Original Article
Gaps in the Care of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Australia: First Report From the National Registry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2020.07.012Get rights and content

Background

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is under-diagnosed and under-treated worldwide, including Australia. National registries play a key role in identifying patients with FH, understanding gaps in care and advancing the science of FH to improve care for these patients.

Methods

The FH Australasia Network has established a national web-based registry to raise awareness of the condition, facilitate service planning and inform best practice and care services in Australia. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,528 FH adults enrolled in the registry from 28 lipid clinics.

Results

The mean age at enrolment was 53.4±15.1 years, 50.5% were male and 54.3% had undergone FH genetic testing, of which 61.8% had a pathogenic FH-causing gene variant. Only 14.0% of the cohort were family members identified through cascade testing. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was reported in 28.0% of patients (age of onset 49.0±10.5 years) and 64.9% had at least one modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. The mean untreated LDL-cholesterol was 7.4±2.5 mmol/L. 80.8% of patients were on lipid-lowering therapy with a mean treated LDL-cholesterol of 3.3±1.7 mmol/L. Among patients receiving lipid-lowering therapies, 25.6% achieved an LDL-cholesterol target of <2.5 mmol/L without CAD or <1.8 mmol/L with CAD.

Conclusion

Patients in the national FH registry are detected later in life, have a high burden of CAD and risk factors, and do not achieve guideline-recommended LDL-cholesterol targets. Genetic and cascade testing are under-utilised. These deficiencies in care need to be addressed as a public health priority.

Introduction

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a high-risk condition characterised by elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels that predisposes individuals to premature coronary artery disease (CAD) [1]. FH has been defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a Tier 1 genomic application [2], meaning that it is a preventable cause of premature disease and death with significant potential for a positive impact on public health [2]. FH has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 250 in the general population [3] and 1 in 20 among those with premature CAD [4]. There are an estimated 100,000 individuals with FH in Australia with the vast majority undiagnosed; thus FH is a public health priority.

In 2011, the FH Australasia Network (FHAN) of the Australian Atherosclerosis Society developed a comprehensive model of care for FH which encompasses detection of cases, diagnosis and assessment, management, cascade testing, genetic testing and clinical services for FH [5]. However, this model of care still requires extensive implementation in Australia. A crucial component of the model of care was to deploy a national web-based FH registry [6]. Registries capture real-world clinical practice data that are important not only to raise overall awareness of FH, but also for garnering information for health service planning and for clinical trials, as a means for improving the quality of patient care and outcomes [7,8].

Launched in 2015 in collaboration with FHAN, the Office of Population Health Genomics (Government of Western Australia) and the Centre for Comparative Genomics (Murdoch University) [6], the national FH registry now has an extensive network of clinical sites across Australia [9]. We aimed to describe the characteristics, detection and management patterns of adult FH patients enrolled in the national FH registry to highlight contemporary health care gaps that need to be addressed.

Section snippets

Methods

Eligibility criteria for adult entry into the registry included: a pathogenic gene variant causative of FH, a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria score of ≥6 (Definite/Probable FH) or a DLCN criteria score of ≥3 (Possible FH) with familial elevation of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], as well as all relatives identified via cascade screening with a pathogenic FH gene variant or “Likely” FH according to age and gender-specific LDL-cholesterol cut-offs [10]. The first participant enrolled was

Results

A total of 1,528 adult patients from 28 lipid clinics were included in the study (Figure 1). The demographic, clinical and biochemical characteristics of the cohort are shown in Table 1. The mean age at FH enrolment was 53.4±15.1 years (formal assessment for FH was undertaken 1.7±4.1 years earlier); 50.5% were male, 90.5% Caucasian (6.0% Asian, 2.0% Middle Eastern, 1.5% other ethnicity), 86.0% were index cases and of those that had undergone genetic testing, 61.8%% had a pathogenic FH-causing

Discussion

We provide the first report of adult FH patients in Australia from the FHAN registry. The data described the clinical and management characteristics of a contemporary cohort of FH patients, diagnosed using the DLCN criteria. The present study showed that although the majority of patients are on lipid-lowering therapies, CVD risk remains high, owing in part to a high prevalence of CVD risk factors and LDL-cholesterol targets not being reached.

