Temperature-based method for determination of feed increments in crankshaft grinding
Introduction
Production of crankshafts for heavy-duty diesel engines (Fig. 1a) poses significant challenges, particularly with respect to finishing and the obtained surface integrity. Therefore, automotive OEMs usually grind and abrasive fine-finish (Hashimoto et al., 2016) these critical components by themselves. One particularly difficult element of crankshaft grinding is the crankpin, which comprises two sidewalls extending outward from the cylindrical bearing surface, through a curved transition portion, i.e. the radius (Fig. 1b). Crankpins are often at risk for grinding-induced thermal damage, especially on the sidewalls (Comley et al., 2006). For example, it has been shown that inappropriate grinding conditions cause residual tensile stress and material phase transformation in the crankpin (Mahdi and Zhang, 1999), which can cause fatigue cracking when operating under high-torque cyclic loads in the engine (Grum, 2003). Here the high temperatures generated in the grinding process are the primary source of tensile residual stress (Chen et al., 2000). To ensure no-burn grinding, some leading engine manufacturers send crankshafts through vigorous non-destructive testing, including measurements of Barkhausen Noise to detect softening, residual tensile stress and phase changes in the material (Krajnik et al., 2013). They also occasionally use magnetic-particle inspection to visually check for cracks in the sidewalls.
The most commonly used method for industrial grinding of crankpins is a combined (a) radial-plunge grinding for roughing (Junker, 2003), where the grinding wheel plunges radially into the crankpin, followed by (b) angle-plunge grinding during finishing (Banks et al., 2007), where the grinding wheel is fed into the crankpin both radially and axially at an angle. The differences between the radial- and axial-grinding methods are discussed previously (Oliveira et al., 2005). It is shown that a multi-step, axial face-grinding method provides a flexible solution to process design – to adjust the specific material-removal rate along the wheel profile, thereby achieving better control of the process. This method, however, is not readily available nor is it supplied with machines, which limits its use in the automotive industry.
Because the wheel-workpiece contact takes place over a larger area, angle-plunge grinding is a fundamentally better process compared to the radial-plunge grinding, giving shorter grinding cycle times. In spite of this, the angle-plunge grinding process is not explicitly understood, nor has it been quantified. As a result, grinding parameters are often chosen arbitrarily based on trial-and-error, resulting in regions of the crankpin with high temperatures and other regions with low temperatures.
Therefore, an investigation was made into the fundamental parameters and geometries in crankpin grinding. Once this was established, a new temperature-based grinding method was developed and patented (Krajnik et al., 2017), where the axial and radial feed increments are automatically determined so that the surface temperature of the workpiece does not exceed a predetermined (critical) maximum surface temperature threshold – ensuring that the thermal damage is avoided.
Section snippets
Geometric, kinematical and thermal modeling
For modeling of the wheel-crankpin geometry, shown in Fig. 2a, the wheel radius is denoted by and the wheel width by , whereas the curved transition portion of the wheel has a radius , corresponding to the intended radius of the crankpin. The crankpin radii are defined for the bearing surface, , and the sidewall, . The subsequent modeling, however, uses the parameter for symbolizing the workpiece radius, which in this case equals the bearing surface radius . Moreover, the
Temperature-based grinding method
The temperature-based determination of feed increments (Krajnik et al., 2017) involves controlling the depth of cut using the thermal model (Eq. (12)), rewritten as:where is the limit depth of cut, which is calculated in every point of the wheel profile, , regardless of a feed increment, in order to achieve a preset critical maximum surface temperature . However, the availability of only two parameters to determine the feed in each
Experimental validation
For the validation of the new grinding technology, two grinding experiments were carried out. First, a single preset temperature was selected at (Case 1) to grind on the established burn threshold; then the feed increments were determined for the two values of : 550 °C at the initial part of the grinding cycle and 450 °C at the final part (Case 2).
A vitrified CBN wheel (B151-grain, wheel radius , radius , wheel width ) was used on a CNC machine for orbital
Comparison of grinding cycles
In order to evaluate the capability of the newly developed grinding method (Krajnik et al., 2017), its performance is benchmarked against the radial-plunge grinding method hitherto used in engine production. The latter method, commonly used in the automotive industry, is a proprietary technology developed by a major machine builder, where the entire rough-grinding cycle is comprised of radial feed increments (Fig. 13). In contrast, the temperature-based method developed here also includes axial
Conclusions
A new, temperature-based method for determination of feed increments in crankshaft grinding has been developed and experimentally validated in an industrial environment.
Process geometry and thermal effects – unknown prior to this research – have been modeled in the grinding zone to estimate the feed-dependent maximum surface temperature and to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the crankshaft grinding process. Based on the process analyses, two surface-temperature maxima have been used to
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Pontus Andreasson for his managerial support in developing this technology, which has now been patented and implemented in Scania’s engine-production lines in Sweden and Brazil.
References (16)
Factors affecting wheel collapse in grinding
CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol.
(2009)- et al.
Analysis of the transitional temperature for tensile residual stress in grinding
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
(2000) - et al.
A high material removal rate grinding process for the production of automotive crankshafts
CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol.
(2006) - et al.
Geometric, kinematical and thermal analyses of non-round cylindrical grinding
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
(2014) - et al.
Abrasive fine-finishing technology
CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol.
(2016) - et al.
Optimization of peripheral non-round cylindrical grinding via an adaptable constant-temperature process
CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol.
(2013) - et al.
Cycle optimization in cam-lobe grinding for high productivity
CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol.
(2014) - et al.
Applied mechanics in grinding. Part 7: residual stresses induced by the full coupling of mechanical deformation, thermal deformation and phase transformation
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
(1999)
Cited by (13)
Influence of batch-to-batch material variations on grindability of a medium‑carbon steel
2022, Journal of Manufacturing ProcessesCitation Excerpt :However, wheel wear at the corner was not insignificant, as shown in Fig. 2b. Here, a larger change in the radius Δr was observed when grinding the recycled steel, even though the total wear was less than half the grit diameter. This situation (of measurable corner wear, but negligible outer-diameter wear) is analogous to production grinding of crankpins, where the grinding aggressiveness (and hence wheel wear) surges in a localized, narrow portion on the radius of the wheel [1]. The appearance of an unfavorable step and/or grinding burn localized on the radius of a crankshaft pin, both caused by irregular wheel wear was observed previously by Oliveira et al. [9], which is consistent with the experience of practicing engineers in industry.
Application of the dimensionless Aggressiveness number in abrasive processes
2021, Procedia CIRPGrinding and fine finishing of future automotive powertrain components
2021, CIRP AnnalsCitation Excerpt :The grinding cycle analysis revealed that the temperature-based method is superior to the reference radial-plunge grinding method in terms of: (i) productivity (min. 25% improvement), (ii) the ability to avoid grinding burn [57], and (iii) in increasing the dressing intervals. The method for the implementation of this constant-temperature process was patented by Scania [131].
On geometry and kinematics of abrasive processes: The theory of aggressiveness
2020, International Journal of Machine Tools and ManufactureCitation Excerpt :This led to ongoing confusion, including: i) the level of detail to be included in a model; ii) a multitude of equations for different processes and geometries [14]; iii) the use of average values or maximum values for different positions in the grit path; and, perhaps most confusingly, iv) complications arising from the need to quantify the seemingly random spacing and micro-geometry of abrasive-surface topography [15–17]. One might argue that such an approach is limited, but recent applications of aggressiveness number in modelling the geometry and kinematics of camshaft [23] and crankshaft grinding [24] proved effective in advancing both understanding and optimizing these processes – for example, to achieve reductions in thermal damage and cycle time – without requiring any attempt to quantify the abrasive-surface topography, however inaccurately. In addition, the use of dimensionless aggressiveness in modelling a truing process [25] led to a better understanding of the fundamental truing mechanism and parameters.