Elsevier

Journal of Alloys and Compounds

Volume 711, 15 July 2017, Pages 627-636
Journal of Alloys and Compounds

Up-conversion luminescence of Er(Yb)-CeO2: Status and new results

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.043Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Analysis of down-conversion properties of Er and Er,Yb-CeO2 nanoparticles via X-ray and optical excitation.

  • Observation of a selective level sensitization of Er emission via CeO2 charge transfer band.

  • Modulation of the down conversion emission by Er concentration and excitation mode.

  • Discrimination of up-conversion mechanisms by use of time gated luminescence spectroscopy.

  • Effect of Er concentration on up-conversion emission excited around 1500 nm.

Abstract

We investigate the down- and up-conversion properties of Er (0.3, 1 and 3%)-CeO2 and Er(1%)Yb(20%)-CeO2 nanoparticles by use of ns pulsed monochromatic excitation. The emission spectra were recorded in the visible to near-infrared range (500–1100 nm) under ultraviolet, visible (490 and 650 nm) and near-infrared (790, 971/977 and 1470 nm) up-conversion excitations as well as X-ray excitation. The structural properties were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Raman, Diffuse Reflectance UV/Vis and Diffuse Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopies. The role of CeO2 charge transfer band as a level selective antenna sensitizer, the dopant induced oxygen vacancies and the effect of Er concentration on the overall emission properties are highlighted. The mechanisms involved in the up-conversion emission in Er-CeO2 and Er,Yb-CeO2 are analysed in terms of up-conversion excitation spectra, up-conversion emission decays and evolution of the red to green emission ratio with Er concentration and delay after the laser pulse. Our findings are also discussed in the context of a comprehensive literature survey regarding the actual stage of research on the luminescence of Er and Er,Yb doped CeO2 and their possible applications.

Introduction

Cerium oxide (CeO2) represents an attractive host for the luminescent lanthanide (Ln) dopants due to its low phonon energy (∼470 cm−1), high chemical and thermal stability, high optical transparency in the visible region (band gap of ∼3.2 ÷ 3.5 eV), high values of refractive index (between 2 and 2.2) and ease of doping with trivalent Ln ions due to the small differences between ionic radius of Ln3+ and Ce4+ [1], [2], [3], [4]. Down- and up-conversion (UPC) emission studies on Ln doped CeO2 nanoparticles (NPs) represents a topic of great interest due to their potential applications in theranostics, photonics and bioimaging [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. To date, of the UPC studies regarding Ln doped CeO2, those on Er (Yb)-CeO2 are the most numerous [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. The first report on luminescence properties of Er doped CeO2 NPs described the effect of the nanoparticle size (18, 38 and 70 nm) on the down-conversion emission intensity under 488 nm excitation [22]. It was found that the red to green emission ratio value increased with decrease of the particle size. The down-conversion luminescence properties of Er doped CeO2 were also studied by Mu et al. [6] who analysed the emission properties of Er-CeO2 thin film under 340 nm excitation and observed that the red to green emission ratio increases monotonously for up to 5 at.% Er. Also, the maximum intensity of the green emission corresponds to 1% Er concentration while for red and near infrared (∼1500 nm) emission corresponds for 5% Er concentration.

Guo et al. [7] analysed the UPC emission properties of Er doped CeO2 with 0.5, 1, 3 and 6% Er concentration under 785 nm cw laser excitation. They observed that the maximum of the UPC emission intensity was attained for 3%Er concentration. The potential for therapy applications of CeO2 (co-)doped with Yb and Ln (Ln = Er, Ho or Tm) was first investigated by Seal et al. [8]. They reported that Er,Yb-CeO2 nanoparticles, excited with near-infrared radiation (975 nm) can be used as contrast agents for diagnostic imaging and as therapeutic agents for treatment of cancer. Shehata et al. [9] analysed the UPC emission of Er-CeO2 via both theoretically and experimentally approaches. The Er-CeO2 with 1, 3, 5, 10% Er concentration were excited at 780 nm and the maximum of UPC emission intensity was obtained for 5% Er. The same group also analysed the effect of calcination temperature on the UPC emission intensity and showed that the no-calcinated sample did not emit light under infrared excitation [9]. Following co-doping Er-CeO2 with the Yb sensitizer, Cho et al. [10] showed that the red to green emission ratio increases linearly with Yb co-doping concentration. The dependence of the red to green emission ratio value on Er and Yb concentrations was also observed by Cheng et al. [11]. They demonstrated a green to red UPC color tunability for three dimensional ordered macroporous Er,Yb-CeO2 excited at 980 nm and reported pure red up-conversion emission for 0,5%Er and 10%Yb. Han et al. [23] showed that the calcination temperature promoted crystallization of Er,Yb-CeO2 nanoparticles and also enhanced the UPC emission intensity. For Er,Yb-CeO2, generally a two-photon process was found responsible for both the red and green up-conversion emissions [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [23], [24], [25].

