Microencapsulation of bacteria: A review of different technologies and their impact on the probiotic effects

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2014.09.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The article summarizes the most important and new technologies applied in probiotic encapsulation.

  • An overview of the materials used in these technologies is given, paying special attention to advantages and disadvantages.

  • Our work is the first time that a review described the results obtained using encapsulated probiotic in various pathologies.

Abstract

Probiotic based products are associated with many health benefits. However, the main problem is the low survival of these microorganisms in food products and in gastrointestinal tract. Providing probiotics with a physical barrier is an efficient approach to protect microorganisms and to deliver them into the gut. In our opinion, microencapsulation is one of the most efficient methods, and has been under especial consideration and investigation. However, there are still many challenges to overcome with respect to the microencapsulation process. This review focuses mainly on the methodological approach of probiotic encapsulation including materials and results obtained using encapsulated probiotic in food matrices and different pathologies in animal models.

Industrial relevance

The inclusion of probiotics into food matrices is one of the most challenging lines of research in food technology. Probiotics in general, and some strains in particular, have a low resistance to different environmental conditions, such as oxygen, light or temperature. Thus, the protection and isolation of the microorganism from the food matrix and the environmental condition are crucial for the development of new probiotic food. In this sense, microencapsulation has gained an increasing interest, since it has been demonstrated that it could protect the bacteria not only during its production process but also during its incorporation into the food matrix, also with protective effects during storage. In conclusion, microencapsulation is of great interest since it could allow a wider application of probiotics in the food market, actually restricted to fresh or powder products.

Introduction

Probiotics are described by the World Health Organization (WHO) as “live organism, which when administered in adequate amounts confer health benefits to the host” (FAO/WHO, 2001). In this sense, probiotics have shown in some studies, to be effective in the treatment of several intestinal disorders and to have an impact on the immune system (Kurmann & Rasic, 1991). Considering that these microorganisms are mainly consumed orally, it would be reasonable to believe that its beneficial effects would be mainly apparent in these intestinal pathologies. However, their modulatory effects on systemic immune response may lead to positive effects in systemic disorders such as allergy (Majamaa & Isolauri, 1997) or inflammatory diseases (Malchow, 1997) and they also have demonstrated a beneficial effect in the treatment of vaginitis (Reid, 2000).

The most used probiotic microorganisms are Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria strains (Solanki et al., 2013). However, other species, such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus have also been used to achieve the same objectives, together with some yeast, mainly Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Burgain, Gaiani, Linder, & Scher, 2011). Some of these species have been incorporated in foods converting them in functional food (Champagne, Gardner, & Roy, 2005). These kinds of aliments are defined as modified food or food ingredient that provides a health benefit beyond satisfying traditional nutrient requirements (Sanders, 1998).

To produce these beneficial effects in health, probiotics have to be able to survive and multiply in the host. In this respect, probiotics should be metabolically stable and active in the product, survive passage through the stomach and reach the intestine in large amounts (Sanz, 2007). However, several factors have been reported to affect the viability of probiotics, including pH, hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, storage temperature, among others (Shah, Lankaputhra, Britz, & Kyle, 1995). Different approaches that increase the resistance of these sensitive microorganisms against adverse conditions have been proposed, including appropriate selection of acid and bile resistant strains, use of oxygen-impermeable containers, two-step fermentation, stress adaptation, incorporation of micronutrients such as peptides and amino acids, and microencapsulation (Sarkar, 2010).

The last option, microencapsulation, is one of the most efficient methods, and has been under especial consideration and investigation. Microencapsulation can be defined as the process in which cells are retained within an encapsulating membrane to reduce cell injury or cell lost, in a way that result in appropriate microorganism release in the gut (Sultana et al., 2000). Some benefits of microencapsulation of cells include: protection from bacteriophages and detrimental factors increasing survival during freeze drying, freezing and storage and converting them into a powder form easier to use, since it enhances their homogeneous distribution throughout the product (Mortazavian, Razavi, Ehsani, & Sohrabvandi, 2007).

