Diversity and dynamics of fungi during spontaneous fermentations and association with unique aroma profiles in wine

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108983Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Fungal microbiota showed geographic distribution patterns at small geographic scales.

  • Associations between fungal species and wine metabolites were elucidated.

  • Geographic differentiation of S. cerevisiae was evident at a distance of 12 km.

  • Structural equation modelling revealed the importance of S. cerevisiae to aroma.

Abstract

Microbial ecology is an integral part of an agricultural ecosystem and influences the quality of agricultural commodities. Microbial activity influences grapevine health and crop production, conversion of sugar to ethanol during fermentation, thus forming wine aroma and flavour. There are regionally differentiated microbial patterns in grapevines and must but how microbial patterns contribute to wine regional distinctiveness (terroir) at small scale (<100 km) is not well defined. Here we characterise fungal communities, yeast populations, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations during spontaneous fermentation using metagenomics and population genetics to investigate microbial distribution and fungal contributions to the resultant wine. We found differentiation of fungi, yeasts, and S. cerevisiae between geographic origins (estate/vineyard), with influences from the grape variety. Growth and dominance of S. cerevisiae during fermentation reshaped the fungal community and showed geographic structure at the strain level. Associations between fungal microbiota diversity and wine chemicals suggest that S. cerevisiae plays a primary role in determining wine aroma profiles at a sub-regional scale. The geographic distribution at scales of less than 12 km supports that differential microbial communities, including the dominant fermentative yeast S. cerevisiae can be distinct in a local setting. These findings provide further evidence for microbial contributions to wine terroir, and perspectives for sustainable agricultural practices to maintain microbial diversity and optimise fermentation function to craft beverage quality.

Introduction

Wine grapes (Vitis vinifera) are an economically and culturally important agricultural commodity for which microbial activity plays key roles in grape and wine production and quality (Barata et al., 2012; Swiegers et al., 2005). The grapevine harbours complex and diverse microbiota, such as bacteria, filamentous fungi, and yeasts (Barata et al., 2012; Liu and Howell, 2020; Stefanini and Cavalieri, 2018), which substantially modulate vine health, growth, and crop productivity (Berg et al., 2014; Gilbert et al., 2014; Müller et al., 2016). Grapevine-associated microbiota can be transferred to the grape must/juice and have an influence on wine composition, aroma, flavour, and quality (Barata et al., 2012; Ciani et al., 2010; Morrison-Whittle and Goddard, 2018). Wine fermentation is a complex and multispecies process, involving numerous transformations by fungi and bacteria to sculpt chemical and sensory properties of the resulting wines (Swiegers et al., 2005; Verginer et al., 2010). While these consortia all contribute to wine flavour formation, the fermentation process is principally driven by diverse populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Fleet, 2003; Goddard, 2008; Howell et al., 2006).

Microbial biogeography contributes to regional distinctiveness of agricultural products, known as “terroir” in viticulture [reviewed by Liu et al., 2019]. Biogeographical patterns in the microbiota associated with the grape and must have been demonstrated for both fungi and bacteria at a regional scale (Bokulich et al., 2014; Mezzasalma et al., 2018; Pinto et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2014), which are conditioned by multiple factors, such as cultivar, climate and vintage, topography, and soil properties (Bokulich et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2019; Miura et al., 2017; Portillo et al., 2016; Zarraonaindia et al., 2015). Bokulich et al. (2016) showed that the bacterial and fungal consortia correlated with metabolites in finished wines, highlighting the importance of fermentative yeasts (for example, S. cerevisiae, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Pichia guilliermondii) and lactic acid bacteria (Leuconostocaceae) on the abundance of regional aromatic signatures. Our previous research revealed that wine-related fungal communities structured and distinguished vineyard ecosystems by impacting the flavour and quality of wine, and weather with a contribution by soil properties affected soil and must fungal communities and thus the composition of wines across six winegrowing regions in southern Australia (Liu et al., 2020). However, whether grape-associated microbiota exhibit distinct patterns of distribution at smaller geographic scales (for example individual vineyards) and their associations with wine aroma profiles are not well understood.

