Elsevier

Journal of Business Research

Volume 142, March 2022, Pages 188-199
Journal of Business Research

An exploratory study into emerging market SMEs’ involvement in the circular Economy: Evidence from India’s indigenous Ayurveda industry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.053Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper explores the extent to which SMEs can adapt and develop circular economy practices in an emerging market context. Since the evidence provided by the literature is mostly based on large firms operating in developed countries, our focus on India’s indigenous Ayurveda industry allows a much-needed and nuanced lens through which to view circular economy activities. We use a two-step research design involving a systematic bibliometric analysis as a first step in the highlighting of numerous themes emanating from the circular economy literature. Second, we complement these insights with two case studies based on SMEs in the Indian Ayurveda industry. Our findings reveal that SMEs engage and contribute to the circular economy. More specifically, we present unique insights into the reasons, drivers, and motivations for SME involvement in the circular economy, wherein we observe a blending of indigenous practices and modern technology. Our findings allow us to propose several important implications for theory and practice.

Introduction

In the quest to become more socially responsible, many organizations, mostly larger ones, have been following ethical and sustainable practices for quite some time (Lahane et al., 2020, Yadav et al., 2021). These efforts to contribute toward the circular economy (CE) can be observed in various industries across the world. For example, Parida, Burstrom, Visnijic and Wincent (2019) show qualitative evidence of how resource-intensive manufacturing firms can work with their interdependent ecosystem partners to become more sustainable and contribute to the CE. There is also recent evidence from the services sector (Sanguino, Barroso, Fernández-Rodríguez, & Sánchez-Hernández, 2020), construction sector (Benachio, Freitas, & Tavares, 2020), and the primary sector (Milios, Beqiri, Whalen, & Jelonek, 2019) that uncovers various unique approaches used by organizations to support the development of circular activities in the context of their business model innovations. Indeed, the CE has emerged as a popular approach to address sustainability concerns (Barreiro‐Gen & Lozano, 2020) and can be defined as “an industrial economy that is restorative or regenerative by intention and design” (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013, p.14). The CE considers waste as a resource and consists of activities such as reducing, repairing, reusing, recycling and remanufacturing (Barreiro‐Gen and Lozano, 2020). The CE necessitates a shift from a traditional linear production–consumption path to a regenerative or closed loop path of production and consumption to attain harmony between economic and environmental interests (Merli, Preziosi, & Acampora, 2018). Table 1.

Overall, this emerging and rich evidence portrays the diverse efforts by many firms and countries to transform from a linear economy to a CE. This transformation essentially involves the sustainable, cyclical, and regenerative use of all types of resources at different micro, meso, and macro levels and interactions between economic agents in a particular ecosystem (Kirchherr et al., 2017, Kristensen and Mosgaard, 2020). However, the existing evidence and literature are focused primarily on larger firms, including multinational corporations (MNCs), while only a few, more recent, insights focus on small and medium-sized enterprizes (SMEs) and highlight their essential role in the CE (Dey et al., 2019; 2020). Given that SMEs are the backbone of many economies worldwide and are an integral part of many supply chains of larger firms regionally and globally, it becomes imperative to investigate the extent of their contribution toward the CE.

Another limitation on the current understanding of the CE is the lack of research on SMEs’ activities, innovations, and strategies, particularly in emerging markets. These activities, innovations, and strategies are potentially different from those of developed markets. They can have a varying impact not only on SMEs themselves but also on the region in which they operate (e.g., van Loon and Van Wassenhove, 2020, Subramanian et al., 2019, Dey et al., 2020, Zhang et al., 2019, Salmenperä et al., 2020, García-Quevedo et al., 2020, Agyemang et al., 2019). More specifically, we still do not know much about the role, involvement, and practices of emerging market SMEs in the CE context. For example, in India, unique traditions of sustainable business and management practices have deep historical roots in indigenous philosophies and knowledge systems. India has a rich cultural and intellectual heritage, such that both atomistic modernity and holistic indigenous systems, values, and traditions can coexist, which leads to integrated and hybrid forms of managing people and performance at work (Holtbrügge and Garg, 2016, Malik et al., 2021). The foundations of India’s indigenous administrative and political practices can be linked back to a series of texts and compilations between the second and third centuries. The treatise by Kautilya, entitled Arthashastra, has a substantive set of procedural guidelines for the study and practice of politics, economics, government, military strategy, and ethical decision making in Indian culture (Chaturvedi, 2001). India has also been blessed with several other indigenous philosophical knowledge systems, including that of the Ayurveda, which prescribes a set of principles that humans should follow for conducting themselves. The Ayurveda focuses on transmitting the key principles for living in a sustainable manner (Chaturvedi et al., 2001, Sujatha, 2020).

