The future nexus of the Brahmaputra River Basin: Climate, water, energy and food trajectories
Introduction
Advance knowledge of conflicting trajectories of transboundary water resources development at a basin scale is highly relevant for national and international policy making. While military conflict may or may not arise as a result of conflicting water resources development plans (Gleick, 2011, Wolf, 2007), without coordination it is unsurprising that such plans may exceed the available water resources of a basin and not achieve desired objectives of riparian countries. In particular, concerns that the multiple uses of water (e.g., for energy and food production) may overlap and lead to unanticipated consequences for one sector or another, popularly referred to as a “nexus,” may be especially vexing in rapidly developing transboundary basins.
The Brahmaputra River Basin (BRB) in South Asia is such a basin, with development of new hydropower/water diversion projects and possible climate changes introducing concerns among riparian countries about future water supply for energy and food production (Ray et al., 2014). The Brahmaputra (also called the Yarlung Tsangpo in China and the Jamuna in Bangladesh) has a total drainage area of about 570,000 km2. Its main stem and tributaries flow through four countries: China, India, Bhutan and Bangladesh (Fig. 1). It is the foundation of water, energy and food for an estimated 130 million people living within the basin, and since the river flows through some of the most highly disputed areas in South Asia, the potential for riparian conflicts of interest over water resources development is significant. For the Brahmaputra River’s water resources that have been largely undeveloped, conflicts of interest have so far taken the form of downstream states’ objections to the proposed water-related plans of upstream states. Now that upstream states are enacting water development plans, these plans have a potential for increasing conflict between states. For example, ten dams comprising six gigawatts (GW) of hydropower generating capacity are currently under construction in the basin (Rahaman, 2012). Both China and India are evaluating the potential effects of transboundary water diversions made for use both inside and outside of the BRB. Bhutan is rapidly developing its hydropower resources, in partnership with India. Bangladesh is eager to gain greater protection from monsoon floods, and secure water resources for the agricultural irrigation.
To better understand the interconnection of water, energy and food security and reduce the conflicts of interest among riparian countries, “nexus thinking” has been suggested by several previous studies (Biggs et al., 2015, Rasul, 2014, Rasul and Sharma, 2015, Scott et al., 2015). First conceived by the World Economic Forum (WEF, 2011), nexus thinking is advocated as an advance on current and often sector-focused governance of natural resource use. It aims to link water, energy and food together systematically and provide tools to increase resource use efficiency. It ensures policy coherence and coordination across sectors and stakeholders to build synergies and generate co-benefits (Rasul and Sharma, 2015). In South Asia, Rasul (2014) pointed out the limited efforts to understanding the spatial and regional dimensions of the water-energy-food (WEF) nexus in the Himalayan region, and argued that proactive decision-making supported by water resources system models is needed for the development of the region's water resources. Rasul and Sharma (2015) suggested switching from sectoral-focused policy approaches to a nexus approach focusing on policy coherence among sectors.
As summarized by Scott et al. (2015) there are three aspects of institutional performance to be examined when pivoting from a sectoral approach to policy-making toward a nexus approach: (1) institutional levels (or spatial scales), from household to multinational; (2) institutional functions, which foster social consensus, enabling increased economic production and administrating laws and regulations justly; and (3) considering higher human needs of esteem and self-actualization. International water treaties are good entry points to examine the institutional dimensions of the WEF nexus. These treaties usually address the questions of institutional levels and functions. Although transboundary waters in the South Asian river basins have led to international water treaties, such as the 1996 Ganges Water treaty between Bangladesh and India, the 1996 Mahakali treaty between India and Nepal, and the 1960 Indus Water Treaty between India and Pakistan, no multilateral or basin-wide international treaty has yet been established on the use of BRB waters (Uprety and Salman, 2011). We argue that nexus thinking, which includes the international level of cooperative management actions and addresses the socioeconomic needs of different riparian countries would be the first step in the formation of an international water treaty on BRB waters.
