Ni supported on CaO-MgO-Al2O3 as a highly selective and stable catalyst for H2 production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.165Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Ni on CaO-MgO-Al2O3 highly selective and stable for H2 production via GSR reaction.

  • Presence of CaO and MgO leads to significantly increased amount of Ni0 active phase.

  • Higher conversion to gaseous products for Ni/modAl by favoring H2 and CO2 production.

  • No liquid products produced by Ni/modAl over 550 °C, 100 °C lower than Ni/Al.

  • Less amount and more defective structures of deposited coke for the modified sample.

Abstract

A comparative study of the GSR performance for Ni/CaO-MgO-Al2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts is reported. Catalysts were synthesized applying the wet impregnation method at a constant metal loading (8 wt %). Synthesized samples were characterized by N2 adsorption/desorption, ICP, BET, XRD, NH3-TPD, CO2-TPD, H2-TPR, XPS, TEM, STEM-HAADF and EDS. The carbon deposited on their surface under reaction conditions was characterized by TPO, Raman and TEM. It was proven that the use of CaO-MgO as alumina modifiers leads to smaller nickel species crystallite size, increased basicity and surface amount of Ni0 phase. Thus, it increases the conversion to gaseous products favoring H2 and CO2 production to the detriment of CO formation, by enhancing the water gas-shift (WGS) reaction. No liquid products were produced by the Ni/modAl catalyst over 550 °C, whereas time on stream results confirmed that deactivation can be prevented, as apart from decreasing the amount of coke deposition the nature of carbon was altered towards less graphitic and more defective structures.

Introduction

Biodiesel is currently being produced through the transesterification of vegetable oils and/or fats with alcohols [1], [2] and is thought of as a renewable, biodegradable, environmentally-friendly fuel [3]. The main by product of the process is glycerol, which accounts for 10% of the volume of oil undergoing the reaction [4], [5]. Although glycerol is a raw material with numerous uses in a multitude of industries, the glycerol produced by the transesterification process is ‘crude’, as it contains a number of impurities such as salts, methanol and fatty acid methyl esters. Its refining into high purity glycerol demands neutralization, stripping, filtration/centrifugation and vacuum distillation, which make the process highly costly [6], [7]. Thus, innovative options for the utilization of glycerol are needed that help minimize the environmental effects of biodiesel production and aid the industry to become more competitive by reducing its costs and/or add to its revenue streams.

Glycerol could also be used for the production of hydrogen, a fuel that is carbon-free and possesses the highest energy content compared to any known fuel [8], [9], [10], [11], via catalytic reactions, such as steam reforming (SR) [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], aqueous phase reforming (APR) [18], [19] and auto-thermal reforming (ATR) [20], [21]. Glycerol steam reforming (GSR) presents two main advantages. Firstly, as deduced from the overall reaction (Eq. (1)), every mole of glycerol fed to the reactor can theoretically produce 7 mol of hydrogen. Secondly, SR is a mature industrial technology, which means that the shift from the commonly used feedstocks to glycerol will require relatively few adjustments [22], [23]. Note that the overall reaction is a combination of glycerol decomposition (Eq. (2)) and the water-gas shift reaction (Eq. (3)), but the process is complicated by a number of accompanying reactions that depend on the operating conditions [24], [25], [26].C3H8O3 + 3H2O → 3CO2 + 7H2 ΔHo = 123 kJ/molC3H8O3 → 3CO + 4H2 ΔHo = 245 kJ/molCO + H2O ↔ CO2 + H2 ΔHo = −41 kJ/mol

The thermodynamic studies that have been undertaken for the GSR show that hydrogen production is favored at atmospheric pressure, high temperatures and high water to glycerol feed ratios (WGFR > 9:1, molar) [27], [28], [29]. However, the reaction network followed during the decomposition of glycerol is quite complex as it involves a number of parallel and consecutive steps of reaction intermediates such as dehydrogenation, dehydration, polymerization and isomerization [30], [31]. Moreover, the catalyst that will be used should promote the cleavage of C-C, O-H, and C-H bonds in the glycerol mole, while the cleavage of the C-O bonds needs to be avoided as it leads to the production of alkanes, which in turn lead to carbon deposition. Additionally, the catalyst should also allow the WGS reaction to take place, so that absorbed CO from the surface can be removed as CO2 [32], [33].