However, from our first step, namely the bibliometric literature review, we identify that there is limited, scattered literature and evidence on the role of emerging market SMEs in the CE and, hence, we aim to contribute to the literature by overcoming this research gap. We focus particularly on the indigenous Ayurveda industry in India, which is a medical system with roots in ancient Sanskrit language texts dating back thousands of years. As a second step, we complement the insights drawn from our bibliometric analysis with two case studies based on SMEs in the Indian Ayurveda industry. Within this traditional industry context, we are keen to understand how SMEs adopt CE practices. In summary, our paper, through the above two steps, investigates the following two research questions (RQs):

  • RQ1: What are the key research themes explored in the literature on the CE?

  • RQ2: Within the indigenous Ayurveda industry, what are the practices adopted by emerging market SMEs to enhance their involvement in a CE?

There are five pivotal ways in which we contribute through this paper. First, this paper explores the extent to which SMEs operating in niche, traditional and historical industries like the Ayurveda industry in emerging countries, such as India, have been adapting and developing CE practices. Second, we investigate SMEs and develop the scant literature on CE practices in the SME context, as prior research has predominantly concentrated on large firms operating in developed countries. Thus, our focus on SMEs in India’s Ayurveda industry offers a nuanced lens to view CE activities. Third, we contribute to the research on CE by bringing together a scattered research field through a bibliometric review of the CE knowledge base. This helps to understand how the knowledge–research base of the CE field is structured, taking into account its underlying features and explanations along with the conceptual structure of the field’s entire research base (which includes research articles, review papers, books, and book chapters). We have done this by using robust bibliometric metadata of the research field. Our fourth contribution is methodological, as we use a two-step research design involving the above systematic bibliometric analysis. This analysis highlighted the research gaps, which were then redressed by investigation of important sources of insight. That is, we substantiated and complemented our first step by conducting two representative case studies of SMEs in the Indian Ayurveda industry in a detailed and critical manner. Fifth, we have contributed through our findings, which provide evidence that SMEs from the Indian Ayurveda industry engage and contribute to the CE. Specifically, we present unique insights into the reasons, drivers, and motivations for SME involvement in the CE, wherein we observe a blending of indigenous practises and modern technology.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. First, we provide an overview of our bibliometric analysis of the literature on CE. This section is followed by a review of the role of CE in emerging markets, particularly as it works in SMEs. Next, we present details of the methodological approach and analysis of the data. Finally, we discuss the implications of our conclusions for theory, practice, and future research.

Section snippets

An overview of the CE knowledge base

To understand how the research base of the CE is structured and what the underlying features and explanations of this field of research are, the conceptual structure of the entire research base (which includes research articles, review papers, books, and book chapters) of the CE was mapped using bibliometric metadata of the research field (Fig. 1). Grasp of a research field’s conceptual structure aids understanding of its underlying features and explanations and their various functions. The

Methodology

As our paper is based on a dual methodology, we present the two methods adopted here. Our first methodology comprised a bibliometric analysis, a method that is well recognized and used extensively in various disciplines to analyze bibliometric metadata knowledge bases (Baker, Pandey, Kumar, & Haldar, 2020). Bibliometric analysis is considered to be a quantitative and more objective form of literature review that helps the understanding of a knowledge domain (Khan et al. 2021). This paper’s

Data analysis

Several CE themes emerged from our interviews with the key informants. We now provide a discussion and analysis of the themes inherent in the principles of Ayurveda and their surrounding philosophy of harmony with nature. The selected owners and lead practitioners have reflected this philosophy in their managerial policies, as was readily discernible in the practices of their organizations. Specifically, we noted CE themes in both resource use and product or service creation (see Fig. 2 below).