Geographic differentiation of S. cerevisiae populations is evident at global (Legras et al., 2007; Liti et al., 2009) and regional scales (Gayevskiy and Goddard, 2012; Knight and Goddard, 2015), revealing a picture of distinctive populations at large scales more than ~100 km. Drumonde-Neves et al. (2018) showed higher genetic divergence among S. cerevisiae populations between rather than within islands/regions (~1.5–260 km scale) and suggested a prevailing role of geography over ecology (grape varieties and agricultural cultivation) in shaping diversification, as previously reported (Goddard et al., 2010). At small scales, several studies characterised significant genetic differences between S. cerevisiae populations residing in different vineyards within the same region [Börlin et al., 2016; <10 km] and different sites within a vineyard [Schuller and Casal, 2007; 10–400 m]. Knight et al. (2015) experimentally demonstrated that regional strains of S. cerevisiae produce distinct wine chemical compositions, suggesting a prominent route by which regional S. cerevisiae shape wine terroir. While few studies have investigated how S. cerevisiae differentiation can affect wine aroma, flavour, and characteristics, and none have considered S. cerevisiae, fermentative yeasts, and the global fungal communities simultaneously to quantify their contributions to the resultant wine.

To investigate these questions, we sampled microbial communities associated with Pinot Noir and Chardonnay grape must and juice from three wine estates with 8–12 km pairwise distances to include grapes from 11 vineyards in the Mornington Peninsula wine region of Victoria, Australia. Using culture-independent sequencing to characterise fungal communities, we disentangled the influences of geographic origin (estate/vineyard), grape variety, and (spontaneous) fermentation stage on the diversity, structure, and composition of the fungal communities. Yeast populations were isolated during spontaneous wine fermentation and taxonomically identified, and the S. cerevisiae populations differentiated using microsatellite analysis. To identify the volatiles that differentiated the wine estates we used headspace solid-phase microextraction gas-chromatographic mass-spectrometric (HS-SPME–GC–MS) for metabolite profiling of the resultant wines. Associations between fungal communities and wine metabolites were elucidated with partial least squares regression (PLSR) and structural equation model (SEM). We demonstrate that the grape/wine microbiota and metabolites are geographically distinct, identify multiple layers of fungal microbiota that correlate with wine aroma profiles, and demonstrate that distinctive S. cerevisiae exert the most powerful influences on wine quality and style at small geographic scales.

Section snippets

Sampling

Five Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot Noir and six Vitis vinifera cv. Chardonnay vineyards from three wine estates (designated A, B, and C) in the Mornington Peninsula region were selected to conduct this study in 2019 (Supplementary Fig. S1). The distance between wine estates A and B, A and C, B and C is 8 km, 12 km, and 10 km, respectively. Within these estates, vineyards are within a 5 km radius of one another. All vineyards were commercially managed using similar viticultural practices, for

Fungal microbiota vary by geographical origin and grape variety

To elucidate the influences of geographic locations, grape variety, and fermentation process on the wine microbiota, 66 duplicate samples covering three wine estates, Pinot noir and Chardonnay, from the beginning, middle and end of fermentation were collected to analyse fungal communities. A total of 1,566,576 ITS high-quality sequences were generated from all samples, which were clustered into 277 fungal OTUs with a threshold of 97% pairwise identity. Ascomycota was the most abundant phylum in

Discussion

There is mounting evidence for geographical differentiation of wine-related microbial communities at regional scales (Bokulich et al., 2014; Gayevskiy and Goddard, 2012; Jara et al., 2016; Pinto et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2014). Our previous work revealed that different wine-producing regions in southern Australia possess distinct, distinguishable microbial patterns (especially fungal microbiota) at the scale of 400 km, correlated with local weather conditions and soil properties (Liu et al.,

Conclusions

Our study describes the diversity of fungal communities during spontaneous wine fermentation in carefully selected vineyards comprising two cultivars. As predicted, we observed ecological dominance Saccharomyces spp., but showed that geographical diversification is evident in the initial fungal community composition and the strain level diversity of S. cerevisiae. Fungal species correlated with wine volatile compounds, of which S. cerevisiae is likely the primary driver of wine aroma and

Declaration of competing interest

We declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We give our sincere thanks to the vignerons who kindly enabled sampling and provided wine samples. DL acknowledges support from a Ph.D. scholarship and funding from Wine Australia (AGW Ph1602) and a Melbourne Research Scholarship from the University of Melbourne. We would also like to acknowledge Master student Haoran Liu at the University of Melbourne for assistance in sample collection and yeast culture experiments.

