Review
CO2 capture from pre-combustion processes—Strategies for membrane gas separation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The application of membrane gas separation to CO2 capture from a coal gasification process is one potential solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This review considers the potential for either H2- or CO2-selective membranes in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) process. In particular, the advantages and disadvantages of metallic, porous inorganic and polymeric membranes are considered. This analysis is extended to consider membrane technology as an enhancement to the water-gas shift reaction, to drive the production of hydrogen above the thermodynamic limit. The review concludes with a brief overview of the economics of incorporating membrane gas separation into the IGCC process and gives an indication of the potential economic use of membrane gas separation technology in the IGCC process.

Introduction

Anthropogenic induced climate change is very likely driven by increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (IPCC, 2007), caused by the world's dependence on fossil fuels. Currently, the capture of carbon dioxide from large point sources, such as power plants, is considered a viable option to reduce emissions, since it allows storage opportunities such as geo-sequestration. There are three main strategies for CO2 capture from fossil fuel based power plants (Steeneveldt et al., 2006, Thambimuthu et al., 2005). In post-combustion, CO2 is captured from the exiting flue gas, while in oxy-fuel combustion air is replaced by oxygen in the combustion process producing mainly H2O and CO2 which are readily separated. The third strategy, the focus of this article, is pre-combustion capture, where fossil fuels are reformed into synthesis gas (syngas) comprised mainly of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. This is then further converted to more hydrogen through the water-gas shift (WGS) reaction, resulting in high pressure CO2 and H2. Separation of these two components allows for the storage of CO2, while H2 can be used for a number of processes, such as power generation. Pre-combustion capture has a number of advantages, such as the production of a carbon-free fuel and capture of CO2 at high pressure (Audus et al., 1998, Thambimuthu et al., 2005).

Membrane technology holds great potential for both CO2 and H2 separation within such gasification processes for a number of reasons. The simplicity of the approach, the removal of gas through a selective film, ensures it has high-energy efficiencies, small equipment footprint and therefore low capital cost compared to conventional separation processes (Bracht et al., 1997, Shelly, 2009). Gas separation membranes have been commercially proven in the sweetening of natural gas (removal of CO2 and H2S) and are commonly used for H2 recovery in refineries. This review focuses on the inclusion of membrane gas separation in pre-combustion carbon capture as part of the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) from a technical and design perspective. Initially, an overview of the IGCC process is provided, highlighting where membranes can be of most advantage. This is followed by a brief review of membranes for H2 and CO2 separation, as well as their potential to drive the water-gas shift as membrane reactors. The review then explores potential improvements to the IGCC process as a result of incorporation of membrane gas separation. This is supported by an examination into the economics of membrane technology in IGCC. The review finishes with a discussion on the future direction of this field.

Section snippets

Integrated gasification combined cycle

Gasification is a method of generating synthesis gas (syngas) from heating carbonaceous fuels, primarily coal, with reactive gases, such as air or oxygen, often in the presence of steam (Thambimuthu et al., 2005). The syngas components, hydrogen and carbon monoxide, can be used to generate power (combined cycle) or as a feed source for the synthesis of a range of chemicals, such as Fischer–Tropsch reactions and ammonia. If hydrogen is the desired component, the syngas can be further reformed

Membrane types

There are a number of comprehensive reviews that investigate the types of membranes generally available for gas separation (Adhikari and Fernando, 2006, Armor, 1998, Baker, 2002, Maier, 1998, Paglieri and Way, 2002, Powell and Qiao, 2006, Shao et al., 2009a, Stern, 1994). In this section, only a brief overview of H2- and CO2-selective membranes is presented to familiarize the reader with the membrane options available for use in the IGCC process. This overview considers first membranes that

Water-gas shift membrane reactors

In a fixed bed WGS reactor, the equilibrium CO conversion is a function of both the temperature and the H2O/CO ratio (also known as the steam to carbon ratio S/C), as shown in Fig. 3 (Xue et al., 1996). The exothermic nature of the forward WGS reaction means that high conversions are obtained at low temperatures, while increasing the amount of water present also produces more H2. However, from an economic view, a H2O/CO ratio between 0.9 and 1.5 has been claimed to be the most beneficial (

Membrane processing strategies and economics

For membrane based pre-combustion capture to be viable, the process must be economical compared with alternative CO2 capture technologies (Spillman and Grace, 1989). This includes WGS-MR relative to a standard WGS reactor, with solvent scrubbing or other CO2 removal technology, as well as the modifications required to an IGCC process for incorporation of the membrane separation.

Future directions

This review has shown that while membranes are prospective for pre-combustion capture, there remain a number of key issues that must be resolved before the technology can be considered competitive with solvent absorption processes.

At the laboratory scale, more research is required into high performance membranes that are firstly inexpensive and secondly resilient to syngas conditions. The minor components in the syngas can have an important influence on membrane performance (Scholes et al., 2009

References (140)

  • S. Choi et al.

    Fabrication and gas separation properties of polybenzimidazole (PBI)/nano porous silicates hybrid membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • J.I. Choi et al.

