Original ArticleTelevision Viewing Time and 13-year Mortality in Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: Data from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)
Introduction
Adults in the general population spend more than half of their waking hours engaged in sedentary behaviours [1]. Sedentary behaviour refers to any waking behaviour characterised by low energy expenditure while in a sitting or reclining posture [2] and is a distinct behavioural entity from insufficient physical activity (PA) [3]. While more sophisticated measures of sedentary behaviour are now available [4], early studies in this area typically used television (TV) viewing as a marker of sedentary behaviour [5], [6]. Television viewing occupies a large amount of adults’ leisure time [7] and is particularly prevalent in older adults, who typically watch between three and five hours of TV per day [8]. High TV viewing is associated with low household income, low education, poor self-rated health [9], and the consumption of energy-dense snack foods [10].
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide [11]. People who survive an acute event are at an increased risk of a subsequent event and premature death [12]. Physical activity is a unique form of treatment and management for CVD because it contributes to lowering physiological risk factors [13], [14], reducing premature all-cause and cardiac-related mortality [15] and morbidity [16], and improving quality of life and psychological wellbeing [17]. Adults with CVD are less likely to engage in sufficient PA than the general population [18], [19]. Emerging evidence suggests that people with CVD engage in more sedentary behaviour than those without CVD [18], [19]. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the prevalence of sedentary behaviour in Australians with CVD.
Over the past decade, research in the general adult population has consistently shown an association between TV viewing time and poor health outcomes, independent of PA levels. Excessive TV viewing is associated with increased risk of all-cause [5], [20], [21], [22] and CVD [5], [21], [22] mortality as well as higher morbidity, including higher rates of CVD [5], [20], [22], [23], [24], type 2 diabetes [25] and depression [26], independent of confounding factors such as age [27], [28], lower education levels [29], [30], [31], [32], smoking [31], higher waist circumference/body mass index (BMI) [31], serum triglycerides [5], blood pressure [5], total cholesterol [5], high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [5] and PA [31]. Even adults who meet the minimum PA recommendations remain at risk of poorer health if they spend excessive amounts of time engaged in TV viewing [22], [27], [33].
To ensure results are not biased by the presence of illness categories, the majority of population-based studies of sedentary behaviour and health have excluded people with established CVD [5], [20], [21], [22]. In a large population study of Australian adults, Van der Ploeg and colleagues [34] found consistent associations, independent of PA levels, between self-reported sitting time and all-cause mortality among healthy participants and also among those with pre-existing CVD, diabetes mellitus and overweight/obesity. While these findings highlight the importance of investigating not only healthy but also chronically ill populations, the impact of sedentary behaviour on mortality risk in adults with existing CVD is unknown.
The present study replicates the approach used in the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study with the sub-sample of patients with self-reported CVD who were excluded from the original study [5]. The primary aim was to investigate the association between TV viewing time and 13-year all-cause mortality. Television viewing was used in the original AusDiab study as the indicator of sedentary behaviour. The secondary aims were to examine the amount of time spent in TV viewing among people with CVD and to characterise high versus low TV viewers according to sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, medical conditions and cardiometabolic health outcomes.
Section snippets
Population and Procedure
Participants were part of a national population-based cohort of men and women from the AusDiab study which was designed to evaluate the national prevalence of diabetes and related risk factors. The study included three rounds of data collection: baseline (1999-2000); phase 2 (2004-2005); and phase 3 (2011-2012). The methods for the baseline AusDiab study have been described in full elsewhere [35]. In brief, the original study sample was drawn from 42 randomly selected urban and non-urban areas
Descriptive Characteristics
Cardiovascular disease participants spent an average of 143.5 mins/d (SD=97.3) watching TV. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the sample in relation to categories of TV viewing time. Participants who watched more TV were older (P<0.05) and less educated (P<0.01), had lower household incomes (P<0.001), higher systolic blood pressure and BMI, and were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (all P<0.05).
Association of TV Viewing Time and PA with All-cause Mortality
During the median follow-up period of 13.0 years, 294 participants (183 men and 111
Discussion
This is the first study to examine sedentary behaviour and all-cause mortality in a CVD population. Excessive TV viewing time, used here as a marker of sedentary behaviour, was associated with an increased risk of 13-year all-cause mortality, independent of leisure-time PA level. Almost half (48%) of the 609 participants died from any cause over the 13-year follow-up period. After controlling for potential confounding variables such as age, education, household income, smoking, BMI and lipid
Conflict of Interest Disclosures
None.
Acknowledgements and Funding Sources
The collection of this data was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant (233200) and by in-kind support from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, which collected the mortality data. In addition, the AusDiab study has received financial support from the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Abbott Australasia, Alphapharm, AstraZeneca, Aventis Pharma, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, City Health Centre Diabetes
References (51)
- et al.
Screen-Based Entertainment Time, All-Cause Mortality, and Cardiovascular Events Population-Based Study With Ongoing Mortality and Hospital Events Follow-Up
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
(2011) - et al.
