Potential of lower-limb muscles to accelerate the body during cerebral palsy gait
Highlights
► This study evaluated lower-limb muscle function in 18 cerebral palsy patients and 10 controls. ► Computational modelling was used to assess each muscle's potential to accelerate the body. ► Significant differences in potential accelerations were displayed between crouch, jump and normal gait patterns. ► The vertical ‘support’ potential of gluteus medius was significantly reduced in crouch and jump gait.
Introduction
Gait patterns in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) have been classified in many different ways for several decades [1], [2]. Two of the most common patterns in the various classifications are termed ‘crouch gait’ and ‘jump gait’. These two gait patterns may be differentiated on the basis of stance phase sagittal-plane kinematics [3]. Specifically, although both patterns are characterized by excessive hip and knee flexion, in jump gait there is excessive plantarflexion at the ankle, whilst in crouch gait there is excessive dorsiflexion at the ankle [3]. Pharmacological and/or surgical interventions may be prescribed to children displaying these gait abnormalities [4]. Treatment decisions are often based on functional assessments of the neuromusculoskeletal system such as quantitative gait analysis. While quantitative gait analysis can be used to measure lower-limb joint kinematics, moments and muscle electromyographic activity [5], the function of individual lower-limb muscles during a task such as walking can only be inferred from these data. The outcomes of surgical interventions for crouch gait are generally positive in terms of a correction toward a more extended posture at the hip and knee, with improvements in knee pain and increased functional mobility [6], [7]. However, the outcomes of surgery for some children with crouch gait results in minimal or no improvements, which may be partially attributable to incorrect interpretations of lower-limb muscle function (e.g., scenarios described by Arnold [8] and Delp et al. [9]).
Musculoskeletal modeling has the potential to address this issue by providing non-invasive quantification of muscle function [10]. Person-specific models combined with quantitative gait analysis data enable the development of computer-based simulations of motion. Muscle forces can be determined using a variety of optimization-based techniques [11], and neuromuscular coordination patterns can be revealed through muscle contributions to the acceleration of the body's center of mass (e.g., [12], [13]). For example, Liu et al. [14] used this technique to determine the muscles that provide deceleration and/or forward propulsion during normal gait, and Steele et al. [15] similarly determined the muscles that are important in crouch gait. Unfortunately, as children with CP display neural function that is clearly sub-optimal, the ability of optimization-based techniques to accurately represent lower-limb muscle function in this population is limited. One way to overcome this limitation is to avoid mathematical optimization, and instead evaluate the potential or capacity of individual lower-limb muscles to accelerate the body.
The potential accelerations of the body's center of mass induced by individual muscles describe the influence of musculoskeletal geometry and limb positions on the functional capacities of these muscles, as distinct from the neuromuscular coordination patterns revealed by muscle-force-induced accelerations. To the best of our knowledge, the only investigation of gait patterns using potential center-of-mass accelerations was performed by Lakin et al. [16], despite several studies having evaluated hip and knee accelerations (e.g., [17], [18]). While Lakin et al. [16] reported large differences between crouch gait and normal gait, only the sagittal-plane accelerations induced by three lower-limb muscles were evaluated. A logical extension of this work is a more complete comparison of not only crouch gait and normal gait, but jump gait as well. It is anticipated that outcomes may provide novel clinical insights, and would generate baseline data for future work targeted at specific clinical questions, such as the effect of a particular surgical procedure.
The aim of this study was to determine the differences in lower-limb muscle function between jump gait and crouch gait by quantifying the potential of key lower-limb muscles to accelerate the body's center of mass. Our hypotheses were: firstly, that there would be significant differences between the two cohorts with abnormal gait patterns when compared with able-bodied counterparts, particularly for those muscles that typically require corrective treatment (e.g., rectus femoris and hamstrings); and secondly, that the potential accelerations in crouch and jump gait would differ most significantly for the ankle-spanning muscles, because ankle position is the main differentiating factor between these patterns.
Section snippets
Methods
Eighteen subjects diagnosed with spastic diplegic CP (eight with crouch gait, aged 12.3 ± 2.2 years; ten with jump gait, aged 7.9 ± 1.1 years) and ten able-bodied controls (aged 10.2 ± 1.9 years) participated in this study. The CP subjects were identified from medical records held at the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne, and were classified by an experienced physiotherapist as level II or III under the Gross Motor Function Classification System [19]. The crouch gait and jump gait patterns were
Results
There was no significant difference in walking speeds between the three groups (control, 1.2 ± 0.1 m/s; crouch, 1.1 ± 0.2 m/s; jump, 1.1 ± 0.1 m/s). The sagittal-plane hip and knee angles were similar between jump and crouch gait, but the ankle joint angles differed substantially (Fig. 1). Ankle kinematics in the crouch cohort more closely resembled those of the controls, while ankle kinematics in the jump gait cohort were distinctly different. There was an increased hip extension moment in mid-stance
Discussion
We quantified the potential of lower-limb muscles to accelerate the body's center of mass during normal gait, crouch gait and jump gait. There were significant differences (p < 0.017) between crouch gait and normal gait for many of the lower-limb muscles, and likewise between jump gait and normal gait, supporting our first hypothesis (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Table 1). Several muscles that are commonly targeted for treatment in the CP population displayed significant differences from their
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence their work.
Acknowledgments
Financial support was provided by the Australian Research Council under Discovery Project Grant DP0878705, the National Health and Medical Research Council through the Centre for Clinical Research Excellence in Gait Analysis and Gait Rehabilitation (Gait CCRE), and a VESKI Innovation Fellowship awarded to M.G.P.
References (29)
- et al.
Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements
Clin Biomech
(2007) - et al.
Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking
Gait Posture
(2003) - et al.
Muscle force redistributes segmental power for body progression during walking
Gait Posture
(2004) - et al.
Muscles that support the body also modulate forward progression during walking
J Biomech
(2006) - et al.
Muscle contributions to support and progression during single-limb stance in crouch gait
J Biomech
(2010) - et al.
Muscular contributions to hip and knee extension during the single limb stance phase of normal gait: a framework for investigating the causes of crouch gait
J Biomech
(2005) - et al.
Crouched postures reduce the capacity of muscles to extend the hip and knee during the single-limb stance phase of gait
J Biomech
(2008) - et al.
The effect of excessive tibial torsion on the capacity of muscles to extend the hip and knee during single-limb stance
Gait Posture
(2007) - et al.
Accuracy of generic musculoskeletal models in predicting the functional roles of muscles in human gait
J Biomech
(2011) - et al.
Muscle-induced accelerations at maximum activation to assess individual muscle capacity during movement
J Biomech
(2009)