Given the importance of microencapsulation, the aim of this article is to review the techniques for the microencapsulation of probiotics, as well as the components used during encapsulation, and its advantages. In addition, we analyze the effect of encapsulated probiotic in food and in some diseases.

Section snippets

Techniques for microencapsulation of probiotics

Currently, there are a lot of encapsulation technologies. Before selecting one of them, industry should have taken into account, the following point (Zuidam & Shimoni, 2010): (i) Which conditions affect probiotics viability? (ii) Which processing conditions are used during food production or processing? (iii) What will be the storage conditions of the food product containing the encapsulated prior to consumer use? (iv) Which particle size and density are needed to incorporate it properly in the

Encapsulated probiotic in food matrices

Although probiotics are normally considered as pharmaceutical products, the current trend is moving towards the health food sector, making true the Hippocrates' statement “let food be your medicine”. Most probiotic foods in the current market are refrigerated dairy products. However, the analysis of these products in several different countries has confirmed that probiotic strains exhibit poor survival in food such as fermented dairy products (Shah, 2000). In this respect, probiotic

Studies of the effects of microencapsulated bacteria on some pathologies

As we mentioned in Section 1, probiotics can produce beneficial effect on some pathologies. However, to get this beneficial effect, they have to reach the gut in adequate amounts. As a result of the harsh condition associated with the gastrointestinal tract, using encapsulated probiotic could be an interesting option. However, only a few in vivo studies have been carried out to test the beneficial effect of encapsulated probiotics in various pathologies.

In this respect, probiotics have been

Conclusion

Microencapsulation has been proven to be one of the most efficient methods for maintaining viability and stability of probiotics, as it protects probiotics during food processing and storage, as well as in gastric conditions. Besides the polysaccharides traditionally used as a matrix in microencapsulation, new materials are being tested and new technologies are developed such as electrospinning. However there is a need to develop new technologies or equipments that produce uniform particles for

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by the University of Granada (FPU-UGR Programme).

References (110)

  • C.P. Champagne et al.

    The determination of viable counts in probiotic cultures microencapsulated by spray-coating

    Food Microbiology

    (2010)
  • V. Chandramouli et al.

    An improved method of microencapsulation and its evaluation to protect Lactobacillus spp. in simulated gastric conditions

    Journal of Microbiological Methods

    (2004)
  • P. Chitprasert et al.

    Aluminum carboxymethyl cellulose–rice bran microcapsules: Enhancing survival of Lactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2012)
  • M.T. Cook et al.

    Microencapsulation of probiotics for gastrointestinal delivery

    Journal of Controlled Release

    (2012)
  • D. Dianawati et al.

    Stability of microencapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris during storage at room temperature at low aw

    Food Research International

    (2013)
  • S.B. Doherty et al.

    Development and characterisation of whey protein micro-beads as potential matrices for probiotic protection

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2011)
  • A. Dwivedi et al.

    The effects of microencapsulated Lactobacillus casei on tumour cell growth: In vitro and in vivo studies

    International Journal of Medical Microbiology

    (2012)
  • C.B. Fritzen-Freire et al.

    Microencapsulation of Bifidobacteria by spray drying in the presence of probiotics

    Food Research International

    (2012)
  • S. Gouin

    Microencapsulation: Industrial appraisal of existing technologies and trends

    Trends in Food Science and Technology

    (2004)
  • S. Gunasekaran et al.

    Use of whey proteins for encapsulation and controlled delivery applications

    Journal of Food Engineering

    (2007)
  • T. Heidebach et al.

    Microencapsulation of probiotic cells by means of rennet-gelation of milk proteins

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2009)
  • K. Kailasapathy

    Survival of free and encapsulated probiotic bacteria and their effect on the sensory properties of yogurt

    Lebensmittelwissenschaft und-Technologie

    (2006)
  • W. Krasaekoopt et al.

    Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt

    International Dairy Journal

    (2003)
  • W. Krasaekoopt et al.

    The influence of coating materials on some properties of alginate beads and survivability of microencapsulated probiotic bacteria

    International Dairy Journal

    (2004)
  • W. Krasaekoopt et al.

    Survival of probiotics encapsulated in chitosan-coated alginate beads in yoghurt from UHT- and conventionally treated milk during storage

    LWT - Food Science and Technology

    (2006)
  • A. López-Rubio et al.

    Electrospinning as a useful technique for the encapsulation of living Bifidobacteria in food hydrocolloids

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2012)
  • H. Majamaa et al.

    Probiotics: A novel approach in the management of food allergy

    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

    (1997)
  • M.J. Martin et al.

    Effect of unmodified starch on viability of alginate-encapsulated Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716

    LWT - Food Science and Technology

    (2013)
  • T. Matsuzaki

    Immunomodulation by treatment with Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (1998)
  • R. Paéz et al.

    Effect of heat treatment and spray drying on lactobacilli viability and resistance to simulated gastrointestinal digestion

    Food Research International

    (2012)
  • D.L. Pedroso et al.

    Protection of Bifidobacterium lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus by microencapsulation using spray-chilling

    International Dairy Journal

    (2012)
  • A. Picot et al.

    Encapsulation of bifidobacteria in whey protein-basee microcapsules and survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yogurt

    International Dairy Journal

    (2004)
  • A.V. Rao et al.

    Survival of microencapsulated Bifidobacterium pseudolongum in simulated gastric and intestinal juices

    Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal

    (1989)
  • X. Ruan et al.

    Encapsulated Bifidobacteria reduced bacterial translocation in rats following hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation

    Nutrition

    (2007)
  • M.E. Sanders

    Overview of functional foods: Emphasis on probiotic bacteria

    International Dairy Journal

    (1998)
  • Y. Sanz

    Ecological and functional implications of the acid-adaptation ability of Bifidobacterium: A way of selecting improved probiotic strains

    International Dairy Journal

    (2007)
  • G. Schlegel et al.

    Journal of Dairy Science

    (2012)
  • D. Semyonov et al.

    Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus paracasei by spray freeze drying

    Food Research International

    (2010)
  • D. Semyonov et al.

    Using ultrasonic vacuum spray dryer to produce highly viable dry probiotics

    LWT — Food Science and Technology

    (2011)
  • N.P. Shah

    Probiotic bacteria: Selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods

    Journal of Dairy Science

    (2000)
  • N.P. Shah et al.

    Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum in commercial yoghurt during refrigerated storage

    International Dairy Journal

    (1995)
  • T.Y. Sheu et al.

    Improving survival of culture bacteria in frozen dessert by microentrapment

    Journal of Dairy Science

    (1993)
  • L.E. Shi et al.

    Encapsulation of probiotic Lactobacillus bulgaricus in alginate–milk microspheres and evaluation of the survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions

    Journal of Food Engineering

    (2013)
  • L.-E. Shi et al.

    Encapsulation of Lactobacillus bulgaricus in carrageenan-locust bean gum coated milk microspheres with double layer structure

    LWT - Food Science and Technology

    (2013)
  • A. Sohail et al.

    Survivability of probiotics encapsulated in alginate gel microbeads using a novel impinging aerosols method

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2011)
  • A. Sohail et al.

    Evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM encapsulated using a novel impinging aerosol method in fruit food products

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2012)
  • S. Stummer et al.

    Application of shellac for the development of probiotic formulations

    Food Research International

    (2010)
  • R. Su et al.

    Encapsulation of probiotic Bifidobacterium longum BIOMA 5920 with alginate–human-like collagen and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions

    International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

    (2011)
  • K. Sultana et al.

    Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria with alginate–starch and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2000)
  • W. Sun et al.

    Survival of Bifidobacteria in yogurt and simulate gastric juice following immobilization in gellanxanthan beads

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (349)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text