Elsevier

Journal of Power Sources

Volume 544, 1 October 2022, 231894
Journal of Power Sources

Understanding slurry formulations to guide solution-processing of solid electrolytes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231894Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Slurry formulation principles discussed for LLZO solid electrolyte.

  • Implication of slurry design on tape-casting of green films discussed.

  • Evaluation strategies for sintering of the tape casted LLZO thin films.

  • Slurry formulation steps can be leveraged for manufacturing of solid electrolytes.

Abstract

Scalable processing of thin solid electrolytes is crucial for engineering solid-state batteries with practical energy densities. To leverage existing battery production infrastructure, pathways for solution processing of solid electrolyte films must be investigated. Roll-to-roll compatible film preparation of aluminum-doped lithium lanthanum zirconate oxide was studied. Four slurry configurations accounting for different solvent properties and solid loadings were evaluated to investigate the ternary interactions within the dispersions. Rheological and coating stability analyses were carried out on the processed slurries. The analysis and characterization indicated that improved component interactions within the ethanol/toluene system result in homogenized distribution of the particles, binder, and plasticizer, and enable the extraction of free-standing thin films with thicknesses of 20 μm and large area (>15 in.2). The drawbacks and opportunities of several protocols for high temperature sintering of the dried green films were investigated. This study highlights the importance of engineering dispersions during the development of processing protocols for solid electrolytes and provides guidelines for the best practices that can be leveraged for solution processing–based fabrications for a wide range of solid electrolyte materials.

Introduction

To increase the adoption of electrified mobility alternatives, safe, high–energy density batteries must be developed [1,2]. Conventional lithium-ion batteries are not inherently safe because the liquid electrolyte contains flammable solvents [3]. Solid-state batteries (SSBs), which replace the liquid electrolyte with its solid counterpart, are theoretically safer because they do not contain flammable solvents [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. Despite many efforts in material development, cell architecture optimizations, and processing inventions, SSBs have not yet been commercialized [10,11]. The US Department of Energy's performance and cost goals for electric vehicle batteries are energy density greater than 350 Wh kg−1 and costs lower than $60/kWh at the cell level [2,12]. These goals require the development of next-generation batteries with highly ionic conducting electrolytes and the use of energy-dense anodes and high-voltage, high-loading cathode materials. Use of lithium-metal anodes in conventional lithium-ion batteries is limited by various parameters such as safety and side reactions [13]. Furthermore, liquid electrolytes have narrow electrochemical stability windows, which hinder the use of high-voltage cathode materials [14]. However, a solid electrolyte (SE) allows the use of lithium metal because a dense SE can theoretically prevent dendrite formation [15,16], and many SEs have wide electrochemical stability windows, allowing integration of high-voltage cathode materials [3].

To develop a safe, energy-dense, and cost-effective battery, liquid electrolytes must be replaced by their solid counterparts [[17], [18], [19]]. Some challenges must be addressed concerning the ionic conductivity of SEs, chemical and electrochemical stability of anode | SE and cathode | SE, and the processability of SEs [10,20]. Many garnet SEs have ionic conductivity in the range of 10−4 to 10−3 S/cm and have a very wide electrochemical and chemical stability window [[21], [22], [23]]. Despite these favorable electrochemical, chemical, and transport properties, garnet-based SSBs have not been commercialized because garnets have processing challenges coupled with mechanical issues of brittleness, high Young's modulus and low fracture toughness [24]. These properties are not favorable for attaining intimate contact between lithium-metal | SE and SE | cathode, and the solutions to these issues are not cost-effective, generally requiring additional processing steps and materials [[25], [26], [27], [28]]. Furthermore, garnets have a higher density than other SEs, which adversely affects the gravimetric energy density when processed in currently employed form factors (pellets).

To enable garnet-based SE research, thick (1–2 mm) SE pellets are used at lab scale [11]. SE thickness is a critical parameter that enables garnet-like, high-density SEs to achieve gravimetric energy-density metrics relevant to electric vehicle applications [29,30]. Currently, average lithium, SE, and cathode thicknesses used in all-solid-state batteries are 100, 500, and 30 μm, respectively [11]. The energy density metrics for cells with such thicknesses are lower than those of conventional lithium-ion batteries (approximately 10–100 Wh kg−1). Furthermore, SSBs are cycled at very high pressures in the range of approximately 10 MPa to obtain intimate contact between solid–solid interfaces in the SSB (anode | SE and cathode | SE) [31,32]. The brittle nature of garnets limits the maximum allowable pressure on the cell. Transitioning to a thin SE film can mitigate these issues by decreasing the overall material cost, providing facile mechanical properties for ease of handling, and reducing the ion transport path to enable fast charging capabilities of the battery. Thus, developing strategies to manufacture thin, dense-defect–free SEs at scale is necessary for a successful deployment of SSBs in electric vehicles. However, efforts to address this challenge are not well documented [10,30]. A thin and very dense layer of electrolyte may be created via physical vapor deposition or atomic layer deposition, but these methods pose concerns of scalability and costs associated with large-scale production [33]. Tape casting, or roll-to-roll processing, is the most promising technology for manufacturing thin, dense-defect–free SEs SE sheets. Roll-to-roll processing of SEs can also use the existing infrastructure for conventional lithium-ion battery manufacturing for successful deployment of SSBs [34].

