Vancomycin dosing in chronic high-flux haemodialysis: a systematic review
Introduction
Vancomycin is an antibiotic that is often prescribed for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This antibiotic is predominantly renally cleared, and in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) clearance is reduced. Many patients with ESRD will require renal replacement therapy, which includes haemodialysis (HD). However, to complicate matters, vancomycin is readily cleared by high-flux dialysers (haemodialysis filters) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. This drastically affects the amount of vancomycin available in the body to treat an infection. If therapeutic serum concentrations of vancomycin are not reached, the risk of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens may increase [7].
To determine an optimal dosage regimen for an antibiotic, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameter specific to the antibiotic should be considered. The PK/PD parameter that correlates best with outcomes for vancomycin is the ratio between the 24-h area under the concentration–time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (i.e. AUC/MIC) [8]. To date, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has recommended an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 for vancomycin, with a serum trough concentration of 15–20 mg/L as a surrogate measure for micro-organisms with an MIC of ≤1 mg/L [9]. The quality of evidence and the strength of this recommendation is Level III (evidence from opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees) and grade B (moderate quality of evidence to support recommendation for use), respectively [9]. In the HD setting, pre-HD vancomycin concentrations are often obtained in place of a trough concentration owing to the rebound of plasma concentrations observed immediately post-HD. This allows for vancomycin to be dosed during or immediately after HD.
Studies investigating vancomycin dosing in high-flux HD have often focused on either non-weight-based dosing (non-WBD) or weight-based dosing (WBD) strategies. However, it is still unclear whether non-WBD or WBD strategies for vancomycin will result in a higher proportion of patients within the nominal PK/PD target for vancomycin in the high-flux HD setting. A systematic review of the current evidence available for vancomycin dosing in patients receiving HD was conducted in order to address this knowledge gap and, where possible, to examine the clinical outcomes of the two types of dosing strategies.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The methods regarding study identification, inclusion criteria, data extraction and quality assessment were specified and documented in advance as per recommendations from the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [10].
Study selection
The initial search yielded 3948 studies after duplicates were removed, and 5 studies met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1) [4], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Only one of these studies is currently unpublished, by Ezdon et al. (abstract available from the Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [15] and personal communication with corresponding author H.P. Schlecht, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA).
Study characteristics
The five studies included a total of 128 patients, with
Discussion
This systematic review provides important insight into non-WBD and WBD strategies that have been used for vancomycin dosing in patients receiving high-flux HD. To date there is no robust consensus on whether non-WBD or WBD of vancomycin is the most appropriate dosing strategy in patients receiving HD. According to earlier reviews, WBD was thought to be more appropriate in the high-flux HD setting, although the authors conceded that more studies evaluating WBD were required [16], [17], [18]. The
Conclusion
Based on the findings of this systematic review, it is difficult to determine an optimal dosing strategy for vancomycin in the high-flux HD setting. There are limited high-quality data to ascertain whether non-WBD or WBD strategies will better achieve the nominal PK/PD target for vancomycin in patients receiving high-flux HD. The current study suggests that WBD may be preferential to non-WBD dosing as there is a potential trend for non-WBD strategies to have a higher proportion of patients with
Acknowledgments
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Not applicable.
References (22)
- et al.
Vancomycin redistribution: dosing recommendations following high-flux hemodialysis
Kidney Int
(1994) - et al.
Adequacy of a vancomycin dosing regimen in patients receiving high-flux hemodialysis
Am J Kidney Dis
(2005) - et al.
Practical vancomycin dosing in hemodialysis patients in the era of emerging vancomycin resistance: a single-center experience
Am J Kidney Dis
(2010) - et al.
Area under the concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio as a predictor of vancomycin treatment outcome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia
Int J Antimicrob Agents
(2014) - et al.
Relationships between vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration, dosing strategies, and outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
(2011) - et al.
Rebound of plasma vancomycin levels after haemodialysis with highly permeable membranes
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
(1992) - et al.
Vancomycin elimination during high-flux hemodialysis: kinetic model and comparison of four membranes
Am J Kidney Dis
(1992) - et al.
Removal of vancomycin by high-flux hemodialysis membranes
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
(1992) - et al.
Clinical review: use of vancomycin in haemodialysis patients
Crit Care
(2002) - et al.
Assessment of vancomycin use in chronic haemodialysis patients: room for improvement
Nephrol Dial Transplant
(2008)