References (83)

  • K.S. Howell et al.

    Variation in 4-mercapto-4-methyl-pentan-2-one release by Saccharomyces cerevisiae commercial wine strains

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (2004)
  • M.d.C. Portillo et al.

    Bacterial diversity of Grenache and Carignan grape surface from different vineyards at Priorat wine region (Catalonia, Spain)

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2016)
  • P. Romano et al.

    Function of yeast species and strains in wine flavour

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2003)
  • J. Sabate et al.

    Isolation and identification of yeasts associated with vineyard and winery by RFLP analysis of ribosomal genes and mitochondrial DNA

    Microbiol. Res.

    (2002)
  • B. Bagheri et al.

    The impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a wine yeast consortium in natural and inoculated fermentations

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2017)
  • G. Berg

    Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

    (2009)
  • G. Berg et al.

    Unraveling the plant microbiome: looking back and future perspectives

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • N.A. Bokulich et al.

    Monitoring seasonal changes in winery-resident microbiota

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • N.A. Bokulich et al.

    Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2014)
  • N.A. Bokulich et al.

    Associations among wine grape microbiome, metabolome, and fermentation behavior suggest microbial contribution to regional wine characteristics

    MBio

    (2016)
  • M. Börlin et al.

    Cellar-associated Saccharomyces cerevisiae population structure revealed high diversity and perennial persistence in Sauternes wine estates

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2016)
  • J.C. Brunson

    ggalluvial: alluvial diagrams

  • R. Bruvo et al.

    A simple method for the calculation of microsatellite genotype distances irrespective of ploidy level

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2004)
  • J.G. Caporaso et al.

    QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data

    Nat. Methods

    (2010)
  • M. Ciani et al.

    Contribution of winery-resident Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to spontaneous grape must fermentation

    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek

    (2004)
  • M. Ciani et al.

    Controlled mixed culture fermentation: a new perspective on the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking

    FEMS Yeast Res.

    (2010)
  • R.C. Edgar

    Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST

    Bioinformatics

    (2010)
  • R.C. Edgar et al.

    UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection

    Bioinformatics

    (2011)
  • L. Excoffier et al.

    Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data

    Genetics

    (1992)
  • N. Francesca et al.

    Dissemination of wine-related yeasts by migratory birds

    Environ. Microbiol. Rep.

    (2012)
  • R.W.M. Fung et al.

    Powdery mildew induces defense-oriented reprogramming of the transcriptome in a susceptible but not in a resistant grapevine

    Plant Physiol.

    (2008)
  • V. Gayevskiy et al.

    Geographic delineations of yeast communities and populations associated with vines and wines in New Zealand

    The ISME journal

    (2012)
  • J.A. Gilbert et al.

    Microbial terroir for wine grapes

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2014)
  • M.R. Goddard

    Quantifying the complexities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae's ecosystem engineering via fermentation

    Ecology

    (2008)
  • M.R. Goddard et al.

    A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels

    Environ. Microbiol.

    (2010)
  • J. Goudet

    Hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics

    Mol. Ecol. Notes

    (2005)
  • J.B. Grace

    Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems

    (2006)
  • K.S. Howell et al.

    Metabolic profiling as a tool for revealing Saccharomyces interactions during wine fermentation

    FEMS Yeast Res.

    (2006)
  • C. Jara et al.

    Microbial Terroir in Chilean valleys: diversity of non-conventional yeast

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2016)
  • N.P. Jolly et al.

    Not your ordinary yeast: non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered

    FEMS Yeast Res.

    (2014)
  • T. Jombart et al.

    Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations

    BMC Genet.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (53)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text