Conformational analysis of branched alkanes using limiting partial molar volumes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2017.07.026Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Limiting partial molar volumes of mono branched-chain alkanes in methanol and carbon tetrachloride.

  • Conformational analysis of branched-chain alkanes in two different solvents.

  • Additive scheme including group contribution and the average number of gauche interactions.

  • Solvent effect upon the enthalpy change during an anti→gauche transition.

Abstract

The solvent effect on the solute conformations of straight and branched-chain alkanes infinitely diluted in methanol and carbon tetrachloride is studied. An additive scheme is used that takes into account the strong relation between limiting partial molar volumes and the average numbers of gauche conformations adopted by the solute molecules in each solvent. These numbers were determined using the Pitzer’s steric partition function with different values of anti→gauche transition enthalpy variations, ranging from (+2931 to −1465) kJ·mol−1. The partial molar volumes at infinite dilution for three mono branched-chain alkanes (2-methylpentane, 3-methylpentane and 2-methylheptane) were experimentally determined in methanol to complement other series consisting mainly of straight, bi and tri branched-chain alkanes obtained in previous works. The conformational analysis performed using statistical methods is quite convincing about the strong effect of the solvent on the solute conformation equilibrium. Conclusions about close-packing and structure effects related to anti-gauche transitions in these two solvents are also drawn.

Introduction

Conformational analysis has been frequently used in several chemistry domains in order to rationalize the behaviour of flexible molecules in terms of molecular interactions in liquid solutions and mixtures as well as at several types of interfaces. The very different conformational behaviour that a given flexible molecule presents in the gas phase and in pure liquids when compared to liquid mixtures where it can act both as a solute or solvent makes this subject so important. Reasoning to explain the folding or unfolding of proteins, the mechanisms of many kinds of reactions and catalytic effects in homogeneous or heterogeneous media are often based on conformational analysis [1], [2], [3].

Spectroscopic techniques and in particular Raman spectroscopy [4], [5], [6] have been widely used to assess the most probable molecular conformations and in some cases their relative abundance. Computational studies have also proliferated in literature [7], [8], [9].

It has been proved that the conformational distribution of a given flexible solute in a solvent, described by the average number of gauche interactions, Zg, has a decisive influence on thermophysical properties of the solute in its own medium or of the solute infinitely diluted in a solvent [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Some qualitative reasoning, based on Zg changes with composition, have also been made to justify some interesting features found in the very-dilute region of aqueous mixtures of amphiphilic molecules with a flexible hydrophobic moiety [15], [16], [17], [18].

Several additive schemes [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] based on group contributions, or using reference volumes such as van der Waals volumes calculated according to Bondi [25], have been proposed to calculate limiting partial molar volumes, at a fixed temperature and pressure. Some of them include a term containing the average number of gauche interactions, Zg, in order to take into account experimental values obtained for different isomeric solutes. As far as we know, the solvent effect on Zg values concerning 1–4 carbon–carbon interactions has not yet been considered. This is however imperative, given that the volume changes produced by each gauche interaction depend on the cohesive energy density (c.e.d.) of that solvent and can be represented by the enthalpy change for the anti→ ganche (a→g) conversion, ΔH(a→g) [26]. Apparently, calculations of Zg values have been made considering always the same ΔH(a→g) = 2931 kJ·mol−1 value. Examples are calculations for series of straight and branched-chain alkanes, using the Pitzer’s steric partition function [27], made by Edward et al. (in carbon tetrachloride) [12] and Criss et al. (in methanol) [13]. Also, the same ΔH(a→g) value was used by Mann [10], [11] in pure alkanes.