In our previous reports on the UPC emission of Ln doped CeO2 [5], [16], [28] we have shown that Ln generate significant charge-compensation defects, mostly oxygen vacancies, which modify the phonon spectrum by introducing characteristic phonon modes at higher energy than the characteristic Raman active F2g mode of pure CeO2 (∼464 cm−1). We also observed that the amount of defects in the Er-CeO2 lattice induced by heterovalent co-dopants such as La and Li ions, changed the nanoscale environment around Er ions and strongly modulated both the intensity and shape of the Er emission [16]. The Er-CeO2 co-doped with concentration up to 20% La or 15% Li were analysed under X-ray and optical down-conversion excitation into CeO2 charge transfer band (CT) or f-f absorption of Er as well as UPC excitation at ∼1500 nm. We found that the low-lying charge-transfer band of CeO2 acted as a selective antenna sensitizer of Ln emission, that is, the red emission was sensitized more via CT band whilst the green emission was excited mainly via the f-f absorptions of Er [16], [28]. Co-doping with La induced a strong reduction of Er emission intensity compared to Er single doped CeO2 which was explained by a simultaneous decrease of crystallite size, increase of the oxygen vacancy defects and OH surface defects. On the other hand, the co-doping with Li improved the crystallization and reduced the OH surface defects which leaded to a remarkable enhancement of the UPC emission intensity by a factor of ∼17 for excitation at ∼1500 nm. Moreover, under X-ray and up-conversion excitation at ∼1500 nm, the measured contribution of the near-infrared emission at 980 nm to the total emission intensity approached 90% respectively 98% [16].

Here, we report on the down- and up-conversion processes in Er doped and Er,Yb co-doped CeO2 NPs by use of time-gated luminescence spectroscopy under optical down/up-conversion and X-ray excitation. Optical excitation was pursued by use of ns pulsed laser in the range of 300–1500 nm and the emission was measured in the range of 500–1100 nm. The mechanisms involved in the up-conversion emission of Er (excitation at 650, 790, 977 and 1470 nm) and Er,Yb-CeO2 (excitation at 971 nm) were investigated in detail in terms of UPC excitation spectra, UPC emission decays and evolution of red to green emission ratio with Er concentration and delay after the laser pulse. The structural properties of Er and Er,Yb-CeO2 nanoparticles were analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman, Diffuse Reflectance optical (DR-UV-Vis) and Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform (DRIFTS) spectroscopies. Our results are also discussed in the frame of comprehensive review of current literature which highlights the potential of the Er, (Yb) –CeO2 nanoparticles for bio-imaging, theranostics and solar cell applications (see Table 1).

Section snippets

Materials and characterization

Samples of 0.3, 1, 3% Er and 1%Er20%Yb doped CeO2 were synthesized by a citrate complexation method as described elsewhere [29]. All samples were calcined in air at 1000 °C (heating rate of 10 °C/min) for 5 h. The samples containing 0.3, 1, 3% Er and 1%Er 20% Yb, are denoted as: 0.3Er-CeO2, 1Er-CeO2, 3Er-CeO2 and 1Er20Yb-CeO2.

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Schimadzu XRD-7000 diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å, 40 kV, 40 mA) at a step of 0.02° and a

Structural characterization

Fig. 1 gathers the structural characterization of 1Er-CeO2 and 1Er20Yb-CeO2 pursued by X-ray diffraction, Raman, DRIFT and DR UV/Vis spectroscopies.

The XRD patterns (Fig. 1a) show that both 1Er-CeO2 and 1Er20Yb-CeO2 samples exhibit the cubic phase of ceria (JCPDS No. 34-0394) with no additional lines for erbium or ytterbium oxides (Fig. 1a). By use of Scherrer equation, the crystallite sizes for 1Er-CeO2 and 1Er20Yb-CeO2 were calculated as ∼48 and ∼44 nm, respectively. For 1Er20Yb-CeO2 samples,

Conclusions

Herein, we present a comprehensive study on the down- and up-conversion properties of Er (0.3, 1 and 3%)-CeO2 and Er(1%)Yb(20%)-CeO2 nanoparticles. The samples were synthetized by citrate complexation method and the structural properties were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Raman, Diffuse Reflectance UV/Vis and Diffuse Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopies. Down-conversion emission properties were analysed under excitation into f-f absorption of Er, charge transfer band of

Acknowledgements

DA and CT acknowledge the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, the program NUCLEU, contract 4N/2016 for the financial support.

