Elsevier

Materials & Design

Volume 141, 5 March 2018, Pages 1-8
Materials & Design

Piezoresistive response of extruded polyaniline/(styrene-butadiene-styrene) polymer blends for force and deformation sensors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Conductive PANI can be an alternative to nanofillers in piezoresistive polymer composites for smart materials applications

  • Extruded PANI/SBS blends show good mechanical, electrical and piezoresistive properties

  • The percolation threshold is near 30 wt% polyaniline and the highest electrical conductivity is 0.1 S/m

  • Mechanical strain reaches near 60% and the samples withstand large number of piezoresistive cycles

  • Piezoresistive response shows a Gauge Factor ≈ 1, with linear resistance variation with the applied strain

Abstract

Smart materials for sensor applications are increasingly being used in a wide variety of applications ranging from engineering to medical devices. This work reports on piezoresistive sensors based on conductive polyaniline and thermoplastic elastomer processed by conventional polymer extrusion. The material presents excellent processability and piezoresistive performance offering an alternative to traditional composites with conductive nanofillers for sensor applications.

The polyaniline/styrene-butadiene-styrene (PANI/SBS) conductive polymer blends present good mechanical properties, high electrical conductivity and piezoresistive response. The maximum strain reaches ≈ 60% for 30 weight percentage (wt%) PANI content and the electrical conductivity is σ  0.1 S/m for blends with 40 wt% PANI content. Further, the sample with 40 wt% PANI content shows a piezoresistive gauge factor GF  1 for deformation measurements between 0.1 and 3 mm in bending cycles.

Introduction

Materials with piezoresistive properties represent a key engineering technology for device applications, being commonly used in industry and consumer products with ever growing demand [1], [2], [3]. Pressure or strain moldable sensors must be low profile and flexible to conform to arbitrary surfaces [4].

Most of the commercial piezoresistive sensors used in industrial applications are based on metallic films characterized by low flexibility and stretchability, limiting their range of applications [2], [5]. Semiconductor materials show high piezoresistive sensitivity but poor mechanical properties [1], [4]. In order to overcome these mechanical limitations, polymer-based smart materials have been developed due to their flexibility, low temperature processability and low cost [2], [6]. Further, these materials show simpler device integration and allow tailoring their overall physico-chemical properties for specific applications. Their outstanding properties result in a broad spectrum of engineering materials [5], [7] for sensors and actuators [8], [9], optoelectronics [10], low weight structures [11], antistatic dissipations [11] and dielectric devices [12], among others.

Promising applications of these materials are related to strain sensing technology for structural health monitoring and biomedical applications [4], [13]. Polymer composites with specific conductive characteristics can be developed using different materials (polymers and nanofillers) and strategies (processing methods and conditions). Extrinsically conducting polymers (ECPs) are based on conductive nanoparticles embedded in insulating polymer matrices. The most used conductive nanofillers are mostly based on carbonaceous materials, including carbon black, carbon nanofibers or nanotubes and graphene [7], [14]. The electrical conductivity of polymer composites as a function of nanofiller content is characterized by different well-defined zones. The zone showing a strong increase of the electrical conductivity is identified as the percolation threshold (PT) and strongly depends on the nanofiller type and the composite processing method [15]. Thus, the PT can be as low as 0.01 wt% [15] for composites prepared by solvent casting or between 1 and 3 wt% for composites based on polymers with carbon nanotubes (CNT) processed with industrially viable methods such as melt compounding and extrusion [16]. Therefore, up scaled industrial processing for composite preparation typically lead to an increase of carbonaceous nanofiller loading content for achieving similar electrical properties when compared with laboratory methods.

In addition to ECPs, intrinsically conducting polymers (ICPs) also show piezoresistive properties and can be considered regarded a suitable alternative in terms of electrical conductivity and piezoresistive behavior response. Polyaniline (PANI), poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), PEDOT modified with polystyrenesulfonate acid (PEDOT/PSS) and polypyrrole (PPy) [5] are examples of ICPs. These types of polymers can be used as piezoresistive sensors. In this way, the piezoresistive behavior of ICPs opens a new concept for piezoresistive sensors applications [17] but, on the other hand, ICPs present several limitations that need to be overcome. In particular with respect to their mechanical properties and longtime stability of the ICPs [17]. From the many available ICPs, PANI has been implemented in a wide variety of applications, including biosensors [18], anti-static materials [19] and batteries [20], among others. PANI shows easy processing, low cost and stability, allied to the doping/dedoping mechanism, allowing to further tune material physico-chemical properties, makes the PANI one of the most interesting ICPs [5], [17].

Further, stretchable conductive composites are growing attention to replace the traditional rigid conductor materials, due to their applicability in flexible and stretchable devices [21]. Elastomer or thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) polymer matrices are interesting materials in this context. TPEs are an important class of polymers that combine the mechanical properties of rubbers (e.g., stretchable materials) with the processability and recyclability of thermoplastics [22]. Additionally TPEs do not need vulcanization [6]. Styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) tri-block copolymer is an interesting TPE for the development of stress/strain sensors for large strain, robotic and industrial automation applications in order to replace silicone-like materials that are not capable of sustaining large deformations and sudden impacts [6]. Since SBS can be processed without the use of vulcanization, the properties of the corresponding composites do not deteriorate during their processing in composite materials [15]. With respect to the thermal behavior, SBS has two Tg at − 86 and 76 °C, assigned to the glass transitions of polybutadiene and polystyrene, respectively [22], [23].

In fact SBS and (styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene) SEBS composites with CNT have been prepared by several methods, including solvent casting, electrospinning [24] and extrusion [15]. The different processing methods allow preparing composites with excellent piezoresistive properties with gauge factors (GF) up to ≈ 120 and deformation up to 30% under uniaxial stress [8]. Elastomeric polymer composite with piezoresistive properties can be processed using other conductive carbon nanofillers such as graphene or carbon black within different rubber-like materials [25], [26]. Natural rubber/CNT composites show linear behavior with mechanical stress for strains up to 250%, unlike graphene composites for lower strains [25]. The main drawback of composites with nanocarbonaceous fillers is the agglomeration of the nanofillers, which can be up to tens of micrometres in size [27], [28]. Another issue with respect to polymer composites is their poor adhesion of the polymer to fibre surfaces, being necessary the use of supplementary binders, which increase price and decrease electrical conductivity [29]. The agglomerates are defective structures that reduce the electrical and mechanical properties of the composite, leading to difficult reproducibility of the properties of the materials under the same manufacturing conditions. Further, the presence of large nanofiller agglomerates hinders the use of specific sensors integration processes, such as printing techniques [30], [31].

Thus, PANI/TPE blends are an interesting alternative to polymer-based composites with conductive nanocarbonaceous fillers, due increased compatibility between the conductive polymer and the polymer matrix [32]. Further, the polymer blend can be processed by extrusion that, when compared to solvent-casting, commonly used for the preparation of piezoresistive polymer composites [15], has the advantage of being a purely mechanical process for polymer mixing which does not rely on the use of any chemical solvent. Further, it is a continuous process and allows the molding of the resultant products.

The present work reports on extruded blend composites based on intrinsic conductive PANI embedded one a thermoplastic elastomer (SBS). The morphologic, electrical, mechanical and electro-mechanical properties of the PANI/SBS blends are reported as a function of PANI and compatibilizer content.

Section snippets

Material synthesis

Aniline and potassium peroxodisulfate (APS) were purchased from Fluka (Steinheim, Germany). Dodecylbenzensulfonic acid (DBSA) 70 wt% solution in 2-propanol and acetone were obtained from Scharlau (Sentmenat, Spain). Chloroform and methanol were supplied from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and Octyl Gallate (OG) compatibilizer was acquired on Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). All the solvents and reagents except DBSA were at least of 99% purity. Water was purified on a Milli-QUltrapure 109 system

Morphological properties

The morphology of the PANI/SBS extruded blends can be observed in the surface SEM images presented in Fig. 1. Two magnifications are presented for each blend with 40 wt% PANI, 1000 × and 5000 × in order to evaluate the distribution of PANI within the polymer matrix.

The morphology of the PANI/SBS blends with 40 wt% PANI content and SBS content ranging from 40 to 55 wt%, is shown in Fig. 2. The SEM images are representative for the remaining blends. All samples show good dispersion of the PANI within

Conclusions

Extruded PANI/SBS blends offer an interesting alternative to conductive nanocarbonaceous/polymer piezoresistive composites. The processed blends have good mechanical and piezoresistive properties, as the extrusion method allows a good dispersion of the aggregates of PANI in the SBS polymer.

Deformations up to 60% in uniaxial stress are obtained before break for the PANI/SBS blends with the higher SBS contents. The electrical conductivity of the blends increases with increase conductive PANI

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) in the framework of the Strategic Funding UID/FIS/04650/2013. The authors thank the FCT for financial support under projects PTDC/EEI-SII/5582/2014 and PTDC/CTM-ENE/5387/2014. P. C. also thank the FCT for the SFRH/BPD/110914/2015 grant, as well POCH and European Union. Financial support from the Basque Government Industry Department under the ELKARTEK Program is also acknowledged as well as funding by the

References (42)

  • P. Costa et al.

    Extruded thermoplastic elastomers styrene–butadiene–styrene/carbon nanotubes composites for strain sensor applications

    Compos. Part B

    (2014)
  • E. Bilotti et al.

    Controlling the dynamic percolation of carbon nanotube based conductive polymer composites by addition of secondary nanofillers: the effect on electrical conductivity and tuneable sensing behaviour

    Compos. Sci. Technol.

    (2013)
  • S. Bhadra et al.

    Progress in preparation, processing and applications of polyaniline

    Prog. Polym. Sci.

    (2009)
  • C. Dhand et al.

    Recent advances in polyaniline based biosensors

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2011)
  • L. Horta-Romarís et al.

    Cyclic temperature dependence of electrical conductivity in polyanilines as a function of the dopant and synthesis method

    Mater. Des.

    (2017)
  • Y. Luan et al.

    Facile control of stretchability and electrical resistance of elastomer/polyaniline composites for stretchable conductors

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2017)
  • R.-S. Shih et al.

    Thermal and mechanical properties of microcellular thermoplastic SBS/PS/SBR blend: effect of crosslinking

    Polymer

    (2011)
  • S. Ribeiro et al.

    Electrospun styrene–butadiene–styrene elastomer copolymers for tissue engineering applications: effect of butadiene/styrene ratio, block structure, hydrogenation and carbon nanotube loading on physical properties and cytotoxicity

    Compos. Part B

    (2014)
  • H. Aguilar-Bolados et al.

    Influence of the morphology of carbon nanostructures on the piezoresistivity of hybrid natural rubber nanocomposites

    Compos. Part B

    (2017)
  • L.C. Herrera-Ramírez et al.

    How do graphite nanoplates affect the fracture toughness of polypropylene composites?

    Compos. Sci. Technol.

    (2015)
  • X. Zhao et al.

    Effect of the selective localization of carbon nanotubes in polystyrene/poly(vinylidene fluoride) blends on their dielectric, thermal, and mechanical properties

    Mater. Des.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Additive manufacturing of polyaniline-based materials: an opportunity for new designs and applications in energy and biotechnology

      2022, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Development of novel AM processes for PANI manufacturing: In order to fully access the potential of 3D printed PANI products, novel printing techniques must be developed. Recently, PANI has been used as a conductive filler in thermoplastic polymers (e.g. PANI-DBSA/SBS [54]; PANI, Carbon Black and cross-linked polyethylene [55] composites or PANI with graphene in either PLA, PETG or PMMA [56]). These composites were not 3D printed, as they were either synthesised, extruded or formed by other methods (e.g. pressing or rolling similar to continuous metal casting).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text