SOFC cathodic layers using wet powder spraying technique with self synthesized nanopowders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.220Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cathode side symmetric cells have been produced by wet powder spraying.

  • The effect of the ball milling has been studied and process optimized.

  • The best EIS results were achieved with thicknesses of 10 μm of LSF and LNF.

Abstracts

In this work, a wet powder spraying method has been investigated as a facile low cost route to deposit electrode layer on SOFC electrolyte support. A particular focus has been examining the interfacial stability of the deposited layers, and determining the influence of the thickness of the different layers, as well as the ball milling regime used to produce the electrode inks.

The developed system consist of an yttria stabilized zirconia electrolyte support, a La0.6Sr0.4FeO3 (LSF) cathode, a Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 (SDC) barrier layer between the electrolyte and the cathode, and LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3 (LNF) as a contact layer, for a future integration with the SOFC interconnector. The electrolyte supports (300 μm thickness and 9 mm diameter) supports were prepared by uniaxial pressing, while the deposition of thin barrier layers, cathode and contact layer were carried out by manual spray coating.

Introduction

Fuel cells are energy conversion devices that directly convert the chemical energy of a fuel into electrical power and heat. Among the fuel cell types, solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) have attracted much attention due to their advantages such as higher electrical conversion efficiency, long-term stability, fuel flexibility and environmental friendliness [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].

The two main configurations of SOFCs are tubular and planar [6], [7], [8] ], [9], [10], [11]. Among the different configurations, this study is focused in planar SOFCs, which have a much simpler manufacturing process and lower fabrication cost than those of their tubular counterparts [12], [13], [14]. Regarding planar configuration, two types are preferred: electrode (mainly at anode) supported cells and electrolyte supported cells [3], [15], [16]. Although electrolyte supported cells may exhibit higher ohmic losses, they are more robust and have demonstrated much better stability during the reduction-oxidation processes and thermal cycles [17], [18].

The main drawbacks for the industrial implementation of SOFCs are their manufacturing cost and high degradation rate [14], [19], [20], [21]. The aim is to replace the expensive and complex processing for the cell manufacturing with cheaper, simpler and industrially scalable techniques. Within these techniques, spray coating is a cost effective deposition method for electrode layers, showing good quality and thickness control. In particular, this method present a highly reproducible process for covering planar surfaces [22], [23], [24], [25].

In the development of a planar SOFC stack, each repeating unit is composed of an anode, electrolyte, cathode and interconnect [26], [27]. Among the typical material choices, yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) is the most commonly used electrolyte for SOFCs because of its low cost, high ionic transference number in oxidizing and reducing atmospheres, and good chemical and mechanical properties [28], [29], [30]. The mechanical properties of the YSZ allow it to withstand the residual stresses from cell fabrication processes as well as the stresses from the operational conditions. Samarium doped ceria (SDC) or gadolinium doped ceria (GDC) can also be used as electrolytes [31], [32], [33], or as a protective barrier between the YSZ electrolyte and commonly used cathode materials, preventing the formation of poorly conducting secondary phases, such as La2Zr2O7 or SrZrO3, which are deleterious for as cathode performance [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Iron containing perovskites such as La0.6Sr0.4FeO3 (LSF) or La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 (LSCF) are good candidates as SOFC cathodes showing high mixed conductivity and good catalytic activity for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) [39], [40], [41], [42]. The use of cathode contact layers such as LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3 (LNF) and LaNi0.6Co0.4O3 (LNC) have been demonstrated to improve the electron transfer through the contact interface from interconnect to the cathode layer. In addition, it means that the ORR of the TPB in the cathode receives more electrons from the interconnector, increasing the performance of the cell [43], [44], [45].

In this research, the deposition of the cathode side components (SDC as protective layer, LSF as cathode and LNF as contact layer) by wet powder spraying (WPS) deposition has been studied with the aim of optimizing the fabrication process using self-made materials, using a cheap, simple and scalable technique. Furthermore, special attention has been paid to the influence of the ball milling process and the layer thickness in determining the morphology and stability of the layers. The systems were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed in a button cell test rig (NorECs) and a Zanher Zennium workstation, in air at 700 and 800 °C.

Section snippets

Synthesis and system fabrication

All the SOFC component powders were prepared by a glycine nitrate (GN) process. Stoichiometric amounts of the corresponding metal nitrates were dissolved in deionized water. For all compositions, glycine was then added into the nitrate aqueous solution (Glycine-nitrate 1:1) under continuous stirring. The resulting viscous liquid was auto-ignited by heating up to approximately 455 °C and the obtained powders were calcined around 600 °C for 5 h to remove carbon residues. In the case of LSF and

Initial structural study of the compounds

The purity of the samples was analyzed by X-ray diffraction. All the materials (YSZ, SDC and LSF) prepared through the GN combustion route show the desired final phases. The signal identification for all XRD patterns was in good agreement with the Powder Diffraction File database (PDF). All the samples were pure as can be observed in Fig. 3 for different batches. For the LNF compound, the appearance of extra shoulders in the experimental profile indicated a possible phase segregation to give

Conclusions

Uniform and well-adhered coatings of LSF, SDC and LNF have been deposited by wet powder spraying onto an YSZ electrolyte support, with self-synthesized materials. The microstructure of the system has been shown to be unstable at thicknesses greater than 10 μm due to stresses caused by different TECs, while layers below 3 μm thickness lacked homogeneity. The best results have been obtained with the inks ball milled at 270 rpm, avoiding the appearance of coarsening in the layers after sintering.

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad [MAT2016-76739-R and MAT2015-68078-R] [AEI/FEDER, UE] and Dpto. Educación of the Basque Government [IT-630-13]. The authors thanks the support received by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). The technical support of SGIker of UPV/EHU is gratefully acknowledged. A. Wain-Martin thanks Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad for funding his work [BES-2014-068433].

References (56)

  • J. Myung et al.

    Fabrication and characterization of planar-type SOFC unit cells using the tape-casting/lamination/co-firing method

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2012)
  • Q. Lin et al.

    Solid oxide fuel cells supported on cathodes with large straight open pores and catalyst-decorated surfaces

    Solid State Ionics

    (2018)
  • M. Preininger et al.

    Electrochemical characterization of a CFY-stack with planar electrolyte-supported solid oxide cells in rSOC operation

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2018)
  • Y. Patcharavorachot et al.

    Electrochemical study of a planar solid oxide fuel cell: role of support structures

    J Power Sources

    (2008)
  • S. Lee et al.

    Fabrication of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) by solvent-controlled co-tape casting technique

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2017)
  • M. Morales et al.

    Processing of graded anode-supported micro-tubular SOFCs based on samaria-doped ceria via gel-casting and spray-coating

    Ceram Int

    (2012)
  • M.P. Carpanese et al.

    BaCe0.85Y0.15O2.925 dense layer by wet powder spraying as electrolyte for SOFC/SOEC applications

    Solid State Ionics

    (2015)
  • G. Taillades et al.

    High performance anode-supported proton ceramic fuel cell elaborated by wet powder spraying

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2016)
  • P. Liu et al.

    Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-delta-based dual-gradient cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells

    Ceram Int

    (2018)
  • J.H. Zhu et al.

    Cathode-side electrical contact and contact materials for solid oxide fuel cell stacking: a review

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2017)
  • X. Li et al.

    Optimization of interconnect flow channels width in a planar solid oxide fuel cell

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2018)
  • C.F. Setevich et al.

    Optimum cathode configuration for IT-SOFC using La0.4Ba0.6CoO3−δ and Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2012)
  • D. Saebea et al.

    Electrochemical performance assessment of low-temperature solid oxide fuel cell with YSZ-based and SDC-based electrolytes

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2018)
  • K. Yamaji et al.

    Oxygen ionic

  • H. Sun et al.

    Interfacial effects on electrical conductivity in ultrafine-grained Sm0.2Ce0.8O2−δ electrolytes fabricated by a two-step sintering process

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2017)
  • S.M. Jamil et al.

    Anode supported micro-tubular SOFC fabricated with mixed particle size electrolyte via phase-inversion technique

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2017)
  • J. Sar et al.

    Electrochemical properties of graded and homogeneous Ce0.9Gd0.1O2−δ–La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ composite electrodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells

    Int J Hydrog Energy

    (2016)
  • A. Martínez-Amesti et al.

    Chemical compatibility between YSZ and SDC sintered at different atmospheres for SOFC applications

    J Power Sources

    (2009)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Influence of microstructure and applied current on the electrical conductivity of SmBaCo<inf>2</inf>O<inf>5+d</inf> cathode in solid oxide fuel cell

      2022, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs) are energy devices that generate electrical energy directly from the chemical energy of oxygen and fuel gases like hydrogen, methane or the reformates of higher hydrocarbons. SOFCs have the advantages of high efficiency, low carbon emissions and fuel flexibility due to their high operating temperature (500–1000 °C) and materials used [1–7]. The single cell in SOFCs consists of cathode, electrolyte and anode.

    • An oxygen reduction reaction active and durable SOFC cathode/electrolyte interface achieved via a cost-effective spray-coating

      2021, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hence, a relatively simple spraying technology has been widely investigated. For example, Wain-Martin et al. deposited cathode side components (including SDC protective layer, LSF cathode and LNF contact layer) onto the YSZ electrolyte via a wet powder spraying method and studied the impact of layer thickness and milling regimes on cells performance [41]. Herein, in this work, a cost-effective spray-coating method has been employed to fabricate a porous LSCF cathode on a dense electrolyte, building a high ORR active and durable interface.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text