Below the room temperature measurements of solubilities in ester absorbents for CO2 capture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2018.07.021Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Measured CO2 solubilities in six physical absorbents with ester groups below the room temperature.

  • Calculated Henry’s constants and thermodynamic properties of selected systems.

  • Concluded that tributyl phosphate and triethyl phosphate have potential research value for CO2 capture.

Abstract

Six ester absorbents were selected for CO2 capture, such as methyl benzoate, methyl heptanoate, ethyl hexanoate, butyl butyrate, triethyl phosphate and tributyl phosphate. CO2 solubilities in these absorbents were determined under temperatures of 273.15–283.15 K, and pressures up to 1.2 MPa. Henry’s constants of CO2 + the selected absorbent systems at 273.15 K and 283.15 K were calculated and compared with those at higher temperature. It seemed that decreasing the absorption temperature is obviously beneficial for enhancing absorption performance. In order to assess the absorption capacity for different physical absorbents, Henry’s constants and volumetric solubilities of the selected absorbents were compared with ionic liquids, common solvents and the selected absorbents in our previous work. The result showed that tributyl phosphate and triethyl phosphate were found to be relatively good absorbents by mole and volumetric fraction respectively, and they have potential value for CO2 capture. Moreover, thermodynamic properties such as entropy of solution, enthalpy of solution and Gibbs free energy of solution for the selected systems were calculated and assessed to study the absorption behavior.

Introduction

In recent years, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been the effective technology for decreasing the release of excessive carbon dioxide into the atmosphere [1]. Currently, there are several methods as physical/chemical/hybrid absorption method [2], adsorption method [3], [4], cryogenic method [5], membrane method [6] that are used to capture CO2. Physical absorption method, which is mature and common in industry installations, is widely used under the condition of large amount of feed gas and extremely high CO2 concentration. It is indicated that the development of new physical absorbent is one of the core parts for carbon capture technology [7].

Many researchers have concluded that different functional groups may lead to different CO2 capacities for various physical absorbents. Gui [8] concluded that hydroxyl group may be considered as phobic-CO2 group because strong hydrogen-bond interaction among the molecules of the absorbents may cause low solubilities of CO2. In our previous work [9], carbonyl group is considered as philic-CO2 group due to their good solvency for CO2, which may be attributed to electronic theory of acids and bases. Strong interaction between carbonyl group (Lewis acid) and CO2 (Lewis base) happens during the CO2 absorption process. In addition, Perisanu [10] claimed that carbon dioxide shows very high solubilities in solvents containing carbon-oxygen bonds (esters, ethers, some ketones), which follows the principle “like dissolves like”. Vapor-liquid equilibrium data of CO2-various ester absorbents were determined, which showed the absorbents with ester groups showed excellent absorption behaviour. The solubility of carbon dioxide in six absorbents containing propylene carbonate (PC), ethyl carbonate (EC), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), and mixtures of these components were performed at temperatures from 275 to 333 K at atmospheric pressure by Blanchard [11]. It seemed that DEC was the best of the whole selected absorbents. Fandiño [12], [13] reported CO2 solubilities in four pentaerythritol esters as tetrapentanoate, tetra(2-ethylhexanoate), tetraheptanoate, tetranonanoate from (283 to 348) K and pressures up to 7.5 MPa. The result showed that in the present analyzed range CO2 is highly soluble in these ester oils. Gui measured CO2 solubilities in some esters as DMC [14], diethyl succinate [15], DMC + DEC [16], DMC + PC [16] and DMC + EC [16] at the temperature variations from 280 K to 313 K and pressures up to 6 MPa. Miller [17] assessed fifteen different low molar mass compounds including methyl acetate, 2-methoxy ethyl acetate, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethyl acetate, PC, 2-butoxyethyl acetate as CO2 solvents based on the CO2-solvent pressure-composition diagram at 298.15 K. When compared on a molar basis, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethyl acetate rich with carbonate ester and ether groups was the best absorbent of the fifteen. Howlader [18] determined solubility of CO2 in triglyaceride at different temperatures (283.2–303.2 K) and pressures (600–2450 kPa). Tian [19] and Cheng [20] measured CO2 solubilities in ethyl propanoate, ethyl acetate, diethyl oxalate, ethyl laurate, and dibutyl phthalate at supercritical pressures. Moreover, Lenoir [21] determined CO2 solubilities in the nineteen absorbents as alcohols, hydrocarbons, ketones, carbonate esters and phosphate esters at 298.15–343.15 K. Henry’s constants of these solvents were reported and compared with each other, which indicated that phosphate esters showed relatively high absorption capacities of CO2. In our previous work [9], [22], [23], the absorbents with carbonate ester groups such as ethylene glycol methyl ether acetate (EGMEA), propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMEA), 3-methoxy butyl acetate (MBA), ethylene glycol butyl ether acetate (EGBEA) and carbitol acetate (CA) were selected, CO2 solubilities in these absorbents were determined at the temperatures of 273.15–333.15 K and under pressures up to 1.2 MPa. The result showed that absorption capacities of these absorbents improve by 139–160% and 38–45%, with the condition of absorption temperature decreasing from 333.15 K to 273.15 K and from 293.15 K to 273.15 K respectively. Additionally, it is advantageous for decreasing circulation flow of the absorbent and minimizing the loss of absorbent. In this paper, the relatively low temperatures of 273.15 K and 283.15 K were chose to investigate CO2 absorption properties of the physical absorbents.

