International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Clinical PaperCleft Lip and PalateAvascular necrosis in cleft maxillary repositioning: a review of cases and introduction of the ‘delayed maxillary flap’
Section snippets
Patients and methods
Records of all cleft lip and palate patients who underwent a Le Fort I maxillary repositioning were retrieved from the database of the Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Children’s Hospital of Melbourne, and interrogated for any events of vascular compromise.
From a sample of 207 patients, five were noted to have suffered varying manifestations of avascular necrosis and all had at least 3 years of postoperative follow-up. All patients underwent standard primary lip and palate
Results
There were three patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and two patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate who manifested a degree of avascular necrosis. At the time of the complication, the age range was 18–23 years, and all patients were male. All patients had a maxillary advancement (Le Fort I down-fracture osteotomies), two of which involved concurrent segmental expansion (Table 1). Four of the patients had residual palatal fistulae following their primary surgery that were closed
Discussion
Avascular necrosis has also been referred to as aseptic necrosis, although the former terminology is preferred in this clinical setting. This complication is a rare and potentially devastating outcome from maxillary surgery and is seen more frequently in the cleft population, but may also occur in patients with systemic diseases. Reported cases secondary to systemic diseases include a case report of non-surgical avascular necrosis of the midface following an episode of disseminated
Introduction of the ‘delayed maxillary flap’ technique
As many cleft patients have a significant transverse maxillary deficiency, a surgically-assisted rapid maxillary expansion is often indicated. This procedure will often reduce the need for segmental expansion during a maxillary advancement. It has been observed that patients who have undergone an earlier surgically-assisted maxillary expansion, have noticeably better perfusion of the down-fractured segment during the subsequent definitive orthognathic procedure with or without segmentalization.
Funding
No funding source.
Competing interests
None to declare.
Ethical approval
Approved with individual patient consents.
Patient consent
Written consent was obtained from all patients/guardians of patients to use images and records for publication.
References (25)
- et al.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1995) Vascular considerations in orthognathic surgery. II. Maxillary osteotomies
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
(1984)Latitude and limitation of midface movements
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1984)- et al.
Aseptic necrosis following maxillary osteotomies: report of 36 cases
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1990) - et al.
Avascular necrosis of the midface secondary to disseminated intravascular coagulation
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2014) - et al.
Maxillary aseptic necrosis after Le Fort I osteotomy: a case report and literature review
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2010) - et al.
Effects of dextrans, heparin and hyperbaric oxygen on mandibular tissue damage after osteotomy in an experimental system
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1987) Selective angiographic studies prior to Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate
J Maxillofac Surg
(1979)- et al.
Maxillary perfusion during Le Fort I osteotomy after ligation of the descending palatine artery
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1997) - et al.
Anatomy of the Le Fort I segment: are arterial variations a potential risk factor for avascular bone necrosis in Le Fort I osteotomies?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2018)