    Thermally rearranged (TR) poly(benzoxazole-co-pyrrolone) membranes tuned for high gas permeability and selectivity

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2010)
  • A. Corti et al.

    Carbon dioxide removal in power generation using membrane technology

    Energy

    (2004)
  • A. Criscuoli et al.

    An analysis of the performance of membrane reactors for the water-gas shift reaction using a gas feed mixtures

    Catal. Today

    (2000)
  • A. Criscuoli et al.

    An economic feasibility study for water gas shift membrane reactor

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2001)
  • A.S. Damle et al.

    A simple model for a water gas shift membrane reactor

    Gas. Sep. Purif.

    (1994)
  • X. Duthie et al.

    Operating temperature effects on the plasticization of polyimide gas separation membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • L.A. El-Azzami et al.

    Carbon dioxide separation from hydrogen and nitrogen by fixed facilitated transport in swollen chitosan membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • L.A. El-Azzami et al.

    Carbon dioxide separation from hydrogen and nitrogen facilitated transport in arginine salt-chitosan membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2009)
  • J. Fan et al.

    High flux zirconia composite membrane for hydrogen separation at elevated temperature

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • J. Galuszka et al.

    Methane to syngas: development of non-coking catalyst and hydrogen-permselective membrane

    Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.

    (2001)
  • G.R. Gavalas et al.

    Deposition of H2-permselective SiO2 films

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1989)
  • S. Giessler et al.

    Performance of hydrophobic and hydrophilic silica membrane reactors for the water gas shift reaction

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2003)
  • V. Gryaznov

    Membrane catalysis

    Catal. Today

    (1999)
  • X. Gu et al.

    On-stream modification of MFI zeolite membranes for enhancing hydrogen separation at high temperature

    Micro. Meso. Mat.

    (2008)
  • G. Guan et al.

    Characterization of AlPO4 type molecular sieving membranes formed on a porous a-alumina tube

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2003)
  • S. Hara et al.

    Hydrogen permeation through amorphous Zr36-xHfxNi64 alloy membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2003)
  • Y. Hirayama et al.

    Permeation properties to CO2 and N2 of poly(ethylene oxide)-containing and crosslinked polymer films

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1999)
  • S.S. Hosseini et al.

    Hydrogen separation and purification in membranes of miscible polymer blends with interpenetration networks

    Polymer

    (2008)
  • J. Huang et al.

    Modeling of CO2-selective water gas shift membrane reactor for fuel cell

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2005)
  • K.C. Jansen et al.

    Zeolitic membranes

    Curr. Opin. Solid St. Mat. Sci.

    (1996)
  • J.H. Kim et al.

    Gas permeation of poly(amide-6-b-ethylene oxide) copolymer

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2001)
  • S. Lagorsse et al.

    Water adsorption on carbon molecular sieve membranes. Experimental data and isotherm model

    Carbon

    (2005)
  • K.H. Lee et al.

    The transport of condensible vapors through a microporous Vycor glass membrane

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1986)
  • A. Li et al.

    Characterisation and permeation of palladium/stainless steel composite membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1998)
  • D. Li et al.

    Gas separation by silicon based inorganic membrane at high temperature

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1992)
  • H. Lin et al.

    Gas solubility, diffusivity and permeability in poly(ethylene oxide)

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2004)
  • H. Lin et al.

    Materials selection guidelines for membranes that remove CO2 from gas mixtures

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (2005)
  • V.M. Linkov et al.

    Highly asymmetrical carbon membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1994)
  • B.T. Low et al.

    Amplifying the molecular sieving capability of polyimide membranes via coupling of diamine networking and molecular architecture

    Polymer

    (2009)
  • G.Q. Lu et al.

    Inorganic membranes for hydrogen production and purification: a critical review and perspective

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2007)
  • F.P. McCandless

    A comparison of some recycle permeators for gas separation

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1985)
  • T.C. Merkel et al.

    Mixed-gas permeation of syngas components in poly(dimethylsiloxane) and poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) at elevated temperatures

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2001)
  • S. Morooka et al.

    Formation of hydrogen-permselective SiO2 membrane in macropores of a-alumina support tube by thermal decomposition of TEOS

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1995)
  • C. Myers et al.

    High temperature separation of carbon dioxide/hydrogen mixtures using facilitated supported ionic liquid membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • K. Nagai et al.

    Gas permeability of poly(bis-trifluoroethoxyphosphazene) and blends with adamantane amino/trifluoroethoxy (50/50) polyphosphazene

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • S.E. Nam et al.

    A study on the palladium/nickel composite membrane by vacuum electrodeposition

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • C. Nishimura et al.

    V–Ni alloy membranes for hydrogen purification

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2002)
  • T. Ozaki et al.

    Hydrogen permeation characteristics of V–Ni–Al alloys

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2003)
  • D.R. Pesiri et al.

    Thermal optimization of polybenzimidazole meniscus membranes for the separation of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (268)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text