Ester absorbents such as methyl benzoate, methyl heptanoate, ethyl hexanoate, butyl butyrate, triethyl phosphate, tributyl phosphate were selected to study the absorption behaviour at 273.15–283.15 K. Bamberger [24], Weng [25], and Chen [26] determined vapor–liquid equilibrium data of the CO2-methyl benzoate system at supercritical pressure of 6.10–14.11 MPa, 3.0–14.5 MPa and 2.46–7.36 MPa, and under temperatures of 313.1–393.2 K, 313.15–348.15 K and 308.2–318.2 K respectively. Lenoir [21] measured CO2 solubilities in triethyl phosphate and tributyl phosphate under the temperature of 325.14 K, and reported the results in the form of Henry’s constants. In addition, Sweeney [27] reported Henry’s constant of CO2 for tributyl phosphate at 298.14–323.14 K. Vapor-liquid equilibrium data of the CO2-ethyl hexanoate [28] system and the CO2-tributyl phosphate [29] system at the temperatures of 308.2–328.2 K and 298.65–435.55 K were determined at supercritical pressure of 1.699–9.218 MPa and 8.42–27.51 MPa respectively. CO2 solubilities in methyl benzoate, methyl heptanoate, ethyl hexanoate were determined at pressures up to 1.2 MPa and temperatures ranged from 293.15 K to 333.15 K, in our previous work that recently submitted to the journal of chemical thermodynamics [30]. There are no data on CO2 solubilities in six absorbents under low pressures and 273.15–283.15 K that reported in the literature.

In this work, below the room temperature measurements of CO2 solubilities in the six absorbents were made at 273.15 K and 283.15 K, and under pressures up to 1.2 MPa. Henry’s constants and thermodynamic properties of the CO2 + selected solvent systems were calculated and discussed.

Section snippets

Materials

A Metrohm 831 Karl Fischer coulometer was used for the determination of the water content in the studied solvents. The purity that stated by the supplier, molecular structure, water mass fraction content, and source of the used chemicals are listed in Table 1. Ultra-purified water was used, which was produced by a Millipore water filtering system. In order to remove CO2, water was boiled before use. The other substances were directly used without any further purification.

Apparatus

The device schematic

Solubilities

CO2 solubilities in six absorbents were determined under the temperatures of 273.15–283.15 K and pressures up to 1.2 MPa, which were presented in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7. It can be concluded that CO2 absorption capacities of the six absorbents increase with the increase of pressure and the decrease of temperature, which is the typical characteristic of physical absorption.

Henry’s constant

Henry’s constant shows the linear relationship between gas solubilities in the absorbent and

Conclusion

CO2 solubilities in six absorbents with ester groups, methyl benzoate, methyl heptanoate, ethyl hexanoate, butyl butyrate, triethyl phosphate and tributyl phosphate were determined at T = 273.15–283.15 K and p = 0–1.2 MPa. The selected absorbents with phosphate and carbonate ester groups showed relatively excellent behavior of CO2 absorption, which may be attributed to electronic theory of acids and bases.

Henry’s constants of the selected systems were calculated at 273.15–283.15 K and compared

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21506124, 51741605).

References (55)

  • H. Huang et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • P.S. Northrop et al.

    Energy Procedia

    (2009)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2014)
  • O. Fandiño et al.

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2010)
  • M.S. Howlader et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2017)
  • K.W. Cheng et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2001)
  • Y. Li et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2018)
  • Y. Li et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2014)
  • A. Bamberger et al.

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (1994)
  • W.H. Hwu et al.

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2004)
  • S.H. Page et al.

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (1993)
  • Y. Li et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2018)
  • S.P. Verevkin et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2008)
  • Y. Miyano

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2005)
  • J. Safarov et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2013)
  • J. Pardo et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (1996)
  • J. Hong et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (1988)
  • M. Safavi et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2013)
  • A.H. Jalili et al.

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2010)
  • M. Ramdin et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2014)
  • M. Boot-Handford et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2014)
  • W.J. Huang et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2014)
  • K. Wang et al.

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2016)
  • X. Lv et al.

    Appl. Energy

    (2012)
  • X.P. Zhang et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2012)
  • X. Gui et al.

    J. Chem. Eng. Data

    (2011)
  • S.T. Perisanu

    J. Solution Chem.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Analysis and selection of optimal solvent-based technologies for biogas upgrading

      2021, Fuel
      Citation Excerpt :

      This applies to Rajasingam et al. [77] for NMP and to Chen et al. [78] for TPB. It is difficult to find (and thus evaluate) experimental data for CO2 solubilities in tributyl phosphate, but the results obtained by Chen et al. [78] seem inconsistent with those obtained by Li et al. [68] and by Thompson et al. [69], and molecular simulation estimates give credibility to the observations of the latter two research groups [79]. The experimental Henry’s coefficients of all physical solvents are shown in Fig. 2, together with the curves obtained with Eq. (2) and the parameters presented on Table 3.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text