Conformity of responses among graduate students in an online environment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.01.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We examined conformity to curriculum-based tasks in an online environment.

  • Students copy incorrect responses reported by their peers in an online classroom.

  • Students provide several reasons for conforming to incorrect information.

  • Students are likely to conform when students meet in an online space just as they do face-to-face.

Abstract

Despite 60 years of social–psychological research demonstrating that individuals are likely to conform to inaccurate information presented by group members, this phenomenon of conformity has yet to be studied in an online environment. A total of 53 graduate students visited a virtual classroom. Each one was able to see the names of three other students (confederates), while responding to 10 multiple choice questions about research. Participants who saw incorrect responses given by confederates before responding, obtained fewer correct responses (M = 6.78, SD = 1.82) than did participants who saw no responses from confederates (M = 8.08, SD = 1.09), F(1,51) = 9.78, p < 0.01, d = 0.33. Thus, this study supports the need for consideration of conformity behaviors within online learning activities.

Introduction

Conformity to the group, or changing one's responses to be consistent with group members' responses, was documented in Asch's seminal studies (Asch, 1952, Asch, 1955, Asch, 1956, Asch, 1958) and has been replicated internationally over the last 60 years (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004). It has received little attention, however, in the online higher education environment. Learning in front of an audience of peers requires social risk taking in the form of asking questions that may reveal lack of understanding, providing answers that may be incorrect, and suggesting new ideas that may not be agreed upon (Ilias, Razak, Yunus & Razak, 2013). Concern about this type of evaluation from others is likely to result in subordination to the group (Bond & Smith, 1996). In particular, when one group member holds an opinion that is contrary to those of the remainder of the group, there may be pressure for the individual to conform (Forsyth & Burnett, 2010). This experience may cause distress to the individual as well as mislead learning. To date, this phenomenon has received widespread attention in business (Chapman, 2006), aviation (Hermann & Rammal, 2010), space exploration (Esser & Linoerfer, 1989), military (Badie, 2010), law (Breger, 2010), and most recently medical education (Beran, Kaba, Caird & McLaughlin, 2014). It would seem reasonable to conclude that conformity would additionally exert influence within online learning events, particularly given the increased emphasis placed on the social aspects of the online learning environment (e.g., Garrison and Arbaugh, 2007, McKenna et al., 2002). The present study examines the extent to which group consensus is a possible barrier to effective communication and learning that takes place online by investigating the extent to which graduate students conform to their peers when performing an online curriculum-based task. The following sections provide a review of what is known about the group conformity effect and discuss its relevance to online learning environments.

Section snippets

Group Conformity Theory

As a social psychologist, Asch (1955) examined the thoughts, perceptions, and behaviors of the individual within complex environmental conditions. In a series of seminal studies, Asch, 1952, Asch, 1956 determined that when members of a group were instructed to provide the same incorrect response to a line matching perception test, the individual in the group who was uninformed about the purpose of the study was likely to provide the same incorrect response. These studies demonstrate that when

Relevance of conformity to online learning

Despite the widespread study of the group conformity effect, it is not known whether conformity occurs within the online learning environment. With enrollment in online courses increasing at a faster rate than that for traditional higher education courses (Allen & Seaman, 2012), in combination with the growing emphasis on collaborative and interactive learning experiences within online courses, it is critical that social influences within the online learning environment are examined. Of

The present study

The present study examines group consensus as a possible barrier to effective communication and learning within the online environment. To study this phenomenon we elected to use synchronous online learning events, in which students and instructors interact together in real time. To obtain empirical evidence of conformity online, graduate students were asked to participate in an Elluminate Live!®1

Sample

The sample included 53 graduate students (male = 10, female = 43) enrolled in online (n = 33) or on-campus (n = 20) research design courses offered through the Faculty of Education in the fall (n = 4), spring (n = 1) or winter (n = 48) terms. The inclusion criteria were the current enrollment in and completion of at least one graduate research course. The total sample represents 17% of the population of students in the graduate program. Participants were recruited at the beginning of the term by a research

Results

According to Chi square analyses, there were no significant differences in the distribution of men/women, winter/fall/spring terms, or whether on/off campus between the experimental and control groups, p > 0.05. In addition, the number of correct responses did not significantly differ for any of these characteristics, p > 0.05.

