Elsevier

Materials & Design

Volume 157, 5 November 2018, Pages 179-199
Materials & Design

Inconel 625 lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM): Mechanical properties, deformation and failure modes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A comprehensive reference of the mechanical response of Inconel 625 (IN625) lattice structures made by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is provided.

  • Mechanical performance was measured including yield strength, Young’s Modulus and associated density specific properties for mass limited design.

  • IN625 lattice structures display exceptional ductility presenting attractive opportunities for energy absorption applications.

  • Adjustment of topology and cell size can enable coarse and fine tuning of lattice mechanical properties.

  • This previously unavailable IN625 lattice experimental data provides a reference for design application and numerical models validation.

Abstract

Additive Manufacture (AM) enables the fabrication of highly complex lattice structures with exceptional engineering properties. Inconel is a technically useful material in that it provides high resistance to oxidisation, creep and loss of mechanical properties at elevated temperatures. The combination of Inconel material properties and the geometric freedom of AM provides a unique opportunity for the fabrication of engineered structures with exceptional strength and stiffness at elevated temperatures, as for example is required for high temperature turbomachinery. Despite the associated technical opportunities, there exists no design data on the mechanical response, deformation characteristics and failure modes of AM Inconel 625 lattice structures. This research provides a comprehensive reference for the mechanical response of Inconel 625 lattice structures fabricated by Selective Laser Melting (SLM). Furthermore, the high ductility of Inconel 625 lattice enables novel insight into the structural mechanics of AM lattice, and the associated deformation photography provides a reference for the validation and verification of numerical models of AM lattice behaviour.

Section snippets

Additive manufacture

Additive manufacturing (AM) refers to the process of “joining materials to make objects from 3D model data” [1], and typically occurs in a layer-wise manner [2]. AM enables a fundamentally different set of economic and technical production attributes in comparison to traditional manufacturing processes, in particular, the design of engineered structures with enhanced technical performance [3].

Additive manufacture occurs by the sequential joining of material layers [2]. This fabrication method

Fabrication of SLM Inconel 625 lattice structures

Inconel is fundamentally compatible with the SLM process as it is challenging to fabricate with traditional methods, and is applicable for high-value applications. Despite the significant commercial and technical opportunities, there appears to be no comprehensive resource for the design of Inconel lattice structures for load bearing applications. This research responds to this identified deficiency by characterising the manufacturability and associated mechanical response of IN625 lattices

Mechanical testing

Manufactured lattice specimens (Table 8) in the as-built condition were subject to quasi-static uniaxial compression at room temperature to quantify mechanical properties and associated failure modes. Specimen strain was determined from machine crosshead displacement, and a strain rate of 1 × 10−3 s−1 was used according to ASTM standards [56]. The compressive stress was calculated based on applied compression force and the initial XY plane cross-sectional base area of each lattice specimen. As

Concluding remarks

Inconel alloys provide an exceptional commercial opportunity for additive manufacture due to their poor manufacturability by traditional methods, and their appeal for high-value applications as engineered lattice structures. Despite this opportunity, insufficient data exists for engineering design of IN625 lattice structures. This research provides a robust design reference for IN625 lattice structures, as well as providing fundamental insights into AM lattice behaviour.

Manufacturability limits

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted by the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing (IC160100026) http://www.additivebiomanufacturing.org.

References (60)

  • P. Kanagarajah

    Inconel 939 processed by selective laser melting: effect of microstructure and temperature on the mechanical properties under static and cyclic loading

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2013)
  • T. Trosch

    Microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Inconel 718 compared to forging and casting

    Mater. Lett.

    (2016)
  • Q. Jia et al.

    Selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 superalloy parts: densification, microstructure and properties

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2014)
  • D. Zhang

    Effect of standard heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melting manufactured Inconel 718 superalloy

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2015)
  • Z. Wang

    The microstructure and mechanical properties of deposited-IN718 by selective laser melting

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2012)
  • Q. Jia et al.

    Selective laser melting additive manufactured Inconel 718 superalloy parts: high-temperature oxidation property and its mechanisms

    Opt. Laser Technol.

    (2014)
  • I. Yadroitsev

    Single track formation in selective laser melting of metal powders

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2010)
  • I. Yadroitsev

    Strategy of manufacturing components with designed internal structure by selective laser melting of metallic powder

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2007)
  • D. Bourell

    Materials for additive manufacturing

    CIRP Ann.

    (2017)
  • V.S. Deshpande et al.

    Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (2001)
  • V.S. Deshpande et al.

    Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures

    Acta Mater.

    (2001)
  • ASTM Standard F2792-12a, D., F2792-12a. Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies

    (2012)
  • Y. Zhai et al.

    Additive manufacturing: making imagination the major limitation

    JOM

    (2014)
  • I. Gibson et al.

    Additive Manufacturing Technologies

    (2010)
  • C.B. Williams et al.

    Additive manufacturing of metallic cellular materials via three-dimensional printing

    Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.

    (2010)
  • M.F. Ashby

    Metal Foams: A Design Guide: A Design Guide

    (2000)
  • L.J. Gibson et al.

    Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties

    (1997)
  • C. Chu et al.

    Design for additive manufacturing of cellular structures

    Comput.-Aided Des. Applic.

    (2008)
  • W.E. Frazier

    Metal additive manufacturing: a review

    J. Mater. Eng. Perform.

    (2014)
  • T.R. Gruber et al.

    Generative Design Rationale: Beyond the Record and Replay Paradigm

    (1996)
  • Cited by (302)

    • GNNs for mechanical properties prediction of strut-based lattice structures

      2024, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text