Among adult FH patients in the FHAN registry, the

Conclusion

These registry data have demonstrated several management gaps in the care of FH in Australia that need to be addressed: (1) FH is detected too late in life, usually after a CAD event; (2) there is under-utilisation of genetic testing of index cases; (3) cascade testing, using cholesterol or genetic testing of family members of affected index cases is rarely employed; (4) the majority of patients do not attain guideline recommended LDL-cholesterol targets; (5) women with FH are receiving less

Funding

The registry received significant in-kind support from members of the FHAN and was also, in part, supported by grants from Amgen, MSD and Sanofi. JP was supported by a WAHTN Early Career Fellowship and the Australian Government’s Medical Research Future Fund.

Disclosures

DRS has received grants from Regeneron, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Amarin, Espirion, and Novartis, as well as personal fees from Amgen and Sanofi.

DLH has received consulting fees, educational grants, research grants or advisory board honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Regeneron, Servier and Vifor.

DMC has received honoraria for advisory boards or research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Pfizer and Sanofi.

TRB has

Acknowledgements

The study was undertaken under the aegis of the FH Australasia Network (FHAN), the Australian Atherosclerosis Society (AAS) Inc. We thank Ms Natasha Whitwell and Ms Annette Pedrotti for their excellent assistance. We also acknowledge the other members of the FHAN registry team: Dr Edmund Brice, A/Prof Elif Ekinci, Dr Shahid Hafeez, A/Prof Christian Hamilton-Craig, Prof Leonard Kritharides, Dr Stephen Li, Dr Michael Metz (deceased), Dr Allison Morton, Dr Shubha Srinivasan and Dr Angela

References (44)

  • D.A. Bell et al.

    Effectiveness of genetic cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia using a centrally co-ordinated clinical service: an Australian experience

    Atherosclerosis

    (2015)
  • A.J. Hooper et al.

    Genetic analysis of familial hypercholesterolaemia in Western Australia

    Atherosclerosis

    (2012)
  • L. Perez de Isla et al.

    Attainment of LDL-cholesterol treatment goals in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: 5-Year SAFEHEART Registry follow-up

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2016)
  • S.M. Amrock et al.

    Health disparities among adult patients with a phenotypic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in the CASCADE-FH™ patient registry

    Atherosclerosis

    (2017)
  • S. Humphries et al.

    Coronary heart disease mortality in treated familial hypercholesterolaemia: Update of the UK Simon Broome FH register

    Atherosclerosis

    (2018)
  • D.C. Chan et al.

    Elevated lipoprotein(a), hypertension and renal insufficiency as predictors of coronary artery disease in patients with genetically confirmed heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

    Int J Cardiol

    (2015)
  • R. Alonso et al.

    Lipoprotein (a) levels in familial hypercholesterolaemia: an important predictor for cardiovascular disease independent of the type of LDL-receptor mutation

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2014)
  • S. Tsimikas et al.

    NHLBI Working Group recommendations to reduce lipoprotein(a)-mediated risk of cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2018)
  • A. Langsted et al.

    High lipoprotein(a) as a possible cause of clinical familial hypercholesterolaemia: a prospective cohort study

    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol

    (2016)
  • D.P. Wilson et al.

    Use of lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: A biomarker whose time has come. A scientific statement from the National Lipid Association

    J Clin Lipidol

    (2019)
  • J. Cegla et al.

    HEART UK Consensus Statement on lipoprotein(a) - a call to action

    Atherosclerosis

    (2019)
  • S.E. Humphries et al.

    Coronary heart disease mortality in severe vs. non-severe familial hypercholesterolaemia in the Simon Broome Register

    Atherosclerosis

    (2019)
  • Cited by (16)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text