The spread of medical fake news in social media – The pilot quantitative study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.03.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Fake, misleading and over-interpreted health news in social media is the potential threat for public health.

  • Top links related to common diseases in 40% cases contained misinformation and were shared 451 272 times in the period 2012–2017.

  • Analyzing social media could contribute to identification and take action on leading web pages polluting medical information.

Abstract

Objectives

Fake news: misinformation and falsehood of health news in social media constitute a potential threat to the public health, but the scope of this issue remains unclear. Our pilot study is an initial attempt to measure a number of the top shared health misinformation stories in the Polish language social media.

Methods

Using the BuzzSumo Application, a range of the top shared health web links in the Polish language social media was assessed during the period between 2012 and 2017. We used the following keywords which were related to the most common diseases and causes of death: cancer, neoplasm, heart attack, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, vaccinations, HIV, and AIDS. Each link was checked for the presence of fake news.

Results

40% of the most frequently shared links contained text we classified as fake news. These were shared more than 450,000 times. The most fallacious content concerned vaccines, while news about cardiovascular diseases was, in general, well sourced and informative. More than 20% of dangerous links from our material was generated by one source.

Conclusions

Analyzing social media top shared news could contribute to identification of leading fake medical information miseducating the society. It might also encourage authorities to take actions such as put warnings on biased domains or scientifically evaluate those generating fake health news.

Introduction

Misinformation concerning health subject is not a new phenomenon - its roots are probably as old as health care itself. In the pre-media era, this problem was centered on the patient-doctor relation and its context [1]. As a result of the radio and television revolutions, and an exponential increase in the global Internet usage, a potential range of harm was brought to a totally new level [2].

Post-truth phase attracted a lot of attention during the United States presidential election in 2016. Afterwards, ‘post-truth’ itself was announced the word of the year by Oxford English Dictionary [3]. The term was getting used more frequently along with ‘fake news’ also in the leading medical journals [3], [4]. It was defined as ‘news that is intentionally false and could mislead readers’ [5]. Two main motives behind fake news were financial and ideological [5]. Public health was confronted with a risk of patients’ exposure to the fallacious and misleading information. It was believed that such a phenomenon might affect health literacy and spread medical conspiracy theories. Indeed, it resulted in behavioral changes and is now emerging as a serious threat to the public health [6], [7]. However, there has not been published many comprehensive analyses concerning this subject yet. Recently, in Poland, as in many other countries, the Internet has consolidated its role as a source of health-related information, easily overtaking other types of media [8]. In response to these rapid changes, we hereby present a pilot study that is an attempt to measure the volume of shares concerning health fake news in the Polish language social media. We investigated most frequently shared articles using keywords related to diseases regarded as the top causes of death in Poland – cerebral stroke, ischemic heart disease, and cancers (together accounting for >60% of total deaths), prevalent chronic diseases – arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus (32% and 9,5% of total population, respectively) and additionally – vaccinations and HIV/AIDS [9].

Section snippets

Methodology

Analysis was performed employing the BuzzSumo Enterprise Application (BuzzSumo Limited, Brighton, United Kingdom) available via its website. ‘BuzzSumo is a social media analytics and curation tool for content marketers. It searches the web for the content based on search queries and reports the enquirer on its success, based upon its social likes and shares’ (https://app.buzzsumo.com). Since BuzzSumo is user-friendly and free of charges, the authors decided to use this tool to make the study

Results

Ultimately, eighty of the most frequently shared pages were reviewed (top 10 in each keyword category). On the whole, Facebook activities accounted for the majority of total shares and engagements (means range: 98–100%). The analyzed topics have attracted public attention with an unequal distribution (total shares, means, in thousands): cancer (34), neoplasm (18), vaccinations (15), heart attack (7), AIDS/HIV (7), hypertension (5), stroke (5) and diabetes (2). The topic most contaminated with

Discussion

Recently, public attention was paid to the presence of the biased health information in media, which can undermine trust in healthcare. Our study is an initial attempt to measure the scale of medical fake news in the Polish social media. Identifying the scale and patterns of its stream, we can put forward some recommendations to the regulatory and policy authorities.

In our material, 40% of the links were assessed as fake news. It is worth pointing out that more than 20% of them were generated

Conclusions

Public health authorities, non-governmental organizations, and their collaborators from the Internet technology sector should consider results of this study as some of our conclusions could be introduced to public health regulations.

Actions could be taken to scientifically evaluate sources of the most frequently shared medical myths. As shown above, some topics were generally free of fake news, whereas others were extremely biased and filled with fallacies. Thus, an extensive educational

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Tomasz Klepinowski who had made style, grammar, and vocabulary corrections.

Author Statements

Funding

No funding was obtained for the purpose of this research.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. All listed authors have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data as well as its interpretation, and agree to its submission.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required as this study did not involve any individuals. No personal data was accessed and it did not put anyone at risk.

References (20)

  • D.L. Davis

    Medical misinformation: communication between outport newfoundland women and their physicians

    Soc Sci Med

    (1984)
  • M. Marmot

    Post-truth and science

    Lancet

    (2017)
  • L. Bode et al.

    See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media

    Health Commun

    (2017)
  • M. McCartney

    Margaret McCartney: evidence in a post-truth world

    BMJ

    (2016)
  • E.C. Tandoc et al.

    Defining ‘fake news’

    Digit J

    (2017)
  • K. Forster

    Revealed: how dangerous fake health news conquered Facebook

    (2017)
  • G. Schwitzer

    Pollution of health news

    BMJ (Br Med J)

    (2017)
  • M.M. Bujnowska-Fedak

    Trends in the use of the Internet for health purposes in Poland

    BMC Public Health

    (2015)
  • Health and health care in 2015

    (2017)
  • Barthel M., Mitchell A., Holcomb J. Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion....
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (271)

  • COVID-19 fake news detection: A hybrid CNN-BiLSTM-AM model

    2023, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text