When developing an institutional framework for WEF nexus-based policy making, the impacts of change generally, and climate change in particular, must be explicitly addressed. Responses to climate change in the BRB can be distinguished according to the different hydrologic regimes within the basin: snow/glacier melt-dominated in the upper part (mostly the mountainous areas of China, India and Bhutan), and monsoon rainfall in the lower part (mostly the floodplains of India and Bangladesh). While there are numerous studies of the region’s historical and future climate, a great deal of uncertainty remains (Annamalai et al., 2007, Yang et al., 2008, NRC, 2012, Pithan, 2013). There is general agreement between observed and projected increases in temperature (Gao et al., 2008, Xu et al., 2009). And the retreat of glaciers in the region has been attributed to the increasing temperature (Yao, 2008, Eriksson et al., 2009, Bajracharya and Shrestha, 2011). However, while projections of future climate have tilted toward increasing precipitation (Li et al., 2010, Turner and Annamalai, 2012, Menon et al., 2013), analysis of observed precipitation indicates decreasing trends (Jain and Kumar, 2012; Deka et al., 2013). Given that the physical processes that drive the South Asian Monsoon are not completely understood (Beniston et al., 1997, Annamalai et al., 2007, Yang et al., 2008) and not fully represented in global/regional climate models, interpretation of climate projections as deterministic limits on the range of future climate change is not warranted (Stainforth et al., 2007, Brown and Wilby, 2012).
Assessing the joint impacts of development and climate change on the WEF nexus in the BRB requires careful consideration and simulation of both physical processes and institutional decision-making. This study presents a modeling framework combining physically-based hydrologic modeling, hydro-economic modeling, and ex post scenario analysis within a decision-scaling framework (Brown, 2010) to elicit the conditions under which development trajectories conflict and where they align. Trajectories represent the transient nature of both climate change and development and highlight the delayed nature of conflicts that is invoked by decisions made in the present. Policy-relevant, ex post scenario analysis (Groves and Lempert, 2007) allows problematic scenarios to emerge from the analysis and is used in response to the degree of uncertainty associated with future climate and changes in other factors. This proposed modeling framework quantifies the WEF nexus under these uncertainties and addresses the institutional dimension by targeting the concern of increasing economic production and fostering social consensus at international level.
Section snippets
Methodology
The effects of climate change and development choices on the use of water resources in the BRB are explored with a coupled modeling framework using ex post scenario analysis. The first modeling part is based on a physically-based hydrologic model applied to the spatially distributed basin system, in which the hydrological water cycles are simulated at a daily temporal scale. The modeled streamflow is used as an input to drive the second model, a water resources system model, which takes into
Uncertainty framework
Scenario-led analyses make prejudgments regarding possible future scenarios that are overconfident and thus prejudice the study results (Brown, 2010). To address a highly uncertain future with potential planning conflicts that cannot be entirely anticipated, this study explores a wide ranging ensemble of future conditions related to climate change and development. In this way, all problematic scenarios can be uncovered using ex post scenario analysis. The problematic scenarios can later be
Model evaluation
We evaluate models (HYMOD_DS and BRAHEMO) performances by fitting the outcomes to historical record. Example parameters that can be adjusted to fit the historical conditions are maximum soil moisture storage, channel routing and diffusivity and wave velocity, and temperature threshold for snow/glacier melting in HYMOD_DS and crop water productivity coefficient, irrigation efficiency, and hydropower generation efficiency in BRAHEMO.
The performance of the HYMOD_DS is evaluated based on the
Likelihood of basin trajectories
In this section, we discuss the likelihood of changes. We have avoided discussion of likelihood to this point, as it is not immediately relevant to the analysis of WEF nexus vulnerabilities, and can prove a distraction from the establishment of performance thresholds. However, if risks are understood to be a function of impact and probability (Dessai and Hulme, 2004), then risks of water, energy and food security cannot be communicated without at least a general sense for the likelihood of
Conclusion
Advance knowledge of policy/institutional dimensions of natural and social drivers’ impacts on transboundary WEF nexus are highly relevant for national and international policy making. We demonstrate how to apply a coupled modeling framework with an ex post scenario analysis to establish such a knowledge platform to examine institutional dimensions of the WEF nexus (institutional level and functions by Scott et al., 2015) and inform policy making using the Brahmaputra River Basin as an example.
