Original articleClinical endoscopyEffect of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an instrumental variable analysis
Section snippets
Overview
We first identified persons aged 50 to 74 years in Ontario who received health care from the same PCP from 1996 to 2000. We then determined whether each patient underwent a colonoscopy for any reason during this 5-year period. Because we were interested in characterizing PCPs' use of colonoscopy, we linked each participant to a PCP, and the intensity of colonoscopy use for each PCP was measured. To obtain an estimate of each PCP's inclination to use colonoscopy in apparent “screening”
Results
Of the 2,900,321 screen-eligible Ontario residents aged 50 to 74 years during the period from 1996 to 2000, 85.7% could be linked to a PCP. Of these, 73.8% had the same PCP over 5 years, and 73.1% had at least 2 years of continuous care from the same PCP. The study cohort was made up of 1,089,998 persons who were alive and free of CRC on January 1, 2001, and whose PCPs sent at least 3% of his or her linked patients for colonoscopy (Fig. 1). The mean age of patients was 62 years, and 54.9% were
Discussion
By using instrumental variable methods to estimate the effectiveness of colonoscopy in the prevention of CRC among persons aged 50 to 74 years, we found that use of colonoscopy was associated with a relative 7-year decrease in CRC incidence of 48% and a relative 5-year decrease in CRC death of 81%. Increasing the rate of colonoscopy in the population—even among people who may not have a clinical indication for colonoscopy—has the potential to make a substantial impact on CRC incidence and
References (46)
Colonoscopy
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am
(2000)- et al.
Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of GastroenterologyAmerican College of Gastroenterology
Am J Gastroenterol
(2000) - et al.
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology
Gastroenterology
(2008) - et al.
Cost effectiveness of colonoscopy, based on the appropriateness of an indication
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2008) - et al.
Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007
Am J Prev Med
(2009) - et al.
The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer
Gastroenterology
(2010) Canadian Cancer Statistics 2010, CCS/NCIC, Toronto, Canada
Public Health Canada Statistics
- et al.
Colorectal cancer screening clinical practice guidelines
J Natl Compr Canc Netw
(2006) - et al.
Colorectal cancer screening: a guide to the guidelines
Rev Gastroenterol Disord
(2007)
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy
N Engl J Med
Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer: a case-control study among veterans
Arch Intern Med
Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Digestive Health Foundation: Guidelines on colon cancer screening
Can J Gastroenterol
Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population
JAMA
Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer
Ann Intern Med
Association between colonoscopy rates and colorectal cancer mortality
Am J Gastroenterol
Social disparities in the use of colonoscopy by primary care physicians in Ontario
BMC Gastroenterol
Use of bowel procedures in Ontario: ICES Atlas
Frequency of colorectal cancer screening and the impact of family physicians on screening behaviour
CMAJ
Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods
JAMA
Use of instrumental variables in the presence of heterogeneity and self-selection: an application to treatments of breast cancer patients
Health Econ
Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality?Analysis using instrumental variables
JAMA
Cited by (0)
DISCLOSURE: This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Colon Cancer Canada. The study was supported by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this article are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES or the Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Nancy Baxter holds the Cancer Care Ontario Health Services Research Chair and an Early Researchers Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation. No other financial relationships relevant to this publication were disclosed.