Thinking outside the boxChallenging clinical paradigms of common bile duct diameter
Section snippets
Disclosure
The authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
References (13)
What is the upper limit of normal for the common bile duct on ultrasound: how much do you want it to be?
Am J Gastroenterol
(2000)- et al.
Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction
HPB (Oxford)
(2006) The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis
Gastrointest Endosc
(2010)Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size
Radiology
(1979)- et al.
Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct
J Ultrasound Med
(2003) - et al.
Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size in normal adult patients and following cholecystectomy
Eur J Radiol
(1981)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (6)
Managing Gallstone Disease in the Elderly
2021, Clinics in Geriatric MedicineStandardization of common bile duct size using ultrasound in pediatric patients
2019, Journal of Pediatric SurgeryArtificial neural network predicts the need for therapeutic ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis
2014, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyCitation Excerpt :The same 7-mm cutoff of CBD diameter on US was also suggested as usable by Sarli et al8; LeBedis30 also reported that CDL may be considered when dilation of the CBD greater than 8 mm is present on US or CT. One of the recent studies on the dilemmas regarding the pathological threshold of CBD diameter31 advocated that the CBD diameter is best expressed and most clinically useful as an age-related variable. With diameters between 3 and 10 mm, the probability of CBD stones increases in an approximately linear fashion with an increasing CBD diameter and is modified by clinical presentation and the patient’s age.
Management of choledocholithiasis
2015, Acute Cholecystitis
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.