Elsevier

Marine Policy

Volume 112, February 2020, 103730
Marine Policy

Assessing multiple sources of data to detect illegal fishing, trade and mislabelling of elasmobranchs in Greek markets

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103730Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Mislabelling of elasmobranch reach 60% of the specimens found in Greek fish markets.

  • Weak spots in elasmobranch trade expands from reporting to traceability.

  • Participatory management would enhance the protection of vulnerable elasmobranch.

Abstract

Elasmobranchs, extremely charismatic and threatened animals, still are an important economic source for fishers in many parts of the world, providing significant income through trade. Even though Greek seas host at least 67 elasmobranch species, our knowledge about their biology and ecology is to a large extent unknown. In the present study the integration of conventional (legislation, official data from fisheries landings and fish market value and import/export data) and unconventional (social media) sources of data, accompanied with the use of genetics, aim at outlining the elasmobranch fisheries and trade in Greece and identifying “weak spots” that sabotage their conservation. Results revealed that: (a) about 60% of the 68 specimens collected in fish markets were mislabelled, with that being very common for Prionace glauca and Mustelus spp., (b) Illegal fishing is a reality, c) Greece represents one of the top-three European Union southern countries in terms of elasmobranch market size, (d) Aegean Sea and especially its Northern part (Thermaikos Gulf and Thracian Sea) contributed to more than half of the M. mustelus Greek fisheries landings and (e) wholesale prices of elasmobranchs have remained stable during the last decade. Mislabelling and illegal trade of elasmobranchs are common ground in Greece. This context stems from incoherent and complex fisheries legislative framework due to institutional decoupling, discrepancies in the collection and analysis of fisheries-related data, thus substantially reducing the efficiency of the fisheries management in Greek seas.

Introduction

Currently about ¼ of all sharks, rays and skates are facing an elevated extinction risk, primarily because of their overexploitation from fisheries [1]. Due to that, global public awareness and perception of elasmobranchs, especially sharks, is gradually shifting towards their conservation rather than exploitation [2]. Paradoxically at the same time, the demand for elasmobranch products is still rising [3,4]. In 2011 global shark fisheries value was estimated around 1$ US billion [1], excluding the value of elasmobranch products consumed domestically, which may potentially comprise the vast majority of the captures (around 2 million tons) [1], as well as the Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) portion of the catches [2]. Thus, official data may underestimate the total commercial harvests and misrepresent the current level of shark exploitation. Considering that most elasmobranch species are not legally protected and still marketable, consumer awareness for sustainable and responsible consumption has the potential to serve as a bottom-up management tool for the conservation of such species.

Intentional and accidental mislabelling has aggravated the problem of elasmobranch trade that occurs in several markets around the world [[5], [6], [7]]. For instance, in South Africa threatened shark species are sold as “ocean fillets”, while in Brazilian and Portuguese markets the name “cação” is commonly used, referring to any small shark species [7,8]. Mislabelling of sharks and rays has also been recorded in Europe. Shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), porbeagle (Lamna nasus), and thresher sharks (Alopias spp.) have often been found to be labelled as swordfish (Xiphias gladius) due to their highly palatable meat [9], while in France, Germany, Spain and Italy different shark species are sold under the common names “saumonette”, “schillerlocken” or “seeaal”, “cazon” or “moixima” and “palombo” or “spinarolo ”, respectively [[10], [11], [12]]. In addition, in Italy mislabelling of elasmobranchs has been recently recorded at the Italian “free fish market”, where sellers used simple labels with the local or Italian names of the products [13].

The consequences of accidental mislabelling can affect consumers [14], but more importantly the marine ecosystems, jeopardising the conservation of highly threatened species [14]. In general, mislabelling may cause severe ecological ramifications when provoking the depletion of threatened species or creating economic incentives for illegal fishing [15], setting thus a biased reference point for sustainability. The latter is the case of the authentication of Mustelus spp. products in the Greek fish markets that are sold under the label “Galeos” together with all the other protected shark species that can be found in open markets [16]. Greek seas host a remarkable biodiversity of elasmobranchs, whilst their conservation status is to a large extent unknown, with the latest formal assessment carried out in 2009 [17]. Elasmobranch species are not a primary fisheries target in Greece, and they are mostly caught incidentally as by-catch [18]. Their catches are often deliberately or unintentionally misreported or misidentified while they are recorded in aggregated categories within other group of elasmobranchs (e.g. dogfish, rays nei, etc.), compromising accurate reporting about this taxon. The lack of baseline information for elasmobranch fisheries (e.g. data from field surveys, catches, consumption) highlights the importance of using all possible sources of information, conventional (official data from fisheries landings) and unconventional (social media), complemented with the use of genetics in order to validate scientific knowledge, set a baseline about the existence of illegal trade and illegal fishing and empower scientists and stakeholders (e.g., Refs. [19,20]). It is also important to note that the consideration of economic data (fish prices and import/export quantities) could provide significant insights into the motivation for mislabelling [21] and the market itself.