Significant challenges must be overcome to facilitate slurry processing for making thin, dense electrolytes. This process is illustrated in Fig. 1. The structure and properties of roll-to-roll–coated SEs are a function of the interactions that occur among the constituents in the dispersion. Slurry processing involves coating, drying, calendering, delaminating, and sintering electrolyte films at high temperatures to eliminate solvent-binder-plasticizer systems. These systems affect the lithium lanthanum zirconate oxide (LLZO) properties, including microstructure, density, hardness, shrinkage, and conductivity. Significant work has been devoted to slurry engineering for electrodes in fuel-cell technologies and conventional lithium-ion batteries [30,[35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]]. In this study, the underlying principles of ternary component interactions in the dispersions were leveraged to achieve roll-to-roll coatings of free-standing aluminum-doped lithium lanthanum zirconate oxide (LALZO) SE films. The slurry composition of the solvent-binder-plasticizer system was optimized to form a defect-free green tape that can be delaminated to obtain free-standing LLZO thin films. Various sintering strategies were evaluated to obtain a flat, dense-defect–free SE film. Lithium loss was optimized in the SE densification to achieve a homogeneous composition of LLZO. Experimental strategies and best practices for solution processing of SEs can also be leveraged for other SEs.

Section snippets

Slurry preparation

Commercial LALZO was used for this study. Slurries were prepared using two solvent systems: (1) isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and toluene and (2) ethanol and toluene. Fish oil was used as a dispersant, benzyl butyl phthalate was used as a plasticizer, and polyvinyl butyral (PVB) was used as a binder. Yttrium-stabilized zirconium balls were used as a milling media. Four slurries were prepared using the compositions listed in Table 1. The constituents were mixed in specific ratios and ball milled in a

Coating stability window model

The stability windows for slot-die coatings of non-Newtonian slurries are well documented [[41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]]. The model used for predicting coating stability windows is briefly described as follows. A full derivation of the model can be found elsewhere [[41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]]. Fig. 2 shows a diagram of fluid flow through a slot die coater with key elements of the flow profile identified. A uniform coating window is specified in terms of the fluid flow

Results and discussion

The development of successful roll-to-roll processing for SEs requires the engineering of stable, functional dispersions. Dispersion stability is a key requirement for achieving high-quality coatings and improving the shelf life of the slurry [36]. Dispersion stability is dictated by the competing interactions between the solvent, dispersed particles, binders, and surfactant. These interactions typically include van Der Waals, electrostatic, steric, and depletion interactions [[48], [49], [50],

Conclusion

Scalable processing of thin SEs is crucial for the development of high–energy density SSBs. Factors that affect the slurry-based processing of LALZO-based thin films were investigated. Specifically, IPA/toluene and ethanol/toluene slurries at different solid loadings were used to investigate the influence of component interaction in the dispersion phase on the resulting film microstructure and processability. Improved component interactions within the IPA/toluene slurries yielded

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Anand Parejiya: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Marm B. Dixit: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Dhrupad Parikh: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Ruhul Amin: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Methodology. Rachid Essehli: Writing – review & editing,

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT Battelle, LLC, for the US Department of Energy (DOE) under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, was sponsored by Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) (Director: David Howell) Applied Battery Research subprogram (Program Manager: Peter Faguy). Marm Dixit is supported by the Alvin M. Weinberg

References (63)

  • M. Boström et al.

    Extended DLVO theory: electrostatic and non-electrostatic forces in oxide suspensions

    Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2006)
  • Z.A. Needell et al.

    Potential for widespread electrification of personal vehicle travel in the United States

    Nat. Energy

    (2016)
  • T.T. Mai et al.

    Electrification futures study: scenarios of electric technology adoption and power consumption for the United States

    Natl. Renew. Energy Lab.

    (2018)
  • Z. Gao et al.

    Promises, challenges, and recent progress of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries

    Adv. Mater.

    (2018)
  • M. Dixit et al.

    Current status and prospects of solid-state batteries as the future of energy storage

  • M.B. Dixit et al.

    Status and prospect of in situ and operando characterization of solid-state batteries

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2021)
  • P. Albertus et al.

    Challenges for and pathways toward Li-Metal-Based all-solid-state batteries

    ACS Energy Lett.

    (2021)
  • K.B. Hatzell et al.

    Challenges in lithium metal anodes for solid state batteries

    ACS Energy Lett.

    (2020)
  • J. Janek et al.

    A solid future for battery development

    Nat. Energy

    (2016)
  • K. Kerman et al.

    Review—practical challenges hindering the development of solid state Li ion batteries

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (2017)
  • S. Randau et al.

    Benchmarking the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries

    Nat. Energy

    (2020)
  • Steven Boyd

    Batteries and Electrification R&D Overview

    (2018)
  • K.N. Wood et al.

    Lithium metal anodes: toward an improved understanding of coupled morphological, electrochemical, and mechanical behavior

    ACS Energy Lett.

    (2017)
  • N.Е. Galushkin et al.

    Mechanism of gases generation during lithium-ion batteries cycling

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (2019)
  • C. Monroe et al.

    Dendrite growth in lithium/polymer systems A propagation model for liquid electrolytes under galvanostatic conditions

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (2003)
  • C. Monroe et al.

    The impact of elastic deformation on deposition kinetics at lithium/polymer interfaces

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (2005)
  • A. Parejiya et al.

    Improving contact impedance via electrochemical pulses applied to lithium–solid electrolyte interface in solid-state batteries

    ACS Energy Lett.

    (2021)
  • A. Parejiya et al.

    Electrochemical healing of dendrites in garnet-based solid electrolytes

    ACS Energy Lett.

    (2020)
  • A. Parejiya et al.

    Na1+xMnx/2Zr2–x/2(PO4)3 as a Li+ and Na+ super ion conductor for solid-state batteries

    ACS Energy Lett.

    (2021)
  • R. Pfenninger et al.

    A low ride on processing temperature for fast lithium conduction in garnet solid-state battery films

    Nat. Energy

    (2019)
  • F. Shen et al.

    The effect of pore connectivity on Li dendrite propagation within LLZO electrolytes observed with synchrotron X-ray tomography

    ACS Energy Lett.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (0)

    This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

    View full text