ReviewManagement of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review
Introduction
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered to be the most effective and reliable treatment for patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee. The definition of stiffness varies widely throughout the available literature, resulting in different reported ranges of prevalence. However, two large series performed in recent times by Kim et al. [1] and Yercan et al. [2] report the prevalence to be 1.3% in 1000 knees and 5.3% in 1188 knees respectively. Post-operative stiffness, which is attributed to arthrofibrosis which occurs in the knee joint, can be extremely debilitating for the patient, often making activities of daily living such as climbing stairs or rising from a chair painful and difficult [3], [4].
The causes of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty surgery are multifactorial. Several risk factors for stiffness in the knee post-TKA have been identified. These risk factors can be divided into pre-operative, per-operative and post-operative. The most significant and well-recognised cause of a stiff TKA is decreased pre-operative range of movement [5]. A correlation also has been demonstrated between history of previous surgery and diabetes mellitus and stiffness post-TKA [6]. Per-operative risk factors leading to stiffness include incorrect flexion–extension gap, malpositioning of components, inadequate femoral or tibial resection, excessive joint line elevation, creation of an anterior tibial slope and incomplete resection of posterior osteophytes. Post-operative risk factors leading to decreased range of movement include poor patient motivation, lack of compliance with physiotherapy, deep infection, arthrofibrosis of the knee joint, patellar complications, complex regional pain syndrome and heterotopic ossification [7].
The definition of stiffness in the knee varies within the available literature, Christensen et al. [8] described it as an arc of motion less than 70° whereas Kim et al. [1] describe it as a flexion contracture of > 15° and/or < 75° of flexion. Another parameter that is used to measure stiffness in the knee is the Knee Society Scoring System, which provides a uniform method to quantify the amount of pain that the patient is experiencing in the knee. It encompasses various aspects of knee movement and function, such as pain, flexion contracture, extension lag, range of movement, alignment and stability [9].
The various treatment options available for arthrofibrosis of the knee are manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic arthrolysis, open arthrolysis and finally revision TKA. MUA is generally regarded as the first step in the treatment of a stiff TKA, especially in the first two months [2]. The technique of performing MUA is uniform, the patient is put under adequate anesthesia to the point of maximum relaxation and the ipsilateral hip is flexed to 90°. The knee is then flexed slowly and gently until the audible and palpable separation of adhesions no longer occurs [10]. Arthroscopic release is another treatment option for the stiff TKA, and is usually performed in moderately painful and stiff knees, preferably within 3 to 6 months after TKA. In arthroscopic debridement, the arthrofibrosis is relieved by resecting large fibrous bands of scar tissue under arthroscopic visualisation [6]. In certain cases, open surgical release is recommended to patients, especially in the case of severe stiffness (< 60°). Other cases of severe stiffness, especially those with malpositioned implants, require a revision TKA. Although studies have been performed in the past to examine the effect of these treatment modalities on the stiff knee post-TKA, there is paucity of evidence regarding the comparable effectiveness of these treatments.
The aim of this systematic review, therefore, was to pool the studies dealing with different treatment strategies available in order to summarise the outcome of these treatment modalities. In the literature reviewed, different treatments of post-TKA stiffness have been explored to compare the outcomes of improvement in range of movement and improvement in the Knee Society Score (KSS).
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The first step of the research was the data search and selection. Using the medical subject heading terms arthroplasty, replacement and knee along with Boolean operators ‘or’ and ‘and’, we entered the search query “stiffness” AND “(arthroplasty, replacement, knee)” OR (“arthroplasty” AND “replacement” AND “knee”) OR “knee replacement arthroplasty” OR (“total” AND “knee” AND “replacement”) OR “total knee replacement” into the various databases used in order to maximise the amount and relevance
Results
Of the 199 papers that were initially gathered during screening, 25 trials were finally selected for data extraction and systematic review (Fig. 1). Of the 25 trials, 23 were retrospective while only two were prospective. The total number of participants was 798.
The studies were then subjected to quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). On assessment, the 25 studies scored a total of 77 stars, out of a possible 125. The scores of all individual studies are described in Fig. 2.
Manipulation under anesthesia
A total of 10 studies of the total 25 reviewed reported the results of this technique (Fig. 3). The method by which it was performed was described in all of the articles, and was uniform. In the studies in which the interval between primary TKA and MUA was given, they were all described as being performed within the first 3 months of surgery. The improvement in range of movement (ROM) was clearly given in only 6 out of the 10 studies, the rest choosing to report the final increase in flexion
Discussion
The goal of this systematic review was to bring together a number of separately conducted studies, critically appraise them and synthesise their results to find out whether the scientific findings are consistent. Ideally, we would have preferred large, randomised controlled trials for a systematic review, as that is the highest quality in research and would have enhanced the quality assessment scores in our study. However, we realise that conducting randomised controlled trials presents
Conclusion
In summary our analysis represents the recent available evidence regarding the efficacy of the four main treatment modalities of stiffness post total knee replacement surgery. Our review suggests that open surgical release provides the highest increase in ROM at final follow up, however the Knee Society Score remained relatively consistent for all four treatments. We did however face methodological limitations as the majority of papers in this systematic review were case series, which decreased
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
References (40)
- et al.
Intraoperative flexion against gravity as an indication of ultimate range of motion in individual cases after total knee arthroplasty
J Arthroplasty
(1998) - et al.
Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty
J Arthroplasty
(Jun. 2002) - et al.
The incidence and results of manipulation after primary total knee arthroplasty
Knee
(2010) The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management
J Arthroplasty
(Jun 2002)- et al.
The role of arthroscopy in the problem total knee replacement
Arthroscopy
(1990) - et al.
Arthroscopy of symptomatic total knee replacements
Arthroscopy
(1995) - et al.
Arthroscopy of the painful dysfunctional total knee replacement
Arthroscopy
(1989) - et al.
The efficacy of arthroscopy following total knee replacement
Arthroscopy
(Apr 1997) Arthroscopy in total knee replacements
Arthroscopy
(1987)- et al.
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2004)
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes
Knee
Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty
J Orthop Traumatol
Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty
J Arthroplasty
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty
J Am Acad Orthop Surg
Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness following knee arthroplasty
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus; a systematic review
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses
Closed manipulation after total knee arthroplasty: outcome and affecting variables
Orthopedics
Cited by (59)
Can adjunctive perioperative radiation improve range of motion after total knee revision for arthrofibrosis?
2020, KneeCitation Excerpt :Revision surgery has been reserved for refractory cases of chronic arthrofibrosis. Improvements in ROM after TKRev have been reported as 24.7–52°, but recurrent stiffness occurs in as many as 25% of patients [9,12,13,25]. Farid et al. published the only known article regarding the use of adjunctive irradiation for the treatment of arthrofibrosis [9].
Efficacy of manipulation under anesthesia beyond three months following total knee arthroplasty
2019, Arthroplasty TodayCitation Excerpt :Optimal timing for MUA has been debated in the literature for years. It is frequently presumed that MUA is most successful only when performed within 3 months of index TKA and should not be performed beyond then [5,7,8,28,29,31]. Issa et al [7] reviewed 144 MUAs and reported that early manipulations had significantly higher gain in flexion (36.5° vs 17°), final ROM (119° vs 95°), and Knee Society objective and function scores than late manipulations.