The heat of mixing and second virial cross coefficient of water + oxygen and water + nitrogen

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2008.12.009Get rights and content

Abstract

A vapour phase flow mixing calorimeter has been used to measure the heat of mixing HmE of (0.5H2O + 0.5O2)(g) and (0.5H2O + 0.5N2)(g) at the pressure p = 0.101325 MPa and at temperatures from (373.15 to 493.15) K. The HmE measurements were analysed using an association model for water in which the non-specific part of the interaction energy was calculated from the Stockmayer potential with the parameters ε/k = 233 K, σ = 0.312 nm, and t = 1.278. The specific part of the energy was calculated from an equilibrium constant for the association of two water molecules K298 K = 0.36 MPa−1 together with an enthalpy of association ΔH = −16.85 kJ · mol−1. The second virial coefficients of O2 and N2 were calculated from the Lennard-Jones potential. Cross coefficients B12 were calculated from a combining rule containing an adjustable parameter ξ which is known to be satisfactory for mixtures of (water + hydrogen, or nitrogen, or argon, or methane). For all these mixtures the combining rule gives ξ = 0.99, and this value gives a good fit to the new HmE measurements on (water + nitrogen). For (water + oxygen) it was necessary to reduce ξ from 0.99 to 0.83 to fit the measurements. The values of B12 for both mixtures are close to those obtained from measurements of the solubility of water in compressed oxygen or nitrogen, and confirm that B12 for water–oxygen is less negative than that for water–nitrogen. This is in accord with recent theoretical calculations of the potential surfaces for water–oxygen and water–nitrogen.

Introduction

Second virial cross coefficients B12 for water–nitrogen or water–oxygen are very difficult to measure, particularly at low temperatures. The use of pVT techniques is complicated by the need to make corrections for the adsorption of water on the walls of the apparatus. An alternative technique is to measure the solubility of water in compressed nitrogen or oxygen, a method which has the advantage that there are no adsorption errors. Another technique is to measure the isothermal Joule–Thomson coefficient ϕ of the gaseous mixture, where ϕ = B  T · (dB/dT). From know values of ϕ11 and ϕ22 of the pure component gases the cross coefficient ϕ12 can be extracted. By fitting ϕ12 to a suitable potential function values of B12 can be obtained. However the design and operation of a Joule–Thomson calorimeter presents several problems, the control of heat leaks is difficult, and kinetic effects due to the high velocity of the gas passing through the throttle can spoil the accuracy of the measurements.

An alternative to Joule–Thomson calorimetry is to measure the heat of mixing of the gases, an experiment which yields experimental values of ϕ12 from which values of B12 can be calculated. The control of heat leaks is easier, and kinetic effects are negligible. The first calorimeter [1] designed for this purpose featured two identical flow calorimeters connected in series. The gases were mixed in the first calorimeter, and the gas mixture then flowed through the second calorimeter which acted as a reference. There is a small pressure drop across a flow mixing calorimeter, but by connecting two identical calorimeters in series the Joule–Thomson effect can be cancelled out. Alternatively the pressure drop can be measured and a correction for the Joule–Thomson effect can be made. Unlike pVT experiments flow calorimetric measurements are free from adsorption errors, any molecules which absorb are, in effect, part of the apparatus. A twin flow mixing calorimeter [2] operating at pressures close to atmospheric has been used to measure the excess enthalpy HmE for (0.5H2O + 0.5N2)(g) at the standard pressure p=0.101325MPa and at six temperatures in the range (373.15 to 423.15) K. A flow mixing calorimeter for measurements at high temperatures and pressures was then developed [3] and this was used to make measurements on (yH2O + (1  y)N2) at seven temperatures in the range (448.2 to 698.2) K, at pressures from (0.35 to 12.59) MPa. A further development was the construction of a plug-in gas phase flow mixing calorimeter [4] which could be easily removed and modified as required. This calorimeter has proved to be invaluable for measurements on polar fluid mixtures [5] and is the one used for the measurements reported here.

Section snippets

Experimental

The flow calorimetric apparatus used to make HmE measurements on (water + nitrogen) and (water + oxygen) is almost the same as that previously described [4], [5]. The plug-in calorimeter was a single vessel, not a twin arrangement. The pressure drop across the calorimeter was measured and a small correction for the Joule–Thomson effect was made. The apparatus was improved in several ways. To minimise the possibility of oxidation of the stainless steel gauze used to assist mixing of the gases in the

Calculation of the excess enthalpy

It was shown previously [1] that HmE for a binary vapour mixture is given by the equationHmE=y(1-y)·p·(2ϕ12-ϕ11-ϕ22)-(p2/RT)·(Bmϕm-yB11ϕ11-(1-y)B22ϕ22),whereϕ=B-T·(dB/dT),Bm=y2B11+2y(1-y)B12+(1-y)2B22and ϕm for the mixture is given by a similar expression. In the above, third and higher coefficients have been neglected. For mixtures of both non-polar and polar fluids it has been shown [6] that the experimental values of HmE can be well fitted by values of B12 and ϕ12 calculated from the

An association model for water

For mixtures containing steam as a component the use of an association model is appropriate. Measurements of HE for (0.5H2O + 0.5Ar) reported previously [7] were analysed using the association model suggested by Woolley [8] and Lambert et al. [9]. Details are also given in reference [4] where the self association of water in a (0.5H2O + 0.5N2) mixture is discussed.

In the quasi-chemical association model the observed second virial coefficient B11 for water is split into a non-specific part B11ns due

Analysis of the HE measurements

Lennard-Jones parameters for nitrogen are ε/k = 95 K and σ = 0.370 nm, and for oxygen they are ε/k = 121 K and σ = 0.339 nm. These parameters were obtained by fitting class 1 second virial coefficient data for nitrogen and oxygen listed in the compilation of Dymond and Smith [17]. The ionisation energies are (2.5 · 10−18 and 1.9 · 10−18) J, respectively, and the ionisation energy of water is 2.0 · 10−18 J. Values of B and ϕ for nitrogen or oxygen were calculated from the Lennard-Jones parameters, and values of B

Discussion

A significant advance in the calculation of second virial cross coefficients from first principles has been made for water–nitrogen [22] and for water–oxygen [23] by Harvey, Hodges, Tulegenov, and Wheatley. The authors construct a rigid-body potential energy surface for the water–nitrogen and water–oxygen complexes using a systematic intermolecular potential extrapolation routine (SIMPER). The intermolecular potential was then extrapolated to the limit of a complete basis set. An analytic fit

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express his thanks to Dr. A.H. Harvey for his encouragement to publish the heat of mixing measurements, and for his help in making comparisons of the derived B12 values with those obtained from ab initio calculations.

References (23)

  • C.J. Wormald

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1977)
  • P. Richards et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1981)
  • C.J. Wormald et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1983)
  • C.J. Wormald

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1997)
  • C.J. Wormald et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2001)
  • C.J. Wormald et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1996)
  • C.J. Wormald et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1996)
  • C.J. Wormald et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1997)
  • C. Mathonat et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1998)
  • A.P. Parker et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1998)
  • C.J. Wormald et al.

    J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text