Discussion and conclusions

This paper discusses the adoption of CE practices in SMEs in an emerging market context. Its primary concerns are twofold: the extent to which SMEs in emerging countries contribute to CE adoption and practices and, secondly, the nature of this involvement in CE. To answer these questions, we have, as a first step, performed a bibliometric review of CE research to develop a descriptive discourse on the knowledge structure of the research field. Next, we have presented a specific discourse on CE

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Vijay Pereira: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration. M.K. Nandakumar: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Sreevas Sahasranamam: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft,

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Vijay Pereira (PhD, United Kingdom) is Full Professor of International and Strategic Human Capital Management and Head of the Department of the People and Organizations Department at NEOMA Business School, Reims Campus, France. He is also an adjunct Full Professor at the University of South Pacific (USP) Fiji. Professor Pereira is the Associate Editor (Strategic Management and Organization Behavior) for the Journal of Business Research and the Global Real Impact Editor for the Journal of

References (106)

  • P. Ghisellini et al.

    Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2018)
  • B. Guo et al.

    Comparative assessment of circular economy development in China’s four megacities: The case of Beijing, Chongqing, Shanghai and Urumqi

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2017)
  • D. Holzer et al.

    Mind the gap: Towards a systematic circular economy encouragement of small and medium-sized companies

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2021)
  • M.U. Hossain et al.

    Critical consideration of buildings’ environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2018)
  • Y.S. Jaiswal et al.

    A glimpse of Ayurveda-The forgotten history and principles of Indian traditional medicine

    Journal of traditional and complementary medicine

    (2017)
  • J. Kirchherr et al.

    Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions

    Resources, Conservation and Recycling

    (2017)
  • H.S. Kristensen et al.

    A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy—Moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability?

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2020)
  • S. Lahane et al.

    Circular supply chain management: A state-of-art review and future opportunities

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2020)
  • R. Merli et al.

    How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2018)
  • L. Milios et al.

    Sailing towards a circular economy: Conditions for increased reuse and remanufacturing in the Scandinavian maritime sector

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2019)
  • M. Norris et al.

    Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature

    Journal of Informetrics

    (2007)
  • M. Ormazabal et al.

    Circular economy in Spanish SMEs: Challenges and opportunities

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2018)
  • A. Parchomenko et al.

    Measuring the circular economy—A Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2019)
  • V. Parida et al.

    Orchestrating industrial ecosystem in circular economy: A two-stage transformation model for large manufacturing companies

    Journal of Business Research

    (2019)
  • N. Patwa et al.

    Towards a circular economy: An emerging economies context

    Journal of Business Research

    (2021)
  • K. Poulis et al.

    The role of context in case study selection: An international business perspective

    International Business Review

    (2013)
  • S.M. Rahman et al.

    Circular economy, proximity, and shipbreaking: A material flow and environmental impact analysis

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2020)
  • T. Škrinjarić

    Empirical assessment of the circular economy of selected European countries

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2020)
  • M. Trigkas et al.

    Circular economy. The Greek industry leaders’ way towards a transformational shift

    Resources, Conservation and Recycling

    (2020)
  • V. Veleva et al.

    Corporate-entrepreneur collaborations to advance a circular economy

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2018)
  • V. Veleva et al.

    The need for better measurement and employee engagement to advance a circular economy: Lessons from Biogen’s “zero waste” journey

    Journal of Cleaner production

    (2017)
  • A. Agrawal et al.

    Corporate social entrepreneurship in India

    South Asian Journal of Global Business Research

    (2016)
  • M. Agyemang et al.

    Drivers and barriers to circular economy implementation

    Management Decision.

    (2019)
  • S. Bag et al.

    Examining the role of procurement 4.0 towards remanufacturing operations and circular economy

    Production Planning & Control

    (2020)
  • H.K. Baker et al.

    A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions

    Journal of Business Research

    (2020)
  • N. Bamel et al.

    Knowledge management within a strategic alliances context: Past, present and future

    Journal of Knowledge Management

    (2021)
  • U. Bamel et al.

    The extent and impact of intellectual capital research: A two decade analysis

    Journal of Intellectual Capital

    (2020)
  • M. Barreiro-Gen et al.

    How circular is the circular economy? Analyzing the implementation of circular economy in organizations

    Business Strategy and the Environment

    (2020)
  • T. Bartol et al.

    Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia

    Scientometrics

    (2014)
  • F. Bassi et al.

    Sustainable development of small-and medium-sized enterprises in the European Union: A taxonomy of circular economy practices

    Business Strategy and the Environment

    (2020)
  • D.P. Bhawuk

    AdhyAtma or spirituality: Construct definition and elaboration using multiple methods

  • J.C. Boldrini

    The value co-creation in a collaborative project of innovation: A case of transition towards circular economy

    Innovations

    (2018)
  • A.M. Bundgaard et al.

    Luxury products for the circular economy? A case study of Bang & Olufsen

    Business Strategy and the Environment

    (2019)
  • L.O. Cezarino et al.

    Diving into emerging economies bottleneck: Industry 4.0 and implications for circular economy

    Management Decision.

    (2019)
  • B.K. Chaturvedi

    Kautilya's arthshastra

    (2001)
  • A. Chaturvedi et al.

    Relevance of indigenous institutions to management of forest ecosystems

    (2001)
  • M.J. Cobo et al.

    Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools

    Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology

    (2011)
  • J.W. Creswell et al.

    Designing and conducting mixed methods research

    (2017)
  • M. Del Giudice et al.

    Supply chain management in the era of circular economy: The moderating effect of big data

    The International Journal of Logistics Management.

    (2020)
  • Cited by (31)

    • What would a human-centred ‘social’ Circular Economy look like? Drawing from Max-Neef's Human-Scale Development proposal

      2023, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      A preoccupation with consumer wants may mean the needs of various communities that have faced exploitation and neglect in the linear economy, reflecting structural injustices, remain unaddressed. For instance, at the global perspective, the positioning of circularity in so-called Global South regions (Pereira et al., 2022) as well as the impacts on vulnerable stakeholders, such as informal workers (Barford and Ahmad, 2021; Hartmann et al., 2022), low-income (Padilla-Rivera et al., 2020; Schröder et al., 2020) and persons with disabilities (Clube and Tennant, 2021), are frequently overlooked. Thus, a wants-based CE fails to consider how subsistence needs can be universally satisfied, as social equity is largely overlooked (Murray et al., 2017).

    • Interactive effects of two-way information and perceived convenience on waste separation behavior: Evidence from residents in eastern China

      2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the present study, regardless of how strong the stimulus for the negative information was, residents' waste separation behavior did not change dramatically. An alternative explanation invokes involvement, which refers to the subjective experience of a relationship, or the relative importance of an activity or product to oneself (Pereira et al., 2022). Weber et al. (2018) found that people's involvement in public debates and consultations is beneficial to waste management.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Vijay Pereira (PhD, United Kingdom) is Full Professor of International and Strategic Human Capital Management and Head of the Department of the People and Organizations Department at NEOMA Business School, Reims Campus, France. He is also an adjunct Full Professor at the University of South Pacific (USP) Fiji. Professor Pereira is the Associate Editor (Strategic Management and Organization Behavior) for the Journal of Business Research and the Global Real Impact Editor for the Journal of Knowledge Management. Professor Pereira has unique experience in industry, consulting and academia. He has a track record of attracting funding and has published widely, in over 100 outlets, including in leading international journals such as the HRM US, Academy of Management Perspectives, Academy of Management Discoveries, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of World Business, British Journal of Management, International Journal of HRM, Journal of Business Research, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Business History, International Marketing Review, Journal of International Management, International Business Review, Applied Psychology: An International Review and International Journal of Production Research, among others. Professor Pereira has guest edited close to 20 special issues in top tier journals and has published 12 books. He is currently on the editorial and advisory board for the journals Production and Operations Management (Listed in Financial Times), Journal of Management Studies, International Journal of HRM, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Asian Business & Management Journal and South Asian History and Culture. Professor Pereira is the elected Vice President of the Academy of International Business (Middle East and North Africa) and the Secretary of the Indian Academy of Management (an affiliate of the Academy of Management, US)

