Reduction of nosocomial bloodstream infections and nosocomial vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on an intensive care unit after introduction of antiseptic octenidine-based bathing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2018.10.023Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) is emerging in German intensive care units (ICUs). On a 32-bed surgical ICU at a university hospital, increasing numbers of nosocomial cases occurred despite enforcement of hand hygiene and environmental disinfection.

Aim

To introduce universal octenidine-based bathing in order to reduce the burden of VRE.

Methods

Between January 2012 and March 2014, patients were screened for VRE on admission and twice weekly. Active surveillance was undertaken for VRE infections and colonizations, and for bloodstream infections (BSI) with any pathogen. Intervention in this before–after study comprised of standardized octenidine-based bathing. Distinct subgroups of VRE colonizations or infections were defined and used for statistical analysis of frequency, prevalence and incidence density.

Findings

In the pre-intervention period (January 2012 to April 2013), the admission prevalence of VRE was 4/100 patients and the mean incidence density of nosocomial cases was 7.55/1000 patient-days (PD). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis revealed prevalence of three vanA and two vanB clusters. In the post-intervention period (August 2013 to March 2014), the admission prevalence of VRE was 2.41/100 patients and the mean incidence density of nosocomial cases was 2.61/1000 PD [P = 0.001 (pre- vs post-intervention)]. Thirteen nosocomial VRE infections were identified in the pre-intervention period, compared with one nosocomial VRE infection in the post-intervention period. Incidence densities of BSI pre- and post-intervention were 2.98 and 2.06/1000 PD (P = 0.15), respectively.

Conclusion

The epidemiology of emerging VRE appeared as a complex mix of admitted cases and transmissions in small clusters, challenging infection control measures. The implementation of universal octenidine-based bathing combined with a standardized washing regime led to a significant reduction in nosocomial VRE.

Introduction

In recent years, vancomycin resistance of enterococci, mainly Enterococcus faecium, has increased in clinically relevant samples from patients in Europe [1]. Additionally, vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE) detection in clinical specimens has shown a spatial distribution. In 2012, the percentage of vancomycin resistance of enterococci was between 1% and 5% in Spain, between 5% and 10% in Italy and Poland, between 10% and 25% in Germany and Great Britain, and between 25% and 50% in Ireland [1]. In Germany, the Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System detected a dramatic increase in nosocomial VRE infections with a large variation in VRE proportions of all enterococcal infections from west (North Rhine-Westphalia) to east (Saxony) [2], [3]. Cologne is sited within this belt, and the VRE proportion in blood cultures in a university hospital was 0% (0/20) and 35% (7/20) VRE/E. faecium in 2010 and 2011, respectively.

In 2011, three VRE infections emerged in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at the study hospital within two weeks. Therefore, infection control activities were intensified by introducing an active surveillance system for VRE, enforcing hand hygiene and additional environmental cleaning and disinfection; this system was fully implemented in December 2011. The National Reference Centre (NRC) for Staphylococci and Enterococci in Germany performed an analysis of all VRE isolates for the presence of pathogenicity markers hyl and esp and resistance genes vanA or vanB. This analysis showed primarily heterogenic epidemiology in the ICU. In 2012, VRE cases continued to increase despite all infection control measures. Therefore, in 2013, the decision was made to introduce a whole-body washing procedure for all patients.

Initial studies showed that antiseptic washing with chlorhexidine led to a reduction in VRE, and this appeared to be a promising option in the study setting [4], [5], [6]. At the time, chlorhexidine was not commercially available for antiseptic body washing in German hospitals. The alternative in Germany was octenidine, which was available as a body wash soap (Octenisan containing 0.3% octenidine), and had been in use for many years for decolonization of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-positive patients. Octenidine has shown excellent activity against most relevant bacteria [6], [7], [8]. The primary aim of this intervention study was to control VRE colonizations and infections. A reduction in bloodstream infections (BSI) was included as a secondary outcome to enable comparability with other recently published studies using chlorhexidine for daily body washing [4], [9], [10].

Section snippets

Setting and VRE subgroups

A before–after intervention study was performed on an operative 32-bed surgical ICU (neuro, orthopaedic, visceral, vascular and trauma patients) in a 754-bed university hospital in Cologne. The intervention comprised a daily, structured, octenidine-based whole-body wash with Octenisan (octenidine 0.3%) (Schülke & Mayr, Sheffield, UK) for all patients.

The main study outcomes were nosocomial VRE acquisition, VRE infections and BSI with any pathogen. Infections were defined according to the

Epidemiological analyses in VRE subgroups

In total, 2485 and 1246 cases were treated in the ICU during the PRE-IP (16 months) and POST-IP (eight months), respectively. In the PRE-IP, a total of 100 VRE-colonized (4.00/100 patients) cases and 113 (7.55/1000 PD) nosocomial cases (Subgroups II + IV) were detected. In the POST-IP, 30 VRE-colonized (2.41/100 patients) and 19 (2.61/1000 PD) nosocomial cases were detected. The rate of VRE acquisition (Subgroups II + IV) was 65% lower in the POST-IP than in the PRE-IP. A summary of

Discussion

Well-designed and sufficiently powered multi-centre studies have demonstrated that antiseptic body washing reduces VRE, MRSA and BSI [4], [9], [10]. What can a single-centre study add? All infection control measures are only effective if the prevalence or incidence of pathogen colonizations or infections are high enough to be addressed by an intervention. In daily hospital infection control, different ICUs may be epidemiologically very distinct in terms of nosocomial infections or

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr Cori Diaz and Dr Anke Helmers who were responsible for microbiological routine diagnostics at MVZ Synlab Leverkusen. The authors also wish to thank Carola Fleige, Christine Guenther and Uta Geringer for excellent technical assistance at the NRC for Staphylococci and Enterococci. The authors wish to thank Schülke & Mayr GmbH for taking the costs for the statistical analysis. The results of this study were presented at IDWeek2014 in Philadelphia and at ECCMID 2014 in

References (25)

  • A. Kramer et al.

    Octenidindihydrochlorid

  • D.M. Sedlock et al.

    Microbicidal activity of octenidine hydrochloride, a new alkanediylbis[pyridine] germicidal agent

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (1985)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Evidence of the medical and economic benefits of implementing hygiene measures by a prevention link physician in trauma surgery: Study protocol for a biphasic multicenter prospective interventional pre-post cohort study using a structured intervention bundle development and tools of behavior change management

      2021, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although effective individual measures to reduce SSI are already been implemented, the prevention of infections is often underestimated, such that the number of SSIs has hardly decreased in recent decades [6,7]. Previous studies have shown that antiseptic washing, antibiotic prophylaxis, the use of nasal ointment containing the active ingredient mupirocin as recommended by the KRINKO and WHO, and adherence to hand hygiene are effective individual measures [8–17]. The introduction of IPM bundles appears to be more effective than the introduction of individual measures, as several effective evidence-based measures are combined [18].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text