Elsevier

Journal of Alloys and Compounds

Volume 667, 15 May 2016, Pages 255-261
Journal of Alloys and Compounds

Formation of magnetic nanoparticles by low energy dual implantation of Ni and Fe into SiO2

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.172Get rights and content

Highlights

  • First study of dual Ni and Fe low-energy ion implantation into SiO2.

  • Small superparamagnetic nanoparticles are observed after implantation.

  • These nanoparticles do not follow Bloch T3/2 law.

  • Electron beam annealing leads to a bimodal size distribution and magnetic ordering.

  • A spin-glass from uncompensated moments at the nanoparticle surface was observed.

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles have been made by Ni and Fe implantation into a SiO2 film with a Ni:Fe ratio of 82:18 both before and after electron beam annealing (EBA). Superparamagnetic nanoparticles with diameters ∼4 nm were observed after implantation. The moment per implanted ion at high magnetic fields was significantly lower than that reported for bulk Ni1−xFex with a similar x, which may be due to some implanted ions not magnetically ordering and the appearance of antiferromagnetic phases. The high field moment did not follow Bloch's T3/2 law where T is the temperature. This behaviour is likely to be due to spin-waves propagating in the nanoparticle/NiyFe1−ySizOn matrix as well as the effect of disordered spins on the surfaces of the nanoparticles. After EBA, a bimodal size distribution was observed with large isolated particles closer to the surface and smaller nanoparticles further into the film. Such a distribution has not been previously reported for similar Fe or Ni implantation. All of the Ni and Fe moments have magnetically ordered and the high field moment can be modelled using Bloch's law and a small contribution from disordered moments in the shell with an average thickness of ∼0.3 nm.

Introduction

Magnetic nanoparticles are being actively researched because they have a wide variety of potential applications that include magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents [1], [2], medical treatment and diagnostics [1], [2], waste water treatment [3], high density magnetic memory [4], [5], [6], and magnetic field sensors [7], [8], [9]. The nanoscale physics is different when compared with the bulk where the coercivity and magnetocrystalline anisotropy can depend on the nanoparticle size [10], [11], [12]. The magnon dispersion is known to change for small nanoparticles where the small nanoparticle size can lead to the opening of a magnon gap [13], [14], [15]. When the nanoparticle radius becomes small enough it is possible for the thermal energy to exceed the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy and this leads to superparamagnetism with negligible hysteresis [16]. This can be advantageous for magnetic sensing applications where negligible hysteresis makes it easier to measure small magnetic fields. Nanostructured composites containing magnetic nanoparticles can display magnetotransport properties not seen in the bulk [7], [17], [18], [19]. For example, spin tunnelling between nanoparticles in a semiconducting matrix can lead to large magnetoresistances [17], [18], [19].

Different methods are being pursued to create magnetic nanoparticles. Most nanoparticles have been made in powder form using chemical solution methods [14], [15], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. Nanoparticle composites have been made by mixing powders in polymers [27] and they have also been made by pulsed laser deposition [28], [29] and other methods [30]. Ion implantation is a relatively new method that can be used to create nanostructured magnetic materials [7], [11], [12], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]. The advantages of ion implantation over other methods include the ability to control to high precision the depth and concentration at a nanoscale level. We have recently shown that low energy Fe ion implantation into SiO2 followed by electron beam annealing (EBA) leads to superparamagnetic Fe nanoparticles in the surface region that have a large room temperature magnetoresistance that can be useful for magnetic sensing applications [7]. A range of other magnetic nanoparticles have been made by ion implantation into SiO2 that includes Ni [11], [12], [33] and Co [12] nanoparticles. Dual implantation of Co and Pt has been reported that leads to an enhanced coercivity and magnetic remanence [12] but there have been no reports of dual Fe and Ni implantation. Implanting Fe and Ni might be expected to lead to Ni1−xFex where the bulk compound is known to display a large anisotropic magnetoresistance, low coercivity, and high permeability [16].

In this paper, we report the results from Rutherford backscattered spectrometry (RBS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and magnetization measurements on SiO2 films implanted with Ni and Fe ions at low energies before and after EBA. We show below that as-implanted films contain superparamagnetic nanoparticles and EBA at 1000 °C for 1 h leads to ferromagnetic order and a bimodal size distribution and a different nanoparticle depth distribution that is not seen after only Fe or Ni ion implantation and EBA.

Section snippets

Methods

Ni1−xFex nanoclusters embedded in silicon dioxide were made using low-energy implantation followed by EBA at 1000 °C under high vacuum. Implantation into 500 nm SiO2 on 0.3 mm crystalline silicon substrates was performed with the low-energy metal implanter at GNS Science [31], [36] and an implantation energy of 10 keV. The implantation of 58Ni+ was carried out first and then followed by 56Fe+ with a low current of <2 μA and pressure of 10−7 mbar. The implanted nickel fluence was 2 × 1016 at./cm2

Results and discussion

The results from DTRIM simulations of the nickel and iron concentration profiles can be seen in Fig. 1 after nickel implantation into silicon dioxide with a fluence of 2 × 1016 at./cm2 that was followed by iron implantation with a fluence of 4.5 × 1015 at./cm2. The resultant ratios of the relative concentrations of iron to nickel with depth are also plotted in Fig. 1. The simulated average estimated depth of the nickel in silicon dioxide is ∼15 nm and the maximum depth is 35 nm. The average

Conclusions

In conclusion, magnetic nanoparticles have been made by low energy Ni and Fe ion implantation into silicon dioxide films with an average Fe fraction of 0.18. The as-implanted film had superparamagnetic nanoparticles with diameters ∼4 nm, as estimated from the TEM data, in a ∼20 nm wide layer near the surface. The blocking temperature was 13 K and the resultant magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy was ∼13 × 104 J m−3 and it is in the range expected for Ni0.82Fe0.18 nanoparticles. The moment per

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from the MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology and MBIE (C08X01206). We thank Jerome Leveneur for assistance in setting up the ion beam implanter, Chris Purcell for technical assistance with ion beam analysis measurements and Peter Murmu for assistance with ion beam analysis measurements and analysis.

References (64)

  • J. Kennedy et al.

    High temperature annealing effects on low energy iron implanted SiO2

    Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B

    (2012)
  • H. Amekura et al.

    Non-magnetic to magnetic and non-metal to metal transitions in nickel nanoparticles in SiO2 under heat treatment

    Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B

    (2004)
  • B. Zhang et al.

    Magnetic properties of in-situ synthesized FeNi3 by selective laser melting Fe-80% Ni powders

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2013)
  • X.G. Li et al.

    Preparation and magnetic properties of ultrafine particles of Fe-Ni alloys

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (1997)
  • I. Ban et al.

    The synthesis of iron-nickel alloy nanoparticles using a reverse micelle technique

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2006)
  • S. Vitta et al.

    Electrical and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline Fe100−xNix alloys

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2008)
  • R. Banerjee et al.

    Nanomedicine: magnetic nanoparticles and their biomedical applications

    Curr. Med. Chem.

    (2010)
  • Q.A. Pankhurst et al.

    Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine

    J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys.

    (2003)
  • C.A. Ross

    Patterned magnetic recording media

    Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.

    (2001)
  • S. Sun et al.

    Monodisperse FePt nanoparticles and ferromagnetic FePt nanocrystal superlattices

    Science

    (2000)
  • A. Moser et al.

    Magnetic recording: advancing into the future

    J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.

    (2002)
  • J. Leveneur et al.

    Large room temperature magnetoresistance in ion beam synthesized surface Fe nanoclusters on SiO2

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2011)
  • L.X. Chen et al.

    Fiber magnetic-field sensor based on nanoparticle magnetic fluid and Fresnel reflection

    Opt. Lett.

    (2011)
  • D.L. Huber

    Synthesis, properties, and applications of iron nanoparticles

    Small

    (2005)
  • P.V. Hendriksen et al.

    Finite size modification of the magnetic properties of clusters

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1993)
  • R. Aquino et al.

    Magnetization temperature dependence and freezing of surface spins in magnetic fluids based on ferrite nanoparticles

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2005)
  • B.D. Cullity et al.

    Introduction to Magnetic Materials

    (2009)
  • J. Inoue et al.

    Theory of tunneling magnetoresistance in granular magnetic films

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1996)
  • W. Wang et al.

    Enhanced tunneling magnetoresistance and high-spin polarization at room temperature in a polystyrene-coated Fe3O4 granular system

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2006)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Enhanced magnetoresistance in self-assembled monolayer of oleic acid molecules on Fe3O4 nanoparticles

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2009)
  • K. Liu et al.

    Extrinsic magnetoresistance in magnetite nanoparticles

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2002)
  • C. Vázquez-Vázquez et al.

    Finite size and surface effects on the magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles

    J. Nanopart. Res.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text