Position Statement

Position Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Familial Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a condition involving dilation of cardiac chambers, which results in contraction impairment. Besides invasive and non-invasive diagnostic procedures, cardiac biomarkers are of great importance in both diagnosis and prognosis of the disease. These biomarkers are categorized into three groups based on their site; cardiomyocyte biomarkers, microenvironmental biomarkers and macroenvironmental biomarkers.

In this review, an overview of characteristics, epidemiology, etiology and clinical manifestations of DCM is provided. In addition, the most important biomarkers, of all three categories, and their diagnostic and prognostic values are discussed.

Considering the association of DCM with conditions such as infections and autoimmunity, which are prevalent among the population, introducing efficient diagnostic tools is of high value for the early detection of DCM to prevent its severe complications. The three discussed classes of biomarkers are potential candidates for the detection of DCM. However, further studies are necessary in this regard.

The genetic basis for a number of heart diseases is increasingly understood. Genetic testing forms a key aspect of management of families with inherited cardiomyopathies, and at present the utility is largely the ability to perform cascade genetic testing of at-risk relatives. Here we provide an overview of current knowledge and practice for many of these conditions, including case examples highlighting challenging clinical scenarios and finally provide future directions for the field.

Advances in human genome sequencing have re-invigorated genetics studies of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), facilitating genetic testing and clinical applications. With a range of genetic testing options now available, new challenges arise for data interpretation and identifying single pathogenic variants from the many thousands of rare variants present in every individual. There is accumulating evidence that genetic factors have an important role in the pathogenesis of DCM. However, although more than 100 genes have been implicated to date, the sensitivity of genetic testing, even in familial disease, is only ∼25–40%. As more patients are genotyped, nuanced information about disease phenotypes is emerging including variability in age of onset and penetrance of DCM, as well as additional cardiac and extra-cardiac features. Genotype-phenotype correlations have also identified a subset of genes that can be highly arrhythmogenic or show frequent progression to heart failure. Recognition of variants in these genes is important as this may impact on the timing of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or heart transplantation. Finding a causative variant in a patient with DCM allows predictive testing of family members and provides an opportunity for preventative intervention. Diagnostic imaging modalities such as speckle-tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are increasingly being used to detect and monitor pre-clinical ventricular dysfunction in asymptomatic variant carriers. Although there are several examples of successful genotype-based therapy, optimal strategies for implementation of precision medicine in familial DCM remain to be determined. Identification of modifiable co-morbidities and lifestyle factors that exacerbate or protect against DCM development in genetically-predisposed individuals remains a key component of family management.

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a heart muscle disease characterized by ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of abnormal loading conditions or coronary artery disease. This cardiac disorder is a major health problem due to its high prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. DCM is a complex disease with a common phenotype but heterogeneous pathological mechanisms. Early etiological diagnosis and prognosis stratification is crucial for the clinical management of the patient. Advances in imaging technology and genetic tests have provided useful tools for clinical practice. Nevertheless, the assessment of the disease remains challenging. Novel noninvasive indicators are still needed to assist in decision-making. microRNAs (miRNAs), a group of small noncoding RNAs, have been identified as key mediators of cell biology. They are found in a stable form in body fluids and their concentration is altered in response to stress. Previous research has suggested that the miRNA signature constitutes a novel source of noninvasive biomarkers for a wide array of cardiovascular diseases. Specifically, several studies have reported the potential role of miRNAs as clinical indicators among the etiologies of DCM. However, this field has not been reviewed in detail. Here, we summarize the evidence of intracellular and circulating miRNAs in DCM and their usefulness in the development of novel diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic approaches, with a focus on DCM etiology. Although the findings are still preliminary, due to methodological and technical limitations and the lack of robust population-based studies, miRNAs constitute a promising tool to assist in the clinical management of DCM.

Precision medicine promises to dramatically improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs through a shift in focus from disease treatment to prevention and individualized therapies. For families with inherited cardiomyopathies, efforts to date have been directed toward discovery and functional characterization of single disease-causing variants. With advances in sequencing, the cataloging of personal genetic variation has been expedited, providing improved insights into the key importance of the genes in which variants occur. These advances have propelled seminal opportunities for successful variant-targeted disease-reversing therapy. New challenges have also emerged—particularly interpretation of the rapidly rising numbers of “variants of unknown significance.” For treatments based on patient genotype to be feasible on a wider scale, these obstacles need to be overcome. Here the authors focus on genetics of dilated cardiomyopathy and provide a roadmap for implementing genomic information into future patient management.

We evaluated genome sequencing (GS) as an alternative to multigene panel sequencing (PS) for genetic testing in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

Forty-two patients with familial DCM underwent PS and GS, and detection rates of rare single-nucleotide variants and small insertions/deletions in panel genes were compared. Loss-of-function variants in 406 cardiac-enriched genes were evaluated, and an assessment of structural variation was performed.

GS provided broader and more uniform coverage than PS, with high concordance for rare variant detection in panel genes. GS identified all PS-identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants as well as two additional likely pathogenic variants: one was missed by PS due to low coverage, the other was a known disease-causing variant in a gene not included on the panel. No loss-of-function variants in the extended gene set met clinical criteria for pathogenicity. One BAG3 structural variant was classified as pathogenic.

Our data support the use of GS for genetic testing in DCM, with high variant detection accuracy and a capacity to identify structural variants. GS provides an opportunity to go beyond suites of established disease genes, but the incremental yield of clinically actionable variants is limited by a paucity of genetic and functional evidence for DCM association.