Original articleThe Effect of School Suspensions and Arrests on Subsequent Adolescent Antisocial Behavior in Australia and the United States
Section snippets
Literature Review
Rates of antisocial and violent behaviors appear similar in Washington State and Victoria [12], [13], [14], [15]. To reduce such behavior, globally, crime and mental health prevention programs are adopting a “developmental pathways” approach [16], [17], [18], [19]. This approach recognizes that effective intervention can occur at critical developmental phases and life transition points. Interventions aim to reduce risk factors and increase protective factors [19]. Risk factors are prospective
Participants
A two-stage cluster sampling approach was used for school and student recruitment in 2002. Schools were randomly selected in the first stage and a target classroom within each school was randomly selected in the second stage. Within each state and grade level, public and private schools containing Grades 5, 7, or 9 were randomly selected using a probability proportionate to grade-level size sampling procedure [33]. The principal or contact person at each school was asked to provide a list of
Rates of Antisocial Behavior and Societal Responses
The percentage of students engaging in antisocial behavior at each time point is reported in Table 2. There were no state differences in the prevalence of antisocial behavior at either of the two assessments. Table 2 shows that, of the four comparisons of societal responses at the first assessment (one each for males and females on school suspensions and arrests), both societal response variables were significantly higher for Washington males and the comparisons for females were not
Discussion
The main finding of this study was that societal responses in the form of school suspensions increase subsequent antisocial behavior. Further, this study confirmed risk and protective factors identified in earlier studies (see Table 4 for summary of the multivariate predictors in this study). This study also showed that, although the rates of self-reported antisocial behavior were similar in Victoria and Washington State, state differences in students' experiences of school suspension and
Conclusions
In summary, these results have important implications for practice and policy. Self-reported school suspension and arrests were higher in Washington State than Victoria but in both states, only school suspension significantly increased the likelihood of subsequent antisocial behavior after controlling for a wide variety of risk and protective factors. Although the findings require replication, it seems that early exposure to school suspension may increase subsequent antisocial behavior. A more
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (RO1 DA12140) for the International Youth Development Study. The writing of this article was supported by a Grant from the Australian Criminology Research Council. The views expressed are the responsibility of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Council. The authors wish to express their appreciation and thanks to project staff and participants for their valuable contribution to the project.
References (40)
- et al.
Developmental risk factors for youth violence
J Adolesc Health
(2000) - et al.
School suspension: a study with secondary school students
J Sch Psychol
(1998) - et al.
Adolescent substance use: beware of international comparisons
J Adolesc Health
(2003) Treatment of antisocial behaviour in children: current status and future directions
Psychol Bull
(1987)- et al.
Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
The mental health of young people in Australia: key findings from the child and adolescent component of the National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being
Aust N Z J Psychiatry
(2001) Juveniles in Crime: Part 1—Participation Rates and Risk Factors
(1998)- et al.
Improving the Lives of Young Victorians in Our Community: A Survey of Risk and Protective Factors
(2000) - et al.
Antisocial Behaviour by Young People
(1998) Characteristics of conduct-disordered children and their families: a review
Aust Psychol
(1996)
Violent children: bridging development, intervention, and public policy
Dev Psychol
A cross-national study of violence-related behaviors in adolescents
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
Washington State Healthy Youth Survey: Analytic Report
Patterns and Precursors of Adolescent Antisocial Behaviour
Early developmental prevention of juvenile delinquency
Child Behav Ment Health
Understanding and Preventing Youth Crime
Pathways to Prevention: Developmental and Early Intervention Approaches to Crime in Australia
Cited by (146)
Staying in School: Connection, Cohesiveness, and Suspension
2022, Academic PediatricsThe relationship between externalizing behavior and school and familial attachments among girls from diverse backgrounds
2020, Children and Youth Services ReviewThe effects of parental school exclusion on offspring drug use: An intergenerational path analysis
2020, Journal of Criminal JusticeCitation Excerpt :The impact of school exclusionary policies on the school-to-prison pipeline is well documented (Wald & Losen, 2003). Prior research has also found that students who are suspended or expelled from school have a higher rate of problematic behavior such as drug use and delinquency (Dong & Krohn, 2019; Hemphill et al., 2006; Kaplan & Fukurai, 1992; McCrystal et al., 2007). Importantly, exclusionary school punishment also leads to other collateral consequences such as lower school achievement and dropping out of school (Arcia, 2006; Noltemeyer et al., 2015; Perry & Morris, 2014).
Effects of Tiered SWPBIS Fidelity on Exclusionary Discipline Outcomes for Students With Disabilities: A Conceptual Replication
2024, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions