Elsevier

Journal of Business Research

Volume 135, October 2021, Pages 40-48
Journal of Business Research

Betting on the wrong horse: The antecedents and outcomes of entrepreneur’s opportunity regret

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The nature of regret entails positive and/or negative consequences for opportunity recognition.

  • Psychological characteristics and differing circumstances influence venture outcomes.

  • Individuals should try to regulate their feelings of regret and look at the bright side.

Abstract

We examine opportunity regret, which entrepreneurs may feel as they compare their own new venture opportunities with superior opportunities others have realized. We conjecture opportunity regret will be associated negatively with entrepreneurs’ equity stake in the venture and work–life satisfaction. In addition, we predict entrepreneurs with high personal accountability and female entrepreneurs will be less likely to experience opportunity regret. Structural equations modeling analysis of data collected from entrepreneurs in the United States who have launched a new venture provided support for all hypotheses. In conclusion, we argue entrepreneurs must be aware of the Januslike nature of regret, which may encourage the reassessment and readjustment of identified opportunities but also may hinder the discovery of new opportunities.

Introduction

Regret represents a form of emotionally charged self-criticism (“kicking oneself”) that in some cases may lead to bitter self-recrimination or even self-flagellation (Gilovich et al., 1998, Kahneman and Miller, 1986, Landman, 1993, Philippe et al., 2018, Pieters and Zeelenberg, 2005, Pieters and Zeelenberg, 2007, Ritov and Baron, 1995, Ritov and Baron, 1996). Regret may be construed as a reaction to a purportedly unwise decision resulting in an unfavorable outcome that perhaps would not have materialized had the decision maker acted instead of doing nothing, avoided acting altogether, or acted differently. Consequently, counterfactual thinking—that is, comparing what actually happened to imaginary scenarios with more advantageous outcomes—drives regret (Tykocinski & Pittman, 2001, Tykocinski and Pittman, 2004, Zeelenberg et al., 1998, Zeelenberg, 1999a, Zeelenberg, 1999b).

In this sense, regret is different from grief (Shepherd, 2003) or feelings of guilt or shame about one’s actions and/or oneself (Shepherd and Patzelt, 2016, van Gelderen et al., 2015) because it is both backward-looking and forward-looking. Regret is not only about taking another look at the past but also about making new decisions, resolutions, and plans. Thus, it has a dual, Janus-like nature. On the one hand, regret represents a negative affect that can be extremely unpleasant and may lead to intense suffering (Landman, 1993). On the other hand, regret can help an individual reevaluate their actions and options (Roese, 1997) and reassess those factors in light of best practices, thus driving continual self-improvement and self-advancement (Roese and Summerville, 2005, Pieters and Zeelenberg, 2005, Zeelenberg and Pieters, 2007). Therefore, regret is a complex emotion that may represent both an antecedent and a consequence of decision-making (George & Dane, 2016).

Initial research on entrepreneur regret has focused on the question of whether entrepreneurs are more or less likely than other people to engage in counterfactual thinking (Baron, 1998, Baron, 2000a, Baron, 2000b, Markman et al., 2002, Markman et al., 2005). Some studies have established that overoptimistic and overconfident entrepreneurs are less likely than nonentrepreneurs to feel regret (Baron, 1998, Baron, 2000a, Baron, 2000b). By contrast, other studies have shown that entrepreneurs are more likely than nonentrepreneurs to experience regret, possibly because they constantly deal with adversity; therefore, they must continually reassess their actions to correct themselves appropriately (Markman et al., 2002, Markman et al., 2005).

Subsequent research has determined that regret may be related negatively to entrepreneurial self-efficacy (Arora et al., 2013); that entrepreneurs may seek to avoid anticipated regret, which affects the actions they choose (Hatak & Snellman, 2017); that regret may influence action inertia if the opportunity is regarded as similar to the one dismissed earlier (Wood et al., 2017); and that entrepreneur regret may be related not only to business underperformance but also to health problems and unhappiness in terms of work-life balance (Hsu et al., 2019).