Conformity was analyzed in two ways. First, the number of correct responses to the 10 research questions was compared between the experimental and control groups using an

Discussion

This study provides initial support that just as conformity has been shown to occur in various face-to-face groupings (Argyle, 1957, Bond and Smith, 1996, Mori and Arai, 2010), it may also manifest in the online classroom environment during curriculum-based tasks. We found that students participating in a synchronous online learning event were likely to respond incorrectly to multiple-choice, curriculum-based questions upon seeing incorrect responses from other students. In fact, almost all of

Conclusions

While our study provides an initial examination of conformity within the online environment, it is plausible that these findings are of relevance to informing learning and teaching practices in general. Research spanning 60 years across many countries confirms that conformity is a prevalent phenomenon across populations and group situations (Bond and Smith, 1996, Cialdini and Goldstein, 2004). Moreover, research supports online learning events as comparable to on-campus based courses in terms of

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Grant #430-2011-0032.

References (65)

  • N.I.B. Adnan et al.

    Online social learning model

  • I.E. Allen et al.

    Conflicted: Faculty and online education, 2012

    (2012)
  • G. Antonides

    Cognitive consistency

    (1996)
  • M. Argyle

    Social pressure in public and private situations

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1957)
  • S.E. Asch

    Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments

  • S.E. Asch

    Opinions and social pressure

    Scientific American

    (1955)
  • S.E. Asch

    Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority

    Psychological Monographs: General and Applied

    (1956)
  • S.E. Asch

    Effects of group pressure upon modification and distortion of judgments

  • P. Ayres et al.

    Cognitive load theory: New directions and challenges

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    (2012)
  • D. Badie

    Groupthink, Iraq, and the war on terror: Explaining US policy shift toward Iraq

    Foreign Policy Analysis

    (2010)
  • J.N. Bailenson et al.

    The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments

    Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

    (2005)
  • T.N. Beran et al.

    The good and bad of group conformity: A call for a new program of research in medical education

    Medical Education

    (2014)
  • A.C. Berger et al.

    Roundtable on translating genomic-based research for health board on health sciences policy

    (2012)
  • F. Biocca et al.

    Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria

    Presence

    (2004)
  • J. Blascovich et al.

    Social“ facilitation” as challenge and threat

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1999)
  • R. Bond et al.

    Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task

    Psychology Bulletin

    (1996)
  • M.L. Breger

    Making waves or keeping the claim: Analyzing the institutional culture of family courts through the lens of social psychology groupthink theory

    Law & Psychology Review

    (2010)
  • A. Buchner et al.

    How to use G*Power [computer manual]

  • J. Chapman

    Anxiety and defective decision making: An elaboration of the groupthink model

    Management Decision

    (2006)
  • R.B. Cialdini

    Harnessing the science of persuasion

    Harvard Business Review

    (2001)
  • R.B. Cialdini et al.

    Social influence: Compliance and conformity

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2004)
  • R.S. Crutchfield

    Conformity and character

    American Psychologist

    (1955)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Status reinforcing: Unintended rating bias on online shopping platforms

      2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
    • Quantifying determinants of social conformity in an online debating website

      2022, International Journal of Human Computer Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      A study examining the effect of social information on the accuracy of a visual judgement task indicates that conforming to biased and incorrect responses from peers led to more errors among Mechanical Turk users (Hullman et al., 2011). Similarly, Beran et al. (2015) note how displaying peer answers to students when completing an online quiz resulted in fewer correct answers among students who conformed to the majority’s answers, than students who answered the quiz independently. Similar results were observed by Wijenayake et al. (2019), where detrimental effects of conforming to the majority’s answers in an online quiz were exacerbated due to gender stereotypical perceptions.

    • Impact of contextual and personal determinants on online social conformity

      2020, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The study confirmed the existence of ‘normative influence’ and social conformity, and its applicability in shaping the amount of effort users put into their contributions in online communities. However, a more recent study by Beran et al. (2015) exploring conformity among graduate students in a virtual learning environment revealed contradicting observations. This study deployed an online quiz on curriculum-based tasks, where a proportion of the participants were shown incorrect peer answers prior to answering the questions, while the others attempted the quiz independently.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text