Environmentally conscious consumption: The role of retailers and peers as external influences

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.01.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Environmentally conscious consumption is one of the key concerns in modern society generally, and increasingly among the consumer population. However, consumers often overstate their willingness to purchase environmentally conscious products, with global purchasing of these products relatively low. Much research has considered the role of drivers internal to an individual in making such consumption choices; however there is less knowledge as to how external influences may impact environmentally conscious consumption behaviour. As retailers increasingly strive to adopt and communicate their environmentally sustainable business practices, and encourage parallel consumer behavior, the question arises: what role do retailers play in influencing consumers’ environmentally conscious consumption? In this paper we investigate this notion, specifically how external influences (the retailer and peers) impact environmentally conscious behavior. We investigate this behavior in terms of two outcomes; sustainable consumption (direct costs) and willingness to accept environmental taxes (indirect costs). Our research demonstrates that retailers can influence consumers to be more environmentally conscious in their consumption, with retailer influence a stronger mediator than peers in this relationship. One important implication of this research is that retailers have the opportunity to shape environmentally conscious consumption if they adopt sustainable business practices.

Highlights

► Consumers often overstate their willingness to purchase environmentally conscious products. ► Global purchase of these products low, little is known as to how external influences impact behaviour. ► We assessthe role of retailers and peers in influencing environmentally conscious consumption. ► Resultsdemonstrate that retailers can influence such consumption.

Introduction

Environmentally sustainable business practice, the existence and management of an organization’s economic and environmental position in meeting the needs of the present without compromising future generations (WCED, 1987), is an increasingly important commitment for the retail industry (Jones et al., 2007). In fact, during the past decade, retailers globally have looked to emphasize their commitment to more than merely economic goals, with an increased focus on broader environmental and social impacts (Jones et al., 2007). This is an important practice for retailers, both in terms of attracting consumer segments and given their active role in driving production and in stimulating and shaping customer demand (McGoldrik, 2002, Wrigley and Lowe, 2002).

Equally important to the business practice of environmental sustainability is an understanding of consumer’s environmentally conscious consumption. This is crucially important for retailers given the intention–behavior gap that often exists in this regard (Auger and Devinney, 2007, Carrigan and Attalla, 2001, de Pelsmacker et al., 2005, Follows and Jobber, 2000, Shaw et al., 2007), whereby a large proportion of consumers report that they are very concerned about environmental issues, but this concern fails to translate into behavior. One case in point can be seen in the fair-trade grocery category, with research showing that while the vast majority of consumers believe it is important to buy grocery products that support fair-trade causes, only a relatively small percentage do so (Datamonitor, 2010). Essentially, despite the existence of environmental concerns, the reality is that most environmentally sustainable product categories have seen relatively low levels of adoption, and consumer-buying behavior generally is not consistent with positive attitudes toward environmental sustainability (de Pelsmacker et al., 2005).

Much of the existing environmentally conscious consumption research suggests that purchase intention is driven by intrinsic factors such as demographics; for instance income, education and social status (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001), or psychographics for instance attitudes, values and personality characteristics (Dickson, 2001). However, one criticism of this body of research is a lack of consideration of external factors and social influences (Fukukawa, 2003), and a general gap in our understanding as to how both internal and external factors influence an individual’s environmental consumption behavior (Beck and Ajzen, 1991, Gorsuch and Ortberg, 1983, Kalafatis et al., 1999). Whist external factors such as one’s social peers have been shown to affect consumption behavior, another important external driver are retail organisations. Retailers play an active role not only in promoting sustainable business practices but also in shaping and modifying consumer behavior (Jones et al., 2007), commonly through consumer education. In reality, factors external to the individual may play an influential role in environmentally conscious consumption and, as such, they are an important consideration for the marketing literature broadly and retail practice more specifically.

In this paper, we investigate the role of external influences impacting environmentally conscious consumer behavior in terms of sustainable consumption and willingness to accept environment-related Government taxes. The purpose of this research is to explore how intrinsic characteristics (concern for the environment and self-image) lead to consumer willingness to modify behavior (through intentions to consume sustainably and a willingness to accept environment-related taxes), as facilitated by external factors such as the influence of the retailer (in terms of the appeal an environmentally conscious retailer has to consumers) and peers (in terms of the discussion of environmental issues with peers). Our paper is structured as follows. In the next section, we present our theoretical framework and the relevant literature in developing a conceptual framework. We then present the method and findings, followed by a discussion of the results and conclusions. Finally, implications and future research considerations are discussed.

Section snippets

Conceptual framework

From the mid-1990s, consumers have become more environmentally and socially aware (Strong, 1996). During this time, environmental consumption has moved from the cultural fringes to become more entrenched in mainstream society (Carrington et al., 2010, Crane and Matten, 2004, Hanas, 2007, Shaw et al., 2006) and today the issue is one that many retailers strive to address to operate a more sustainable business model and maintain relevance among consumers. In fact, a new force of consumers has

Hypotheses testing

To test our hypotheses, we transformed our measurement model to a structural model with a focus on mediation analyses, and performed the bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals based on SEM analysis, as suggested by Cheung and Lau (2008). This process allowed us to model mediation successfully in the presence of measurement error. The SEM model revealed acceptable fit indices: χ2 (1 2 1)=343.6, p<.001; GFI=.97; CFI=.98; TLI=.97 and RMSEA=.043.

Before assessing meditational hypotheses, we

Discussion

This research set out to extend the understanding of how internal and external factors influence environmental consumption. We specifically sought to better understand how the external influences of retailers and peers could shape environmentally conscious consumption behavior. This is important for retailers (and any consumer facing organization) to understand, given that their communications and consumer engagement strategies are often aimed at reinforcing environmentally sustainable business

References (70)

  • Ajzen, I., 2006. Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations, Retrieved March 22,...
  • I. Ajzen et al.

    Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior

    (1980)
  • P. Auger et al.

    Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2007)
  • M. Baldassare et al.

    The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices

    Environment and Behavior

    (1992)
  • A. Bandura

    Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control

    (1997)
  • M.R. Buckley et al.

    Measurement errors in the behavioral sciences: the case of personality/attitude research

    Educational and Psychological Measurement

    (1990)
  • M. Carrigan et al.

    The myth of the ethical consumer—do ethics matter in purchase behaviour?

    Journal of Consumer Marketing

    (2001)
  • M.J. Carrington et al.

    Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2010)
  • A. Crane et al.

    Business Ethics: A European Perspective

    (2004)
  • G.W. Cheung et al.

    Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: bootstrapping with structural equation models

    Organizational Research Methods

    (2008)
  • Datamonitor, 2010. New Consumer Insight (NCI): Offering Ethicality and Sustainability in Food and Drinks Report...
  • P. de Pelsmacker et al.

    Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee

    Journal of Consumer Affairs

    (2005)
  • M.A. Dickson

    Utility of no-sweat labels for apparel consumers: profiling label users and predicting their purchases

    Journal of Consumer Affairs

    (2001)
  • S.B. Follows et al.

    Environmentally responsible purchase behavior: a test of a consumer model

    European Journal of Marketing

    (2000)
  • E. Fraj et al.

    Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: an empirical analysis

    Journal of Consumer Marketing

    (2006)
  • K. Fukukawa

    A theoretical review of business and consumer ethics research: normative and descriptive approaches

    Marketing Review

    (2003)
  • C. Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1981)
  • R.L. Gorsuch et al.

    Moral obligation and attitudes: their relation to behavioural intentions

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • S. Grunert

    Everybody seems concerned about the environment but is this concern reflected in (Danish) consumers’ food choice?

    European Advances in Consumer Research

    (1993)
  • C. Gurau et al.

    International green marketing: a comparative study of British and Romanian firms

    International Marketing Review

    (2005)
  • J.F. Hair et al.

    Mulitvariate Data Analysis

    (2010)
  • Hanas, J., 2007. A world gone green: environmental awareness has not only yipped in the media: it’s hit corporate...
  • T. Hedlund

    The impact of values, environmental concern, and willingness to accept economic sacrifices to protect the environment on tourists’ intentions to buy ecologically sustainable tourism alternatives

    Tourism and Hospitality Research

    (2011)
  • P. Honkanen et al.

    Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice

    Journal of Consumer Behaviour

    (2006)
  • L.T. Hu et al.

    Evaluating model fit

  • Cited by (85)

    • Selling electric vehicles: Experiences from vehicle salespeople in Sweden

      2022, Research in Transportation Business and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Intermediaries have also been found to have an essential influencing role in the adoption of green products through product positioning and salespeople's training (Matthews et al., 2017), as well as for the diffusion of innovations in general (Rogers, 2010). In a study comparing the external influence of peers and retailers on environmentally conscious purchase decisions, Tsarenko, Ferraro, Sands, and McLeod (2013) found that retailers were a more vital mediator than consumers' peers. The still somewhat limited research into the sales process of EVs has, by and large, found that EVs are sold in a way that could hamper their sales outlook.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text