Full Length Article
Spatial profiling of stapled α–helical peptide ATSP-7041 in mouse whole-body thin tissue sections using droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling-HPLC-ESI–MS/MS

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2018.01.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The application of an autosampler/HPLC-ESI–MS/MS system for spatially resolved quantitative surface sampling/profiling of ATSP-7041.

  • The observed ATSP-7041 concentration was lower than that measured by the tissue punch workflow at the same tissue location of a serial section.

  • Calculated extraction efficiencies were reproducible within a given organ.

  • Reproducibility of the approach could provide a non-labor intensive and high-throughput means to acquire spatially resolved quantitative data.

Abstract

The application of a fully automated autosampler/HPLC-ESI–MS/MS system for spatially resolved quantitative droplet-based liquid extraction surface sampling/profiling of stapled α–helical peptide ATSP-7041 in mouse whole-body thin tissue sections is reported. 20-μm-thick serial tissue sections of an ATSP-7041 dosed mouse were prepared and the absolute concentration of the targeted peptide was first determined in different organs using 2.3-mm diameter tissue punches, standard bulk tissue extraction protocols, and subsequent HPLC separation and tandem mass spectrometric analysis. The same organs/locations were then analyzed in neighboring tissue sections using the droplet-based surface sampling approach. The observed ATSP-7041 concentration using this method was always significantly lower than that measured by the tissue punch workflow at the same tissue location of a serial section. Calculated extraction efficiencies were 10.7 ± 0.5% (brain), 11.0 ± 3.2% (liver spot 1), 10.7 ± 2.6% (liver spot 2), 15.0 ± 0.6% (lung) and 12.9 ± 0.7% (blood). While these extraction efficiency values were low, they were reproducible within a given organ. This suggests that once the extraction efficiency is established for a given tissue type and drug, the reproducibility of the droplet-based approach could provide a non-labor intensive and high-throughput means to acquire spatially resolved quantitative analysis of multiple samples of the same type.

Introduction

Peptides are increasingly being utilized as therapeutics for various extra- and intra-cellular targets. Pharmaceutical discovery and development would benefit from a label-free method to probe biodistribution, metabolic and elimination pathways, as well as query pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations in preclinical species. Thus, spatially resolved quantitation of targeted pharmaceuticals including the dosed therapeutic and its metabolites in preclinical tissues via a label-free method with minimal sample preparation is desirable.

The two methods most often used to obtain spatially resolved chemical information in biological tissue samples are quantitative whole-body autoradiography (QWBA) [[1], [2]] and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) [[3], [4], [5]]. Unfortunately, QWBA is unable to distinguish between a parent drug and its metabolites and thus is not well suited alone for detailed drug and metabolite distribution studies. Quantitative MALDI-MS has been the subject of numerous studies and reports and its ability to reliably provide absolute quantitation is continuing to advance [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. However, the technique requires coating the sample with a chemical matrix prior to MS analysis. In addition, MALDI-MS tends to fragment fragile molecules like phase II metabolites thus it is not well-suited for their detection [4]. Finally, sampling and ionization processes are not separated in MALDI-MS thus it lacks the capability to transfer the sampled material for post-sampling processing. For example, HPLC separation of sampled material can be advantageous in dealing with complex sample matrices and/or for separation and identification of isomeric compounds not distinguishable by MS methods alone.

Liquid extraction based surface sampling probes of different types [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]] are getting increased attention due to their enhanced sensitivity compared to other ambient surface sampling techniques [[19], [20], [21], [22]] and due to their ability to integrate with HPLC/MS systems [[23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]]. These techniques for spatially resolved sampling rely on liquid-solid extraction of material from the tissue. No modifications to existing tissue sections are required to employ the technique. Typical sampling spatial resolution is 1–3 mm, or roughly equivalent to the size of traditional punch samples [[32], [33]], and thereby adequate for many relevant applications for examining tissue distributions of drugs and metabolites.

Importantly, relative quantitation of drug and metabolite distributions from dosed tissue sections determined by liquid extraction based surface sampling/mass spectrometry approaches has been shown to compare well with other studies using QWBA and HPLC/MS [24], QWBA and radio thin-layer chromatography [25] and HPLC/MS of tissue homogenate [28]. Even more significant, the ability for absolute quantitation with the liquid extraction based surface sampling/mass spectrometry approaches has been demonstrated. That work, quantifying propranolol [32], employed a workflow that included calibration of the extraction efficiency of the targeted molecules from the different tissue organs of a dosed mouse. That was accomplished by comparing quantitative results from the analysis of serial tissue sections using tissue punches (considered to provide 100% extraction) and the liquid extraction based surface sampling methods. These established extraction efficiency values were then used to correct the experimentally obtained concentration values for subsequent sections to provide absolute quantitation.

The human transcription factor protein p53 plays a critical role in protecting cells from cancerous transformation [[34], [35]]. Inactivation of this biomacromolecule by inhibitory proteins is the most common defect in human cancers. In one type of cancer proteins MDM2 and MDMX are overexpressed and inhibit p53 [36]. Thus, disruption of the interactions between p53 and these proteins offers the pharmacological opportunity to restore p53-dependent cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Stapled α–helical peptide ATSP-7041 (under development by Aileron Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA) has emerged as a highly potent and specific dual inhibitor of MDM2 and MDMX that possesses robust drug-like properties and on-mechanism in vitro and in vivo activity [37]. It is of interest to study the tissue distribution of ATSP-7041 on a time scale that is consistent with its rapid absorption and elimination [37]. In this communication, the spatial distribution and extraction efficiency for ATSP-7041 from mouse whole-body thin tissue sections utilizing a droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling probe (LMJ-SSP)-HPLC–MS/MS system [[23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [31], [32]] is reported. Extraction efficiency varied with tissue type (∼10 to 15%), but was reproducible (∼5 to 30% relative standard deviation) for the individual organs. The potential advantages of using droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling mass spectrometry as a label-free, non-labor intensive, and relatively high-throughput means to acquire spatially resolved quantitative analysis of dosed pharmaceuticals in tissue samples is discussed.

Section snippets

Reagents and chemicals

ATSP-7041 (cpd 1) and ATSP-7041-13C (cpd 1 labelled with 13C at the third carbon of the first alanine from the C-terminus, cpd 1a) were obtained from Merck (West Point, PA, USA) and Biopeptek (Malvern, PA, USA), respectively, and their structures and mass-to-charge ratio are shown in Scheme 1. LC–MS grade Chromasolv® solvents water, acetonitrile (ACN), 100/0.1 (v/v) water/formic acid (FA) and 100/0.1 (v/v) ACN/FA were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Thin tissue section preparation

All animals used in this

Tissue section analysis by droplet-LMJ-SSP-HPLC–MS/MS

Serial tissue samples to the sample analyzed by the tissue punch method (taken before and after) were analyzed by droplet-LMJ-SSP-HPLC–MS/MS as described previously [[24], [25], [31], [32]]. Glass slides were mounted in a microtiter-plate-size sample holder and the sample holder was then placed into an open tray of the HTC PAL autosampler. The schematic illustration of the automated (controlled entirely by the dropletProbe Premium v2.70 software developed in house) droplet-based liquid

Conclusions

In this paper, spatial quantitative profiling of a therapeutic peptide in dosed tissues was examined by incorporating a stable isotope labeled version of the peptide into the extraction solvent used for a fully automated droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling-HPLC-ESI–MS/MS analysis. The workflow requires an initial extraction efficiency calibration process for all organs studied. This process is relatively low throughput and requires manual labor. Thus, the presented workflow is

Acknowledgements

The original advancement of the droplet-based liquid extraction surface sampling platform and the development of the software package dropletProbe Premium© v2.70 were supported at ORNL by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. The present application of the technology was supported at ORNL by, and the SCIEX TripleTOF 5600+ mass spectrometer used in this work was provided on loan through, a Cooperative

References (39)

  • E.G. Solon et al.

    Whole-body autoradiography in drug discovery

    Curr. Drug Metab.

    (2002)
  • U. S. Food and Drug Administration; www.fda.gov, 1005;...
  • S. Khatib-Shahidi et al.

    Direct molecular analysis of whole-body animal tissue sections by imaging MALDI mass spectrometry

    Anal. Chem.

    (2006)
  • M. Stoeckli et al.

    Compound and metabolite distribution measured by MALDI mass spectrometric imaging in whole-body tissue sections

    Int. J. Mass Spectrom.

    (2007)
  • A. Walch et al.

    MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for direct tissue analysis: a new frontier for molecular histology

    Histochem. Cell Biol.

    (2008)
  • G. Hamm et al.

    Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging of propranolol and olanzapine using tissue extinction calculation as normalization factor

    J. Proteomics

    (2012)
  • T. Porta et al.

    Quantification in MALDI-MS imaging: what can we learn from MALDI-selected reaction monitoring and what can we expect for imaging?

    Anal. Bioanal. Chem.

    (2015)
  • C.W. Chumbley et al.

    Absolute quantitative MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: a case of rifampicin in liver tissues

    Anal. Chem.

    (2016)
  • B.M. Prentice et al.

    Absolute quantification of rifampicin by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry using multiple TOF/TOF events in a single laser shot

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2017)
  • G.J. Van Berkel et al.

    Established and emerging atmospheric pressure surface sampling/ionization techniques for mass spectrometry

    J. Mass Spectrom.

    (2008)
  • I. Lanekoff et al.

    Imaging nicotine in rat brain tissue by use of nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

    Anal. Chem.

    (2013)
  • H.-M. Bergman et al.

    Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging of small-molecule neurotransmitters in rat brain tissue sections using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization

    Analyst

    (2016)
  • D. Eikel et al.

    Liquid extraction surface analysis mass spectrometry (LESA-MS) as a novel profiling tool for drug distribution and metabolism analysis: the terfenadine example

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (2011)
  • E.Q. Blatherwick et al.

    Utility of spatially-resolved atmospheric pressure surface sampling and ionization techniques as alternatives to mass spectrometric imaging (MSI) in drug metabolism

    Xenobiotica

    (2011)
  • S. Schadt et al.

    Investigation of figopitant and its metabolites in rat tissue by combining whole body autoradiography with liquid extraction surface analysis mass spectrometry

    Drug Metab. Dispos.

    (2012)
  • G.J. Van Berkel et al.

    Liquid microjunction surface sampling probe electrospray mass spectrometry for detection of drugs and metabolites in thin tissue sections

    J. Mass Spectrom.

    (2008)
  • G.J. Van Berkel et al.

    Application of a liquid extraction based sealing surface sampling probe for mass spectrometric analysis of dried blood spots and mouse whole-body thin tissue sections

    Anal. Chem.

    (2009)
  • V. Kertesz et al.

    Fully automated liquid extraction-based surface sampling and ionization using a chip-based robotic nanoelectrospray platform

    J. Mass Spectrom.

    (2010)
  • W. Rao et al.

    Ambient DESI and LESA-MS analysis of proteins adsorbed to a biomaterial surface using in-situ surface tryptic digestion

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

    View full text