Short Communication
A note on Hunt and Crossley model with generalized visco-elastic damping

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.07.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The Hunt & Crossley model has been developed further by incorporating a closed form expression for determining the value of the damping coefficient D as function of K, n and coefficient of restitution (Ce).

  • The value of Ce is measurable whereas “n” is not fixed at 1.5 (as in the case of Hertz law) and may take any value within the range: 1–2.

  • The formal derivation of the newly introduced closed form expression is presented.

Abstract

The Hunt and Crossley model has been demonstrated to give accurate predictions of contact force generated by the impact of a solid object. The simulated contact force values have been demonstrated to match closely with experimental results as reported in the literature. However, derivation of the expression for finding the value of the damping coefficient has never been presented. The writing of this paper was motivated by the need to fill in the important knowledge gap.

Introduction

This paper is relevant to analysis of impact actions by falling or moving objects in the context of sports [1], [2], [3], vehicular accidents [4], [5], [6], [7], windborne debris [8] or hail [9]. The focus of interest is in the estimation of the contact force (Fc) which is the controlling parameter for localised actions of the impact causing denting, crushing or perforation of the surface of the target [10].

Accurate simulation of the contact force relies on the choice of the adopted contact law as well as the associated input parameters. Hunt and Crossley model which is non-linear visco-elastically behaved as depicted in Fig. 1 and represented by Eq. (1), is based on the use of non-linear damper in conjunction with the Hertzian spring [11], [12], [13]. The dynamic compressive stiffness K, non-linear power exponent n, and damping coefficient D are parameters characterizing the conditions at contact. The Hunt & Crossley model features the use of three coefficients: K, n and D to fully define the transient force at point of contact between the impactor object and the surface of the target as function of the relative displacement and velocity of the two objects. These parameter values need to be calibrated against experimental measurements in order that real behaviour at contact is represented accurately. However, uncertainties over the value of these coefficients have always been an issue given the difficulties to have values of all three coefficients calibrated to achieve the best match with experimental measurements. The issues have been circumvented by the use of a closed form expression which provides prediction of the value of D for any given values of K, n and coefficient of restitution Ce (the 3rd item on the list can be inferred from measurements taken from an impact experiment). Given this new closed form expression only two coefficients (K and n) need be obtained by calibration. This new development is instrumental in having design charts drawn for determining the value of the contact force for the whole range of scenarios of storm debris [8] and hail [9] but no presentation of the basis of the adopted closed form relationship can be found in the literature. This paper presents for the first time the formal derivation for this important closed form expression along with an illustration of its use. Contact force associated with large indentation and high energy dissipation can be predicted by the adopted model [14], [15].Fc=Kδn+Dδnδ˙where δ (=xixj) is the indentation of the impactor into the surface of the target (in which xi is the movements of the impactor and xj is the displacements of the target); δ˙(=vivj) is the indentation velocity (in which vi and vj are velocities of impactor and target at any time in the course of the impact).

Solution for the damping coefficient D forming part of the Hunt and Crossley model has been interpreted in many different ways for characterizing energy losses that can occur in the course of an impact [14], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. The value of D depends on both the material properties of the impactor object and the intensity of impact. Eq. (2), which is based on the simplified assumption of linear visco-elastic behaviour at contact (where n is equal to 1.0), is applicable to scenarios where the area of contact is relatively small compared with the dimensions of the impactor object [22], [23], [24], [25]. Flores et al. [26] proposed an alternative formula for determining the value of D as represented by Eq. (3) which fixed the value of n at 1.5 as per Hertz law [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37].D=32(1CeCe)Kδ˙()D=85(1CeCe)Kδ˙()whereCe=δ˙(+)δ˙()where δ˙()(=vi()vj()) and δ˙(+)(=vi(+)vj(+)) are indentation velocities immediately prior or following the impact; vi () and vj () are the initial velocities of the impactor and the target immediately prior to the occurrence of impact; vi (+) and vj (+) are the respective velocities immediately following the impact.

In summary, the literature has presented solutions for D for the special cases of n = 1.0 and 1.5. However, the coefficient n is not fixed at a constant value. Instead, it may take any value within the range: 1–2 depending on the condition of the impact and the compressive properties of the impacting objects [8], [38], [39]. The value to adopt can be determined by calibration to achieve good match of the modelled contact force with experimental measurements. Turning n from a constant into a variable will result in more realistic prediction of energy dissipation in an impact scenario. The generalized solution for D for any given value of n as described in Eq. (5) has been adopted for simulating contact force as per the Hunt and Crossley model across many impact scenarios involving a range of spherical impactor objects [10], windborne debris specimens [8], and hail specimens [9], [38], [40]. However, the theoretical basis of the introduced relationship has never been explained in the literature. Details of the formal derivation for the expression are presented herein in Section 2 through Section 5 of this article. The writing of this paper was motivated by the need to present the theoretical derivation in a comprehensive manner in order to provide confidence in its usages.D=(0.2n+1.3)×(1CeCe)Kδ˙()

Essentially, the purpose of the closed-form expression of Eq. (5) is to determine the value of the coefficient D once the value of the other two coefficients: K and n are known. The construction of the contact force model as depicted in Fig. 1 based on the governing equation of the Hunt and Crossley model of Eq. (1) is hence expedited. Eq. (5) is also consistent with the previously published expressions (of Eqs. (2) and (3)) that have been derived for the special cases where n = 1.0 and n = 1.5 for the generalized solution for D.

Section snippets

Derivation strategy

In the Hunt and Crossley model (refer Eq. (1)), assume all energy losses (ΔEloss) occurring on the impact is taken by the viscous damper (Dδnδ˙dδ). The relationship can be build up as in Eq. (6).ΔEloss=Dδnδ˙dδ

Deriving the generalized solution for D involves a 3 step procedure as depicted in Fig. 2 and illustrated in Sections 3–5.

Total amount of energy loss during the impact process (ΔEloss)

There are two phases in the course of an impact action as presented in Fig. 3: the compression phase and restitution phase. The compression phase commences when two objects (with masses mi and mj) come into contact at time t (), and terminates when the impacting objects travel with common velocity (V) reaching maximum indentation (δm) at time t (m); the restitution phase commences as soon as the compression phase comes to an end, and terminates once the two colliding objects separate from each

Energy dissipated by the viscous damper (Dδnδ˙dδ)

In order to calculate the amount of energy dissipated by the damping force for the entire impact process (Dδnδ˙dδ) as depicted in Fig. 4, correlation between the value of δ and δ˙ at any point in time during the course of the impact has to be pre-defined. The effect of the impact between two moving objects as depicted in Fig. 5(a) can be modelled by a spring and dashpot connected single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system as shown in Fig. 5(b). The initial indentation δ()=0 and the initial

Generalized damping coefficient (D)

Finally, substitute Eqs. (11) and (28) into the left-hand-side and right-hand-side of Eq. (6) respectively results in Eq. (29). Both sides of Eq. (29) refer to the total amount of energy dissipated on impact.12m(1Ce2)δ˙()2=mD(1+Ce)δ˙()3β(32,n+12)2Dδ˙()β(32,n+12)+4K/(n+1)

Algebraic re-arrangement of Eq. (29) gives the following generalized expression which can be used to determine the value of D once the values of the coefficients K, n and Ce have been evaluated.D=2(n+1)β(32,n+12)(1CeCe)Kδ˙(

Numerical verification

Consider a 62.5 mm diameter simulated hail ice (SHI) weighting 0.131 kg which is made to impact onto a spring connected lumped mass steel target (mj = 2.164 kg; kj = 53.32 kN/m) at an incident velocity of 31.9 m/s as shown in Fig. 8. A two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) spring connected lumped mass model is adopted for simulated response to the impact as depicted in Fig. 9. By considering the dynamic equilibrium of forces, the equation of motion can be written as Eq. (33). Experimental measurements

Conclusion

Estimation of the contact force which is responsible for localized damage of the target greatly relies on the accuracy of the adopted contact law. The Hunt and Crossley model, which is non-linear visco-elastic behaved, is most suitable for simulating contact force in impact scenarios featuring large indentation and high energy dissipation. The generalized solution for D forming part of the Hunt and Crossley model was first introduced (refer Eq. (5)). Although Eq. (5) has been adopted for use in

Acknowledgements

Support offered by the University of Melbourne and Swinburne University of Technology in related research projects are gratefully acknowledged.

References (41)

  • DA Paterson et al.

    Hail impact on building envelopes

    J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn

    (1994)
  • L Smith

    Evaluating baseball bat performance

    Sports Eng

    (2001)
  • S Goodwill et al.

    Modelling of tennis ball impacts on a rigid surface

    Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci

    (2004)
  • AJ Cochran

    Development and use of one-dimensional models of a golf ball

    J Sports Sci

    (2002)
  • HH Tsang et al.

    Collapse of reinforced concrete column by vehicle impact

    Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Engineering

    (2008)
  • J Sun et al.

    Computer simulation of contact forces generated by impact

    Int J Struct Stab Dyn

    (2017)
  • KH Hunt et al.

    Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact

    J Appl Mech

    (1975)
  • H Lankarani et al.

    A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems

    J Mech Des

    (1990)
  • Y Zhang et al.

    Validation of nonlinear viscoelastic contact force models for low speed impact

    J Appl Mech

    (2009)
  • R Herbert et al.

    Shape and frequency composition of pulses from an impact pair

    J Manuf Sci Eng

    (1977)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Deterministic failure prediction of toughened glass when impacted by ice

      2024, International Journal of Impact Engineering
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text