Although prior research has produced many valuable insights regarding entrepreneur regret (Baron, 2000a, Baron, 2000b, Hatak and Snellman, 2017, Hsu et al., 2019, Markman et al., 2002, Markman et al., 2005, Wood et al., 2017), we still know little about its nature and manifestations, principal causes, and outcomes. It is important to better understand entrepreneur regret because it may play a key role in the entrepreneurship process by providing the entrepreneur with critical feedback regarding the comparative advantage of an opportunity originally used for venture creation. Entrepreneurs do not merely identify and explore an opportunity (Mahto and McDowell, 2018, Shane, 2000, Shepherd et al., 2007, Short et al., 2010); they also continually reassess the opportunity they have discovered because its quality and value may change over time. In this paper, we redefine entrepreneur regret as opportunity regret, or regret the entrepreneur may experience while critically reassessing a venture creation opportunity that provides the impetus for continual review and refinement of entrepreneurial actions.

The purpose of this paper is to examine the antecedents and outcomes of opportunity regret. By applying structural equations modeling (SEM) to data collected from student entrepreneurs who founded new ventures, we demonstrate that opportunity regret is (a) associated negatively with entrepreneurs’ personal accountability, (b) associated negatively with entrepreneurs’ ownership stake in a new venture, (c) associated negatively with gender (i.e., women are less likely than men to experience regret), and (d) associated negatively with entrepreneurs’ work–life satisfaction. However, it is important to point out that we conducted the study in California (United States). California has an ingrained entrepreneurial culture. It is not unusual for university students to operate their own ventures. Some may be seasoned entrepreneurs returning to college after accumulating substantial business experience and rich life experiences.

This paper is structured as follows. In the first section, we provide a review and reconceptualization of prior research on entrepreneur regret. In the second section, we develop the hypotheses regarding the antecedents and outcomes of opportunity regret. In the third section, we describe our methods and explain the results of the study. Finally, we discuss our findings and their limitations and point out future directions for research on opportunity regret.

Section snippets

Entrepreneurs are less likely than nonentrepreneurs to feel regret

Initial studies have examined the relative likelihood that entrepreneurs versus nonentrepreneurs may use counterfactual thinking, resulting in regretful emotions (Baron, 1998, Markman et al., 2002, Markman et al., 2005). Specifically, Baron, 2000a, Baron, 2000b contended that action-oriented entrepreneurs are less prone to succumb to counterfactual thinking; that is, they are less likely than nonentrepreneurs to “reflect on outcomes and events that might have occurred if the person in question

Opportunity regret: Theory development

Researchers have identified two principal types of regret: (a) regret of action, arising when decision makers blame themselves for doing something that has resulted in unfavorable outcomes, and (b) regret of inaction, occurring when decision makers blame themselves for not doing something that has resulted (or conceivably could have resulted) in favorable outcomes (Gilovich et al., 1998, Kahneman and Miller, 1986, Kahneman and Tversky, 1982). Original studies have established that regret of

Sample

We collected the data from students studying entrepreneurship at a large public university located in California (United States). The university has a center for entrepreneurship, and students can earn either a major or minor in entrepreneurship. The data were collected in 2012, and we presented the original paper at several major conferences. To obtain the data, we used an online survey. Instructors emailed a link to the survey to 90 students taking courses in entrepreneurship at the

Preliminary assessment

We assessed the validity of the measurement instruments before proceeding to testing the proposed nomological network. Descriptive statistics and interconstruct correlations are provided in Table 1, with reliability scores for multi-item scales (Cronbach’s alphas) indicated on the diagonal. The bottom row includes age as a potential control variable. The numbers in the table demonstrate that all constructs are internally consistent and reliable with Cronbach’s alphas over 0.80.