Identifying Subgroups of U.S. Adults at Risk for Prolonged Television Viewing to Inform Program Development
Am J Prev Med
(2010) - et al.
Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Am J Med
(2004) - et al.
Screen-Based Entertainment Time, All-Cause Mortality, and Cardiovascular Events Population-Based Study With Ongoing Mortality and Hospital Events Follow-Up
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2011) - et al.
Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors and cause-specific mortality in US adults
Am J Clin Nutr
(2012) - et al.
Relationship of sedentary behavior and physical activity to incident cardiovascular disease: results from the Women's Health Initiative
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2013) - et al.
Maintaining physical activity among older adults: 24-month outcomes of the Keep Active Minnesota randomized controlled trial
Preventive Medicine
(2010) - et al.
The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)–methods and response rates
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
(2002) - et al.
Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveys
J Sci Med Sport
(2004) - et al.
Reproducibility and validity of the Diet Quality Index Revised as assessed by use of a food-frequency questionnaire
Am J Clin Nutr
(2003)
Accuracy of the Australian National Death Index: comparison with adjudicated fatal outcomes among Australian participants in the Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study
Aust N Z J Public Health
Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003-06
European Heart Journal
Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Environmental determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior
Exerc Sport Sci Rev
Methods of Measurement in epidemiology: Sedentary Behaviour
International Journal of Epidemiology
Television Viewing Time and Mortality The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)
Circulation
Is Television Viewing Time a Marker of a Broader Pattern of Sedentary Behavior?
Ann Behav Med
The Association of Television Viewing With Snacking Behavior and Body Weight of Young Adults
Am J Health Prom
Effects of exercise and stress management training on markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with ischemic heart disease: a randomized controlled trial
JAMA
The underlying risk of death after myocardial infarction in the absence of treatment
Arch Intern Med
Physical Activity and Exercise Recommendations for Stroke Survivors A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
Stroke
Physical activity and mortality in men and women with coronary heart disease: a prospective population-based cohort study in Norway (the HUNT study)
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil
Exercise, depression, and mortality after myocardial infarction in the ENRICHD trial
Med Sci Sports Exerc
The long-term benefits of cardiac rehabilitation on depression, anxiety, physical activity and quality of life
J Clin Nurs
Cited by (21)
Sedentary behavior, physical inactivity, abdominal obesity and obesity in adults and older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2022, Clinical Nutrition ESPENCitation Excerpt :PI was defined as an insufficient amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (i.e. failure to meet specific guidelines for physical activity) [29]. SB refers to any behavior characterized by a low energy expenditure or energy expenditure of ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs) while sitting or lying down [29,30]. All duplicate articles were removed.
Association of number of bites and eating speed with energy intake: Wearable technology results under free-living conditions
2021, AppetiteCitation Excerpt :The mixed evidence may be partially explained by differences in capturing eating speed; whereas previous studies measured eating speed in controlled environments without visual confirmation of the eating speed, our study used wearable cameras in free-living conditions. Our findings were plausible given that the slowest eating episodes most likely occurred during screen time, a type of distraction associated with higher energy intake (Mekhmoukh, Chapelot, & Bellisle, 2012; Temple, Giacomelli, Kent, Roemmich, & Epstein, 2007), poorer food choice (Shang et al., 2015; Trofholz, Tate, Loth, Neumark-Sztainer, & Berge, 2019), and obesity (Rogerson et al., 2016). Association between reduced eating speed and higher calorie intake may be attributed to greater distractions during the eating episode and, consequently, a longer eating duration (Barrington & Beresford, 2019).
Effect of seat thickness on peak femoral vein velocity
2021, International Journal of Industrial ErgonomicsCitation Excerpt :Sedentary habits, including prolonged sitting, are associated with many health disorders, including low back pain, diabetes, stroke, and coronary artery disease (Lis et al., 2007; Zemp et al., 2016; Thorp et al., 2011; Hamilton et al., 2008; Warren et al., 2010; Rogerson et al., 2016; Wilmot et al., 2012).
High sedentary behaviour and low physical activity levels at 12 months after cardiac rehabilitation: A prospective cohort study
2020, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineCitation Excerpt :A recent meta-analysis of 1 million participants suggested that a threshold > 7 hr (self-reported) and 9 hr (objective measures) of sedentary time was associated with poor health [10]. Rogerson et al. examined the association between sedentary behaviour and all-cause mortality in people with CVD (n = 609), with television viewing time used as a marker of sedentary behaviour [11]: as compared with watching < 2 hr/day, watching ≥ 4 hr/day of television increased all-cause mortality 52%. Therefore, physical activity and also sedentary time must be considered in the secondary prevention of CVD.
Making an Impact: A New Research Prize for Heart, Lung and Circulation
2017, Heart Lung and CirculationTelevision Viewing Time and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
2017, Heart Lung and Circulation
- 1
(formerly known as the Heart Research Centre)