Elsevier

Journal of Dentistry

Volume 41, Supplement 5, November 2013, Pages e45-e53
Journal of Dentistry

The influence of nanoscale inorganic content over optical and surface properties of model composites

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the influence of nanoscale inorganic content over optical and surface properties of model composites before and after ageing.

Methods

Three model composites were formulated with silica fillers in nanoscale of 7 nm (G1), 12 nm (G2) and 16 nm (G3), at 45.5% by weight in a matrix of BisGMA/TEGDMA 1:1. Color coordinates (CIE L*a*b* parameters), color difference (ΔE*), translucency parameter (TP), surface gloss (SG) and surface roughness (SR) were measured before and after ageing procedures of immersion in water and toothbrush abrasion. Surface hardness (SH) were evaluated before and after immersion in absolute ethanol. Results were submitted to two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test performed at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.

Results

Regarding CIE L*a*b* parameters, a darkening, a redness and a blueness effect, were respectively detected after water storage for all groups. Smaller filler sizes (G1) had the highest CIE b* values, whereas medium (G2) (p < 0.05) had higher values than larger fillers (G3) (p < 0.05) either before or after water immersion. Toothbrush abrasion did not produce any significant effect on CIE a* and CIE b* values, however increased CIE L*, decreased TP in addition to produce rougher and matte surfaces in all groups. Filler size did not influence ΔE* (p > 0.05), although a tendency towards lower values in smaller filler materials was observed. Ageing after immersion in absolute ethanol decreased SH for all model composites.

Conclusions

Filler sizes and ageing procedures influenced the optical and surface properties of the nanostructured composites evaluated in this study.

Clinical significance

Filler size influenced optical and surface properties of resin composites. Materials containing smaller filler size offered improved optical stability and surface properties that can lead to longer maintenance of the restoration's appearance in the oral environment.

Introduction

Color and appearance of teeth and restorative materials are a complex phenomenon influenced by several factors such as lighting conditions, translucency, opacity, scattering and light transmission, brightness, fluorescence and opalescence. The surface texture and the size of a restoration may also produce an effect on the perception of light by the observer.1, 2, 3, 4 It is known that the surface of the restoration can be polished to a high gloss.5, 6 Being an attribute of visual appearance, gloss is directly influenced by the surface roughness7 as originates from a geometrical distribution of light reflected by the surface.8 Changes in surface gloss in the oral environment due to mechanical wear and/or chemical degradation of composite restorations may result in unfavourable aesthetics over time.

When incident light strikes a materials’ surface, part of the light is reflected at the boundary between the material and air. The other part of the light is absorbed and interactions such as: reflection, refraction, absorption, scattering and/or transmission occur throughout the restorative composite material. This happens because of changes in the refractive index, once the ratio of the speed of light in a vacuum is different from the speed of light inside.9 The back of the mouth receives little light and appears dark. As a consequence, it is not uncommon to observe in Class III or IV restorations a grey effect in the composite restoration compared with the color of the remaining tooth tissue. This occurs if translucent materials are placed in a cavity with no opaque structure backing, affected by the dark background the restoration will appears dark or grey.10 Thus, translucency and opacity are fundamental characteristics in order to achieve aesthetic restorations with composites, since they are indicators of the quality and quantity of reflected light.11 The main component of a dental composite that significantly affects the translucency is its inorganic content.12 Moreover, the quantity, the size and the shape of the fillers affect the light scattering in dental composites.13

In the last decade several dental resin–composites were introduced utilising nano-filler technology and thus classified as nanocomposites or nanohybrids. The nano-fillers can be dispersed in high concentrations within the organic matrix, improving physical and mechanical properties of the composites after setting.11, 14, 15, 16, 17 Defined as “nanocomposites” these materials appear to bring benefits such as improved surface smoothness,15, 18 excellent resistance to mechanical wear, high aesthetics due to the higher volume fraction of loads and ease of maintenance and polishing.19, 20 Thus, strongly indicated for restorations in areas where aesthetics are indispensable.

Surface texture and optical properties can be modified by several factors such as wear of fillers, degradation of the organic matrix or weakening of organic matrix-filler bonding.21 Some studies have investigated the influence of the type, size and volume of fillers in the optical properties of experimental dental composites.17, 22, 23, 24 Nevertheless, there is no data in the literature about the influence of size and volume of fillers in nanostructured composites on optical and surface properties of the materials when they are submitted to ageing procedures. In this study, a series of model resin-composites with systematically varied filler sizes was examined. The aim was to investigate the effect of filler-size on (i) surface properties such as roughness (SR), surface gloss (SG) and hardness (SH) and (ii) optical properties such as color measurements (CIE L*a*b* parameters), color difference (ΔE*) and translucency parameter (TP) before and after ageing procedures. The hypotheses tested were that filler-size and ageing procedure would affect: (i) optical properties (ii) surface properties.

Section snippets

Materials formulation

The monomers 2,2 bis[4-2(2-hydroxy-3-methacroyloxypropoxy)phenyl] propane (Bis-GMA, Esstech, Essington, PA,USA) and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA, Esstech, Essington PA, USA) were mixed in equal parts by weight. Camphorquinone (0.5% mol; ESSTECH, Essington, PA, USA) and ethyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate (1% mol; Sigma–Aldrich, Chemie, Steinheim, Germany) were added as photoinitiators. The photoinitiator/co-initiator ratio used was based on a previous paper.25 After this, three groups were

Results

Fig. 1 presents values of CIE L*, CIE a* and CIE b* of each group, over time on water storage and after the toothbrush abrasion. For all groups immersion in water for 60 days significantly decreased CIE L* values (p < 0.05). On the other hand, after toothbrush abrasion CIE L* values increased (p < 0.05) compared with immersion for 60 days in water. Materials formulated with larger filler size (G3) revealed higher CIE L* values (p < 0.05) than medium and smaller filler sizes (G2 and G1). Although,

Discussion

Nano filler size composites may have optical features that promote aesthetic matching of restorative materials with surrounding dental hard tissues. In comparison with hybrid resin-composites, nanofillers are believed to offer improved mechanical and optical properties.34 However, there is no consensus on the benefits of these materials, especially in relation with their long term clinical performance.

Optical properties were influenced by ageing procedures and filler size, thus first hypothesis

Conclusions

Within the limitations of the current study, the authors conclude that:

  • -

    Filler sizes influenced the optical and surface properties of the nanostructured composites evaluated in this study.

  • -

    Distinct advantages of smaller and medium up to larger fillers were shown regarding to color difference, gloss retention and surface roughness;

  • -

    All materials evaluated were affected by ageing procedures. Optical and surface properties were adversely affected by immersion in water and toothbrush abrasion.

Acknowledgements

There are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcomes.

This work was supported by FAPERJ/Brazil grant E-26/111.658/2010. The authors thank Esstech Inc. and Degussa Evonik for donation of the materials.

References (56)

  • M.R. Kaizer et al.

    Ageing of silorane-based and methacrylate-based composite resins: effects on translucency

    Journal of Dentistry

    (2012)
  • G.B. Dos Santos et al.

    Light transmission on dental resin composite

    Dental Materials

    (2008)
  • L.F. Schneider et al.

    Effect of co-initiator ratio on the polymer properties of experimental resin composites formulated with camphorquinone and phenyl-propanedione

    Dental Materials

    (2009)
  • N. Tanoue et al.

    Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2000)
  • Y. Hosoya et al.

    Effects of specular component on color differences of different filler type resin composites after aging

    Journal of Dentistry

    (2009)
  • Y.K. Lee et al.

    Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resins

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2005)
  • L.F. Schneider et al.

    Cross-link density evaluation through softening tests: effect of ethanol concentration

    Dental Materials

    (2008)
  • A. Hannigan et al.

    Statistical methodology in oral and dental research: Pitfalls and recommendations

    Journal of Dentistry

    (2013)
  • I.D. Sideridou et al.

    Sorption of water: ethanol or ethanol/water solutions by light-cured dental dimethacrylate resins

    Dental Materials

    (2011)
  • I.E. Ruyter et al.

    Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers

    Dental Materials

    (1987)
  • C.P. Turssi et al.

    Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • B.S. Lim et al.

    Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites

    Dental Materials

    (2002)
  • G.R. Goldstein et al.

    The effect of toothbrushing on a hybrid composite resin

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (1991)
  • L. Schneider et al.

    Cross-link density evaluation through softening tests: effect of ethanol concentration

    Dental Materials

    (2008)
  • J. Janus et al.

    Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach

    Dental Materials

    (2010)
  • N. Gönülol et al.

    The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites

    Journal of Dentistry

    (2012)
  • H. Lu et al.

    Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites

    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

    (2005)
  • J.W. Van Dijken et al.

    Surface chracteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing

    Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

    (1987)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Silane content influences physicochemical properties in nanostructured model composites

      2021, Dental Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      The previous research using the same materials showed via TGA that all composites contained about the same amount of inorganic phase [15]. However, it is known that the total surface area of inorganic particles within the composite can influence optical and surface properties [39], and they probably had small differences between organic and inorganic phases among the groups tested. The slight differences found from 0 to 10 wt.

    • Morphology control to design p(acrylic acid)/silica nanohybrids with controlled mechanical properties

      2018, Polymer
      Citation Excerpt :

      The studies on the formation and the use of hybrid nanoparticles have increased because of their applications in different material fields including electronics, sensors, silicone-rubber reinforcements, and biomaterials [1–5]. The use of nanoparticles in polymer matrix can improve the material properties such as flexural strength, modulus, mechanical wear, and high aesthetics [6,7]. However, the dispersion of these nanoparticles in the polymer matrix is poor due to their surface area and agglomerates form.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text