In this work we measured partial molar volumes at infinite dilution, VB, for three mono branched-chain alkanes, 2-methylpentane (2M-5), 3-methylpentane (3M-5) and 2-methylheptane (2M-7), in methanol with the aim of using limiting partial molar volumes as a quantitative tool to provide a clear confirmation that the conformational equilibrium of flexible molecules at infinite dilution strongly depends on the solvent used. These compounds were chosen in order to complement series of branched and straight-chain alkanes, published by French and Criss [13] and by Barbosa et al. [28]. Values of the average number of 1–4 carbon–carbon gauche interactions were calculated using the Pitzer steric partition function [27] with ΔH(a→g) varying from +2931 to −1465 kJ·mol−1. Resorting to the same additive scheme as used by Edward et al. [12], French and Criss [13] and Inglese et al. [14] and applying a multi-parametric least-squares fitting to the whole set of straight and branched-chain alkanes we prove that other values than +2931 kJ·mol−1should be considered in order to grasp the best a→g equilibrium. We further made the same type of analysis based on 20 straight and branched-chain alkanes in carbon tetrachloride, CCl4, to confirm that in this solvent the best least-squares fitting is obtained with ΔH(a→g) = +2931 kJ·mol−1, as used by Edward et al. following Mann’s proposal for pure compounds.

In order to shed light into the meaning of the obtained ΔH(a→g) values for the two solvents, we used a simple continuum model to get an independent estimate of these quantities taking into account several contributions.

Section snippets

Materials

Methanol p.a. was supplied by Merck, with purity quoted >0.998 in mass fraction. It was further purified as previously described [28], [29]. Its purity was tested by density measurements. The 2-methylpentane and 3-methylpentane were furnished by Fluka with purity claimed >0.995. 2-methylheptane with purity quoted >0.99 in mass fraction was supplied by Merck. The three mono branched-chain alkanes were used without further purification. Table 1 summarizes this information. All the density values

Apparent molar volumes

Apparent molar volumes of all solutes were calculated in the usual way resorting to Eq. (1).Vφ,B={(ρ0-ρ)/(mBρρA)}+MB/ρ,where MB represents the solute molar mass, mB the molality of the solution and ρ and ρA the densities of the solution and solvent, respectively. Plots of Vφ,B vs. mB for the three branched-chain alkanes are displayed in Fig. 1.

Partial molar volumes at infinite dilution VB were estimated by least-squares fitting apparent molar volumes to linear equations of the type:Vφ,B=VB+b

Conclusions

The main conclusion of this work is that limiting partial molar volumes can provide a quantitative tool for a clear confirmation that the conformational equilibrium of flexible molecules at infinite dilution strongly depends on the solvent.

Limiting partial molar volumes, VB, existing in the literature for two series of straight and branched-chain alkanes in methanol and carbon tetrachloride were used to analyse the strong dependence of this property on the solute conformation, evaluated by the

Acknowledgements

Financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal, under projects UID/MULTI/00612/2013 and UID/QUI/00100/2013 is greatly appreciated.

We thank Professor J. C. Reis for his suggestions and revision of the manuscript.

References (55)

  • J.J.C. Teixeira-Dias et al.

    Spectrochim. Acta

    (1986)
  • S. Yurdakul et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (2013)
  • R. Srivastava et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (2017)
  • G. Mann

    Tetrahedron

    (1967)
  • G. Mann et al.

    Tetrahedron

    (1967)
  • I. Cibulka et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2011)
  • T. Bleha et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (1980)
  • I.M.S. Lampreia et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (1992)
  • A.M. Awwad et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1984)
  • C. Duce et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2007)
  • I.M.S. Lampreia et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2011)
  • G.A. Torín-Ollarves et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2012)
  • H. Guerrero et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2013)
  • S.M.C. Sousa et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2013)
  • T.F. Sun et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1988)
  • J.L. Hales et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn

    (1972)
  • J.H. Dymond et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (1988)
  • Y.A. Sanmamed et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2009)
  • L.G. Longsworth

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1966)
  • D. Seebach et al.

    Helv. Chim. Acta

    (2005)
  • M.S.C.S. Santos et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (1998)
  • I. Tvaroska et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (1999)
  • L.A.E. Batista de Carvalho et al.

    Can. J. Chem.

    (1987)
  • S. Chakrabarty et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2009)
  • P.I. Nagy et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2003)
  • J.T. Edward et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1978)
  • R.N. French et al.

    J. Solut. Chem.

    (1981)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text