The present paper has collected and integrated different types of information aiming to describe the Greek market of elasmobranchs, to investigate the potential illegal fishing, trade and mislabelling and to identify “weak spots” in the current legal framework for proposing future actions that could advance elasmobranch conservation in Greece. Finally, some aspects on the conservation status of the species are taken into consideration.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The scarcity of data regarding elasmobranch fisheries triggers towards the use of multi-disciplinary information such as: (a) official landing, import and export data, (b) review and evaluation of the in-force legislation, (c) social media and (d) collection of tissue samples for DNA analysis in auction and fish markets.

Relevant applied legislation

According to EU legislation, all marketed fisheries products should be clearly labelled with their nominal scientific name, the common name in the official language of the Member State marketed, plus the FishBase Information System or the ASFIS database of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the fishing gear and the state of the product (frozen, fresh etc.), when relevant [36,37]. The aforementioned regulation was transposed in Greek law through the Ministry of Rural Development and

Discussion

Our study reveals the existence of illegal fishing, illegal trade, misreporting and mislabelling of elasmobranchs in the Greece using various sources of information. Although fishery product consumption in Greek fish market is small compared to the mean European ratio (17.3 vs 25.7 kg/person in 2015, respectively [47]) and the mean annual price remained stable and unchanged for a decade (2006–2017) (Fig. 2a), Greece is among the top-three South European Mediterranean countries in elasmobranch

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that illegal fishing, mislabelling and illegal trade of elasmobranchs are taking place in Greece, with the potential this to be an extensive practice. The analysis of the existing legislation, both for fisheries and for trade reveals the lack of cohesion that in several cases undercovers mislabelling and illegal trade. The aim of this work was not only to identify such problems, but also to provide solutions and future steps that can advance elasmobranch conservation in

Acknowledgements

We would like to warmly thank all those that contributed to our work, the fishers and the fishmongers that reported their catches and donating samples of elasmobranch products, respectively. In addition, we would like to thank OceanCare and Shark Foundation/Hai-Stiftung (Grant number: 2019-01-04/1) for supporting our work on unravelling the complex situation of elasmobranch fisheries and market in Greece.

References (65)

  • D.K. Moutopoulos et al.

    Quantifying the implementation of Common Fisheries Policy: patterns of fisheries violations and penalties imposed in Greek waters

    Mar. Policy

    (2016)
  • V.J. Giglio et al.

    Human consumption and popular knowledge on the conservation status of groupers and sharks caught by small-scale fisheries on Abrolhos Bank

    SW Atlantic. Mar. Pol.

    (2018)
  • M.M. Storelli et al.

    Concentrations and hazard assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides in shark liver from the Mediterranean Sea

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2005)
  • C.A. Ward-Paige et al.

    Recovery potential and conservation options for elasmobranchs

    J. Fish Biol.

    (2011)
  • F. Dent et al.

    State of the global market for shark products

    Rome

    (2015)
  • M.P. O'Malley et al.

    Characterization of the trade in manta and devil ray gill plates in China and South-east Asia through trader surveys

    Aquat. Conserv.

    (2016)
  • R.D. Ward et al.

    DNA barcoding Australasian chondrichthyans results and potential uses in conservation

    Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2008)
  • H. Bornatowski et al.

    Shark mislabeling threatens biodiversity

    Science

    (2013)
  • H. Bornatowski et al.

    Elasmobranchs consumption in Brazil: impacts and consequences

    Coast. Res. Libr.

    (2017)
  • WildAid

    The End of the Line?

    (2007)
  • C. Barria et al.

    Comments about the landing statistics of sharks and rays: catalonia as a case study

  • M. Arculeo

    Biodiversity in the era of the market globalization: some cases from the marine realm

    Biodivers. J.

    (2015)
  • C.C. Stawitz et al.

    Financial and ecological implications of global seafood mislabeling

    Conserv. Lett.

    (2017)
  • A. Cariani

    Improving the conservation of mediterranean chondrichthyans: the ELASMOMED DNA barcode reference library

    PLoS One

    (2017)
  • A. Legakis et al.

    The Red Book of Threatened Animals in Greece

    (2009)
  • D. Damalas et al.

    Occurrences of large sharks in the open waters of the southeastern Mediterranean Sea

    J. Nat. Hist.

    (2012)
  • R.E. Johannes et al.

    Ignore Fishers' knowledge and miss the boat

    Fish Fish.

    (2000)
  • I. Giovos et al.

    Identifying recreational fisheries in the mediterranean through social media

    Fish. Manag. Ecol.

    (2018)
  • Hellenic Statistical Authority (HELSTAT)

    Results of the Sea Fishery Survey by Motor Boats (For the Years 1982-2017)

    (1965–2018)
  • A.C. Tsikliras et al.

    Reconstruction of Greek marine fisheries landings and comparison of National with FAO statistics

  • FAO. Fisheries and aquaculture software. FishStat Plus - Universal Software for Fishery Statistical Time Series. FAO...
  • Hellenic Statistical Authority (HELSTAT)

    Quantity, Value and Average Price of Catch Distributed Per Fishery by Main Species. Table D1

    (2002-2018)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text