    M.K. Nandakumar: Dr. M.K. Nandakumar is a Professor at the Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode (IIMK). He is a member of the Peer Review College of the British Academy of Management and an editorial board member of the Journal of International Management and Management Decision. He has worked in three leading universities in the United Kingdom: the University of Salford, Middlesex University, and the University of East London, London. His papers have been published in leading journals such as R&D Management, Journal of International Management, Journal of Business Research, Long Range Planning, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, International Studies of Management and Organization, Management Decision, and more. Dr. Nandakumar has trained thousands of managers and executives from leading organizations during his executive development programs. His flagship management program entitled Professional Certificate Programme in Advanced Strategic Management attracts many managers every year. He has secured a research grant under British Academy/Leverhulme Small Research Grants SRG 2019. He has supervised many Ph.D. students to successful completion. At IIMK, he has worked in significant administrative positions such as the Chairman of International Relations, Chairman of International Accreditation, and the Strategic Management Department chairman. He teaches many courses at the MBA and Doctoral levels and also on the Executive Education Programmes. He has successfully led the Association of MBAs (AMBA) accreditation project at IIMK. His paper published in Management Decision has been chosen as a Highly Commended Award Winner at the Literati Network Awards for Excellence 2011. His book entitled Organisational Flexibility and Competitiveness was published by Springer in 2014.

    Sreevas Sahasranamam: Sreevas is a Chancellor's Fellow at the Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship. His research predominantly focuses on innovation/entrepreneurship in and from emerging markets. He is co-lead for the doctoral training centre in Socially Progressive Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Strathclyde, and also a part of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) UK team. His research has been published in leading management journals including Journal of World Business, Global Strategy Journal, Journal of Business Research, among others

    Umesh Bamel: Umesh Bamel is a PhD from Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. His PhD thesis examined that how organizational climate or work environment affects employee performance. His PhD thesis was awarded as the Highly Commended Doctoral Thesis by Emerald/EFMD 2013 Outstanding Doctoral Research Awards in Leadership and Organizational Development category. Umesh research work has appeared and under consideration in top tier academic journals (ABDC A*, A and B) such as Accident Analysis and Prevention, Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal of Knowledge Management, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Process, International Journal of Organizational Analysis and so on. His research interest includes Organizational Climate, Safety Climate, Positive Organizational Behavior, Knowledge Management and so on. Umesh is actively involved in editorial board of various peer reviewed journals such as Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. He has been reviewing papers for many prestigious journals to name few are Journal of Organizational Behavior, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Journal of Knowledge Management, Human Relations, Personnel Review, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, VINE, Annals of Operations Research, Journal of Cleaner Production and so on. Umesh has taught in prestigious and internationally accredited business schools such as School of Business Management, NMIMS Mumbai, IIM Raipur and IIM Amritsar in full time MBA and Executive MBA programs. He has conducted numerous management development programs for corporate such as Hero FinCorp, Indian Oil, Maruti Nexa, and so on. Umesh has also conducted faculty development program for various Engineering Institutes such as NIT Raipur, Uttarakhand Technical University under TEQIP scheme.

    Ashish Malik: Ashish Malik is an Associate Professor and the Head of the Management Discipline at the University of Newcastle, Australia. His current research is at the interface of strategy, HRM, and innovation management focusing on knowledge-intensive services industries. He serves as Associate Editor (Methods) for the Journal of Business Research and Asian & Business Management (HRM) and Editorial Board Member of Journal of Knowledge Management and Human Resource Management Review. Ashish's work appears in several high-ranked journals, including the British Journal of Management, Harvard Business Review, MIT Sloan Management Review, Human Resource Management (US), Human Resource Management Review, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of Business Research, Journal of International Management, and Social Identities, among others.

    Yama Temouri: Yama is an Associate Professor at Khalifa Unversity in the UAE and Aston University in the UK. His research interests are mainly in how multinational enterprises internationalize and impact on host and home economies. He is an Associate Editor for the Business Research Quarterly (Elsevier Publishers). He is currently studying the link between institutional quality, foreign direct investment and firm performance, as well as analyzing the locational choices of foreign direct investment in tax havens. Dr Temouri has published in top tier journals, such as Journal of World Business, Academy of Management Perspectives, Long Range Planning, Journal of International Management; Journal of Business Research and British Journal of Management. He has extensive consultancy experience, including projects for the OECD, European Commission and for several UK Government Departments, including the United Kingdom Trade and Investment (UKTI) Department; the Department for Business, Innovation and Services (BIS) and the Innovation foundation NESTA.

    View full text