Guatemala: The economic burden of illness and health system implications
Introduction
This paper has two goals. The first is to describe the economic burden of ill health on Guatemala's population and to highlight the characteristics of its health sector that likely explains this burden. Our focus on Guatemala derives from the fact that it is the country with the highest population in Central America, and among the poorest in the Latin America and Caribbean region. With a population of about 13 million, Guatemala accounts for nearly one-third of the seven countries that comprise Central America. The share of its population living below the poverty line of $1.25 (PPP adjusted) is considerably greater than the average of 8% for Latin America and the Caribbean region as a whole so that Guatemalans are likely to be more vulnerable to the financial impact of health shocks, whether in the form of out of pocket spending, or income losses. This risk is further underlined by its relatively low levels of government spending, as a share of GDP, on health in the country – at 1.9% of GDP, public spending on health in Guatemala is the second lowest in the Latin American and Caribbean region [1], [2]. The second goal is to use recent health reform efforts in several developing countries to highlight lessons that Guatemalan policymakers can use to formulate strategies to address the economic consequences of ill health for their population.
This paper contributes to an emerging literature in poor countries that links health system characteristics to the risk to their populations of catastrophic levels of spending on health and of falling into poverty on account of ill health [3], [4]. Much of this literature has focused on Asia, and the paper helps fill an important gap in the literature on the economic burden of ill health and its links to health system characteristics by analyzing the case of a major Central American country. To be sure, this is not the first analysis to focus on the Guatemalan health system. In recent work, Macq et al. [5] analyzed the impact of public sector contracting of external health care providers on equity and efficiency in the provision of publicly funded health care, and more generally, on governance in the public sector in Guatemala. The authors concluded that contracting in Guatemala may have had a positive impact on equitable provision of health services, but negatively on efficiency. Another study found that close to 40% of Guatemalans do not have ‘access’ to health care services or pensions and most of these fall into the category of poor or extreme poor [6]. However, we believe ours is the first paper to undertake a careful examination of illness-related economic outcomes in Guatemala and health system factors that likely explain these outcomes, along with associated policy implications.
We find a high level of financial burden due to ill health on Guatemala's population as well as an inequitable distribution of this burden. Both the size and the distribution of this burden are linked to health system characteristics that are described in the next section, including a low level of insurance coverage and a heavy concentration of the uninsured among the economically worse-off and rural populations. The situation is likely exacerbated by the poor quality and low levels of physical access of subsidized public services to the poor. There is also some evidence of rising treatment costs over time for hospital stays. A key finding is that even though overall health expenditures are financed primarily by the rich, a combination of low access to public services and relatively low ability to bear even small levels of spending by the poor leaves them highly susceptible to catastrophic financial implications of ill health and impoverishment. We conclude by drawing upon lessons emerging from the recent efforts of several developing countries that have sought to address similar challenges.
Section snippets
Guatemalan Health Care System
In order to understand the financial implications of ill health that will be discussed below, we first describe the main features of the Guatemalan health care financing system, insurance coverage and access. In Sections 4 Results, 5 Discussion we will analyze how these components are driving adverse economic outcomes of ill health.
Materials and methods
The quantitative analysis of the economic impact of ill health reported in this paper is based primarily on the 2000 and 2006 Living Standard Measurement Surveys (LSMS or Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Vida). The LSMS data is used to estimate health and consumption spending as well as examine variables indicating access to health care. We began by estimating the share of different income groups in health financing, using a version of the methods used in Wagstaff and Doorslaer [14],
Results
Table 4 describes the share of households belonging to the top and bottom income quartiles in the financing of health in Guatemala. The data presented show that the poor contribute less to total spending relative to their incomes, and the rich contribute considerably more to health spending than their incomes; and that if anything, the situation improved for the poorer households between 2000 and 2006. Specifically, the results show that inequality in spending by quartile has improved slightly
Discussion
Here we highlight some of the lessons from other countries that Guatemalan policymakers can usefully apply to address the adverse economic consequences of ill health in their population. We present cases of major middle-income and developing countries that have faced circumstances similar to Guatemala and have devised innovative financing and payment mechanisms to address them particularly the health care and financial risk protection needs of their rural populations and informal sector workers
Conclusion
Analyses of the economic burden of ill health and its links to health system characteristics have not been routinely conducted in poorer countries in Latin America. Guatemala provides an excellent environment to study catastrophic payments and their link to health system indicators due to the availability of data for both 2000 and 2006 from the LSMS. Analysis of the two LSMS surveys shows that Guatemala has a high and inequitable level of out of pocket payments for health care with the
Acknowledgements
We thank our counterparts in Guatemala for their help and comments, especially Felix Alvarado, Walter Flores, Gustavo Estrada Galinda and Ricardo Valladares, and Thomas Bossert from the Harvard School of Public Health.
References (26)
- et al.
Effect of payments for health care on poverty estimates in 11 countries in Asia: an analysis of household survey data
Lancet
(2006) - et al.
Public purchasers contracting external primary care providers in Central America for better responsiveness, efficiency of health care and public governance: issues and challenges
Health Policy
(2008) - et al.
Progressivity, horizontal equity and reranking in health care finance: a decomposition analysis for the Netherlands
Journal of Health Economics
(1997) - et al.
Equity in the finance of health care: some further international comparisons
Journal of Health Economics
(1999) - et al.
The redistributive effect of health care finance in twelve OECD countries
Journal of Health Economics
(1999) - et al.
Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Priority setting for health interventions in Mexico's System of Social Protection in Health
Lancet
(2006) - Estrada Galindo G. El Sistema de Salud en Guatemala: Sintesis. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarollo; 2008...
- World Bank. World Development...
Poverty and health: defeating poverty by going to the roots
Development: Poverty
(2007)
Financiamiento de la protección social en salud y pensiones en Guatemala
Cited by (22)
Freedom of choice, expressions of gratitude: Patient experiences of short-term surgical missions in Guatemala
2018, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :Government investment in surgical infrastructure has been suboptimal. Patient access to surgical care is limited by geographic barriers, ethnic/linguistic discrimination, inequitable coverage, service delivery disruptions, and general confusion over where and how to seek care in an ever-changing health landscape of public, private, and philanthropic sector resources (Bowser and Mahal, 2010; Chary, 2015; Nguyen et al., 2013; Paxtor, 2015). Two separate external assessments of a subset of national hospitals found inadequate equipment (Merchant et al., 2015) and failure to meet basic surgical standards (Knowlton et al., 2017) as primary barriers to surgical care delivery.
A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations and Budget Impact Analyses to Inform Healthcare Decision-Making in Central America
2023, Applied Health Economics and Health PolicyA retrospective analysis of emergency department usage in rural and semi-urban indigenous Guatemalan populations
2022, Healthcare in Low-Resource SettingsStructural competency and global health education
2022, Global Public HealthOut-of-pocket costs for facility-based obstetrical care in rural guatemala
2021, Annals of Global Health
- 1
Tel.: +61 3 9903 0028.