Letter to the EditorResponse changes in Delphi processes: why is it important to provide high-quality feedback to Delphi participants?
Section snippets
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Dmitry Khodyakov: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - original draft. Christine Chen: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing.
References (9)
- et al.
The Delphi method; more research please
J Clin Epidemiol
(2019) An evaluation of Delphi
Technol Forecast Social Change
(1991)- et al.
Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability
BMC Med Res Methodol
(2020) - et al.
The RAND/PPMD patient-centeredness method: a novel online approach to engaging patients and their representatives in guideline development
Eur J Person Centered Healthc
(2019)
Cited by (14)
The Delphi technique: Methodology, variants and usage examples[Formula presented]
2022, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im GesundheitswesenDevelopment of a portfolio framework for implementation of an outcomes-based healthcare professional education curriculum using a modified e-Delphi method
2021, Medical Journal Armed Forces IndiaCitation Excerpt :A moderator conducts the whole proceedings and maintains a track of each round. To enable a faster and wider reach, electronic/internet enabled methods are used leading to the term e-Delphi.6,7 To assist in the collection of data and reporting of results, guidelines given by Hasson et al were used to structure the methodology and report results of the current study.8
Nature and Predictors of Response Changes in Modified-Delphi Panels
2020, Value in HealthCitation Excerpt :Iterative data collection is a key characteristic of the Delphi methodology, which could encourage participants to change their responses based on group feedback.2 Response changes between rounds may also help participants develop consensus.13 In this article, we describe the extent and nature of changes in participants’ responses in OMD panels as a result of exposure to group feedback and discussion, thereby directly addressing recent calls for more methodological research on the Delphi method14,15 by identifying predictors of response changes.
Moving toward standardization: physician reporting of sleep studies
2023, Journal of Clinical Sleep MedicineThe GenderCOS project: study protocol for the development of two international Core Outcome Sets for genital gender affirming surgery
2023, International Journal of Transgender Health
Funding: This work was supported through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Program Award (ME-1507-31052). All statements in this article, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of PCORI, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee, or the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The funding agreement ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report.
Conflict of interest: D.K. is a leader of the ExpertLens team. ExpertLens is a tool used to collect Delphi data for this study. C.C. reports no conflicts of interest.