IP acknowledge the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research (CNCS-UEFISCDI) (project number PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0534) for the financial support.

References (45)

  • P. Wang et al.

    Ultimately simple one-pot single-step synthesis of rare earth doped spherical mesoporous metal oxide nanospheres with upconversion emission ability in supercritical methanol

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2013)
  • B. Tatar et al.

    The influence of Er3+ doping on the structural and optical properties of CeO2 thin films grown by PED

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2013)
  • D. Han et al.

    Tuning the morphology and upconversion fluorescence of CeO2:Er/Yb nano-octahedra

    J. Alloy. Compd.

    (2016)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Solvothermal synthesis of CeO2:Er/Yb nanorods and upconversion luminescence characterization

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2014)
  • Y. Guo et al.

    Effect of Li+ ions doping on microstructure and upconversion luminescence of CeO2: Er3+ translucent ceramics

    Opt. Mater.

    (2015)
  • D. Avram et al.

    Time-gated down-/up-conversion emission of Ho–CeO2 and Ho, Yb–CeO2 nanoparticles

    J. Lumin

    (2016)
  • L. Minervini et al.

    Defect cluster formation in M2O3-doped CeO2

    Solid State Ion.

    (1999)
  • M.S. Wason et al.

    Sensitization of pancreatic cancer cells to radiation by cerium oxide nanoparticle-induced ROS production

    Nanomed. Nanotech. Biol. Med.

    (2013)
  • S. Fischer et al.

    Absolute upconversion quantum yield of β-NaYF4 doped with Er 3+ and external quantum efficiency of upconverter solar cell devices under broad-band excitation considering spectral mismatch corrections

    Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells

    (2014)
  • S. Fischer et al.

    Record efficient upconverter solar cell devices with optimized bifacial silicon solar cells and monocrystalline BaY2F8:30% Er 3+ upconverter

    Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells

    (2015)
  • G.A. Kumar et al.

    Intense visible and near infrared upconversion in M2O2S: Er (M= Y, Gd, La) phosphor under 1550 nm excitation

    Mater. Lett.

    (2012)
  • A. Kumar et al.

    Luminescence properties of europium-doped cerium oxide nanoparticles: role of vacancy and oxidation states

    Langmuir

    (2009)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Defects and symmetry influence on visible emission of Bi<sup>3+</sup> Co-doped CeO<inf>2</inf>:Eu<sup>3+</sup> phosphor

      2020, Optical Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      As previously reported, Bi3+ can improve the luminescence intensity of RE3+-doped compounds [18,19]. Besides, the co-substitution of Bi3+ with Eu3+ doped CeO2 provide the possibility of understanding the role of oxygen vacancies and local structure [20–27]. Nevertheless, Bi3+ co-doped CeO2:Eu3+ has never been explored.

    • Structural and excitation dependent emission properties of octahedral CeO<inf>2</inf>:Er<sup>3+</sup> nanocrystal

      2019, Journal of Luminescence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Er3+-Er3+ energy transfer occurs due to the excessive concentration of Er3+ ions, and the optimal Er3+ doping concentration to achieve the highest visible emission intensity is 3 mol%. The nonequivalent substitution of Er3+ for Ce4+ creates an excess oxygen vacancy defects, resulting in enhanced quenching centers in the nanocrystals [21,22]. The probability of non-radiative transition increased due to more Er3+ ions transfer energy to nearby quenching centers, the intensity of emissions decreased due to the concentration quenching effect [23].

    • Upconversion nanocomposite CeO<inf>2</inf>:Tm<sup>3+</sup>/attapulgite intermediated by carbon quantum dots for photocatalytic desulfurization

      2019, Powder Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cerium oxide (CeO2) is considered as one of the most reactive rare earth metal oxides, possessing excellent thermal stability, chemical stability and low phonon cutoff energy, making it suitable for decreasing the possibility of nonradiative transitions which result in a high quantum yield of UC process [30–32]. However, there are limited reports on the UC emission of lanthanum-doped CeO2 at present [33–37], not to mention the construction of UC CeO2 based heterojunctions. What's more, the typical type-II heterojunction has the disadvantage with respect to the weakened reduction and oxidation potential, leading to the decrease of photocatalytic capability.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text