Biomethane reforming over Ni catalysts supported on PrO2-ZrO2 solid-solutions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The addition of PrO2 to NiO/ZrO2 increased the dispersion of Niº and surface area.

  • The addition of PrO2 to NiO/ZrO2 delayed carbon deposition rates.

  • The solid-solution PrO2-ZrO2 in the catalysts prevents catalyst deactivation.

  • The PrO2-ZrO2 solid-solution favored the catalysis in the presence of O2.

  • The two interactions (PrO2-ZrO2 and NiO-PrO2) together had positive effects on catalysis.

Abstract

Catalysts based on Ni/PrO2-ZrO2 mixtures (PrO2/ZrO2 mass ratio = 1, 4, 8; with Ni 20% of the total weight of catalyst) were synthesized by the one-step polymerization method. They were tested in Dry-Reforming of Biogas (1.5CH4:CO2), Oxidative Reforming of Biomethane (1.5CH4:CO2:0.25 O2), and Partial Oxidation Biomethane (2CH4:1O2). According to the characterization of the catalysts, the XRD results showed the stabilization of tetragonal ZrO2, by forming the PrO2-ZrO2 solid solution; also confirmed by XPS spectroscopy. By SBET analysis, it was found that the higher PrO2 content, increased the surface area (m2 g−1) of the catalysts. The in situ-DRX analyses (under reduction conditions with H2) showed that higher content of PrO2 promoted the decrease in the size of Niº crystallites of the catalysts. According to H2-TPR, the higher content of PrO2 favored the formation of NiO species strongly interacted with support. The catalytic tests showed that the PrO2-ZrO2 solid solution used as catalytic support strongly increased the production of Syngas over Ni-catalysts, and reduced the carbon deposits. The best catalyst was that with 8% PrO2 in the composition (Ni8PrZr), as it recorded the highest reactant conversion rates and the less amount of coke during the reactions. In situ characterization of the catalysts was carried out under reaction conditions (by X-ray absorption spectroscopy), and deactivation was explored. All the results of this research indicated that the use of PrO2-ZrO2 solid solution as catalytic support of Nickel is very promising to Syngas production from clean biomethane and biogas.

Introduction

Human activities lead to the dumping of a huge amount of organic matter that accelerates the emissions of greenhouse gases resulting in the alteration of the balance of the environmental system. The exploration of organic matter for energy production has been enlarged significantly nowadays aiming to reach sustainable development [1]. The widely known anaerobic digestion process applied to organic matter, at the present is applied to any wastes of vegetable and animal origin (ex. agricultural, and municipal solid wastes) to obtain biogas for energy uses and to encourage waste reduction and sustainability [2].

Biogas can be considered a first-generation biofuel, and its production is very attractive owing to its low production cost and is ecofriendly when compared to the other biofuels. The two major components of biogas are CH4 and CO2 (CH4:CO2 ratio depends on the substrate), and other products as minor components (H2S, NH3, and H2) [3], [4]. The methane obtained by the purification process of biogas (to clean principally NH3 and H2S) is denominated biomethane. One different way to explore the potential of biogas or biomethane is the production of Syngas (H2/O2), as demonstrated previously in references [3], [5], [6], [7], [8].

The direct reforming of biogas occurs by Dry Reforming of Methane (DRM, Reaction 1) because biogas is rich in CH4 and CO2 (CH4 is in excess in this case). Partial Oxidation of Biomethane occurs by the addition of oxygen in a sufficient amount to reach a molar ratio of 2CH4:1 O2 (Partial Oxidation of Methane, POM, Reaction 2). To realize the Oxidative Reform of Biogas, the addition of O2 to the biogas is needed to partially oxidize the excess of methane as shown in Reaction 3 (Oxidative Reform of Methane, ORM).DRM: 1.5 CH4 + CO2 → 2 CO + 2H2 + 0.5 CH4 ∆Hº= 260.5 kJ mol−1POM: 2 CH4 + O2 → 2 CO + 4H2 ∆Hº= −22.6 kJ mol−1ORM: 1.5CH4 + CO2 + 0.25O2 → 2.5 CO + 3 H2 ΔHº = 249.2 kJ mol−1

Syngas (H2/CO = 1,2,3.) is a very important starting material for a wide number of products such as hydrogen, methanol, liquid fuels (through Fischer-Tropsch process), Di-methyl ether (DME), ammonia, among others. The Syngas produced from reactions 1, 3 (DRM and ORM) is environmentally attractive since the two main greenhouse gases (in this case CH4 and CO2) are converted into a highly valuated raw material. The Syngas production from biomethane or biogas (Reactions 1–3) is an attractive eco-friendly process and turns it sustainable.

To enable the biogas or biomethane reforming process to produce Syngas, a good catalyst is needed. Transition metals of Group VIIIB are good catalysts for methane reforming (Ex. Fe, Ni, and Co) showing high efficiency in the conversion of methane; special Ni-based catalysts have been extensively used in Steam Reforming Methane (SRM), Dry Reforming of Methane (DRM), and Partial Oxidation of Methane (POM). The industrial process of SRM to produce Syngas (often followed by Water Gas Shift Reaction to produce a hydrogen-rich mixture) uses Ni-catalyst (supported on Al2O3); however, this catalyst causes some troubles related to carbon deposits (which leads to catalyst deactivation and a dangerous increase of the reactor pressure). Among different ways to minimize the carbon deposition rates in these cases we can list: the use of zirconia-based solid solutions as catalyst supports [7], [9], [10], [11], decreasing the crystallite size of the active metal catalyst [12], [13], [14], the use of Noble-metal promoters in non-noble catalysts [8], [12], among others. Solid solutions based on praseodymium have excellent redox properties and oxygen storage capacity which are very good for oxidation reactions and may be interesting in the reforming of biomethane or biogas [15], [16], [17]. In this connection, it possible to affirm that the Nickel catalysts containing solid-solution based on praseodymium are quite interesting.

Given the appointed in the paragraphs above the goal of this research work was to investigate the effect of different proportions of PrO2-ZrO2 solid-solution in nickel catalysts and, evaluate their catalytic performances in Dry Reforming of Methane, Oxidative Reforming of Biogas and Partial Oxidation of Biomethane. It is hoped that the results of this research be useful to enable the sustainable production of Syngas from biomethane (or biogas).

Section snippets

Synthesis of Ni catalysts

The Ni catalysts were synthesized by the One-Step Polymerization method (OSP method), the salt precursors of Ni, Zr, and Pr were Ni(NO3)2.6 H2O, Zr(CO3)2.1.5 H2O, Pr(NO3)3.6 H2O, and the polymer precursors were citric-acid and ethylene-glycol. All reactants were of analytic degree (99.9%<). The salt precursors of Ni, Zr, and Pr were dissolved (nitric acid used for Zr carbonate, and water for nitrates of Ni and Pr) separately, the detailed procedure of the One-Step Polymerization method was

Characterization of the catalysts

Fig. 1a shows the XRD patterns of the NiZr, Ni1PrZr, Ni4PrZr, and Ni8PrZr catalysts at room conditions. In these patterns, the principal peaks are related to the crystal lattice structure of fcc (face-centered cubic) of NiO (JCPDS 78–0643) and tetragonal ZrO2 (JCPDS 81-1549). The XRD pattern of the NiPr catalyst is shown in Fig. 1d, this pattern shows the main phase of perovskite PrNiO3 (JCPDS 79-2453) and a minor phase of fcc crystal lattice structure of NiO (denoted by weak intensity peaks).

Conclusions

The catalyst composed of NiO/PrO2/ZrO2 mixtures can be used in the Dry Reforming of Clean Biogas, Oxidative Reforming of Biomethane, as well as in the Partial Oxidation of Biomethane. The composition of the Ni8PrZr catalyst was the most promising.

The addition of PrO2 in the NiO/ZrO2 system improved the performance of the catalysts in all the methane reactions studied in this work. Catalysts with 4% and 8% of PrO2 showed the highest reactant conversion rates, the catalyst with 8% (Ni8PrZr)

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yvan J.O. Asencios: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Cristiane B. Rodella: Methodology. Elisabete M. Assaf: Supervision. Methodology.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Brazilian National Council for Scientific Development (CNPq, Brazil, Grant No. 407097/20), the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Brazil) for the financial support (Grant No.: 2014/24940-5), and the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS) for the XPS and XANES analysis.

References (26)

  • S.O. Soloviev et al.

    Carbon dioxide reforming of methane on monolithic Ni/Al2O3-based catalysts

    J. Nat. Gas Chem.

    (2011)
  • L.J. Belmonte-Ureña et al.

    Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: a global analysis and future agenda

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2021)
  • E. Winquist et al.

    Is biogas an energy or a sustainability product? Business opportunities in the Finnish biogas branch

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2019)
  • O.A. Bereketidou et al.

    Biogas reforming for syngas production over nickel supported on ceria-alumina catalysts

    Catal. Today

    (2012)
  • N. Rueangjitt, C. Akarawitoo, S. Chavadej, Production of hydrogen-rich syngas from biogas reforming with partial...
  • Y.J.O. Asencios et al.

    Synthesis of NiO-MgO-ZrO2 catalysts and their performance in reforming of model biogas

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2011)
  • Y.J.O. Asencios et al.

    Oxidative-reforming of model biogas over NiO/Al2O3 catalysts: the influence of the variation of support synthesis conditions

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • Y.J.O. Asencios et al.

    Oxidative reforming of model biogas over NiO-Y2O3-ZrO2 catalysts

    Appl. Catal. B Environ.

    (2013)
  • A.F. Lucrédio et al.

    Methane conversion reactions on Ni catalysts promoted with Rh: influence of support

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2011)
  • Y.J.O. Asencios et al.

    Synthesis of NiO/Y2O3/ZrO2 catalysts prepared by one-step polymerization method and their use in the syngas production from methane

    Int. J. Chem. Eng.

    (2018)
  • Y.J.O. Asencios et al.

    Oxidative-reforming of methane and partial oxidation of methane reactions over NiO/PrO2/ZrO2 catalysts: effect of nickel content

    Braz. J. Chem. Eng.

    (2016)
  • J.D.A. Bellido et al.

    Effect of the Y2O3-ZrO2 support composition on nickel catalyst evaluated in dry reforming of methane

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2009)
  • A.F. Lucrédio et al.

    Co/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-type precursor, promoted with La and Ce, studied by XPS and applied to methane steam reforming reactions

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (2)

    • Customized Ni-MgO-ZrO<inf>2</inf>catalysts for the dry reforming of methane using coke oven gas: Optimizing the MgO content

      2023, Journal of CO2 Utilization
      Citation Excerpt :

      For this reason, these catalysts are being actively researched to improve the catalyst deactivation problem [1,26–29]. ZrO2-supported Ni catalysts have been broadly studied for the dry reforming reaction because ZrO2 has good thermal stability, acidic/basic properties, and good oxygen mobility [12,28,30–34]. In our previous study, we demonstrated that the number of Ni active sites on the catalyst surface was a major factor influencing the catalyst performance [35].

    View full text