Unravelling Lessonia trabeculata management in coastal areas of the Atacama region of northern Chile through a DPSIR approach: Insights for sustainable plans
Introduction
The brown macroalgae Lessonia trabeculata inhabits the rocky subtidal zone (up to 40 m deep) of the Pacific coast of South America, from the south of the Peruvian to Chilean coast [1]. This kelp is the most abundant brown macroalgae in subtidal environments throughout much of the Chilean coast (18–42°S) [2], [3]. L. trabeculata supports essential ecological assemblages, forming habitats [4], [5], [6], [7] and providing services and ecosystem functions, such as food sources and shelters for different species of invertebrates and fish [8], [9], [12] and a reduction of wave intensity and water flow [13], [14].
L. trabeculata is a resource of great economic importance for the artisanal fishing sector of the country, with landings that exceed 18,000 tonnes per year [15] and social contributions with a direct workforce of more than 4000 fishers in the last decade [16]. Its exploitation began in the 1980s with the collection of stranded L. trabeculata algae [2]. The most significant interest in Lessonia spp. resources coincided with the collapse of many benthic fisheries, prompting many fishers to become collectors and extractors of brown algae [3], [17]. In the last 20 years, the landing of this brown algae has shown a substantial historical maximum first in 2013 and later in 2017 due to the growing demand for alginates from the international market in countries such as China, Japan, Norway, and France [16]. Additionally, the abalone industry requires L. trabeculata for aquaculture feeding [18].
The contribution to kelp landings on the coast of the Atacama region is one the most important for Chilean production (2017–2018), constituting 32% of the total; the annual landing of L. trabeculata is approximately 25,000 tonnes. At the Atacama regional level, the fishery generates 97,748 USD and 4000 jobs for the artisanal fishing sector [16]. This fishery presents problems, such as the rapid filling of annual harvest quotas, contending with illegal extraction activities, and the use of indiscriminate extraction techniques [16]. These aspects hamper management plans and governance.
By 2005, the increase in resource value propelled the change from dead algae collection due to landing (natural mortality) to direct extraction [3], [18]. Direct harvesting by means of detaching algae from the rocky substrate using crowbars negatively affects the density, size, and morphology of algae, changing biological communities into predominantly barren ground [19], [20]. In this current scenario of a notable increase in the extractive pressure on kelp, the Undersecretary of Fisheries and Aquaculture (SUBPESCA) developed a programme to regulate fishing and research that has been implemented since 2005. The programme is based on the biological and fishing regulations that are part of management plans to guarantee the sustainability of kelp resources as measured by biological aspects: minimum extraction sizes, appropriate removal methods, extractive closures, and annual quotas [18]. Additionally, extra measures have been suggested, such as area rotation; the intercropping of plants; the repopulation, restoration, or creation of new management areas [3], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]; and the establishment of marine reserves to foster kelp protection. All of these specific management strategies aim to regulate landing and promote sustainable exploitation.
The commercial exploitation of L. trabeculata is closely linked to the fisheries activity of the Lessonia nigrescens complex. They share aspects such as extraction agents and the methods of extraction and mincing. However, the same amount of information about the population and community aspects of L. trabeculata are not available, which requires specific management measures [26]. The sustainable development for wild L. trabeculata fisheries requires an understanding of the population dynamics and the ecosystems that they support. Therefore, it is necessary to design and develop a conceptual framework for a sustainable management programme that incorporates the dynamic complexity of the dimensions of the ecological-economic-social system related to this type of fishery [27], [28].
In this context, an analysis based on an integrated management framework [30], [31] is required to identify and unravel the different factors that govern the sustainability of the fisheries of L. trabeculata. The purpose is to evaluate the economic, social, and ecological conflicts in its fishery derived from the implementation of a single general brown algae management programme in northern Chile. One of the tools available and developed by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1993) and EEA (European Environment Agency, 1995) is the driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) conceptual framework. DPSIR is a simple tool for contextualising major environmental issues, contributing to the decision-making process and regulatory enforcement. It also facilitates the inclusion of modules linked to anthropic activities, appropriately distributing the systems analysed, and selecting the relevant indicators for their functioning [42]. This conceptual framework is particularly relevant for assessing the status of the L. trabeculata alga fishery in northern Chile. In order to better understand the past and current problems related to fishery sustainability (e.g., overexploitation and price speculation) [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], it allows us to identify cause-effect relationships among the selected indicators in drivers, pressures, state, impact and response [29] and facilitates communication channels among users, scientists, and decision-makers, among others [33].
This study evaluated the management of an L. trabeculata fishery by using the DPSIR conceptual framework. The main goals were to (i) identify and classify the principal indicators (socioeconomic, ecological, and administrative) affecting the performance of this fishery; (ii) chronologically review the management measures (legal, management, and operational) established for fishing regulations; and (iii) propose considerations for future management plans based on current gaps identified by DPSIR analysis.
Section snippets
Study area and fishery characterisation
The Humboldt Current System, one of the most productive ecological systems in the world, is characterised by the elevation of nutrient-rich subsurface waters and a low oxygen content [38], [39]. It has a significant influence on the coastal edge of Atacama (26–29°S); throughout the Atacama region, L. trabeculata kelp is found in this subtidal environment within numerous patches in bays and inlets [17]. The extraction of this resource is carried out by artisanal fishers and divers registered
Drivers
Concerning the economic dimension, the variations in the average annual ‘kelp beach price’ (first sale value) between 2000 and 2018 showed low prices in the early years (38 USD per tonne), but then prices rose, and the first maximum was reached in 2010, with a cost of 425 USD per tonne. A second maximum peak was reached in 2015, with a value of 359 USD per tonne (Fig. 3a, Table 1). This progressive rise in beach prices was a consequence of sustained growth in international market demand.
Kelp fisheries under a high international demand scenario
In recent years, due to the growing demand on the international markets [49], there has been an evident increase in the first sale value (driving forces) [15] and, consequently, high pressure on this resource (pressure), which does not imply good profits for fishers, since many of them have lower profit percentages than those of the intermediary seller [82]. This scenario is amplified in periods when the other kelp, L. nigrescens, has decreased in price (driving forces). As a result, many
Conclusions
DPSIR analysis applied to the L. trabeculata kelp management plan (in the Atacama Region) was revealed to be useful for the identification and organisation of causal relationships between different components based on current knowledge and conflicts presented in the brown algae resource management plans in northern Chile.
In recent years, there has been growing interest in the exploitation of L. trabeculata due to its high commercial value when the prices of L. nigrescens decrease. Since 2013,
CRediT authorship contribution statement
All authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, drafting, or revision of the manuscript.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was conducted as part of the Postdoctoral Fellowship Universidad de Atacama 2018–2020 Decreto Exento RA N° 366/506/2019 of the first and second author funded by the Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado de la Universidad de Atacama (VRIP), Chile. The authors thank to the director of SERNAPESCA Atacama Guillermo Mery for the information provided, to A. Diu for the artistic contribution. E. Bonnail thanks to ANID/FONDECYT (11180015).
References (98)
Lessonia trabeculata, a subtidal bottom kelp in northern Chile: a case of study for a structural and geographical comparison
- et al.
Successional patterns of hard-bottom macrobenthic communities at kelp bed (Lessonia trabeculata) and barren ground sublittoral systems
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
(2015) Mass balanced and dynamic simulations of trophic models of kelp ecosystems near the Mejillones Peninsula of northern Chile (SE Pacific): comparative network structure and assessment of harvest strategies
Ecol. Model.
(2008)- et al.
Macrobenthic community establishment on artificial reefs with Macrocystis pyrifera over barren-ground and soft-bottom habitats
Glob. Ecol. Conserv.
(2020) Qualitative modelling of the kelp forest of Lessonia nigrescens Bory (Laminariales: Phaeophyta) in eulittoral marine ecosystems of the south–east Pacific: an approach to management plan assessment
Aquaculture
(2003)- et al.
A UK perspective on the development of marine ecosystem indicators
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2005) - et al.
A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems
Ocean Coast. Manag.
(2015) - et al.
Development of a fish-based multimetric index to assess the ecological quality of marine habitats: the Marine Fish Community Index
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2008) - et al.
Critical gaps in seagrass protection reveal the need to address multiple pressures and cumulative impacts
Ocean Coast. Manag.
(2020) - et al.
Reef fisheries management in Kenya: preliminary approach using the driver–pressure–state–impacts–response (DPSIR) scheme of indicators
Ocean Coast. Manag.
(2007)