Acknowledgements
The work has been supported financially by the World Bank project: Hydro-economic modeling of the Brahmaputra and Kabul River. Authors want to thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the earlier version of the manuscript. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank. All input data used for both hydrologic model (precipitation, temperature and glacier coverage, etc.) and system model (water use,
References (73)
Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: a perspective on livelihoods
Environ. Sci. Policy
(2015)- et al.
A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios
Glob. Environ. Change Hum. Policy Dimens.
(2007) - et al.
Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world
Glob. Environ. Change Hum. Policy Dimens.
(2013) Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects
J. Hydrol.
(2009)Downscaled climate change projections with uncertainty assessment over India using a high resolution multi-model approach
Sci. Total Environ.
(2013)- et al.
Wavelet analysis of precipitation in the middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo River from 1957 to 2007?
J. Meteorol. Environ.
(2010) - et al.
River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part 1. A discussion of principles
J. Hydrol.
(1970) Food, water and energy security in South Asia: a nexus perspective from the Hindu Kush Himalayan region
Environ. Sci. Policy
(2014)- et al.
Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments
J. Hydrol.
(2013) Multi-factor impact analysis of agricultural production in Bangladesh with climate change
Glob. Environ. Change Hum. Policy Dimens.
(2013)
Guide to the Indus Basin Model Revised
Groundwater use for irrigation and its productivity: status and opportunities for crop intensification for food security in Bangladesh
Water Resour. Manag.
South Asian Summer Monsoon and its relationship with ENSO in the IPCC AR4 simulations
J. Clim.
Streamflow simulation using remotely sensed rainfall data: Brahmaputra river
The Status of Glaciers in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region
Climatic change at high elevation sites: an overview
Clim. Change
An alternate approach to assessing climate risks
EOS
Decision scaling: linking bottom-up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector
Water Resour. Res.
The future of water resources systems analysis: toward a scientific framework for sustainable water management
Water Resour. Res.
Ground Water Year Book—India, 2011–2012
Environmental Impact Assessment for 1750 MW Demwe Lower HE Project. Arunachal Pradesh
Environmental Impact and Management Plan for Lower Siang HE Project. Arunachal Pradesh
Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities?
Clim. Policy
Issues of Efficiency and Interdependence in Water Resource Investments: Lessons from the Indus Basin of Pakistan
The Changing Himalayas: Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources and Livelihoods in the Greater Himalayas
Impact of climate change on the streamflow of the lower Brahmaputra: trends in high and low flows based on discharge-weighted ensemble modeling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Application of a distributed hydrological model for the Yarlung Zangbo River and analysis of the river runoff
J. China Hydrol.
The world’s water
An estimate of global glacier volume
Cryosphere
Climate change and water availability in the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna Basin: impact on local crop production and policy directives
Research Insights on Climate and Water in the Hindu Kush Himalayas
Trend analysis of rainfall and temperature data for India
Curr. Sci.
Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches
Risk Anal.
Cited by (91)
Synthetic modeling to manage the nexus of food, energy, and water systems under uncertainty: The case of the Columbia River Basin
2024, Computers and Industrial EngineeringFIND: A Synthetic weather generator to control drought Frequency, Intensity, and Duration
2024, Environmental Modelling and SoftwareModeling the water-energy-food-environment nexus and transboundary cooperation opportunity in the Brahmaputra River Basin
2023, Journal of Hydrology: Regional StudiesWater-energy-food nexus of local bioeconomy hub and future climate change impact implication
2023, Journal of Cleaner ProductionWater-energy-food nexus in the Yarlung Tsangpo-Brahmaputra River Basin: Impact of mainstream hydropower development
2023, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies