Original researchA Delphi survey and international e-survey evaluating the Doha agreement meeting classification system in groin pain: Where are we 5 years later?
Section snippets
Practical implications
- •
The high adoption of the Doha agreement meeting classification system indicates a good perceived clinical utility by clinicians.
- •
The Doha agreement meeting classification system can assist in clear communication among clinicians.
- •
Future consensus statements should include a structured knowledge transfer and dissemination plan, as well as evaluating their recommendations over time.
Methods
We undertook: (1) a 2-round Delphi survey among the members of the Doha agreement meeting expert group2 and; (2) a separate international e-survey among clinicians who regularly assess and treat athletes with groin pain. The protocols for these surveys were registered online prior to commencement: (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.8m7hu9n and dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bgkfjutn). An ethics exemption was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Amsterdam Medical Centre, the
Results
Delphi survey. Twenty-three experts (96%) responded to Delphi survey round 1. For the clinical cases, 21 experts were eligible for reporting diagnoses (AW, RJdV excluded). The responses from 1 expert for diagnoses after imaging were not recorded due to a technical issue, while 1 expert did not register a diagnosis for case 3. Demographic characteristics of the experts are described in Table 1.
All reported terms for diagnoses for the 3 clinical cases are presented in Supplementary Appendix E.
Discussion
Five years after publication, the majority of the Doha agreement meeting expert group (73–82%) and independent international clinicians (57–69%) report adopting the terminology of the Doha agreement meeting classification system. However, when clinical cases were presented, only 50–67% of the Doha agreement meeting experts and 43–55% of the independent international clinicians used the actual terminology to describe their diagnosis according to agreed definitions.2 Compared to the original 2015
Conclusion
Five years after publication, the majority of the Doha agreement meeting expert group and independent international clinicians report adopting the Doha agreement meeting classification system. There is still considerable heterogeneity in diagnostic terminology when clinical cases are presented, and disagreement on statements related to amendments of the current classification system.
Patient consent for publication
Not required. Potential identifiers for the presented clinical cases were adjusted to ensure anonymity.
Funding information
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Declaration of interest statement
The authors declare no financial conflict of interest. Seven out of the nine authors of this study were also author of the Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes. The authors declare that this did not influence execution or reporting of this study.
Confirmation of ethical compliance
An ethics exemption was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Amsterdam Medical Centre, the Netherlands. All participants gave their informed consent.
Acknowledgments
We would like to sincerely thank all Doha agreement meeting experts, and all e-survey participants from the FIFA Medical Centres of Excellence and the IOC research centers for sharing their opinions. We also would like to thank Chelsea Oester (FIFA medical), Alexis Weber (FIFA Medical) and Professor Roald Bahr (IOC Medical Commission) for their assistance with distributing the e-survey invitations.
References (19)
- et al.
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
J Clin Epidemiol
(2014) - et al.
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review
Comput Hum Behav
(2010) Diagnosis as category and process: the case of alcoholism
Soc Sci Med
(1978)- et al.
Value of composite reference standards in diagnostic research
BMJ
(2013) - et al.
Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes
Br J Sports Med
(2015) - et al.
Study quality on groin injury management remains low: a systematic review on treatment of groin pain in athletes
Br J Sports Med
(2015) - et al.
Terminology and definitions on groin pain in athletes: building agreement using a short Delphi method
Br J Sports Med
(2015) - et al.
Words do matter: a systematic review on how different terminology for the same condition influences management preferences
BMJ Open
(2017) - et al.
Improved reporting of overuse injuries and health problems in sport: an update of the Oslo Sport Trauma Research Center questionnaires
Br J Sports Med
(2020)
Cited by (8)
Anatomy and terminology of groin pain: Current concepts
2023, Journal of ISAKOSGroin pain in athletes—sportsmen’s groin
2023, RadiologieInter-examiner reliability of the Doha agreement meeting classification system of groin pain in male athletes
2023, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports