Short CommunicationA note on Hunt and Crossley model with generalized visco-elastic damping
Introduction
This paper is relevant to analysis of impact actions by falling or moving objects in the context of sports [1], [2], [3], vehicular accidents [4], [5], [6], [7], windborne debris [8] or hail [9]. The focus of interest is in the estimation of the contact force (Fc) which is the controlling parameter for localised actions of the impact causing denting, crushing or perforation of the surface of the target [10].
Accurate simulation of the contact force relies on the choice of the adopted contact law as well as the associated input parameters. Hunt and Crossley model which is non-linear visco-elastically behaved as depicted in Fig. 1 and represented by Eq. (1), is based on the use of non-linear damper in conjunction with the Hertzian spring [11], [12], [13]. The dynamic compressive stiffness K, non-linear power exponent n, and damping coefficient D are parameters characterizing the conditions at contact. The Hunt & Crossley model features the use of three coefficients: K, n and D to fully define the transient force at point of contact between the impactor object and the surface of the target as function of the relative displacement and velocity of the two objects. These parameter values need to be calibrated against experimental measurements in order that real behaviour at contact is represented accurately. However, uncertainties over the value of these coefficients have always been an issue given the difficulties to have values of all three coefficients calibrated to achieve the best match with experimental measurements. The issues have been circumvented by the use of a closed form expression which provides prediction of the value of D for any given values of K, n and coefficient of restitution Ce (the 3rd item on the list can be inferred from measurements taken from an impact experiment). Given this new closed form expression only two coefficients (K and n) need be obtained by calibration. This new development is instrumental in having design charts drawn for determining the value of the contact force for the whole range of scenarios of storm debris [8] and hail [9] but no presentation of the basis of the adopted closed form relationship can be found in the literature. This paper presents for the first time the formal derivation for this important closed form expression along with an illustration of its use. Contact force associated with large indentation and high energy dissipation can be predicted by the adopted model [14], [15].where δ is the indentation of the impactor into the surface of the target (in which xi is the movements of the impactor and xj is the displacements of the target); is the indentation velocity (in which vi and vj are velocities of impactor and target at any time in the course of the impact).
Solution for the damping coefficient D forming part of the Hunt and Crossley model has been interpreted in many different ways for characterizing energy losses that can occur in the course of an impact [14], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. The value of D depends on both the material properties of the impactor object and the intensity of impact. Eq. (2), which is based on the simplified assumption of linear visco-elastic behaviour at contact (where n is equal to 1.0), is applicable to scenarios where the area of contact is relatively small compared with the dimensions of the impactor object [22], [23], [24], [25]. Flores et al. [26] proposed an alternative formula for determining the value of D as represented by Eq. (3) which fixed the value of n at 1.5 as per Hertz law [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37].where and are indentation velocities immediately prior or following the impact; vi (−) and vj (−) are the initial velocities of the impactor and the target immediately prior to the occurrence of impact; vi (+) and vj (+) are the respective velocities immediately following the impact.
In summary, the literature has presented solutions for D for the special cases of n = 1.0 and 1.5. However, the coefficient n is not fixed at a constant value. Instead, it may take any value within the range: 1–2 depending on the condition of the impact and the compressive properties of the impacting objects [8], [38], [39]. The value to adopt can be determined by calibration to achieve good match of the modelled contact force with experimental measurements. Turning n from a constant into a variable will result in more realistic prediction of energy dissipation in an impact scenario. The generalized solution for D for any given value of n as described in Eq. (5) has been adopted for simulating contact force as per the Hunt and Crossley model across many impact scenarios involving a range of spherical impactor objects [10], windborne debris specimens [8], and hail specimens [9], [38], [40]. However, the theoretical basis of the introduced relationship has never been explained in the literature. Details of the formal derivation for the expression are presented herein in Section 2 through Section 5 of this article. The writing of this paper was motivated by the need to present the theoretical derivation in a comprehensive manner in order to provide confidence in its usages.
Essentially, the purpose of the closed-form expression of Eq. (5) is to determine the value of the coefficient D once the value of the other two coefficients: K and n are known. The construction of the contact force model as depicted in Fig. 1 based on the governing equation of the Hunt and Crossley model of Eq. (1) is hence expedited. Eq. (5) is also consistent with the previously published expressions (of Eqs. (2) and (3)) that have been derived for the special cases where n = 1.0 and n = 1.5 for the generalized solution for D.
Section snippets
Derivation strategy
In the Hunt and Crossley model (refer Eq. (1)), assume all energy losses (ΔEloss) occurring on the impact is taken by the viscous damper (). The relationship can be build up as in Eq. (6).
Deriving the generalized solution for D involves a 3 step procedure as depicted in Fig. 2 and illustrated in Sections 3–5.
Total amount of energy loss during the impact process (ΔEloss)
There are two phases in the course of an impact action as presented in Fig. 3: the compression phase and restitution phase. The compression phase commences when two objects (with masses mi and mj) come into contact at time t (−), and terminates when the impacting objects travel with common velocity (V) reaching maximum indentation (δm) at time t (m); the restitution phase commences as soon as the compression phase comes to an end, and terminates once the two colliding objects separate from each
Energy dissipated by the viscous damper ()
In order to calculate the amount of energy dissipated by the damping force for the entire impact process () as depicted in Fig. 4, correlation between the value of δ and at any point in time during the course of the impact has to be pre-defined. The effect of the impact between two moving objects as depicted in Fig. 5(a) can be modelled by a spring and dashpot connected single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system as shown in Fig. 5(b). The initial indentation and the initial
Generalized damping coefficient (D)
Finally, substitute Eqs. (11) and (28) into the left-hand-side and right-hand-side of Eq. (6) respectively results in Eq. (29). Both sides of Eq. (29) refer to the total amount of energy dissipated on impact.
Algebraic re-arrangement of Eq. (29) gives the following generalized expression which can be used to determine the value of D once the values of the coefficients K, n and Ce have been evaluated.
Numerical verification
Consider a 62.5 mm diameter simulated hail ice (SHI) weighting 0.131 kg which is made to impact onto a spring connected lumped mass steel target (mj = 2.164 kg; kj = 53.32 kN/m) at an incident velocity of 31.9 m/s as shown in Fig. 8. A two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) spring connected lumped mass model is adopted for simulated response to the impact as depicted in Fig. 9. By considering the dynamic equilibrium of forces, the equation of motion can be written as Eq. (33). Experimental measurements
Conclusion
Estimation of the contact force which is responsible for localized damage of the target greatly relies on the accuracy of the adopted contact law. The Hunt and Crossley model, which is non-linear visco-elastic behaved, is most suitable for simulating contact force in impact scenarios featuring large indentation and high energy dissipation. The generalized solution for D forming part of the Hunt and Crossley model was first introduced (refer Eq. (5)). Although Eq. (5) has been adopted for use in
Acknowledgements
Support offered by the University of Melbourne and Swinburne University of Technology in related research projects are gratefully acknowledged.
References (41)
- et al.
Statistical model of a vehicle-to-barrier collision
Int J Impact Eng
(2007) Energy loss in vehicle to vehicle oblique impact
Int J Impact Eng
(2009)- et al.
Performance-based response evaluation of reinforced concrete columns subject to vehicle impact
Int J Impact Eng
(2012) - et al.
Deterministic solutions for contact force generated by impact of windborne debris
Int J Impact Eng
(2016) - et al.
Contact forces generated by hailstone impact
Int J Impact Eng
(2015) - et al.
Compliant contact force models in multibody dynamics: evolution of the Hertz contact theory
Mech Mach Theory
(2012) - et al.
Literature survey of contact dynamics modelling
Mech Mach Theory
(2002) - et al.
A comprehensive survey of the analytical, numerical and experimental methodologies for dynamics of multibody mechanical systems with clearance or imperfect joints
Mech Mach Theory
(2018) - et al.
A comparative study of the viscoelastic constitutive models for frictionless contact interfaces in solids
Mech Mach Theory
(2015) - et al.
Comparison of soft-sphere models to measurements of collision properties during normal impacts
Powder Technol
(2005)
Hail impact on building envelopes
J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn
Evaluating baseball bat performance
Sports Eng
Modelling of tennis ball impacts on a rigid surface
Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci
Development and use of one-dimensional models of a golf ball
J Sports Sci
Collapse of reinforced concrete column by vehicle impact
Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Engineering
Computer simulation of contact forces generated by impact
Int J Struct Stab Dyn
Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact
J Appl Mech
A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems
J Mech Des
Validation of nonlinear viscoelastic contact force models for low speed impact
J Appl Mech
Shape and frequency composition of pulses from an impact pair
J Manuf Sci Eng
Cited by (21)
Life-cycle performance of aluminium cladding panels in resisting hailstorms
2024, Structural SafetyDeterministic failure prediction of toughened glass when impacted by ice
2024, International Journal of Impact EngineeringFlexural strains in a toughened glass panel generated by impact of an ice sphere
2023, International Journal of Solids and StructuresIndentation modelling of aluminium cladding panels subjected to hailstone impact
2023, International Journal of Impact EngineeringAn analytical approach for modelling contact forcing function of hailstone impact
2023, International Journal of Solids and StructuresIndentation into an aluminium panel by the impact of a rigid spherical object
2022, Thin-Walled Structures