As in other reforming reactions, a number of researches have tested noble metal based catalysts, such as Platinum (Pt), Ruthenium (Ru), Rhodium (Rh), Iridium (Ir) and Palladium (Pd), and usually find them active and not easily susceptible to carbon formation [e.g. [34], [35], [36]]. The drawback is that their high cost makes their use on an industrial scale restrictive, which means that most research works found in the literature concern the development of catalysts that are based on transition metals. Although there are some works in the GSR that report on the performance of Cobalt (Co) and Copper (Cu) based catalysts [37], [38], [39], the majority focuses on Nickel (Ni) based systems as these are known to be active and cost effective [40], [41]. The drawback is that Ni catalysts are also known to deactivate due to carbon formation and metal particle sintering [42], [43].

As catalytic performance is influenced by the nature of the support [44], [45], [46], Ni based systems have been tested on different oxides, such as Al2O3 [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], SiO2 [49], [61], [64], [65], [66], [67], ZrO2 [49], [52], [61], [63], [68], [69], CeO2 [53], [60], [63], [70], La2O3 [61], [63], [67], MgO [60], [61], [63], [64], [70], [71] and TiO2 [69], [70]. Clearly, alumina has been the most widely used catalyst support in the GSR. This is due to its high specific area (which improves metal dispersion) and its mechanical and chemical resistance under reaction conditions [72], [73]. However, as alumina is also known to induce deposition of carbon, transition (ZrO2 [48], [52]), lanthanide (La2O3 [50], [74], [75], CeO2 [53], [62], [74]), alkali (K2O [58]) and alkaline earth (SrO [58], MgO [71], [76], [77], [78], [79]) metals have been used as additives in alumina supports, in an effort to induce support-mediated promotional effects on the catalytic system.

Dieuzeite et al. [71], [76], [77], [78] have published a series of works where they investigate the effect that the addition of MgO has on Ni/Al catalysts for the GSR and suggested that its addition can help improve Ni dispersion, as well as minimize carbon formation by enhancing the adsorption of H2O, O2, CO2 and –OH fragments (thus facilitate carbon gasification). Wang et al. [79] have also studied the performance of a Ni-Mg-Al catalyst and reported high H2 selectivity and high conversion of glycerol; however, they also observed significant carbon deposition at low temperatures.

The work presented herein forms part of a wide effort devoted to the design of appropriate catalysts that may be used for the steam reforming of glycerol. In some of our previous works, we studied the performance of different transition metals (Ni, Co, Cu) on alumina [37], of Ni catalysts based on alumina, zirconia, silica [49] and apatite-type lanthanum silicate [17] supports, the influence of the synthesis method on Ni/Al catalysts [42] and the effect of the addition of lanthana on Ni/Al catalysts [50]. In this study, we report on the catalytic performance of a Ni catalyst supported on CaO-MgO-Al2O3 and compare it with the performance of a Ni catalyst supported on pure alumina. An exhaustive literature search revealed that CaO and MgO have never been used together as alumina modifiers for the GSR reaction. The catalysts were synthesized applying the wet impregnation method at a constant metal loading (8 wt %). The synthesized samples, at their calcined and/or their reduced form, were characterized by N2 adsorption/desorption, ICP, BET, XRD, NH3-TPD, CO2-TPD, H2-TPR, XPS, TEM, STEM-HAADF and EDS. The carbon deposited on their surface under reaction conditions was characterized by TPO, Raman and TEM. Catalytic performance aimed at investigating the effect of the reaction temperature on: (i) Glycerol total conversion, (ii) Glycerol conversion to gaseous products, (iii) Hydrogen selectivity and yield, (iv) Selectivity of gaseous products, and (v) Selectivity of liquid products. The stability of the catalysts was also tested. Quantitative results are provided when reporting on the liquid products.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

