Original Research
Prognosis of Severe Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis by Stroke Volume Index and Transvalvular Flow Rate

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.12.029Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objectives

This study determined whether flow state classified by stroke volume index (SVi) or transvalvular flow rate (FR) improved risk stratification of all-cause mortality, hospitalization due to heart failure, and aortic valvular interventions for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).

Background

SVi is a widely accepted classification for flow state in severe low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) AS. Recent studies suggest that FR more closely approximates true AS severity and provides more useful prognostication than SVi.

Methods

Patients with severe AS over a 7-year period were subclassified by echocardiographic parameters. LFLG-AS was defined as severe AS (aortic valve area index [AVAi]: <0.6 cm2/m2), with a mean transvalvular pressure gradient of <40 mm Hg in the setting of low flow state: SVi of <35 ml/m2 and/or FR of <200 ml/s and subclassified into preserved (≥50%; paradoxical) or reduced (<50%; classical) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Results

Among 621 consecutive patients with severe AS, the proportions of patients classified as LFLG-AS were different between SVi and FR (p < 0.001). Classification using SVi, FR, and LVEF was a strong predictor of the composite endpoint at the 2-year follow-up. The addition of SVi to the echocardiographic and clinical model provided significant improvement in reclassification (net reclassification improvement: 0.089; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.045 to 0.133; p = 0.04), whereas addition of FR did not (net reclassification improvement: 0.061; 95% CI: 0.016 to 0.106; p = 0.17). C-statistics indicated improved risk discrimination when AVAi, LVEF, and SVi or FR were added as predictive variables to the clinical model (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Low SVi or FR was associated with adverse cardiovascular events and showed improvement in discrimination, but only SVi, not FR, significantly improved risk reclassification compared to other conventional clinical and echocardiographic predictors. This suggests that FR is not superior to SVi in distinguishing true severe from pseudosevere forms of AS and identification of patients with LFLG-AS who have worse outcomes.

Key Words

aging
aortic stenosis
low-flow

Abbreviations and Acronyms

AS
aortic stenosis
AVAi
indexed aortic valve area
CI
confidence interval
FR
flow rate
HF
heart failure
HR
hazard ratio
LFLG
low-flow, low-gradient
LVEF
left ventricular ejection fraction
LVOT
left ventricular outflow tract
MPG
mean transvalvular pressure gradient
SVi
stroke volume index
VTI
velocity-time integral

Cited by (0)

Philippe Pibarot, MD, served as Guest Editor for this paper.

The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’ institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information, visit the Author Center.