Modeling dengue outbreaks
Highlights
► We introduce an IBM for dengue transmission driven by simulated vector populations. ► The influence of the distribution of the human exposed period is analyzed. ► Epidemic size does not depend on the distribution details except the median. ► The time between primary and secondary cases is sensitive to the distribution. ► The IBM model is shown to be precisely equivalent to a novel compartmental model.
Introduction
Dengue fever is a vector-born disease produced by a flavivirus of the family flaviviridae [1]. The main vectors of dengue are Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.
The research aimed at producing dengue models for public policy use began with Newton and Reiter [2] who introduced the minimal model for dengue in the form of a set of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE) for the human population disaggregated in susceptible, exposed, infected and recovered compartments. The mosquito population was not modeled in this early work. A different starting point was taken by Focks et al. [3], [4] that began by describing mosquito populations in a computer framework named Dynamic Table Model where later the human population (as well as the disease) was introduced [5].
Newton and Reiter’s model (NR) favours economy of resources and mathematical accessibility, in contrast, Focks’ model emphasize realism. These models represent in dengue two contrasting compromises in the standard trade-off in modeling. A third starting point has been recently added. Otero et al. (OSS) developed a dengue model [6] which includes the evolution of the mosquito population [7], [8] and is spatially explicit. This last model is somewhat in between Focks’ and NR as it is formulated as a state-dependent Poisson model with exponentially distributed times (a detailed description of our model is given in Section 2).
All modeling approaches have been further developed [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. ODE models have received most of the attention. Some of the works explore: variability of vector population [9], human population [10], the effects of hypothetical vertical transmission of dengue in vectors [11], seasonality [12], age structure [13] as well as incomplete gamma distributions for the incubation and infectious times [16]. Contrasting modeling outcomes with those of real epidemics has shown the need to consider spatial heterogeneity as well [17].
The development of computing technology has made possible to produce Individual Based Models (IBM) for epidemics [18], [19]. IBM have been advocated as the most realistic models [19] since their great flexibility allows the modeler to describe disease evolution and human mobility at the individual level. When the results are only to be analysed numerically, IBM are probably the best choice. However, they are frequently presented in a most unfriendly way for mathematicians as they usually lack a formulation (expression in closed formulae) and are – at best – presented as algorithms if not just in words [18]. In contrast, working on the ODE side, it has been possible, for example, to achieve an understanding of the influence of distribution of the infectious period in epidemic modeling [20], [21], [22]. IBM have been used to study the time interval between primary and secondary cases [23] which is influenced, in the case of dengue, mainly by the extrinsic (mosquito) and intrinsic (human) incubation period.
In this work an IBM model for human population in a dengue epidemic is presented. The model is driven by mosquito populations modeled with spatial heterogeneity with the method introduced in [8] (see Section 2). The IBM model is then used to examine the actual influence of the distribution of the incubation period comparing the most relevant information produced by dengue models: dependence of the probability of dengue circulation with respect to the mosquito population and the total epidemic size. Exponential, delta (fixed times, deterministic) and experimental [24] distributions are contrasted (Section 3). The infectious period and the extrinsic incubation period is modeled using experimental data and measured transmission rates (human to mosquito) [24].
The IBM model produced is critically discussed. We show that it can be mapped exactly into a stochastic compartmental model of a novel form (see Section 4) thus crossing for the first time the valley separating IBM from compartmental models. This result opens new perspectives which we also discuss in Section 4. Finally, Section 5 presents the conclusions of this work.
Section snippets
The model
It is currently accepted that the dengue virus does not make any effect to the vector. As such, A. aegypti populations are independent of the presence of the virus. In the present model, mosquito populations are produced by the A. aegypti model [8] with spatial resolution of one block using climatic data tuned to Buenos Aires, a temperate city where dengue circulated in the summer season 2008–2009 [25]. The urban unit of the city is the block (approximately a square of 100 m × 100 m). Because of
Epidemic dependence on the distribution of the exposed period
We implemented four different distributions for the duration of the exposed period assigned to human individuals: Nishiura’s experimental distribution [24], a delta and exponential distributions with the same mean that the experimental one and an exponential distribution with the same median than the experimental one. We call them N, D, E1 and E2, respectively. See Fig. 1 for an histogram of Nishiura’s experimental distribution.
The study was performed in two different climatic scenarios, one
Is the IBM model an implementation of a compartmental model?
The use of IBM in epidemiology is usually advocated on an ontological perspective [34], [19], we quote the argument in [19]
…the epidemiology literature has always described an infection history as a sequence of distinct periods, each of which begins and ends with a discrete event. The critical periods include the latent, the infectious, and the incubation periods. The critical events include the receipt of infection, the emission of infectious material, and the appearance of symptoms… Several
Summary, discussion and conclusions
We have developed an IBM model for the evolution of dengue outbreaks that takes information from mosquito populations simulated with an A. aegypti model and builds thereafter the epidemic part of the evolution.
The model was used to explore the actual influence of the distribution of exposed time for humans in those characteristics of epidemic outbreaks that matter the most: determining the level of mosquito abundance that makes unlikely the occurrence of a dengue outbreak and determining the
References (38)
- et al.
Mathematical model of dengue disease transmission by Aedes aegypti mosquito
Math. Biosci.
(2010) - et al.
Analysis of a dengue disease transmission model
Math. Biosci.
(1998) - et al.
Influence of vertical and mechanical transmission on the dynamics of dengue disease
Math. Biosci.
(2000) - et al.
Transmission of dengue hemorrhagic fever in an age structured population
Math. Comput. Model.
(2003) Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: What have we learned and what could we learn in the future?
Ecol. Model.
(1999)Realistic distributions of infectious periods in epidemic models: Changing patterns of persistence and dynamics
Theor. Popul. Biol.
(2001)A note on generation times in epidemic models
Math. Biosci.
(2007)Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
(1998)- et al.
A model of the transmission of dengue fever with an evaluation of the impact of ultra-low volume (ulv) insecticide applications on dengue epidemics
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
(1992) - et al.
Dynamics life table model for Aedes aegypti: Analysis of the literature and model development
J. Med. Entomol.
(1993)