steam reforming processes, but, compared to noble metal-based catalysts, they are less active and can suffer deactivation by carbon deposition and by oxidation of the active phase, Ni0 [2]. Moreover, the high temperatures and pressures used in the SRM may lead to catalyst deactivation by sintering [3].

To improve the catalytic performance and minimize coking of the catalyst, several conditions can be modified, such as characteristics of the support, metal content, preparation method and the introduction of promoters into the catalyst formulation [4]. According to the literature, the first step of the SRM reaction is the decomposition of methane, after which the carbon species formed on the active surface react with steam or surface oxygen species to form CO and/or CO2 [5]. The catalyst support plays an important role in H2O adsorption and some supports enhance the adsorption of steam [6].

Several studies in the literature report that reducible oxides, such as cerium oxide and/or zirconium oxide, improve the performance of some metal catalysts such as Ni, Pt and Pd and promote greater stability during methane reforming reactions. Moreover, when reduced by the reactants, these materials have a high reducing power and ability to store oxygen. Roh et al. [7] studied nickel catalysts supported on CeO2, ZrO2 and Ce–ZrO2 and found that the sample supported on the mixed oxides of cerium and zirconium showed better activity, selectivity and stability in the methane steam and autothermal reforming reactions. Kambolis et al. [8], also studying Ni/Ce–ZrO2 catalysts, showed that these mixed oxides promoted stability and good activity in the dry reforming of methane. The good performance of these catalysts was associated with the presence of redox sites responsible for the decomposition of CO2 and H2O.

According to the literature, [9], the incorporation of zirconium in the CeO2 lattice creates a high concentration of defects in the structure, which improve the O2− mobility that is responsible for the ability to store and liberate oxygen. This high oxygen mobility increases the oxygen vacancies of the support, which increase its reducibility and favor a continuous removal of carbon deposits from the active sites [10].

In view of the above mentioned considerations and also considering the properties of the CeO2–ZrO2 solid solution, the goal of this work was to study the effect of the CeO2–ZrO2 solid solution composition on the performance of Ni catalysts supported on mixed oxides of Al2O3 and CeO2–ZrO2 in the reaction of methane steam reforming.

Section snippets

Synthesis

Supports of composition 50 wt.% Al2O3 and 50 wt.% (CeO2–ZrO2) were synthesized with a series of mass ratios of CeO2 to ZrO2 (xCeO2:(1  x)ZrO2; where x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8). The supports were prepared by co-precipitation of solutions of aluminum nitrate, cerium nitrate and zirconium carbonate (the last salt dissolved in nitric acid), with ammonium carbonate. The precipitation was carried out at 25 °C and pH 10, controlled by adding ammonium hydroxide solution. The precipitates were filtered and

Results and discussion

Fig. 1 shows TPR profiles of the supports. All supports show a reduction region, α, around 600 °C. The support richest in CeO2, Al(0.8Ce0.2Zr), exhibits two reduction regions, α and β. According to the literature [11], [12], CeO2 supports show two reduction peaks, near 580 and 950 °C, which are associated, respectively, with reduction of CeO2 on the surface and bulk CeO2. On the other hand, pure ZrO2 has only a small reduction peak at 660 °C. However, many authors report only one reduction peak

Conclusions

The XRD results indicate the formation of a solid solution between ZrO2 and CeO2. However, the TPR and Raman results also suggest that, at high Ce content, some CeO2 segregates from the solid solution.

In sum, the results suggest that increasing the Ce content facilitated the reduction of Ni species, which increased the conversion rate of methane and led to heavier carbon deposition. Nevertheless, by monitoring performance for 6 h on stream, it can be seen that catalysts with higher Ce content

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to CNPq for financial support, to LNLS for XANES and in situ XRD analysis and also to Virginia C. A. Martins (IQSC/USP) for TGA analysis.

References (25)

Cited by (55)

  • Effects of CeO<inf>2</inf> on the phase, microstructure and mechanical properties of Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf>-ZrO<inf>2</inf>(CeO<inf>2</inf>) nanocomposite ceramics (AZC-NCs) by solid solution precipitation

    2022, Ceramics International
    Citation Excerpt :

    The flexural strength and fracture toughness of this ceramic were 728 MPa and 6.61 MPa·m1/2, respectively. According to relevant reports [25–30], the Al2O3–ZrO2 system can be compatible with the CeO2 phase. The doped CeO2 effectively regulates the microstructure and ZrO2 crystal structure of AZ-NCs.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text