Model estimation

The model was

Discussion and conclusion

Prior research has approached entrepreneur regret from a variety of perspectives (Arora et al., 2013, Baron, 1998, Baron, 2000a, Baron, 2000b, Hatak and Snellman, 2017, Hsu et al., 2019, Markman et al., 2002, Markman et al., 2005, Wood et al., 2017). Initial studies of entrepreneur regret have focused on comparing the likelihood that entrepreneurs versus nonentrepreneurs may engage in counterfactual thinking, and these studies also have examined the relative intensity of regret experienced by

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Dr. Dmitry Khanin is an Associate Professor at Alfaisal University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. His work has been published in leading outlets including Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, and Journal of Small Business Management.

References (65)

  • D.A. Shepherd

    Grief recovery from family business failure: A multi- and meso-level theory

    Journal of Business Venturing

    (2009)
  • M. van Gelderen et al.

    From entrepreneurial intentions to actions: Self-control and action-related doubt, fear, and aversion

    Journal of Business Venturing

    (2015)
  • M.L. Verquer et al.

    A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes

    Journal of Vocational Behavior

    (2003)
  • M. Zeelenberg et al.

    A theory of regret regulation 1.0

    Journal of Consumer Psychology

    (2007)
  • J.C. Anderson et al.

    Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1988)
  • P. Arora et al.

    Counterfactual thinking and entrepreneurial self-efficacy: The Moderating role of self-esteem and dispositional effect

    Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice

    (2013)
  • R.A. Baron

    Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: The potential effects of thinking about ‘what might have been’

    Journal of Business Venturing

    (2000)
  • R.A. Baron

    Psychological perspectives on entrepreneurship: Cognitive and social factors in entrepreneur success

    Current Directions in Psychological Science

    (2000)
  • D.R. Beike et al.

    What we regret most are lost opportunities: A theory of regret intensity

    Personality Social Psychological Bulletin

    (2009)
  • D. Bell

    Regret in decision making under uncertainty

    Operations Research

    (1982)
  • C.G. Brush et al.

    The use of bootstrapping by women entrepreneurs in positioning for growth

    Venture Capital

    (2006)
  • D.R. DeTienne et al.

    The role of gender in opportunity identification

    Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

    (2007)
  • L.F. Edelman et al.

    Start-up motivations and growth intentions of minority nascent entrepreneurs

    Journal of Small Business Management

    (2010)
  • J.R. Edwards

    Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique

  • E.J. Gatewood et al.

    Diana: A symbol of women entrepreneurs’ hunt for knowledge, money, and the rewards of entrepreneurship

    Small Business Economics

    (2009)
  • T. Gilovich et al.

    The experience of regret: What, when, and why

    Psychological Review

    (1995)
  • T. Gilovich et al.

    Varieties of regret: A debate and partial resolution

    Psychological Review

    (1998)
  • P.A. Gompers et al.

    The venture capital cycle

    (2004)
  • E. Green et al.

    ‘Women's business': Are women entrepreneurs breaking new

    Journal of Gender Studies

    (1995)
  • D.A. Grégoire et al.

    Cognitive Processes of Opportunity Recognition: The Role of Structural Alignment

    Organization Science

    (2010)
  • D.A. Grégoire et al.

    Technology-market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities: An investigation of the opportunity-individual nexus

    Academy of Management Journal

    (2012)
  • I. Hatak et al.

    The influence of anticipated regret on business start-up behavior

    International Small Business Journal

    (2017)
  • Cited by (4)

    Dr. Dmitry Khanin is an Associate Professor at Alfaisal University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. His work has been published in leading outlets including Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, and Journal of Small Business Management.

    Dr. Ofir Turel is a Professor of Management Information Systems in the Mihaylo College of Business and Economics at California State University Fullerton. His work has been published in leading outlets including European Journal of Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, and MIT Sloan Management Review.

    Dr. Raj Mahto is a Professor of Entrepreneurship in the Anderson School of Management at the University of New Mexico. His work has been published in leading outlets including Journal of Business Research, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, and Journal of Applied Psychology.

    Dr. Eric Liguori is the Rohrer Chair of Entrepreneurship in the Rohrer College of Business at Rowan University. His work has been published in leading outlets including Journal of Management, Small Business Economics, Journal of Small Business Management, and Entrepreneurship and Regional Development.

    View full text