The alumina support was purchased from Akzo and the modified-alumina was provided by Saint Gobain NorPro. Information on the properties of the untreated catalyst carriers is being presented in Table 1. Both supports had almost equal specific surface areas (SSA), but the modified alumina had a larger median pore diameter, and a larger pore volume. As the supports were in pellet form they were first crashed and then sieved to 350–500 μm. Calcination was undertaken at 800 °C for 4 h. The catalysts

Physicochemical, structural and textural properties of catalytic samples

The physicochemical properties of the calcined and reduced catalytic samples can be found in Table 2. For both samples, the drop of the specific surface area from its initial values (≈280 m2g−1, Table 1) to those after the calcination of the support and the introduction of the Ni species (158 m2g−1 for both calcined samples) and the values obtained after the activation procedure (136 and 123 m2g−1 for the Ni/Al and Ni/modAl reduced samples, respectively) was substantial, but the catalysts did

Conclusions

A comparative investigation of the catalytic performance for H2 production through the glycerol steam reforming reaction (GSR) of nickel catalysts supported on CaO-MgO-Al2O3 (Ni/modAl) and Al2O3 (Ni/Al) was performed. It was proven that use of CaO-MgO as alumina modifiers led to lower nickel species crystallite size (higher dispersion), increased catalyst's basicity and induced a redistribution of the acid sites in terms of strength and density, whereas a significantly increased amount of Ni0

Acknowledgements

Financial support by the program THALIS implemented within the framework of Education and Lifelong Learning Operational Programme, co-financed by the Hellenic Ministry of Education, Lifelong Learning and Religious Affairs and the European Social Fund, Project Title: ‘Production of Energy Carriers from Biomass by Products. Glycerol Reforming for the Production of Hydrogen, Hydrocarbons and Superior Alcohols’ is gratefully acknowledged by LAFEC's members. VS acknowledges financial support from

References (118)

  • J.M. Silva et al.

    Challenges and strategies for optimization of glycerol steam reforming process

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2015)
  • F. Bossola et al.

    Investigation of the promoting effect of Mn on a Pt/C catalyst for the steam and aqueous phase reforming of glycerol

    J Catal

    (2017)
  • N.D. Subramanian et al.

    Optimised hydrogen production by aqueous phase reforming of glycerol on Pt/Al2O3

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2016)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Thermodynamic evaluation of glycerol autothermal reforming in membrane reactors

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2016)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Dry autothermal reforming of glycerol with in situ hydrogen separation via thermodynamic evaluation

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • Y.C. Lin

    Catalytic valorization of glycerol to hydrogen and syngas

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2013)
  • L.F. Bobadilla et al.

    Influence of the acid-base properties over NiSn/MgO-Al2O3 catalysts in the hydrogen production from glycerol steam reforming

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2014)
  • C.A. Franchini et al.

    Ce-substituted LaNiO3 mixed oxides as catalyst precursors for glycerol steam reforming

    Appl Catal B

    (2014)
  • S. Koc et al.

    Reforming of glycerol to hydrogen over Ni-based catalysts in a microchannel reactor

    Fuel Process Technol

    (2017)
  • H. Chen et al.

    A comparative study on hydrogen production from steam-glycerol reforming: thermodynamics and experimental

    Renew Energy

    (2011)
  • S. Bepari et al.

    Selective production of hydrogen by steam reforming of glycerol over Ni/Fly ash catalyst

    Catal Today

    (2017)
  • M. Yurdakul et al.

    Preparation of Ni-based catalysts to produce hydrogen from glycerol by steam reforming process

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2016)
  • A.C.D. Freitas et al.

    Comparison of several glycerol reforming methods for hydrogen and syngas production using Gibbs energy minimization

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2014)
  • Y.J. Go et al.

    The relation between carbon deposition and hydrogen production in glycerol steam reforming

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2015)
  • L. Pastor-Perez et al.

    Bimetallic PtSn/C catalysts obtained via SOMC/M for glycerol steam reforming

    J Colloid Interface Sci

    (2015)
  • I.N. Buffoni et al.

    Hydrogen from glycerol steam reforming with a platinum catalyst supported on a SiO2-C composite

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • K.N. Papageridis et al.

    Comparative study of Ni, Co, Cu supported on γ-alumina catalysts for hydrogen production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction

    Fuel Process Technol

    (2016)
  • S. Ramesh et al.

    Copper decorated perovskite an efficient catalyst for low temperature hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2015)
  • C.K. Cheng et al.

    H2-rich synthesis gas production over Co/Al2O3 catalyst via glycerol steam reforming

    Catal Commun

    (2010)
  • M. Menor et al.

    Natural sepiolite promoted with Ni as new and efficient catalyst for the sustainable production of hydrogen by steam reforming of the biodiesel by-products glycerol

    Fuel

    (2017)
  • L.F. Bobadilla et al.

    Glycerol steam reforming on bimetallic NiSn/CeO2-MgO-Al2O3 catalysts: influence of the support, reaction parameters and deactivation/regeneration processes

    Appl Catal A

    (2015)
  • M.A. Goula et al.

    Syngas production via the biogas dry reforming reaction over Ni supported on zirconia modified with CeO2 or La2O3 catalysts

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • M.A. Goula et al.

    Characterization of carbonaceous species formed during reforming of CH4 with CO2 over Ni/CaO-Al2O3 catalysts studied by various transient techniques

    J Catal

    (1996)
  • L.F. Bobadilla et al.

    Influence of the shape of Ni catalysts in the glycerol steam reforming

    Appl Catal B

    (2012)
  • O.A. Bereketidou et al.

    Biogas reforming for syngas production over nickel supported on ceria-alumina catalysts

    Catal Today

    (2012)
  • I.N. Buffoni et al.

    Nickel catalysts applied in steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production

    Catal Commun

    (2009)
  • N.D. Charisiou et al.

    Hydrogen production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction over nickel supported on alumina and lanthana-alumina catalysts

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • E.A. Sanchez et al.

    Hydrogen production by glycerol steam-reforming over nickel and nickel-cobalt impregnated on alumina

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2014)
  • A. Iriondo et al.

    Effect of ZrO2 addition on Ni/Al2O3 catalyst to produce H2 from glycerol

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2012)
  • A. Iriondo et al.

    Glycerol steam reforming over Ni catalysts supported on ceria and ceria-promoted alumina

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2010)
  • E.A. Sanchez et al.

    Hydrogen by glycerol steam reforming on a nickel-alumina catalyst: deactivation processes and regeneration

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2012)
  • E.A. Sanchez et al.

    Hydrogen production from glycerol on Ni/Al2O3 catalyst

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2010)
  • A. Ebshish et al.

    Steam reforming of glycerol over Ni supported alumina xerogel for hydrogen production

    Energ Procedia

    (2012)
  • V. Chiodo et al.

    Catalytic features of Rh and Ni supported catalysts in the steam reforming of glycerol to produce hydrogen

    Appl Catal A

    (2010)
  • N.H. Zamzuri et al.

    Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of glycerol over various supported nickel catalysts

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • H.D. Demsash et al.

    Steam reforming of glycerol to hydrogen over ceria promoted nickel–alumina catalysts

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2016)
  • V.V. Thyssen et al.

    Influence of MgO content as an additive on the performance of Ni/MgO-SiO2 catalysts for the steam reforming of glycerol

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • F. Pompeo et al.

    Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming with Pt/SiO2 and Ni/SiO2 catalysts

    Catal Today

    (2011)
  • V.V. Thyssen et al.

    Ni supported on La2O3–SiO2 used to catalyze glycerol steam reforming

    Fuel

    (2013)
  • C.D. Dave et al.

    Renewable hydrogen generation by steam reforming of glycerol over zirconia promoted ceria supported catalyst

    Renew Energy

    (2011)
  • Cited by (149)

    • Cobalt aluminate spinel-derived catalysts for glycerol steam reforming

      2024, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text